Revealed: How to Poison A Planet (2024)

Curious minds want to know... documentary movie collection.

Moderator: Maskath3

Watch Docus Amazon   Docus Merchandise

Documentary movie collection.
Post Reply

Revealed: How to Poison A Planet (2024)

Post by bunniefuu »

(DRAMATIC MUSIC)

WOMAN: Do you solemnly swear the

testimony you're about to give

to be the truth, the whole truth

and nothing but the truth?

Yes, I do.

MAN: Hi, Dr Butenhoff.

My name is Ned McWilliams

and I'm one of the attorneys

representing

the various water districts

around the country

that's suing your company, 3M,

among others.

SONG: Man-made chemicals are

Poisoning the Earth

MAN: There were companies

and people

that knew the nature and extent

of this thr*at

but did it anyway.

Chemists move molecules around

Like we move furniture...

MAN: You can't help but ask

what kind of people do that?

After we're dead and gone

It will be here

a million years...

WOMAN: This has to be

the most expl*sive information

that I've found.

We'll all be dead and gone

And cried a billion tears...

MAN: It was

our 'holy sh*t' moment.

(WOMAN LAUGHS) Yeah.

Like, people do this?!

In the water...

WOMAN: Do you swear to tell

the truth, the whole truth

and nothing but the truth,

so help you God?

MAN: I do.

MAN: If you wanted to

contaminate the planet,

you couldn't have invented

a better delivery device

than firefighting foam.

Flowing deep in the water.

(LIQUID BURBLES)

(SOLEMN INDIGENOUS MUSIC)

(BIRDS WARBLE)

(SOFT CRACKLING)

MAN: Our old people

have always had a... a really

special intimate relationship

with this place.

And when we go to special places

like this,

it's really important

that we pay respect...

...to all this part here,

all this country, the water,

the trees...

...grass, everything that's here.

It's all connected

and it was all here before us

and we're obligated

to take care of it.

(WAVES LAP)

WOMAN: The Wreck Bay

Aboriginal fishing community

is tucked away

in a little bit of paradise

on the south coast

of New South Wales.

It's pristine ocean.

And when you look across to the

distance, it's the mountains

and they're quite blue because

of our eucalypt that we have.

It's actually a place

right on the ocean

that is just us, you know,

and it's been like that

for thousands of years.

MATTHEW: Wreck Bay has always

been a fishing village

and everything is here.

Everything is here in abundance.

WOMAN: We'd go diving.

You know,

little ones that I'd get

are little abalones or oysters.

So we wouldn't go home

to have lunch.

We'd have lunch as we catch it.

So full of culture and heritage.

It was a child's playground

in paradise.

(UNEASY MUSIC BUILDS)

MATTHEW: We don't exist.

If... if we don't have water,

we're not here.

It's who we are.

(HELICOPTER WHIRRS)

REPORTER: But now there's

trouble in paradise.

PFAS chemicals

used in firefighting foam

have leached out

from a navy airfield

known as the Jervis Bay

Range Facility.

Head along Wreck Bay Road.

See through there?

That's the east-west runway

there.

Into the right here,

we've got the training centre

where they do

all their fire drills.

Where the PFAS

was kept and stored.

But everything from there,

from their training centre,

all that water...

...every time it rains,

everything runs down this hill

and it runs straight into

little gutters and creeks

and... and... all of these

little nooks and crannies

that all flow down

into Wreck Bay

and then it runs into...

into our ocean down here.

The two main, um, K*llers

in the community

is from heart... heart att*ck

and cancer.

I had a... um, cancerous cyst

in my pancreas.

Pancreatic cancer is very brutal

and savage.

Since January,

we've had six funerals.

So a lot of alarm bells

was ringing.

You know, it's a chemical

used for something...

...that's like a business model.

And when you look at that,

it's all to do with that,

to do with money.

If we can be taken

right back to those places

where people signed

that dotted line

and where that was

a business transaction,

you know, those people

need to be made accountable.

The whole process that

it's gone through to get here

and to poison our beautiful part

of country has to be unpacked.

(SIREN BLARES)

MAN: I think once people

start to see this story,

um, and see how much information

was known by this company

going back as far as it does,

and knowing how much

of the current PFAS

contamination problem

could have been prevented,

I think there are gonna be a lot

of people that are very angry.

MAN 2: How do you,

in good conscience,

if you're aware that a product

that you manufacture,

and are essentially

the exclusive manufacturer of,

and you know

that it's in the blood

of the general population

all around the world,

how is it that you could

in good conscience

not tell folks?

And you let generation

after generation be exposed...

- Right.

- ...um, in the name of profits.

I guess that's the goal

of our trial,

is to... to tell that story.

We're talking about

worldwide contamination

and, what, 3M knew

and when they knew it.

(UNEASY MUSIC)

ROB: I mean, if you think

about the amount of effort

3M has spent over the years

to keep this under wraps,

you know, to make sure that

people didn't see this evidence.

And, again,

it's just remarkable to me

that we're now having

to... to prepare these cases

to go to trial

to get these people

to accept responsibility

for what they did.

GARY: Right.

And there's no doubt who did it.

If you wanted to deliberately

contaminate the planet

with PFAS,

you couldn't have invented

a better delivery device

than firefighting foam

where you're literally spraying

it into the environment,

into the water, and don't do

anything to clean it up

and just let it soak in,

let it leach through the...

through the ground

into the aquifers,

into people's drinking water

and that's exactly

what they did.

(SINGS) Man-made chemicals are

Poisoning the Earth

Chemists move molecules around

Like we move furniture...

GARY: I was always drawn

to being a trial lawyer,

which is, I like to say,

it's sort of performative art.

The only difference is I have

a much more c*ptive audience

when I have a jury.

They have to sit

and listen to me.

I started out

as a struggling musician

for the first 30 years

of my life.

(SINGS) Rollin' down

ol' River Road...

We played everywhere.

We played some of the most

famous punk rock scenes

of the '70s and '80s in New York

and we had a blast.

Give me hope, give me strength

And the faith

when I need it most...

I did not go to law school

till I was 30

and I realised I had...

(LAUGHS) ..to make a living.

Holding on.

- And I also believed...

- (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

...in pursuing just causes,

so I would look

to defend the little guy.

(SOBER PIANO MUSIC)

I got recruited by a firm

that was doing tobacco

litigation for plaintiffs

and we would be representing

thousands of people.

And I won.

I think at that time it was

the third successful case

in the United States.

And then Rob Bilott,

um, reached out to me.

His cases were gonna go to trial

and he needed a trial lawyer.

I was working at a law firm

where we were helping

big corporate clients,

a lot of big chemical companies.

And I got a call in my office

one day

from a gentleman who identified

himself as Mr Tennant

out in West Virginia

and was telling me

that he had cows dying

that I needed to help him with.

He was convinced

there was something

obviously in this white foam

coming out of this landfill

owned by DuPont

that was impacting the cows.

By the time he had

called me in 1998,

he had lost over a hundred

of these animals.

That call led to what became

the next several decades

of litigation

involving these

PFAS "forever chemicals".

GARY: We represented

a class of 3,000 people.

We tried three individual cases,

won them all

and DuPont... (LAUGHS)

...finally caved in

and settled

with all 3,000 people

in that community.

ROB: It ended up

being on the cover

of the 'New York Times'

magazine.

After that story came out,

one of the people

that apparently had seen

the story and reached out to me

was Mark Ruffalo.

You knew.

Still you did nothing.

REPORTER: 'Dark Waters' tells

the true story of Robert Bilott,

the underdog lawyer who

took on the industrial giant

DuPont Chemical.

MAN: You want to take everything

that you know

and turn it against

an iconic American company,

like an informant!

Isn't that right?

Isn't that right?!

- Isn't that right?

- Yes!

- Hey.

- Oh. Oh, man.

- So good to see you.

- Yeah, you too.

- How are you doing?

- Awesome.

- Oh, buddy, it's been too long.

- Yeah!

- Good to see you. Yeah.

- Good to see you.

- It's almost been two years.

- Yeah.

