01x03 - Reckoning

Episode transcripts for the TV series, "m*rder in Boston: Roots, Rampage, and Reckoning". Aired: December 4 - December 18, 2023.*
Watch/Buy Amazon

TV doc follows the m*rder of Carol Stuart, and the investigation that followed, igniting racial tensions and targeting.
Post Reply

01x03 - Reckoning

Post by bunniefuu »

[TV static drones]

[bright tone]

[soft tense music]

♪ ♪

Yesterday, there was
a dramatic turn of events

as it relates
to this particular matter

which focused on
Mr. Charles Stuart


as a suspect.

♪ ♪

Arrangements were made
from Charles Stuart's brother


to come to my office.

During the course
of the evening,

several members and close
friends of the Stuart family

gave statements.

♪ ♪

These statements clearly
exculpated Willie Bennett

and clearly inculpated
Charles Stuart

in the m*rder of his wife
and infant son.

♪ ♪

I instructed Boston Police
homicide detectives


to arrest Charles Stuart
for the m*rder.

A m*rder that grabbed
the nation's attention


takes a bizarre turn.

Carol Stuart was not
k*lled by a robber


after she left
a birthing class.


Investigation now keys on
her husband and his brother.


Topping News 7 tonight,
a bizarre and sinister twist


in the Carol Stuart
m*rder case.


Charles Stuart now called
the prime suspect.


♪ ♪

That morning, I walked in
the office at about 7:30.


And Mayor Flynn,

in a way that was
completely unlike him,

was sort of leaning
over the desk

and hunched over,
and looked up,

and he said, "Neil, he did it."

He said, "Charles Stuart
k*lled his wife."

♪ ♪

And he just jumped off
the Tobin Bridge

and k*lled himself.

[dramatic music]

♪ ♪

Authorities confirmed
today that


Charles Stuart committed
su1c1de this morning


by jumping off
the Tobin Bridge.


Before 7:00 this morning,
Stuart's car


was found parked
on the Mystic Tobin Bridge


along with a note saying,
in substance,


he couldn't handle
the allegations against him.


♪ ♪

No more comment
other than I will inform you


that the body has
positively been identified

as that of Charles Stuart.

- What's the next step?
- Thank you.

♪ ♪

[indistinct chatter]

- Reverend Joseph Washington.
- Right now, we have

behind me at the table
the mayor of Boston, Ray Flynn;

Mickey Roache,
the police commissioner;

the district attorney
of Suffolk County,

Newman Flanagan;

the commissioner
of public safety,

head of the State Police,
William McCabe.

Mic check, please.

[indistinct chatter]

At approximately


Chelsea PD notified
the Tobin Bridge of a disabled

on the lower level
of the Tobin Bridge.

In the front passenger seat
of this vehicle,

I observed a driver's license
of the names of Mr. Stuart

and also a note in the front
seat of that vehicle.

[soft music]

♪ ♪

At that time,
a Massport employee,

Officer Stuckey, and myself
looked down into the water,

and we observed off
to our right about 1,000 feet

what appeared to be
a human body bobbing

in the water at that time.

The story that Charles Stuart
told investigators--

that a man jumped into the car,

forced he and his wife
at gunpoint to Mission Hill

in a robbery attempt
and sh*t Mr. Stuart

in the abdomen and Carol Stuart
in the head--

you now believe that story
he told you is false?

It is not true.

That's correct.

Cameras--get themselves
ready with this.

You may be used to it by now.

Yeah, get it out to you.

Yeah, thanks, man.

Yeah.

What do you think
of the news?

What do I think about it?

Well, I'm glad to hear it.

I mean, what I went through
was just too much.

Um...

What can I say that--

Are you bitter?

Yes, I'm bitter

for what they did to my house
and everything.

What did they do
to your house?

They tore it up.

You mean they searched it?

Put holes in the wall.

Boston Police and Brookline
Police did all that.

You know?

Tore the walls up
all to pieces.

