Narrator: in 1990,
A k*ller of a 22-year-old girl
Left an almost
indistinguishable mark
In a bloodstain
at the crime scene.
But a new computer
forensic technology
Found distinguishing
characteristics in the smear,
Evidence that would lead
directly to the perpetrator.
Richmond, virginia,
is city steeped in history.
As the former capital
of the confederacy,
Richmond keeps close ties
to its past
And a watchful eye
on the future.
With 6 colleges
and universities,
Thousands of young people
move here each fall
to go to school.
Had attended
Virginia commonwealth
university.
Woman: dawn was a musician.
She joined
the v.c.u. Wind symphony
After she was accepted
through auditions.
That's what kept her there
for as long as she was there.
But dawn was anxious to find out
what was out in the real world
And how she could do
and what she could do.
Narrator: after college,
Dawn worked as a phone operator
by day
And a waitress by night.
Despite the long hours,
She enjoyed the freedom
of living on her own.
Jo ann: dawn was a fun-loving
kind of person,
Thought she could do anything
and everything
And didn't care
what other people said
About her trying to do things
that weren't the norm.
Narrator: on december 19, 1990,
Dawn's mother
went to her daughter's apartment
Since she hadn't heard from her
in a few days.
She found dawn
in a pool of blood.
The medical examiner
found evidence.
She had been r*ped, sodomized,
and stabbed in the heart.
Man: the knife was rammed
in her heart.
And the subject held dawn down
until she bled to death,
Which, from what I understand,
Could have been 8-10 minutes
or longer.
And she was defiled
in the process of this.
I don't know
how much vileness is needed,
But that's only my opinion.
I think it was
a very, very bad case.
First impression I had
was what a horrible,
horrible crime
And what somebody
had done to, really,
an innocent young lady
Who absolutely didn't deserve
what happened to her
In any sense of the word.
It was
a young 22-year-old female
Who was working,
minding her own business,
Had a future ahead of her,
had children ahead of her,
Marriage,
everything that we all enjoy,
And she was brutally att*cked
while she was sleeping.
Narrator: investigators
discovered that the k*ller
Entered the apartment
through a window
Which had been pried open.
But there was no evidence
of burglary,
Nothing had been disturbed
or broken.
They found
no foreign fingerprints
inside the apartment.
Man: when I left there,
I didn't have
very good feelings at all
Because I think everything
that I carried out there,
Out of the scene,
was in one large bag,
And that consisted mostly
of the items on the bed:
The bed sheets
and the pill--pillows
and the blankets and so forth.
Narrator: dawn bruce
was last seen
At tommy's restaurant
Where she worked the night shift
as a waitress.
Dawn met many people
through her job,
Which only added
to the large pool
of potential suspects.
Investigators tom tiller
and jim dorton
Interviewed dawn's neighbors
in the apartment complex.
Several neighbors
were suspicious
right from the start.
Dorton: a subject who lived
directly beside the victim
was on active parole,
And he was on parole
for burglary and attempted r*pe
while armed with a knife.
So immediately we felt
that he was a good suspect.
There was
very little evidence,
And it's one of these cases
that, when you left there,
That you just thought
that this is gonna be
a hard one to clear
Because of the lack of evidence.
Narrator: with no m*rder w*apon,
No witnesses, and few leads,
It was going to be
a difficult investigation.
Jo ann: she wanted to be
a firefighter,
And she had past her
firefighter 1 and 2
And was volunteering
as a firefighter.
So dawn was just a happy person.
Dawn wanted
as much out of life
As she could get
into every minute of it.
She, at some point in time,
Would have had a family,
wanted children,
But that was not to be.
Narrator: shortly after
The r*pe and m*rder
of 22-year-old dawn bruce,
John alderman was assigned
to prosecute the case.
Alderman: when you get
a crime like this
That really violates a person,
You get a sense of indignation
that's impossible to escape--
A sense of indignation
that someone being used
and abused like that.
Narrator: investigators
began focusing their attention
On the few bits
of physical evidence they had.
Forensic experts discovered
that the fatal injury
Was a single s*ab wound
in the heart.
In the forensics lab,
Scientists found
on the pillowcase
That were consistent
with the blade of a knife.
The serrated edges
appeared to be those
of a hunting knife.
Also on the pillowcase,
They found what appeared to be
a partial fingerprint
in dawn's blood,
But the fabric was textured,
Which made any kind of
fingerprint analysis impossible.
Man: the print
was almost invisible.
Even to a trained eye,
the ridge detail was very faint.
And we had to really study it
Because as we studied it
under magnification,
You enlarge the fabric weave,
Which had a tendency
to totally eradicate
the ridge detail.
So at that point in time,
I did not have
a whole lot of hope
for that fingerprint.
There was ridge detail
on the print,
But in my opinion at the time,
I didn't think it was very much.
I knew if that's all
that we would ever have
And it could not be enhanced
in any way,
Then we wouldn't have much
of a case
Unless we got
a lot more evidence coming in
That we didn't think
we would get.
Narrator: traces of semen
also were found at the scene.