The film, you know,

that we did together,

it seems to have created a space

to start to change everything.

- Would you say that was true?

- Absolutely.

I think it really showed people,

"Wait a minute,

"this stuff,

it's not just in the water

"in a town in West Virginia."

This stuff that

we were dealing with

and that you see in the film,

'Dark Waters',

it's the same chemicals now

that are in the water in the UK,

in Germany, in Italy,

in Australia, in Japan.

This story... (SCOFFS)

...it's... it's playing out

all over the world now.

This was always the... thing

that was astonishing to me,

that people made the decision

to go forward

with putting

these chemicals in...

...our environment.

They knew what they were doing.

Those were decisions

that were made by people.

You can't help but ask...

...what kind of people do that?

(INTRIGUING MUSIC)

MAN: 3M were a large

multinational conglomerate

chemical company.

They're based in Minnesota.

They go back to the 1800s.

And they're in

the business of selling

thousands of different

commercial and industrial

products.

It's a multibillion-dollar

company,

and they were back in the '70s

when this all got started.

ROB: PFAS is per- and

polyfluoroalkylated substances.

It is a family of completely

man-made chemicals.

These are chemicals that

never existed on the planet

prior to World w*r II.

The two chemicals that we... that

we've been talking about here

that we know the most about

in this PFAS family

are the ones that have

eight carbons - the C8s.

That's PFOA

and PFOS.

Both of these, really,

were created by 3M.

PFOA was sold primarily

to DuPont

to use in things like Teflon.

(OIL SIZZLES, CORN POPS)

PFOS, on the other hand,

was one that was

primarily used by 3M

in a lot of its own products,

things like Scotchgard.

And also they made this thing

called Scotchban.

Think of like, uh,

a... a hamburger wrapper.

That special paper where the

grease doesn't leak through it?

That was what these products

were primarily used for.

PFOS was very much

their secret sauce,

their proprietary chemical.

No-one outside of 3M

had ever made it before,

had ever seen it before,

knew anything about it.

3M also started using PFOS,

and then in later years

PFOA was used as well,

in making a product called

aqueous film forming foam...

...a type of firefighting foam

used to combat petroleum fires.

This was created primarily

around the 1960s

and started being sold

to the US m*llitary.

And over the last

several decades,

this product,

this... this firefighting foam

that's containing

these PFAS chemicals,

has been sold to airports,

fire stations,

m*llitary personnel,

firefighters all over the world.

And this whole other story

started to become apparent

of how much the...

the Department of Defense

was using this

and how many bases

throughout the United States

were poisoned

and how many firefighters...

Yeah.

...who are covered in this stuff.

And are told,

"You spray it all out there,"

even though these companies

understood

when they were making this stuff

it's got PFAS in it.

(LIQUID BUBBLES)

ROB: And these types

of chemicals

when they get out

into the environment,

they never break down.

And so the problem is

not only do these chemicals

get out into our environment

and stay there...

...they're incredibly toxic

and they've been found to be

incredibly persistent,

bioaccumulative

and, unfortunately

in some situations,

carcinogenic as well.

A lot of the information

that has come out over the years

has focused on

what DuPont was doing

and what DuPont knew

about these chemicals

and how DuPont had covered up

information about

the health thr*at here.

There hasn't been as much

information available

about what 3M knew

about these chemicals.

This is the company

that actually created these

at the beginning.

GARY: The stakes are enormous

because it's about holding

to account chemical companies

that have been responsible

for manufacturing a product

that has contaminated virtually

everyone and everything

on the planet

from here to Australia

to Europe to China.

(UNEASY MUSIC)

WOMAN: We're just

on the northern edge

of the airfield here.

We've just had bucketloads

of rain falling down

and now all this foam

seems to be coming down

the waterways off the base.

You'd have to say

that would have to be PFAS.

I've been reporting

on PFAS contamination

for about eight years now.

It really is one of those issues

where every time

you turn the stone over,

you just find something new.

This is the only road

that takes you into Wreck Bay.

We're just approaching

the naval college on our right.

This is where the majority

of the cadets

have done their fire training

and so you'd have to think

that the majority

of the PFAS contamination

has come from this area.

So any training

that they've done here

is gonna have

flushed down the hill,

straight towards the village

of Wreck Bay.

So, really,

in this national park,

you could not have

a worse possible spot

to be doing your fire training

with toxic PFAS chemicals.

(DOG BARKS)

CARRIE: Hi, Uncle Jack.

- JACK: Hi, Carrie. How are you?

- CARRIE: Yeah.

- I'm really well, thanks.

- JACK: Yeah?

- CARRIE: How are you?

- Good, thank you.

JACK: I started as a ranger

in 1968.

I was the first Aboriginal

ranger in the Territory.

We were doing

all our firefighting modules

up at the Jervis Bay

Range Facility.

(UNEASY MUSIC)

If we wanted to put out

an oil fire,

we'd have to use the foam

and the water to put it out.

If we wanted to go into a big,

uh, t*nk or... or like a cabin,

we'd have to crawl through

in the water and everything else

while they had all the smoke

and fire in there.

And what... what would happen,

we'd come out all soaking wet

from the foam

and everything else

and we'd have to, uh, go

near a fire and dry ourself out.

- Oh, wow!

- Yeah.

So you were actually

crawling through water

that had the foam in it.

- Is that right?

- Yeah, it had... Yeah. Yeah.

CARRIE: And did you ever use

anything to protect yourself,

gloves and things,

when you're handling the foam?

- UNCLE JACK: No. No. No.

- That kind of thing.

- We'd just use our bare hands.

- Wild. Oh, wow.

And with a helmet on.

Not even a... a face mask.

- Wow.

- And our overalls.

And our boots. Mmm.

CARRIE: So, of the firefighters

you worked with,

how many are still alive now?

UNCLE JACK: There'd be only

about eight of us.

- CARRIE: Wow.

- That I know of.

The rest of them

have all passed on.

CARRIE:

And so how many, roughly,

would you say have passed?

UNCLE JACK: I'd say...

...between 20 and 22...

...hmm, have passed.

(KNOCK AT DOOR)

MAN: The navy asked us

if we want to do some training

up at the aerodrome.

They said, "We use foam."

I said, "That's alright."

'Cause I didn't know

what was in the foam.

I've had, uh, prostate cancer,

which I've had

my prostate removed.

They found that I had

cirrhosis of the liver.

Every doctor I've been to,

they've asked me,

"Are you a heavy drinker?"

"No, sir.

"I'm not a heavy drinker."

The cancers that you've had,

are those sort of

any possibility

that they were

inherited down the line

like hereditary cancers?

- No. No.

- No.

There's no history of it

in... in my...

you know, my family.

All these different types of

deformities and blood disorders

and... and cancers

that have come to our community

can't be just... hereditary

and it can't be just... you know,

a... a fate of bad luck.

It has to have come

from something else.

CARRIE: One of

the biggest stories

I've ever written in my career

would have to be

the story I wrote

about Tartan High School,

Minnesota,

that was basically on the

doorstep of 3M's headquarters.

They'd had plants over there

that were manufacturing PFAS

and that the PFAS had

contaminated the drinking water.

So I started googling

the name of this town

where their headquarters was,

which was called Oakdale,

and I was just blown away

to see these articles coming up

about these kids

who were dying of cancer

at the local high school.

So I just remember this moment,

it was like a lightning bolt,

of how... how could this happen,

number one?

And... and number two,

why was no-one talking about

why all these kids

were dying of cancer

and... and the potential...

...no-one seemed to have made

that connection

to the contamination

of the drinking water?

Most of them had grown up

drinking water

that was contaminated with PFAS

and their parents

had even drinking that water

while they were in utero.

So once I got over there,

I just went doorknocking.

So I managed to find, um, a few

names of the kids that had d*ed

and I went and knocked

on those doors.

And then it just

spread and spread.

And by the end of the two weeks,

I'd managed to find

21 cancer cases at that school

that all happened

within a 15-year period.

The types of cancers ranged

from Hodgkin's lymphoma,

leukaemia

to bone cancer,

and about six cases

of brain tumours.