They--Mayor Flynn
and Mickey Roache

didn't even come here
and apologize

and say they were sorry.

They go apologize
to the community.

Why apologize to the community?

Apologize to Willie,
and apologize to his family.

That's all we're asking.

No more comment.

That's all I have to say.

[solemn music]

♪ ♪

I was in a state of shock.

♪ ♪

I was mad.

I was mad at myself.

Like, how did you not
get this in the paper?


You have to have solid sourcing
to go with something like that.

♪ ♪

I gotta get one person
to tell me


they're looking at him,
and I can't get it.


I consider it
the biggest failure

of my entire 27-year
journalistic career.

We failed
the city of Boston, um,

particularly the residents
of Mission Hill.

I remember feeling

a certain sense
of immediate relief

that it wasn't
the Black guy after all.

And then I remember feeling
an immediate sense of anger

that it was never
the Black guy.

And I remember
especially thinking

that this is the playbook,

that this is what
you have to fight.

This is what
you're going to fight

in terms of how
you are perceived

and how the people
that look like you

are gonna be perceived.

This was once again the--

the fear of Black people,

the assumption of Black people,

the lack of regard
for Black people,

and the lack of regard
for Carol Stuart,

because getting the Black guy
was more important

than getting her k*ller.

Peter O'Malley called me
at my house,

and he said,
"That f*cking assh*le jumped."

[laughs]

I don't know
who he was talking about.

I said, "Who?"

He goes,
"Chuck Stuart just jumped

off the f*cking
Mystic River Bridge."

And I said,
"You're sh1tting me."

Of course, I said, "Why?"

You know,
just a natural reaction.

Something that had never
been contemplated

and was seismic just happened,
and you're shocked.


The next move was to find out
the whole story.

[indistinct chatter]

My name is Nancy Gertner.

I was a criminal defense
and civil rights lawyer

for 24 years,

and I was a federal judge
for 17.


My connection to the case

is that I represented
Matthew Stuart.

He was a bear of a man.

Seemed very immature.

Matthew was the youngest
child in his family.


Matthew was the runt
of the litter.


Chuck was the star
of the family.

Beautiful wife.

Very good job.

Chuck was everything
that Matthew was not,

and so it would make sense that

if Chuck said do this or jump,
Matthew would jump.

He had no mooring
in his life at that time,

and Chuck was essentially
the model.

[tense music]

♪ ♪

Matthew assumed it would be

a phonied-up robbery
in downtown Boston,

and that's what he thought
he was participating in.

And then it's only
until later that he realized

that that's not at all
what Chuck had in mind.

When Matthew goes
back home,


he looks in the bag
and sees a g*n,

and he finds
Carol's diamond ring.

He goes then
to return the car,


And when he comes back,

the family is talking
about Chuck being sh*t,

Carol being sh*t,

and suddenly,
Matthew puts it all together.

You have dealt us
an injustice.

Anger is too mild a word

for what these Black community
leaders expressed today.


Try rage.

Try fury.

All the political and religious
leaders here today

charged the media,
the mayor, and the police

with simply ignoring
vital information

in the Stuart case.

And there are some
public officials

who gave credence to that.

I want to know now,

will you call
Mr. Charles Stuart an animal?

On the one hand,
it was relief,


and then it was anger over
the numbers of Black families

that had been affected
by the dragnet

that occurred in Mission Hill.

Folks, this is real.

Say what you feel.

This is your sh*t.

No one has heard from you yet.

And now they're gonna hear
from Mission Hill.

There are people being hurt
every day here,

and nobody gives a sh*t.

That was the attitude
in the Black community.

So many of our people
were k*lled in Mission Hill.

Nothing was said about it.

But all of a sudden,
when a white woman--

and it's a shame that
any life is lost,

but all of a sudden,
when a white woman

loses her life
or somebody white,

it--it seems as if white life

is more valuable
than Black life.

What do you think?

[applause]

Why is there
a city-wide manhunt


when there's crime taking place
in this community

every single day?