Serology test indicated
the k*ller had type "a" blood.
This eliminated dawn's boyfriend
As well as dawn's neighbor
Who was on parole
for r*pe and burglary.
Dawn had another neighbor--
robert knight--
Who had some prior arrest
for drug possession.
Dorton: robert knight
had made comments to the victim
As she was outside
washing her car
Or going to and from
her automobile to her apartment.
This subject
would make comments to her
In a sexual suggestive nature,
And he became a suspect.
Narrator: robert knight
had type "a" blood,
Consistent with the semen sample
from the crime scene.
But he had an alibi
for the night of the m*rder.
He said he was with
his girlfriend at the time.
And the fingerprint
on the pillowcase
Did not appear to match
the fingerprints on file
for robert knight.
Norman tiller: we tried
traditional photography,
Everything that we knew
at that point in time,
Also to develop some contrast
between the ridges
and the fabric,
But basically, those techniques
were not satisfactory
At that point in time.
We couldn't get it to a point
where we felt like
We had an identifiable print.
Narrator: scientists tried
various chemical processes
To improve the print
on the pillowcase,
But every time they enhanced it,
They also enhanced
the threads of the pillowcase.
Investigators were no closer
to identifying the print
on the pillowcase
Than they were
the day after the m*rder.
Alderman: the fingerprint was
something that we knew we had.
It clearly was observed.
It clearly was seen.
But no one knew
what to do with it
Because it was
in a medium in blood
On a medium on a pillowcase
Against a pattern
of the pillowcase
That made it unreadable.
And if there were some way
to make that print readable,
It could take on
as vibrant a forensic persuador
as d.n.a. Evidence
And maybe some more.
Narrator: then, investigators
got a break.
Man: every year, we have
a latent print conference
Which encompasses all
the latent print examiners
in virginia.
It's a training seminar,
basically.
And the imaging people there--
One of the vendors brought
their imaging system there.
I was highly skeptical of it,
Had never seen it used
in a forensic case,
But since we had nothing else
Other than this very faint print
on fabric,
We thought it was worth a try.
Narrator: the new system
was called
Image enhancement technology.
Image enhancement
uses a computer
to identify patterns
Like those woven
into the pillowcase.
Once the pattern was identified,
It was subtracted
from the image,
Leaving only the ridge patterns
of the fingerprint behind.
After 10 hours of testing,
The fabric pattern
was subtracted,
And what began to emerge
was a partial thumbprint
of the k*ller.
Narrator: investigators knew
that they had to identify
The fingerprint
on the pillowcase
In order to solve
dawn bruce's m*rder.
The primary suspect in this case
Was one of dawn's neighbors--
robert knight--
Who had a history of drug abuse.
Knight said he had an alibi,
That he was with girlfriend
on the night of the m*rder,
But his girlfriend said
knight wasn't with her
for the entire evening.
Man: the evidence indicated
The crime occurred
about between 3:00 and 4:00,
Roughly that saturday morning.
He claimed to be
with his girlfriend all night,
But his girlfriend said,
"No, he was not with me
for about that period of time,
between 3:00 and 4:00."
Narrator: the fingerprints
on file for robert knight
Did not have enough ridge detail
To determine if they matched
the print on the pillowcase.
Knight voluntarily
gave a second set of prints,
But again,
it was not enough ridge detail
To make a comparison.
Dorton: each time that we would
show our presence around him,
He got
a little bit more standoffish
And not as cooperative
and accused us
of harassing him.
And he just changed entirely
his personality
And his willingness to help.
He did not want us
to come around anymore.
Narrator: now, the prosecution
was in a difficult position.
If they could not identify
the fingerprint as knight's,
The defense attorney
would use that against
the prosecution at a trial.
The defense attorneys
would have said,
"Whose fingerprint is it?
"We don't know.
We'll never know.
"And that fingerprint
is the k*ller,
"And it's not his fingerprint
Or it can't be proved
to be his fingerprint."
So in our line of work,
You really need to answer
all the questions,
And if you don't,
The defense attorney
asks those questions
at closing arguments.
Narrator:
but prosecutors gambled.
They arrested knight
for dawn's m*rder,
Pinning their hopes on the new
fingerprint technology
And the scientists' ability
to match knight's fingerprints.
After knight's arrest,
Norm tiller kept a close eye
on the technique
Police used to fingerprint him,
Making certain that each finger
was carefully rolled
from nail to nail
For the clearest set of prints
possible.
Tiller: as soon as I saw
a good suitable rolled print,
I took that straight back
to my office
And began that examination.
Narrator: but tiller
did not rush the judgment.
He took his time.
After one month
of analysis and retesting,
Norm tiller found
what he was looking for.
The print on the pillowcase
was a left thumbprint.
It matched the outside
of robert knight's left thumb.
Tiller: I spent additional time
doing comparison work
And just analyzing the print
from every angle,
so to so speak,
Before we actually
effected the identification.
And even then,
I had another examiner
go behind me
And take a look
at everything that I had done
To make sure
there were no errors made
in the process.
Narrator: but there was
one more hurdle.