And, tragically,

at the time of my visit,

five of the students

had already passed away

at a really young age.

I met a lot of the students.

And one of the ones

that really stood out to me

was Amara Strande.

When I was 15,

I was diagnosed with

fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma,

an incredibly rare liver cancer.

The chances of being diagnosed

with fibrolamellar

is 1 in 5 million.

(ECG BEEPS)

CARRIE: At the time

that I saw her,

she'd only just

got out of hospital

from being in a coma for 33 days

after her liver tumour

was removed.

And I remember just

going to her house.

She was very switched-on

and she just wanted to know

everything that I knew

about PFAS.

And after I went home,

she just kept going

and researching

and speaking to people.

And there was just

something about her.

I had no idea of how significant

that meeting was gonna be

in the grand scheme of things.

She didn't have any fear about

going up against

people who were more powerful

than her.

ROB: We got involved with 3M

back in 2005.

That's when these chemicals

were discovered in the water

outside of their manufacturing

plant in Minnesota by the state.

You know, we were asked to

come in and help the community,

who was being exposed

to these chemicals

in their drinking water.

Unfortunately, when we...

when we started pursuing

the litigation in Minnesota,

one of the first things 3M did

was go into the local court

and get a blanket

protective order.

They essentially were able to

designate every single document

as confidential.

So despite the fact

that we were able to see

these internal studies and

these internal documents of 3M,

we weren't able to share those

for years.

And, in fact,

a lot of those documents

are only just now being

made available to the public.

And some additional documents

are just now coming out

through this litigation

over firefighting foam.

(SIREN WAILS IN DISTANCE)

So this is the first one

that sort of shows

the water treatment plant

and you can see over there

in the end

it's got the four

ion exchange vessels

that they've constructed so far.

Yeah, so our jurors

can see an aerial sh*t

of what the whole

treatment plant,

um, to remove PFAS...looks like.

(GRIM MUSIC)

GARY: So a few years back,

EPA empanelled a group

of some of the world's

leading scientists and experts

in the area of

PFAS contamination.

They concluded that PFOA and

PFOS are likely to cause cancer

and other human health effects,

in fact.

And they determined that

"there is no dose

"below which either chemical

is considered safe".

In other words,

there is no safe level.

REPORTER: Now the City of Stuart

is taking several manufacturers

of the foam to federal court,

including corporate giant, 3M,

claiming 3M knew

but didn't tell the city

about the toxic

contamination risks.

Stuart was chosen to represent

hundreds of communities

across the country

who want 3M to pay

for their

clean-up testing

and filtration.

You know, why should the victims

here of this contamination,

the people that are drinking

this in their homes every day,

be the ones stuck

with those costs?

Why should the cities

and the municipalities

that are now having

to filter this out

have to be the ones

to pay for this?

And it's just mind-blowing to me

that we're... (CHUCKLES)

...having to go to trial

to get responsibility accepted

for those costs.

With respect to

firefighting foam specifically,

as you know, they... they...

they argue that the "end user",

the firefighters who've been

training with foam,

um, are at fault.

Um, and, of course, as you know,

it's mostly used for training

as opposed to actual fires.

Um, so most of the contamination

is from training

where they're not

actually saving lives

in any way, shape or form.

So in this litigation

which is being seen

by Judge Richard Gergel

in Charleston, South Carolina,

in federal court,

all of the cases

across the country

have been consolidated

before him

and he's decided that the water

provider cases should go first.

REPORTER: The city

wants to be awarded

more than $100 million

to cover what has already

been spent on projects

like a multimillion-dollar

treatment plant

and filtration system,

keeping the levels

of the chemicals

undetectable or below

the health advisory limit.

GARY: The story

that we put together

really started, um, years ago.

In the course of

what we call discovery,

the defendants and 3M

and the other

defendant companies,

manufacturers of PFAS,

were required by court order

to start producing

their internal files,

anything that had

and that was related to PFAS

or aqueous film forming foam.

And over the course

of the next four years,

they produced about

37 million pages of documents.

And from that we were able

to pick out those documents

that really told a story

and it really starts in 1975.

If I were to give it a name

in this whole longer timeline,

this early part of the timeline,

I would call 'The sh*t

Hits the Fan - Part 1'.

(TENSE MUSIC)

(MAN SPEAKS INDISTINCTLY)

WOMAN: A, B. A, B common mark.

This is, uh,

so incredibly f*cked and evil.

(READS) "In the summer of 1975,

"Dr Warren Guy,

"a toxicologist and professor

at the University of Florida,

"calls 3M's corporate

headquarters concerning research

"he and Dr Donald Taves,

a toxicologist and professor,

"are planning to present

at a symposium

"organised by

the American Chemical Society.

"Dr Guy and Dr Taves

have discovered the presence

"of an unidentified organic

fluorine chemical compound

"in human blood..."

"..obtained from the blood banks

in five US cities."

NED: Imagine

these two outside researchers

found this fingerprint

on a crime scene

but they didn't know

who to match it to.

They could tell some things

about it.

They could tell it was 8-chain,

they could tell

it was fluorinated,

and based on that, they knew

that there was this company

up in Minnesota, 3M,

they made chemicals like that.

(TENSE MUSIC)

GARY: They contacted 3M

and asked them,

"Hey, we found

this funny-looking compound

"that's not known in nature."

And this is the actual

telephone memo

from that... of that call

on August 20, 1975.

And it begins,

"Dr Guy called again

"to see if we had

any further ideas

"as to the possible sources

of the fluorocarbon."

Then they literally

pled ignorance.

But the internal documents

have since revealed

3M did its own analysis

and was able to confirm,

yes, this was 3M's stuff

that was being found in

the general population's blood.

GARY: They had known internally

that what these two scientists

had stumbled on

was actually PFOS,

which is the one particular PFAS

that is essentially unique

to 3M.

(GRIM MUSIC)

ROB: At that point, 3M started

looking at its own workers

to try to figure out,

"Is this getting

into the blood of our workers

"who are working with

these chemicals?"

Sure enough, 3M had found this

stuff, this organic fluoride,

was getting in its own workers.

They notified one of

their main customers

for these chemicals, DuPont,

who was buying PFOA.

DuPont went out and started

testing its workers in 1978.

Sure enough,

DuPont found organic fluoride

getting into its workers

as well.

So by this point of time,

in the late 1970s,

both 3M and DuPont

knew these chemicals

were getting into

general population's blood

and workers who were exposed.

NED: Yeah, all hell broke loose.

They immediately started

all these investigations.

For example,

they started toxicology testing.

They went out

and they got a bunch of mice,

rats, monkeys, guinea pigs,

and they did a whole slew

of toxicology tests,

and the results were bad.

They were vomiting,

there was liver necrosis,

haemorrhaging in their

gastrointestinal tract,

tremors, convulsions.

"20 of the 28 rhesus monkeys

in the study

"die as a result

of their exposures to PFOS."

It sent shock waves

within the company.

They said, "This chemical's now

considered extremely toxic,

"more toxic than

we ever realised."

And that, to me, is the evidence

that that's when they

should have told the EPA.

But actually what they did

was even worse than that.

They went out

and they published a paper

in the journal 'Science',

which is the most prolific

and well-respected

scientific journal in existence.

They published a paper saying

that what Guy and Taves found

was not a man-made chemical

at all,

that it was this naturally

occurring compound,

which, of course,

they knew was a lie.

"3M concludes that both

PFOA and PFOS have,

"quote, 'the potential

for widespread distribution

"'in the environment,'

end quote,

"because they, quote,

'persist in the environment',

"thus 'forever chemicals',

"and that they are

highly mobile in soils,

"and that therefore waterways

"would be their ultimate

environmental sink."

MAN: This was the main beach

that was one of the main places

where the community caught fish

and sent it to the market.

That's the creek.

CARRIE: Right.

Oh, wow.

So, my understanding was

Mary's runs pretty much

from the... the airfield

all the way down to the beach

carrying the contamination,

is that right?

MAN: Yes.

How often would you come down

growing up?

I was here practically

every day.

- Yeah.