This was a real question,

and this was one
of the eternal questions

that Black people have
always carried.

We don't matter.

Well, the pain has been there
for a long time.

The Stuart case just
erupted something

that was already painful.

The treatment by the police
has existed

for many, many years,

and to have it intensify
as a result of this case

means that if people are
gonna be bold enough

to walk over us
on nationwide TV,

then we are bold enough to say
that we got a pain,

and we're not gonna
take it anymore,

and that you need to listen.

We are not ready to be healed,

that you gotta stop and listen
to what we have to say.

I kept on being asked
from then until today,

will we ever know
the real story?

And what's so interesting
about that,


so troubling about that,
is you all thought--

you, the Boston press--

you all thought you knew
the real story

when you had the story
of an--of an urban crime.

William "Willie" Bennett,


and according
to police sources,


the primary suspect
in the sh**ting


of Charles and Carol Stuart.

You thought you had
the real story, and that--

the reason why you thought
you had the real story

is that you filled in the dots.

[tense music]

You filled in those dots
with your own prejudices.

The Boston media around
this issue was on fire.

They were buying into,
I think, the racial narrative.

We have to remember
that this incident

was not far removed from

the Central Park r*pe
in New York.

♪ ♪

It was not far removed
from the issue


of wilding at the time,
where Black youth were accused


of going around the communities
and harassing white people.

And there were very few
Black reporters

at the time in Boston.

But the larger white media
sort of bought into

this narrative of--

around race and v*olence
and Black antipathy

towards white people.

The Stuart case is
the ultimate truth serum

of the city of Boston,
of who we were

and, in a lot of ways,
who we are.

The aftermath
and the commentaries

after Charles Stuart
k*lled himself

barely had the hint
of recrimination.

They still wanted
to believe it.

He was so believable.

Chuck Stuart nearly d*ed,
nearly d*ed.

That can't be
emphasized enough.

Everyone who spoke to him
in the hospital--

the police investigators,
the doctors, the nurses--

this man nearly d*ed.

We were shut off
by the Stuart family.

They said, "Don't come to us.

"Don't talk to us right now.

We don't have anything to say."

Many times we're criticized
for going too far

in pushing the family,
the grieving family.

In this case,
perhaps we should have.

Maybe the truth would have
come out earlier.

That's some family too.

The media has nothing to be
defensive about,

but more importantly,
nor do the police.

One of the more
egregious things that,

I think, occurred was that

in an effort
to essentially exonerate


the actions of the Boston
Police Department


in having zeroed in on Bennett,

the Boston Globe columnist,
Mike Barnicle,

wrote a column in which
he published Willie's IQ--


even the number,
he put the numbers in there--


and his grade school
report card marks


and referred to him
being in school records


as a "Mental Defective."

Not only did we all
mess up this guy,


but now that we know
he didn't do it,

to then say, "Well,

"the Boston Police aren't
r*cist for pursuing this.

"What did you
expect them to do?

Look at this guy."

You had to wonder, are--

you know, we're pouring salt
in the wounds.

In Boston, the question is,
who knew that Charles Stuart

had m*rder*d his pregnant wife

and was trying to blame it
on a Black man?

Two of his brothers knew.

But as NBC's
Fred Briggs reports,

the continuing speculation
has prompted denials

from other family members
and criticism

over local media coverage
of the sensational m*rder case.

It's so interesting.

When you recount the people
that Matthew told

about what he had put together
on the night of the m*rder,

that's part of the horror
of this case.

One of the things
that struck me was,

it was, you know,
word on the street was

Willie Bennett was--

a Black man was
the perpetrator.

Word on another street,

which is
where Chuck Stuart lived


and Matthew Stuart lived,
in fact,


understood that
that was not the case.

You order the world
with your generalizations,

and for the police officers,

they ordered the world
with generalizations


about Black people
that were unexamined.


Had they gone to Revere,

they would have found out
about this.

♪ ♪

NewsCenter 5 has learned
Stuart's brother Matthew


told police the g*n,
her handbag, and jewelry


would be found
in the Saugus River.