The image enhancement technology
was so new,
It had never been accepted
as evidence in court.
Tiller: I was concerned
at that point in time
That the evidence
may not be accepted
Within the scientific community
as a good science.
This was the first time
that anybody had used it,
Taken it into court--
into a courtroom
Where it was gonna be
actually challenged.
And it was gonna be fought.
Narrator: a hearing was held
To determine
whether forensic evidence
From this new
fingerprinting technology
Should be admitted.
The defense argued that it was
hocus-pocus technology
Which manipulated and changed
the image of the fingerprint.
Pam ringer was the expert
Who testified
for the prosecution,
Explaining that the human eye
can distinguish
Between 16 and 32 shades
of gray,
But a computer
can distinguish 256 shades.
Ringer said
the image enhancement technology
Simply eliminated
the fabric patterns
Then made the dark areas
of the fingerprint darker
And the light areas
between the ridges lighter.
Alderman:
if somebody as dumb as I am
can understand this
When I got done with her
over the course of a day
And doing some studying
afterwards,
I think the explanation
becomes one
That anyone can understand.
This imaging enhancing
doesn't change the data at all.
What we had was a photograph
of the fingerprint.
And pam ringer said,
"I went ahead and did it
that day on march the 27th.
"I could do it again today.
I can show you--
I can replicate it 100 times
if I need to."
She did it stages.
She took the--
first the pattern out.
Then she took the weave out.
And as you watch it, you can see
the print didn't change.
The print didn't move.
The lines of the lands
and grooves of the print
didn't change at all.
And I think that, graphically,
was the best persuador
For judge kulp in the case.
Narrator:
the judge was convinced.
He did not believe
that the computer enhancements
Altered the bloody fingerprint.
A legal precedent had been set.
But prosecutors wanted more
than the fingerprint
Before heading to trial.
Narrator: robert douglas knight
was charged
With the capital m*rder
of 22-year-old dawn bruce,
But police still didn't have
the m*rder w*apon.
A faint fingerprint
left on a flimsy pillowcase
Would be considered
firm evidence in court.
And prosecutors soon had a lead
on the m*rder w*apon.
A maintenance man working
in knight's old apartment
Discovered something
behind an access panel
in knight's old bedroom.
Reid: I don't know
what possessed him to do that.
I think
there was a plumbing problem
had caused him to take it off.
When he did, he looked in
and found a hunting knife
in a sheath.
Narrator: in the forensics lab,
Scientists performed
a simple test
To determine
if this was the w*apon used
In the m*rder.
Using photographic overlays,
The pattern of the knife
was compared
To the knife impressions found
on dawn bruce's pillowcase.
They matched.
The final piece of evidence
Was the d.n.a. Testing
of the semen
Found at the crime scene.
It matched the d.n.a. Profile
of robert knight.
Prosecutors believe
that dawn bruce
Arrived home from work
around 1 a.m.
And went right to bed.
Sometime around 4:00,
Robert knight
went to the front window
of dawn's apartment,
Pried it open,
And crept upstairs.
He stabbed dawn in the heart.
Then, sexually assaulted her
as she bled to death.
But knight made mistakes.
He wiped the knife
on the pillowcase,
Leaving the impression
of the m*rder w*apon
Later matched to the knife
found in knight's apartment.
He also left
a partial bloody fingerprint
on the pillowcase,
Matched with the latest
in computer technology.
Facing an overwhelming amount
of physical evidence
And in an effort to avoid
the death penalty,
Robert douglas knight
pled guilty.
He was sentenced to 4 life terms
in prison.
I'm very disappointed
That robert knight
didn't get the death penalty.
I think he deserved
the death penalty.
I think the forensic science
Played a major part
in solving the case.
Some cases are solved
just by pure interviewing
without any evidence,
And they are solved.
But I think
this is one of those cases
That would not have been solved
had it not been
For the forensic evidence
that was there at the scene.
When we arrested knight, we had
a bare circumstantial case.
That's all we had.
And it went to being
the absolutely strongest
forensic case
I've ever prosecuted
in 24 years.
The only thing that stands out
with me, personally,
Is that I believe
robert knight deserved
And should have received
the death penalty.
I don't believe
he deserves to be breathing,
Eating, sleeping, laughing,
Whatever emotions
he may experience.
I know one of these days
he'll probably be walking
the streets again,
But it will be a long time.
And even though justice
was served,
I think he was deserving
of the death penalty.
I told my other daughter
one day
When we were talking about life
And about her plans for family
When she said
that she didn't think
she was gonna have children
Because she didn't know
that she could go through
what I had gone through,
And I told her
if I knew ahead of time
That dawn
was gonna be m*rder*d,
I would still have had dawn
Because she brought such joy
to us as her family,
Not to ever not have children
for fear of loss
06x09 - Soft Touch
Watch/Buy Amazon Merchandise
Documentary that reveals how forensic science is used to solve violent crimes, mysterious accidents, and outbreaks of illness.
Documentary that reveals how forensic science is used to solve violent crimes, mysterious accidents, and outbreaks of illness.