- Yeah.

We not only learnt to fish

and surf here, and swim,

we did a lot of

beachcombing here as well

when we was kids.

So that was one of

the activities

you do when you're living

on the coast.

(PENSIVE MUSIC)

(CHILDREN'S VOICES ECHO)

WOMAN: We, obviously,

grew up right in Wreck Bay,

and the water

was our favourite place to go.

We love the ocean.

Especially at, um, Summercloud,

swimming there,

we'd swim in the creek.

(CHILDREN'S VOICES ECHO)

There was foam in the creek

and we would play with it.

We didn't know what it was.

SKYE: So I'd just finished

school before I turned 18.

And then I started getting,

like, really bad headaches,

and it kind of just

was constant.

And then I started to lose

my balance a little bit.

My eyesight s...

Yeah, that started to get

a bit blurry.

I think the third time

in one week

I went to the doctor's again.

And then she said, "I'm just

gonna book you in for a scan

"on your head."

And that's when I met

my surgeons.

And they came in and he said,

"You've got a tumour

on your brain stem

"and we need to remove it."

So they said,

"It's a slow-growing tumour

"and there is a chance

of recurrence,

"but it's also benign."

JADE: We didn't know anyone

that had brain tumours,

so we'd never experienced,

like, even knowing someone

having brain surgery

or anything.

But I think it hit us harder

the second time

when she had surgery,

when we got told,

"Oh, the tumour's come back."

SKYE: It was daunting,

but I think I...always said

I would rather it happen to me

than anyone else,

'cause I knew

that I could do it.

And I'm like, "OK, just have

to push through."

And then...

...we found out about Jade,

which, that, I think,

broke my heart the most.

Yeah.

JADE: Well,

I was having migraines,

like, probably during the period

that she had her first tumour,

but then the symptoms got worse.

And then so me and Mum went in

and they were like,

"Oh, you have

a massive brain tumour."

Then they called Mum and Dad up

for a meeting,

and they were like,

"So, we found...

"..like, we seen

the first tumour,

"but she actually has another

one on the other side as well."

They were trying to connect it

to Mum and Dad

to see if anything came up

in their genes

that would connect to

both of us,

but they found nothing.

Even when we've seen, like,

different doctors and stuff

that I've seen, they're like,

"Oh, where do you live?"

And I'm like, "Jervis Bay."

And they'll look at me again

and be like,

"Oh, do you know about PFAS?"

(GRIM MUSIC)

WOMAN: I was 26 years old

when I was formally diagnosed

with cervical cancer.

I caught it late,

so I was inoperable,

it had already went to

my lymph nodes.

They said, "You might not

be around by Christmas."

I started my treatment in 2015,

and by 2016, in February,

I was in remission.

So here I am, and...

Yeah, thank goodness

you're still here, darling.

ASHLEE: Dad's had

a triple bypass.

- You know...

- We've all had triple bypasses.

- ASHLEE: All the... Yeah.

- My brothers.

All the brothers,

all heart problems.

Every one of youse

have had a bypass...

Yeah.

...that have lived in Wreck Bay.

So that's, like, 10.

10 of them.

My brother Rob,

he's lived down here,

grown up down here -

heart problems.

My brother Baldy,

he d*ed of a heart att*ck.

And then my other brother,

who's the same age as Rob,

lives in La Perouse -

no heart problems.

No health problems.

No health problems at all.

It can't be a coincidence.

CARRIE: So how old were you

when you first started

getting sick?

I had this lump here for years.

- Mm.

- And I never took notice of it.

Yeah.

And I found out that I was sick

with breast cancer.

CARRIE: There have been

studied overseas

in places like Taiwan

and Greenland

that have linked PFAS exposure

to elevated rates

of breast cancer.

And what experts have told me

is that in a community

the size of Wreck Bay

you'd expect to be seeing

about one breast cancer case

every five years,

or three in 15 years.

So it's been surprising

to have been given the names

of 10 women in that village

with breast cancer.

(PENSIVE MUSIC)

WOMAN:

Peggy, she was my granddaughter.

She was a strong woman.

She was gonna be the next

matriarch of the family.

They used to think

she was Naomi Campbell

when she'd walk around

the streets

and people would turn

their heads every time.

Peg was beautiful too.

Beautiful spirit.

I've never, ever

heard her complain.

'Cause she always wanted to be

strong for everyone, you know?

(WISTFUL MUSIC)

Oh.

(TEARFULLY) Oh, Peg.

I have my moments.

She calls out to me at times,

and I'm here by myself

and I'll hear this, "Nan!"

if I'm a bit weepy, you know?

She snaps me out of it. (LAUGHS)

Lets me know she's alright.

(WAVES CRASH)

We know we'll meet up again

one day.

(SOMBRE MUSIC)

Did she wonder, sort of,

her illnesses,

about the PFAS and...

Yeah, well, PFAS

could have played a part in...

...in Peggy's life.

Peggy, since she was a kid,

loved oysters,

so she'd been eating oysters

from this area

for a long time.

So every little spot

around here,

Peggy knew where oysters were.

And oysters are a...

what you call a filter feeder,

so they feed out

of all the food nutrients

in the water.

And she loved the fish.

(WISTFUL MUSIC)

we do know, for sure,

human studies,

not just animal studies,

that PFOS is renowned

for raising cholesterol.

If it's not picked up, we can

expect more arterial disease,

more kidney disease,

strokes, heart att*cks.

The other thing that PFOS

is famous for

is its ability

to immunosuppress,

to reduce people's immunity.

So immunosuppression

in the '70s, '80s and '90s

could easily be causing cancers

in the 2000s and the teens

and the '20s.

So there's theoretical reasons

why there would be a link

between this contamination

and...

...and what I believe to be

a cancer cluster.

NED: There isn't an ailment

that they haven't tied to this.

I mean, childhood development,

immune system response,

cancers,

thyroid disease.

And this was all similar

to what they saw

back in the '70s

with those animal studies.

They saw these same effects

in animals in the '70s

this was, um...

that we're seeing now in people.

(UNSETTLING MUSIC)

"The shocking news

that a proprietary chemical

"made exclusively by 3M

is toxic and present

"in the blood

of the general population

"attracts the attention of 3M's

highest-ranking executives,

"including CEO

and chairman of the board

"Mr Lewis Lehr.

"A May 26, 1978 memo confirms

"arrangements for a meeting

at 9:30am, July 12

"in Mr Lehr's conference room.

"The subject -

fluorochemicals in blood."

Well, of course

he wants to know,

because his product is poisoning

the general public

and the monkeys had d*ed,

so I'm sure he wants to do

the right thing.

NED: So they knew they had

an obligation to report.

So then the next question is,

"Are we required to report?

"Does this rise to the level

that we're supposed to report?"

"3M consulted

two outside scientists,

"Dr Jerry R. Mitchell

and Dr Harold C. Hodge."

GARY: They referred to him

internally,

in one of their internal

documents as, quote,

"Dr Harold C. Hodge,

"a world-renowned expert

"in fluorine and fluoride

metabolism."

So he's not a nobody.

GARY: Good morning, Mr Gerber.

How are you?

Good morning.

I'm well, thank you.

Um, have you ever had

your deposition taken before?

No, I have not.

OK.

Probably what's most important

about Mr Gerber's deposition

is that he wasn't there

as Mr Gerber.

He was there as what's called

a corporate representative.

So, in law, you can say,

"Hey, dear company X,

"I want to know

what the company knows

"about X, Y and Z."

And the company

is then obligated

to get someone prepared

and knowledgeable on a topic

and then let you interview them.

And that's who they put up.

They put up Mr Gerber.

(GARY READS)

"It should be determined

"if FC-807 or its metabolites

"are present in man."

Does that indicate to you

that, at this point in time,

3M did not disclose to Dr Hodge

that they in fact

had information

indicating that PFOS

was "present in man"?

I...I guess I can't speak

to the full scope

of what 3M disclosed

to Dr Hodge.

Um...

But, yeah, I...I think that

that's a reasonable reading

of that sentence.

GARY: And let's read

this last sentence.