Police continue to search
in the waters


less than a mile

from Charles Stuart's
parents' home.


That's where police
now say they found


the purse, wallet, and makeup.

Barely an hour
into their renewed search,


Metro Police diver
Paul Hartley


found a silver-ish .38
revolver in the Pines River.


Officer Hartley recovered
a .38 snub nose revolver.


It certainly does look
promising as the g*n


that was allegedly thrown
into the river

on the night in question.

Two miles away,
Matthew Stuart


left his home
with no apparent reaction


to the recovery of the g*n.

Another twist
in the Charles Stuart case--

a g*n was apparently stolen
from the fur store


where he once worked.

When did Kakas Furs report

that the silver .38
was missing from the safe?

♪ ♪

Did anybody notice
prior to Chuck's su1c1de

that that g*n was not there?

Charles Stuart
was the manager


at Kakas Furs with access
to the safe and the g*n,


which wasn't reported missing
until after his su1c1de.


It's the shoddiest
police work


that I've ever experienced.

It's the mindset
of the men in charge

of the police department,

the district attorney's
office, city hall.


Boston was white,
Irish Catholic male,

and there's a box,

and their framework of ideas
exists within that box.

They were having
a hard time even thinking

that it could be anything
other than what Chuck said.

[sighs]

I'd like to claim I was.

I wish I had been that smart.

I wish I had known that much
at that moment.

But I can't say,

"Wait a minute.
What if the husband did it?"

I can't say I was that smart.

I don't know who can.

I was more skeptical
of what the police were doing

in propping up
"alleged" assailants,

particularly the Willie Bennett

that just didn't ring true.

Had they started looking
at other possibilities

on the murders,
they might have discovered,

for example, Charles Stuart

and the life insurance policies.

The source we talked to
close to the Stuart family

told him--
said that Stuart told him

the motive for the k*lling
was money,

the proceeds
from life insurance policies

on Carol Stuart naming Charles
as the beneficiary.

Today, officials searched
the Stuart house in Redding,


where they reportedly
removed a number of articles,


possibly including
insurance documents.


[solemn music]

♪ ♪

They didn't even look
at the policies


until after he goes
off the bridge.


That should have been
standard operating procedure.

Always look
at the husband first.

♪ ♪

Wouldn't it also have been
routine, in a case like this,

to question
all of Chuck's family?

♪ ♪

One question dogging
the Stuart case all week is,


which brothers or sisters
of Charles Stuart


knew what he had done,

and when did they know it?

According to Michael Stuart's lawyer,

most knew nothing
until last week.


Michael was the exception.

Within three days
of the October 23rd homicide,

my client, Michael Stuart,
received information

from his brother Matthew.

And I say to you,
for purposes of this meeting

and for purposes
of the truth coming out,

he knew what Matthew told him

within three days
of the incident.

I am comfortable,
after an examination

of this entire scenario
and talking to my client,

that there is
no violation of law,

that he did not violate
any statute whatsoever,

that his hands are
legally clean.

You'd want to be
pushing the family,

and I can't help but think

if the police had pushed
Matthew Stuart,

I think Matthew Stuart
would have cracked.


I think he would have cracked
if anybody pushed him.


And what about Michael Stuart?

Wouldn't questioning
those brothers


have possibly caused them
to start cracking a lot sooner?

But nobody was asking
the questions.


When you're police,
your job is to investigate

all--all aspects.

Questions remain
about the Stuart case.


The most puzzling: why?

If Charles Stuart did
m*rder his wife,

what was the motive?

[ominous music]

Testing one, two, three, four.

♪ ♪

David MacLean was
a friend of Chuck Stuart's.

Right around Labor Day 1989,

the two of them go out
to dinner.


He told MacLean,
who obviously knew Carol,

that she was pregnant,

and she now had the upper hand
in the marriage,


and he, Chuck Stuart,
didn't want a baby.