Dr Hodge wanted the people

who attended this meeting

to know that, "If the levels

are high and widespread

"and the half-life is long,

"we could have

a serious problem."

If we could just, um,

put the draft meeting minutes

next to the final

meeting minutes.

So Dr Hodge

wanted the company to know

and wanted the official

meeting minutes to reflect

that if this chemical's

in everyone's blood,

and if the half-life is long,

you have a "serious problem".

And that was removed from

the official meeting minutes,

wasn't it, sir?

I...I don't see

that final statement

in... in the second copy

of the meeting minutes.

(INTENSE MUSIC)

Nobody would be

that unscrupulous

to literally delete something.

It's like...

it's like Richard Nixon

and the, uh...

you know, the missing minutes

from the tape.

"The day after the meeting

with Dr Hodge,

"the same nine 3M employees

travel on a 3M company plane

"to Houston, Texas,

"to meet with

another external expert,

"this time,

Dr Jerry R. Mitchell."

GARY: One of the explicit things

that must always be reported

is cancer, fair?

Yeah, there's...

there's a... a strong bias

towards reporting

in those cases.

Got it.

Do me a favour -

turn to page three.

The third comment he provides to

these individuals at 3M.

(JON READS) "Some of

the symptoms in animals

"from these 90-day studies

"are similar to those observed

with carcinogens."

GARY: Now look at the final,

and I want you to tell me

if that has been removed

from the final meeting minutes.

JON: I do see at the bottom

of page two

and that top of page three

there are numbers 1 and 2,

there's not a number 3.

"The statement by Dr Mitchell

"is removed from the final

draft of the meeting minutes."

This world-renowned expert,

his conclusion

was completely deleted

from the final draft.

It's really like, "Holy sh*t!"

kind of.

It was our "Holy sh*t!" moment.

- (LAUGHS) Yeah.

- Like, "People do this?!"

Arguably the most important

sentence of the entire thing.

The CEO knew. You know,

that's good enough for me.

This wasn't some obscure

nerd in a corner.

This was the head of the company

was aware of this information.

Total and complete criminal...

...behaviour.

(GRIM MUSIC)

GARY: Good morning, Mr Bacon.

How are you this morning?

Not bad, and you?

I'm pretty good.

I'm here to take

your deposition.

My name's Gary Douglas

from the law firm

Douglas and London.

So, and if I understand

correctly,

you worked for 3M

from 1968 to 2008,

is that correct?

Yes.

Dr Griffith shared with you

that Taves and Guy

had found PFOS...

...had been found in the blood

of non-occupationally exposed

persons in the community.

He shared that with you

at this coffee meeting

around the water cooler.

That's how you first

heard about it, right?

That's the way I remember it, right.

We're sort of learning this

in real time

as we're taking his deposition

because we had

no internal documents

reflecting these

water cooler talks,

and I was thinking to myself,

"Should I ask him when?"

Do you remember when you had

this discussion "over coffee"?

Let's put it that way.

I was literally thinking,

"Well, it had to have been

much later on."

And he leans forward

into the camera and says...

Frank Griffith d*ed

in about 1980-something.

I would assume

it was before then.

It was kind of shocking

in that how he was so candid

about it,

and his guard was down,

you know?

And I'm sure the lawyers

who were not on camera

were probably going like,

"Oh, my God,

what did he just say?"

'Cause the company line

has always been

they did not know until 1998.

I think I put my microphone...

- ...on mute.

- Mute.

And I looked at Rebecca.

I said, "Did I just hear that?"

Like, "Are you kidding?"

They were talking about this

so casually

around the water cooler,

over coffee, for decades.

And I think part of the reason

it was so shocking

is that deposition,

I think, came after

a number of other depositions

where we had heard them

basically saying that

that information, they

learned that right in 1998,

maybe late 1997.

So we were totally expecting

him to take the company line,

indicate the same time line,

and so when he said that,

I think it really was

kind of like,

"Did I hear that right?"

GARY: True or false?

By 1980, 3M was in possession

of information

that PFOS

was a bioaccumulative compound

that was widespread

in the blood

of the general population,

and that it k*lled

rhesus monkeys

that were exposed to it.

3M had all that information,

decided not to disclose it

at that time in 1980, correct?

Yes, I...I've reviewed documents

that, uh, you know, after those

studies were conducted,

uh, that information

was reviewed

against EPA's

reporting criteria,

and, uh, the company

made the determination

that the information was not

substantial risk information

under TSCA 8(e).

NED: 3M knew that PFOS

was persistent,

bioaccumulative and toxic.

3M knew that it was coming

from their products.

They knew that they were

the only company

that made these chemicals.

They knew they had an obligation

under federal law

to report such information,

and yet they told nobody

anything.

They violated federal law.

(UNEASY MUSIC)

While this is taking place,

they are increasing production

of PFOS,

or POSF, which is the compound

that converts to PFOS

in the environment

and in human blood.

ROB: In the total grand history

of 3M's production of PFOS,

something like 90% of it

was produced after they learned

it was in everyone's blood,

after they learned it was toxic,

after they learned it was...

it k*lled these monkeys.

There were companies and people

that knew this was happening,

that knew the nature

and extent of this thr*at,

but did it anyway,

profited enormously for decades.

And in the meantime,

the entire world

has been exposed.

- (KOOKABURRAS LAUGH)

- (WAVES CRASH)

Just to the right here,

you'll see

this is the signs that the

Department of Defence put up.

(READS) "Mary Creek is currently

being tested for PFAS.

"As a precaution, Mary Creek

is closed to human use."

Well, this is one of

our sacred sites.

This is of great importance.

As a kid,

oh, we used to come up here

nearly every weekend,

swimming in the...

under the falls

and bathing in the ponds.

It's devastating.

It's heart-wrenching.

(WOMAN SINGS SORROWFULLY

IN INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE)

MAN: Tsss!

(WOMAN CONTINUES SINGING)

WOMAN: We sing that song

'cause that keeps us

culturally connected

to the land and to the water,

to the animals, to the sounds.

And that's how we call out

to our old people,

to our ancestors.

(GULLS CRY)

MAN: Our fish

have been poisoned.

Our land's been poisoned

and sick.

WOMAN: If she's sick,

we're sick.

If she's sad, we're sad.

If she's hurting, we're hurting.

(BIRDSONG)

(WATER TRICKLES GENTLY)

This one here,

this is a native sarsaparilla.

And for us here in this area,

this is probably

the most important medicine

that we have here.

All the stuff that's coming

through the ground here...

...is directly connected to all

these special plants for us.

(DARK MUSIC)

This medicine, the knowledge,

this is the sort of stuff

that's irreplaceable.

What do we do?

When I first found out

that it was contaminated,

like, I felt betrayed.

Especially when I found out

where it came from, you know?

It had come from

the Defence Force,

who are here to serve

and protect our people.

MAN: Good afternoon,

ladies and gentlemen.

I'm the Deputy Secretary

in the Department of Defence.

We've had doctors

travel from Darwin,

Alice Springs and that,

who work for

the Aboriginal health.

They've come here to Wreck Bay.

They've never seen

so much sickness

in one little tiny little place.

Youse haven't been consistent

from the start.

And youse expect our community

to believe your stories

that you come...

You come here with your

PowerPoint presentations

every time

you come and talk to us.

To be honest with you, I'm done

with this... this seminar

'cause we keep getting crap.

- Come on, I'm going.

- Just wait.

I'm out of here. I've got better

things to do than listen to you.

WOMAN: Do you know what

a sacred site is?

Deadset.

You're trained

to fill our heads with sh*t.

Each time the Department

of Defence come down,

they just kept going over

the same old thing,

same old thing all the time.

Just seemed like

they were trying to

brush something

under the carpet.

I just had a sense of feeling

that they were up to something.

And I just got sick of it.

FEMALE REPORTER: There are now

thousands of families

in communities

around the country

affected by an unfolding scandal

over chemical contamination

from Defence Force bases.

MALE REPORTER:

Nationwide, 28 Defence sites

are caught up in the crisis.

The Australian Government,

the Federal Government,

they knew they had

a big problem

by 2000-2002,

no question about it.

Our government knows

that our children are being

exposed to chemicals

and ongoing poisoning

and they're doing nothing.

MARIANN: There was

this huge period of time

when people could have

made decisions

that protected them

and their children,

but that didn't happen

because government

left them ignorant.

MALE REPORTER: In 2015,

Williamtown residents

were told that PFAS chemicals

from firefighting foam

had leached into groundwater

and onto their properties,

raising health fears

and rendering their homes

worthless.

We've had to sue

our own government

to get that justice

that we deserve.

FEMALE REPORTER:

The Defence Department

has already settled

claims by residents

from Williamtown in NSW,

Oakey in Queensland

and Katherine

in the Northern Territory,

paying millions in compensation.

JAMES: I hear

all this other stuff

about these class actions

going on around Australia.

Why aren't we

forming our class action?

What's going on with

our class action, then?

WOMAN: We were up until late

looking up on the internet,

and then that's when we found

Shine Lawyers.

(UNEASY MUSIC)

(PHONE RINGS)

Hello.

Hey, Josh, pretty good.

Yep.

That's great news.

That's what we want.

Got a lot of people

down this way

that are wanting some justice.

FEMALE REPORTER:

In a David and Goliath battle,

the Wreck Bay community has

teamed up with Shine Lawyers

to take class action against

the Commonwealth of Australia.

FEMALE REPORTER 2:

The traditional owners

have just lodged a class action

for loss of culture due to

the contamination of their land.

JOSH: In our current

Western justice system,

we're trying to figure out

the loss of culture.

What is that worth?

Um, and that is something

which is just unprecedented

in our current court system

to try to figure out

a way to do that.

The Commonwealth

are gonna make us prove that

there is culture there,

that they actually have culture.

Which seems ridiculous that

we have to show that, but we do.

Then we have to show how that

culture's actually been lost,

how they can't pass it down

for future generations,

because that's our case.

Legally, it is

a very challenging case.

There's no two ways about it.

It's very difficult. It's

unprecedented in so many ways.

(DOG BARKS)

- JAMES: Hey, buddy. How are ya?

- James. Good.

- Good to see you, mate.

- Yeah, likewise.

Come inside. I'll introduce you

to Mum and Dad.

JOSH: Excellent.

Do you, um... did you grow up

eating bush foods and...

Yes.

...and going to the bush

for bush medicine?

- Yes, we did.

- Yeah.

Like, if we had boils and that,

we used the ribgrass

for the boils

and inkweed for our skin

and bathed in the inkweed.

How does it make you feel

when part of your culture now,

it can't be passed on

in some ways?

(TEARFULLY) Yeah.

In many ways, it can't.

(AUNTY NORMA SNIFFLES)

We've lost a lot.

- (SOLEMN MUSIC)

- (BIRDS WARBLE)

WOMAN: The effect of

the contamination on them,

it's been, um, really sad

to hear story after story

of people that have lived

in this area for generations.

They're heartbroken.

JOSH: Quite often

in First Nations matters,

and Wreck Bay is no exception,

you have these preservation

of evidence hearings

before trial

because trial could be

two, three years away.

And, you know, sad to say,

but there'll be many people

in Wreck Bay

that won't make

two to three years.

(GENTLE MUSIC)

(BIRDS SING)

JOSH: Vida's an elder

in the community

and her family have

been there forever,

and Vida is very unwell.

She's desperate to tell

her story to the Commonwealth.

- Hello.

- VIDA: Hello.

This is William.

- Pleasure to meet you, William.

- JOSH: The barrister.

WILLIAM: Lovely to meet you.

I'm the senior barrister

on the case,

so I'm gonna be the one that's

sitting in the court tomorrow.

Tell me what this area is.

VIDA: That's the creek

at Summercloud just down here.

We used to swim there

from daylight till dark.

All that foam

that used to come down,

we didn't understand

what it was all about, did we?

We used to think

it was wonderful, you know,

jumping up and down

splashing the water and...

- UNCLE PAUL: Making foam.

- ...all this foam.

It's gonna be like

a proper court hearing

as they have it in our system.

The judge will be wearing robes.

- He's insisted upon that.

- Yeah.

- So I'll be wearing robes too.

- UNCLE PAUL: Yeah, yeah.

WILLIAM:

As will my junior, um...

- And I have to wear robes too?

- (ALL LAUGH)

You'd probably look better

in them than I do.

(ALL LAUGH)

(THUNDER RUMBLES)

I didn't know it was gonna

turn out like this, you know,

for me to be chosen to get up

and speak in a courtroom

in front of

the High Court judge.

I don't want to give that

impression of being a radical.

I just want to be me, you know?

Get up!

(LAUGHS)

Being the clown.

Oh, thank you.

It's what I need -

a bit of a kick.

This ochre I'm putting on me,

the men's ochre, is red ochre.

And what it does...

...it gives me permission

to act on behalf

of all our clan,

my clan that come

from this country here.

I'm gonna put some ochre on Mum.

This ochre comes from country.

It connects us

to our old people.

(GENTLE MUSIC)

WOMAN: I am proud of Mum.

Mum had said yesterday

that she's tired,

but she's happy

that she's getting to share

her side of the story

and, you know, a lot of people

have not made it this far.

MAN: I want to make sure

I've got your whole story.

This is your opportunity to tell

your story about everything

related to what you say

you suffered

through this contamination.

(TENSE MUSIC)

REBECCA: We're still two months

out for the trial to begin

and it's gonna be a long trial.

And right now, I think

we're still far enough out

that I think we're just all

sort of trying to remain calm

and not, you know, get too...

too overly stressed too soon

'cause it's a long

road ahead, right?

GARY: There's always

a lot of pressure,

but, you know, that's the job.

They didn't enlist me.

I volunteered.

So, yeah, there's

definitely pressure.

- (TENSE MUSIC)

- (BOTH SPEAK INDISTINCTLY)

GARY: I can't think

of an environmental case

that is as pervasive as this one

and as urgent

for our own health and safety.

And this is where we can

level the playing field

between the average Joe

and giant corporations.

Like, in this case,

we're talking about 3M.

They have tremendous resources.

And this is a place,

a courtroom,

where we can level

the playing field.

They pled their ignorance.

They didn't reveal it.

But within the confines

in the... of private offices,

they spoke about it casually.

And I guess that was

the mentality back then,

that if you can get away

with it, you get away with it,

until, um, the 1990s.

(INTRIGUING MUSIC)

The person at 3M

who was in charge

of monitoring worker blood -

because they were

worried about their workers

who would work with it,

those folks had higher

levels of it in their blood

because they were

working with it -

and he was sort of overwhelmed

with his job.

Um...

His name is Dale Bacon

and he'd been with the company

for about 40 years.

This is where it gets

Keystone Kop-ish.

He went and hired a company, um,

that was known

not for measuring contaminants

or compounds in human blood,

but for measuring, um,

compounds in racehorses.

(HORSE WHICKERS)

NED: We always colloquially

called him 'Horse Track Jack'.

He's famous for

catching doping horses,

you know, like,

horses that are being fed

medicines they're

not supposed to

to make them run faster

in horse races.

It would be funny

if it wasn't so serious.

(HORSE SNORTS)

NED: So Dr Henion was helping 3M

in its program of testing its

workers for PFOS in their blood.

GARY: What he didn't contemplate

was that Dr Henion

would do good work.

And what you do

when you are gonna test

the levels of PFOS

in the worker blood

is look for what we call blanks

to compare it to.

You got to find

blood from people

who are not likely to have

been exposed, non-workers.

And he, of course,

is startled to find

that there's PFOS in every one

of the samples that he took.

He didn't just sit

right on his report.

He picked up the phone.

And Dr Bacon talked about

this in his deposition -

he received the phone call

from Dr Henion

because it was urgent.

"Hey, buddy, I'm finding

"your company's chemical

in everybody's blood."