He had these dreams
of buying a restaurant,

starting a restaurant.

She was going
to quit her job

to be a stay-at-home mom.

This isn't what he had planned,

and he wanted
to get rid of her.

Yes.

Okay.

Okay.

Yeah.

In normal circumstances,
if you got a lead like that,

a lead that Charles Stuart
may have asked an old friend

if he could get somebody
to k*ll his wife,

and you got that tip
in the midst of this,

I would say,
you would not only go

up to this guy's house,

you would drag his butt
down to the police station

for formal questioning
and let him know

that you were taking an
official statement from him.

You don't call
on the telephone.

No, you put him in the chair,
and you look him in the eye,

and you scare
the sh*t out of them,

like they scared Eric Whitney,

Dereck Jackson,

and others
in the Mission Hill project.

For some reason,
they turned their eyes away

from Charles Stuart at
the beginning of this case,

when it would have been common
police procedure

to look at
the surviving spouse.


They want everyone to believe
that over the past 48 hours,


they've uncovered
insurance policies


and diamond rings in rivers

where there are g*ns
and pocketbooks lying,


and suddenly,
they're interviewing people


over a six-hour period,

and the fact of the matter is,

they should have done that
a long time ago,


when people had paid for it.

Willie Bennett isn't
the only victim in this case.


The Black community
is a victim.


And people have to take
responsibility for it,

and someone has
to answer for it.

[tense music]

Matthew Stuart was
indicted today


in the Carol Stuart
m*rder case.


A Suffolk County grand jury

charged Charles Stuart's
brother on several counts,


including conspiracy
to obstruct justice.

Matthew Stuart's friend
Jack McMahon

was charged with accessory
after the fact of m*rder

and other crimes.

♪ ♪

When something as horrible
as this takes place,


you want the perpetrator.

You want to get the person.

They had the wrong person
in Willie Bennett.


The right person
committed su1c1de.

Matthew was
the last man standing.

Prosecutors in the Carol Stuart m*rder

have decided that

Charles Stuart's
brother Matthew,


the man who first
came to police


with inside information

and pointed the finger
at his own brother,


and family friend
John McMahon,


must now stand trial,

Matthew for
obstruction of Justice


and McMahon for being
an accessory to m*rder


after the fact.

He was indicted
for possession


of an unregistered firearm,
for receiving

stolen property,
which was a bag

that Chuck had given him,

for obstruction of justice--

a whole host of things.

But really, they never
developed any other evidence

with respect to him
than the stuff

that came out
of his own statement.

The Boston Police had been
snookered by Charles Stuart.


And I think there was
incredible pressure

to come up with
someone to justify

what the police had done.

So if you blame Matthew,
then you have someone to say,


"It wasn't our fault.
He was the one who misled us.

He was the one who--
who did it."

Matthew Stuart pleaded
guilty to charges


related to the 1989 m*rder

of his sister-in-law
Carol DiMaiti Stuart.


He was sentenced
to three to five years


for his role
in dispensing of the g*n


that Charles Stuart allegedly
used to k*ll his wife.


♪ ♪

Chuck Stuart would have
went all the way through

if his brother Matthew
didn't fold.

My uncle would have
d*ed in prison

if Charles Stuart didn't
k*ll hisself.


This would have been
the case of the century


that they solved.

I was happy he jumped,
'cause I was like,

"Now my uncle gonna go home."

No, Willie didn't go home.

- No. No.
- Why not?

Because they put this
daggone video store on him.

That--that's no relief.

When the focus
of the investigation


turned to Charles Stuart,

another man, Willie Bennett,

went from suspect to victim
in this case.


Ultimately, he was never
charged with the murders.


Instead, he was arraigned

for the robbery
of a Brookline video store.


[solemn music]

♪ ♪

Willie was never charged
with the Stuart case.

We did do a search warrant
on his house

because Willie fit
the description

of an armed robber
the week before.

I think it was a video store
in Brookline.

♪ ♪

Now we know where he is.