GARY: He calls

with startling news

because he was finding

quantifiable levels of PFOS

not just in the worker blood

that you sent for analysis,

but in blood of non-3M-workers

he obtained on his own

from Red Cross-pooled blood,

the blood bank

at the Red Cross, correct?

That's, uh... I believe so. Yes.

NED: Some of

the lawyers within 3M,

they go to their

head toxicologist,

this guy Dr John Butenhoff,

and they say, "OK, well, how

much is in everyone's blood?"

And he pulled up the data

and he said, "There's about

30 parts per billion.

"That's the average amount

in Americans' blood."

And they go,

"OK, what's the safe amount?"

He goes, "Well, hang on.

Let me do some calculations,"

And he used data

that they had from the '70s,

those monkey studies,

and calculated that a safe

level, in his expert opinion,

was about 1 part per billion,

meaning the average American

had 30 times - 3,000% -

more PFOS in their blood

than what their head

toxicologist said was safe.

GARY: There was another

document that we found,

which was

a draft manuscript, 1998.

There was a note, a curious

note, that we found on it.

It's obviously

a Post-it that says,

"John, now that the -

quote - lid is off,

"Kris would like

to get this paper out.

"Any problem?"

We never understood that.

"The lid is off?

The lid is off what?"

And I remember

I was riding in my car

and I got a call from Rob Bilott

and he said, "Gary...

"..don't forget

to use the document

"about 'the lid is off',"

and I said, "Rob,

what are you talking about?"

And he said, "You know,

the one with the Post-it

"that says 'Now that the lid

is off, it's OK to publish',"

and that... it hit me.

"I get it now!

"That's what... that's where

that piece of the puzzle fits."

It's just a consciousness

of what they were doing.

Mm-hm, yeah.

It wasn't, "Oh, my God!

"I can't believe that our

product is in everyone's blood!

"What should we do?"

"Now that the lid is off,"

suggests, you know, a cover-up.

"Gee, the lid is off.

"I guess we gotta

come clean now."

And that's when they decided

to finally tell the EPA

what they've known

for 23 years -

that it was in everyone's blood.

It was in May of 1998

they told the EPA,

and promptly after that,

the EPA said, "OK, well,

you're out of the business.

"You can't make this anymore."

It took them four years to do it

and during that four years,

they increased production,

during that four years, they

sent letters to the customers

encouraging them to buy more

before they quit selling it.

It was like

a going-out-of-business sale.

It wasn't like,

"Oh, no, this is so bad."

WOMAN: Do you solemnly swear the

testimony you're about to give

to be the truth, the full truth

and nothing but the truth?

Yes, I do.

NED: That deposition

was the very first deposition

we took in the case

and we were so startled

by how well that deposition went

and how honest he was

and how forthright he was

and I think it was because

it was over Zoom.

It was because

he didn't have his lawyers

there with him, you know,

at the conference table.

He was in his home.

I think he was in his kitchen,

at his home,

and was just being frank and

honest with us and it was a...

You know... you know, the results

speak for themselves.

NED: And in each

and every one of these media

all around the world,

in Dr Butenhoff's opinion,

the source of PFOS

is more likely

than not 3M, correct?

Thank you for the logo.

Uh, yes, I mean, I...

Other than the fact that there

might be some manufacturing,

I think that more likely

than not the source is 3M, yes.

He basically acknowledged

that if you find a molecule of

PFOS anywhere on planet Earth,

3M made it.

Now, we've known that.

We know we can prove it.

But just to have a head

scientist within the company

just admit it in black-and-white

and even use the legal buzzwords

"more likely than not",

that's the standard of proof

we have here in the States.

CARRIE: So, Wreck Bay,

it's an Aboriginal community

of about 400 people

and it's sort of nestled

within this national park

at Jervis Bay.

There's sort of as I see it...

And, you know, you guys

might think differently,

but there's sort of three

main arcs to the story.

So there's this issue

of cultural loss

and then health seems to be

a really big issue down there

and then there's

sort of these issues

of how much did Defence know,

should things

have been done differently?

It's the incidence of health

impacts you're talking about

above the standard norms

you'd be expecting to see

in a community of this size

of those diseases?

I managed to find

one data source

that looks at rates

of premature death.

Looking at Wreck Bay

comparatively,

it had one of the highest rates

of years of life

lost prematurely

in the whole of Australia

and in some years,

it had the highest rate.

Who is trying to stop you

telling this story?

I can't imagine that

the Department of Defence

will want me to tell this story.

I've heard sort of anecdotally

they weren't very happy

that I was moving on

to start looking at Wreck Bay.

- Too bad.

- CARRIE: Mmm.

(PENSIVE MUSIC)

Thank you.

We've come to the offices

of the National Archives

of Australia

and it basically

is this giant repository

of every government document

that was created prior to 2002.

The Australian Government

got the letter from 3M in 2000

to say that, "We're going

to stop making this product,"

but that doesn't mean that

was the first they ever knew

about the firefighting foam

being hazardous

or being dangerous.

There's thousands of pages

that are all irrelevant

to what we're doing,

so it's quite difficult,

but I just know that

if you check everything,

you can potentially

find that bit of gold

or that smoking g*n

that you've been looking for

that can change the whole game.

(PENSIVE MUSIC CONTINUES)

(CLOCK TICKS)

So I'm in the last

bundle of documents.

I've spent three days here

and, sure enough, in the last

page of the last bundle

is an extraordinary document.

So this document

is from November 1981.

(READS) "Currently,

liquid waste containing AFFF

"from the firefighting

training exercises

"are allowed to discharge

"over the surface

of the adjacent land.

"The wastes have penetrated

a considerable distance

"and have almost reached

"the Aboriginal settlement

at Mary Bay.

"For environmental reasons,

"this situation is unacceptable

and should be discontinued."

So they knew in 1981...

...that the foam was in the

water, escaping off the base

and they knew it was

environmentally unacceptable.

This has to be the most

expl*sive information

that I've found in terms

of the PFAS issue in Australia.

And you think of the extent of

the environmental devastation

that's been caused

over the whole country

that could have been avoided.

JAMES: They knew when they

hosed all that PFAS chemical

off down into the bush

that was gonna go

straight down into our...

...if not our village,

through all our sacred sites

and into the ocean where

we hunted and gathered every day

and that was gonna

destroy our community.

They knew that.

CARRIE: When I got these

documents, I went back over

and looked at what Defence

officials had actually said

when they were questioned

about these kind of issues.

And so the former

deputy secretary

of the Department of Defence

said in the early 2000s,

"There was no evidence

that this product

"was particularly dangerous

"either to the environment

or to human health.

"I don't think

we appreciated in 2004

"that this contaminant was

leaving Defence properties."

Those documents

directly contradict that.

You can only assume

he's been misinformed.

It would appear

from what you're telling me

that there has

been some level of concern

within the Australian Government

since the early 1980s

about the danger of this stuff

getting into a water supply

and nothing's

been done about it.

CARRIE: Yep.

MAN: The traditional owners

of Wreck Bay land

have reached

a $22 million settlement

of their PFAS

contamination class action

against the Commonwealth

of Australia.

While this is a victory

for this First Nations group,

the Wreck Bay community

has to grapple with the impacts

of PFAS contamination

for years to come.

The monetary compensation

that comes out of

the Western legal system

isn't going to be enough

to compensate

for that breaking

of the connection to the land

and the cultural loss,

but we had to grapple with those

issues as best as we could.

I'm a bit concerned that,

to a lot of people,

that's not gonna

feel like enough

to compensate

for the destruction

that PFAS has caused

to their culture.

There will be an opportunity

for people to object,

so it will be very interesting

to see how that will play out

and what sort of reaction

the judge will have

to those objections.

(PENSIVE MUSIC)

JAMES: We're a united community

so we're gonna

keep on fighting this.

We're gonna come together

and we're gonna show

this Department of Defence,

this entity that's so powerful,

that we're powerful too.

(PENSIVE MUSIC CONTINUES)

(MUSIC RISES)

(BOTH SPEAK INAUDIBLY)

(MUSIC CONTINUES)

LEE: I have read the objections,

but if anyone

does wish to speak,

then they're of course

free to do so.

AUNTY JEAN: We are

determined to expose

and put a stop to

the callous government's

past and present use of poison

sprayed in the form

of the grim reaper PFAS.

UNCLE PAUL:

We can't take our children

and our grandchildren

and our great-grandchildren

to parts of the land

that have been affected.

ASHLEE: We have lost an integral

part of our identity,

our sense of belonging,

our connection to our country,

the waterways,

the lands, the skies

and the people who walked

this land before us.

MAN: A thousand years from now,

our children's

children's children

are gonna know on 19 June, 2023,

that a small contingency

of our community

have stood tall against

the Department of Defence

to try and ensure their futures.

LEE: This is a very

catastrophic thing

that's happened

and the question here for me

is are you going

to get more money

running this case

to a conclusion

or is a better outcome

taking the money

that's on offer now

which has been negotiated

and which the lawyers think

is fair and reasonable?

(CAMERAS CLICK)

(PEOPLE SPEAK INDISTINCTLY)

So, unfortunately, the judge

agreed with the settlement offer

today of 22 million

and siding with

the Commonwealth,

that that's a fair and just

settlement.

- So he says.

- So he says.

(SOLEMN MUSIC)

A settlement could

be reached this month

in a court case

involving a corporate giant

in the City of Stuart.

A lawsuit claims

that, for decades,

a toxic forever chemical

tied to health issues,

including cancer,

was pouring into the city's

groundwater and drinking water.

And now the city is

the face of a national fight

to have the manufacturer

pay for the clean-up

that hundreds of communities

have to tackle.

GARY: And if we can prove

the City of Stuart

is entitled to be compensated,

then what does that say

about what New York City

is entitled to

or cities like Miami

who happens to be

very heavily contaminated?

So that's what

this first case is about.

For me, it's sort of, I guess,

the pinnacle of my career.

(LAUGHS) I'm getting

a little too old for this,

but I can't see anything

that's more important

than seeing this through

and seeing that justice is done

and the parties responsible

for contaminating our planet

are held responsible.

(BIRDSONG)

REBECCA: Our anticipation

is that we will be

picking a jury

starting this morning

and be here for

at least five weeks.

GARY: We have been in the final

laps of a very long marathon.

(PEOPLE CHATTER INDISTINCTLY)

MAN: OK, great. Here we go.

GARY: And we were literally at

the proverbial courthouse steps

when we were told that there

was something in the works.

(TENSE MUSIC)

(LOW MOMENTOUS MUSIC)

GARY: I guess we all thought

we'd be in the middle

of jury selection right now

and I know everybody

has that bittersweet feeling.

We've all been working so hard

and, uh, we were ready.

You know, this is what

this case is all about

and, you know, this was one of

the demonstratives

who we were gonna use.

I was gonna say to our jurors

that they are looking at...

an image,

a model of a molecule,

a speck of matter

that neither God nor nature

brought into this world

and this molecule was man-made

and man-made by one company

and one company alone,

the 3M company.

And I know

it's frustrating for everybody

that we're unable

to tell that story.

I know that you're all

conscientious lawyers,

environmental lawyers

and I know that each

and every one of you here today

worked hard to bring that story

and I want to thank you all

for your hard work.

The reason that we're all

in this room here today

and the reason that 3M ran

from the court is because of us.

They weren't afraid of the EPA.

They weren't afraid of lying

to regulators around the world

or lying to the m*llitary.

They were willing to do anything

to protect their pocketbook

and the fact is

is that

this is what made them

worried about that.

It was a team effort

and I couldn't be prouder to be

part of it, so thank you all.

(PEOPLE CHATTER QUIETLY)

REBECCA: There's a bit of a

shock value going on right now.

We've been obviously working

for years to put it together,

so it was sort of the moment

of getting that opportunity.

It was gonna be the big...

sort of the big day.

Even though someone

can be given monetary value

to help address whatever problem

they're claiming or alleging,

it doesn't totally make you feel

like justice was done

all the time

if you don't get the actual...

...get to put the actual conduct

on trial.

(SOFT SOMBRE MUSIC)

GARY: They got away with it.

We didn't get to tell the story.

I almost feel, like, dirty.

It's like hush money.

But I have an obligation

to our clients.

I think their decision to settle

it has a lot to do with the fact

that they really were afraid

of even an opening statement

and their dirty laundry was

about to be aired in a big way.

We know 3M will,

to their last breath,

take the position

that PFAS is harmless

at the levels found in blood

and in the environment.

But even still,

people have a right

to know it's in them.

ROB: Right now

we're dealing with,

really, global

contamination problems.

These PFAS chemicals

have been used

in such an incredible array

of products

over the last 70 to 80 years.

Stain-resistant

waterproof clothing,

carpeting, fast-food wrappers

and packaging, cosmetics,

things that are waterproof,

things that are greaseproof,

things that are non-stick.

These chemicals have been used

in so many different products,

you're really dealing

with global contamination

on an unprecedented scale.

MARK: It's in the water.

It's in the air.

It's in the food.

It's everywhere.

There's nothing you can do

without coming

into contact with it.

It's... it's intense, man.

It's huge.

(SOLEMN VOCAL MUSIC)

My name is Amara Strande

I'm 20 years old.

And at the age of 15,

I was diagnosed

with stage IV fibrolamellar

hepatocellular carcinoma.

Growing up,

I lived in the 3M plume

and attended

Tartan Senior High School

where I met many classmates

that were also

directly affected by cancer

as a result of what

we now understand

these chemicals to be - PFAS.

CARRIE: I never realised

that meeting with her

would have this ripple effect.

She went to the lawmakers

in Minnesota

and she tried to convince them

to ban PFAS

and it worked.

Corporations must stop

the production of these toxins

and be held accountable

and pay for the damage

they've done.

We need stricter regulations

on the use of PFAS chemicals

and more research to be done

on the long-term effects

of exposure.

We also need more education

for the public...

- (SPEECH FADES)

- (MUSIC CONTINUES)

MAN: This spring, she was

asked to speak truth to power

by testifying before

legislative committees

about her experience

of having cancer

to give reasons why

the use of forever chemicals

should be banned

or greatly reduced in products.

We have been told

that her testimonies

were key in getting

the legislation passed.

CARRIE: It's called Amara's Law,

and Minnesota has become

the first place in the world

to enact laws to ban PFAS.

And that's not just banning,

like, one or two kinds of PFAS.

They're trying to eliminate

PFAS altogether there.

(SORROWFUL MUSIC)

It's really a harrowing thing

to write these stories

and I don't think it ever

leaves you when you see people

and you're sitting

and talking to them one day

and you see the fear and you see

the questions that they have

and then they're gone.

I hope people that read

the Wreck Bay stories,

that they can

connect to the love

that the Wreck Bay people have

for their land

and for their culture...

...because unless you can

feel that and understand,

you can't really understand

what they've lost

and you can't understand

the devastation

that these chemicals

have caused.

I hope it lands with the impact

that we feel like

the story deserves.

(SORROWFUL MUSIC CONTINUES)

JAMES: When our

physical bodies die

and we go back into the mother,

all that water

that's inside of us

goes back to the mother as well

and we drink that water

and our ancestors

live inside of us.

But now that PFAS

has poisoned that water...

...they don't just poison us.

They poison our ancestors...

...and everything

that's connected to Ngadjung,

or to our water.

('DEEP IN THE WATER'

BY THE GARY DOUGLAS BAND)

Man-made chemicals are

Poisoning the Earth

Chemists move molecules around

Like we move furniture

After we're dead and gone

It will be here

a million years

We'll all be dead and gone

We cried a billion tears

Those tears are flowing

Deep in the water

Flowing deep in the water

Flowing deep in the water

Flowing deep in the water

A devil with your suit and tie

I know your wicked little game

And we're rising up from

Deep in the water

Rising deep in the water

Sing it now,

brothers and sisters

Sons and daughters

The truth is lying

Deep in the water

The truth is rising up

The truth is rising up from

Deep in the water,

deep in the water

The truth is rising up

The truth is rising up from

Deep in the water...
Post Reply