He's not gonna flee
to Canada or--

so it just--
that's part of the process.

♪ ♪

The video store robbery

became a way
for them to hold him


while they were waiting
to build their case against him

for the Stuart murders.

And the problem
with that was,

there were discrepancies

between Willie Bennett's
appearance

and the descriptions

that the employees
in the video store gave.


Facial hair, no facial hair--

various things that I recall

did not really match up,

but he was found guilty.

♪ ♪

It was just so shady.

It was so weak.

It was such a weak case,
but he was Willie Bennett,

and they were gonna get him,
whatever way they could.

♪ ♪

There are so many families,
so many stories


that you can hear from people
about this kind of injustice


and then folks just
walking away and saying,


"You have to deal with it."

♪ ♪

That's heinous.

♪ ♪

Not only would there be
value in a public apology


for the Bennett family,
but there should be


some kind of offering
from the city

that would--

that would at least
go a little down the road

for justice for this family,

because they don't
have it right now.

They have nothing.

♪ ♪

Willie Bennett is
a metaphor in some ways


of how the Black community
is treated


by the institutions
in this city.


To know that there's probably
four generations of Bennetts

at the moment who can't get
away from all this ugliness,

it's just--

it's just hard to take.

It's hard to take.

[horn honking]

Growing up having
the last name Bennett,

it was just a feeling
of being afraid

to tell people my full name.

That was a big thing for me.

It was always, "Oh, Sharita."

"What is your last name?"

Then I had to think,

do I want to tell them
my last name?

No.

Or then it was always,
"Oh, you're a Bennett.

"Oh, you're no relation
to William Bennett,

the Stuart case?"

And it was always
a big hesitation.

Moving in. Moving in.

Watch the door,
watch the door.

How do you feel when you
see that newspaper story


this morning saying your son
is the number one

suspect in the Stuart case?

How do I feel?

Ask how she feels?

[speaking indistinctly]

It's not over.

I don't know.

Sometimes I just wish
I don't remember that night.

I had to be about six.

I think that's probably
the only thing I remember

from being six and seven.

I don't remember
anything else but that.

That's the only thing
that lingers with me.

They made me stand
outside, outside.

They made me stay outside
because--

What does it do
to your family

having to cope
with something like this?

Well, it's tearing
us all apart.

I know that.

I mean, I can't even go
out the door.

Because I honestly feel...

[sighs]

If none of that
would have happened,

I feel like my grandmother
would have lived longer.

I think that night just
took a toll on her.

[somber music]

♪ ♪

I'd say going to visit him
in jail when we were younger.

Oh, yeah, we asked
a lot of questions, so...


Way too many.

We wanted to know
who he was.

Everybody had two parents.

Where was he at?

So we definitely had questions.

We would always hear things
about him,

first off, even through school.

I knew that he wasn't a angel.

But my mom always
wanted us to know that


he was a good man.

I mean, he was stripped
away from his kids.


My father was taken
from his family.


It's hard for him to...
- Yeah.


Talk about the case.
It really is.

But we do know some details
and a lot of stuff

that he's definitely
spoken to us about.

♪ ♪

By no means was
my uncle an angel.

Everybody knows that.

He admits that.

But he was not a monster.

You know what I'm saying?

Like, what that man did
to his wife

was a monstrous act.

My uncle wasn't a monster.

As long as I've been
involved in this situation,

my uncle made sure that
none of us talked about it.

♪ ♪

He didn't want us
to talk about it

because his theory was,

when you know
you ain't do nothing wrong,

why you gotta explain
to anybody anything?

♪ ♪

But it always ate at me.

It always ate at me.

I wish I could actually
talk to Willie.

- To who?
- Willie Bennett.

I wish I could talk to him.

What would you say?

I'm sorry for the--

for lying on you.

You know, I've been wanting
to talk about this

for a long time.

You know,
I want to apologize to him.

You know what I mean?

You know, and for--you know,
for lying on their uncle.

And that's what it was:

a lie.

You know?

They knew then,
and they know now

that he had nothing
to do with it.

That's why these fools
never charged him.

And like I said,
I wish I could have--

I wish I could speak to Willie
so I can tell him,

you know, man, I'm--
for my part for lying on you,

I deeply apologize, man,
sincerely apologize.

You know, um...

but I was--you know,
I was a kid, man.

I was a kid scared

and kid being threatened
by these same dudes,

you know, these cops.

You know, um...

thank God things like

what Matthew said came out.

You know, so it--

it took the light off Willie immediately,

but the damage was done.

The assumption
the cops did the wrong thing,


that bothers me.

Oh, you're focused in
on this poor Black guy,

and it was a lie all this time.

I don't regret
the way I operated on the--

especially on the street.

Everything I did,
I did from here.

I--I wear my heart
on my sleeve.

Uh, everything I did,
I did because I believed

it was the right thing to do.

We all know that
there's a certain price


you have to pay
to wear the badge.


That's fact.

But we were overcharged
in this case.

The price was too much,
you know.

We were trying to do
the right thing

and was accused
of everything but.

We never got the chance
to finish the investigation.

We never got the chance to say
it wasn't Willie Bennett.

So we'll never know
who k*lled Carol Stuart.

This is a case in which
there's actual facts

in the differential treatment
of the Black community

and the differential treatment
of the white community.

We can see it.

The facts are
that they could have


solved the m*rder with
the testimony of David MacLean.

Okay.

An admission to a friend

about looking for someone
to k*ll his wife

doesn't go up the chain.

They did everything they could
to get Willie Bennett.

They had their chance.

[somber music]

♪ ♪

We're in the throes
of a story


that was cinematic
in every way.


All of the elements
were there--


the characters,
their families,


the city's history on race.

[crowd shouting]

Chuck Stuart didn't quietly go
into his basement

and consume a bottle
of sleeping pills and--and die.

He had to go to the single
most prominent bridge


in this area
and throw himself off


into the Mystic River.

And when he hit the water,

it was a "holy sh*t" moment
for this entire region

that we just got duped
by this guy

into believing the very worst
of what we are.


And we have spent years
figuring out


what went wrong
and how we can fix it.

♪ ♪

This was like a reckoning
for this city.


Now when you're the police,

you've gotta act
a little differently,

'cause now everybody remembers
the Stuart case.

So now you have to handle
yourself differently.

And now media has to handle
itself differently.

The grip that old Boston has
is starting to let go.

This city is
beginning to change.

I owe my career
to the Stuart case

in so many ways,

because looking at the way
the Black community was treated

in that city
and during that time,

I told myself,
"If you leave it to them,

"this is how you're going to be
perceived by everybody.

You need
to represent yourself."

♪ ♪

What's important to see
in Boston


is that there is change
occurring in the city.

The leadership in 1990
and the leadership today


is literally
like night and day.

We have our first
elected mayor


that is not white, not Irish,
not Italian, and not male.

Thank you for placing
your trust in me

to serve as the next
mayor of Boston.

[cheers and applause]

♪ ♪

You have a police department

that has had
two Black commissioners,

and the command staff
of that police department


is majority minority.

♪ ♪

I love the city.

I served it for 36 years.

♪ ♪

These cops today...

my heart cries for them.

♪ ♪

The city's gone.

The city ain't there no more.

We did things different
because we were allowed to,

not because we broke any rules.

We were allowed to do that.

The city of Boston
is not there anymore,

not the city I worked for,

not the city I grew up in.

Hallelujah
that it's not the same city

that he remembers it to be,

and I hope
it never will be that.

♪ ♪

That city had
very clear lines.


That city was fueled
by racial animosity.


That city kept Black people
in certain places,


kept them out
of certain power circles.


We have a long way to go,

but thank God
Boston is not the city

that Mr. Dunn remembered
from back in those days,

and you can tell him
I said that too.

♪ ♪

[dramatic music]

♪ ♪

[bright tone]
Post Reply