Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

Accidental Truth: UFO Revelations (2023)

Curious minds want to know... Documentary Movie collection.

Moderators: Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters, Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters

Watch Docus Amazon   Docus Merchandise

Documentary movie collection.

Accidental Truth: UFO Revelations (2023)

Post by bunniefuu »

[SUSPENSEFUL MUSIC PLAYING]

RON JAMES: I'm sitting

in these rooms alone

with people who have run

secret weapons programs,

interrogated t*rrorists,

protected

closely-guarded secrets

as a profession,

and all I can think about

is getting them

to tell me something

they don't want me to know.

[EERIE MUSIC PLAYING]

It's gonna take somebody

at the executive level to do it,

or there's gonna be

a incredible leak somewhere

that's somebody's conscience,

and they don't end up, um,

you know, committing suicide

by 12 b*llet holes

to the back of the head

kind of thing.

[CAMERA SHUTTER CLICKING]

NARRATOR: The UFO reality

can no longer be denied.

The secret has been

managed and guarded

by a select few

for over 75 years.

Advanced technology,

biological and

physical materials

have been recovered.

They've been secretly studied

by compartmentalized factions

within both government

and industry.

These claims are not new.

But you are about to see

undeniable evidence

and previously

unpublished accounts

that make this case stronger

than ever before.

Somewhere between

fact and denial,

you are about to discover

an accidental truth.

[RADIO STATIC BUZZING]

MAN 1 OVER RADIO:

3-7-8-2-0-5-8-4.

MAN 2: Knees up. Knees up.

[HELICOPTER HOVERING]

[FIRE CRACKLING]

[PEOPLE CHATTERING INDISTINCTLY]

NARRATOR: In 2017,

the UFO subject exploded

into the mainstream.

PILOT 1: There's a whole fleet

of them. Look on the S.A.

PILOT 2: Whoa! Got him!

[BOTH LAUGHING AND WHOOPING]

NARRATOR: The New York Times

broke a front page story

about a shadowy

government program

studying UFOs.

October 2017.

Leslie Kean, who's

a notable expert on UFOs

she was invited to a very

private conference in Washington

with Lue Elizondo

and some other people,

Chris Mellon,

to discuss UFOs.

Lue Elizondo had just submitted

his resignation in October 2017,

as the head of this

very secretive

Pentagon UFO office.

Program was established.

It was initially

called AAWSAP,

Advanced Aerospace Weapon

System Applications Program,

and very quickly

that evolved,

morphed into the

more common vernacular

AATIP, Advanced Aerospace Threat

Identification Program.

I was brought in

initially to come in

to run the counterintelligence

and security piece

for this effort in 2008.

In 2010, I was asked

by the former director

to run this program.

The program was then

taken out of DIA

and up to the OSD level,

Office of Secretary of Defense.

The Pentagon had this secret

UFO monitoring agency

which nobody knew about.

New York Times, Politico,

and followed by them,

everyone else covering

the UFO subject

suddenly, with seriousness,

suddenly talking about

encounters by the U.S. Navy with

objects that are supposed

to be impossible.

The government

is investigating UFOs.

Well, I almost crashed my car.

NARRATOR: Three cryptic videos

were released

that claimed to show

unknown objects

operating in military airspace

while defying known

capabilities of flight

and physics.

BLUMENTHAL:

There are more of them

that have not been released.

These were only snippets,

by the way,

and we knew that.

But we were happy to get them.

And they caused quite a stir.

NARRATOR: Lue Elizondo

made the media rounds

with shocking statements.

My personal belief is that

there is very

compelling evidence that

we may not be alone.

Our cosmic neighborhood

may be a hell of a lot bigger.

And by the way, we might,

might, have neighbors.

That's a profound moment.

NARRATOR: At the 2018 symposium

of The Mutual UFO Network,

behind closed doors,

he went beyond

his public statements

to drop a bombshell.

Sometimes people

may have associated you

as being fringe

or being out there,

and all along, you were right.

NARRATOR: One of the pilots

who engaged the craft,

Commander David Fravor,

chimed in with bold statements

inferring otherworldly origins

of the mysterious phenomenon.

I believe, as do the other folks

that were on the flight,

that what we visually saw,

that it was something

not from this world.

You are talking to a pilot

who is looking at you

with complete bewilderment as to

looking to you for answers.

They're asking you,

"Sir, what was this?"

Congress is now looking

at the possibility

of national security

that the military is now

owning up to hours of videotapes

taken by Navy pilots.

There's been a sea change.

Things are changing.

People are more open

to the idea that,

yeah, maybe we're

not alone in the universe.

NARRATOR: We were given

an updated phrase

to describe it all.

Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon.

They're calling them

UAPs sometimes.

Sometimes UFO, sometimes UAP.

It's a kind of a rebranding

to a certain extent

and a redefinition

of what the phenomenon is.

NARRATOR: A new group called

To The Stars Academy of Arts

and Sciences was introduced.

We are To The Stars Academy

of Arts and Science.

A public benefit corporation.

NARRATOR:

The group was co-founded

by rock star Tom DeLonge.

I was working my way

through NASA,

the Department of Defense,

and various "other" agencies.

NARRATOR:

Its members spoke out,

hinting of

unprecedented openness

and straight answers

about the topic.

But who are

these people really?

Dr. Hal Puthoff,

former CIA operations officer.

Jim Semivan, a 50-year veteran

of NASA, the CIA, and the

National Security Agency.

Steve Justice,

former director of

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works.

Christopher Mellon,

former Undersecretary

of Defense for Intelligence.

Lue Elizondo,

fresh from a controversial

Pentagon resignation.

Was anybody going to

share anything that

brought us concrete answers?

It was the first time I really

digested the enormity

of the national security

implications of the UFO subject.

The CIA and all these people

associated with Skunk Works

and other intelligence agencies,

you're not the right people

to come out with this.

[CHUCKLES] You're really not.

Because you're the ones

that have been lying to us

for 70 years.

We haven't trusted

these individual agencies ever.

In fact, they've always

teased our community.

We are dealing with insiders.

We are dealing with people

who have been in government,

the military,

the intelligence community,

have access to

classified information.

But those people, all of them,

will have to be very careful.

For us to just go ahead

and spew out to satisfy

the idle curiosity of a few,

that's not our job.

Our job is to protect

this nation from enemies,

foreign and domestic.

For what it's worth, I see it

that they were trying to

make progress on this

within government,

they took it as

far as they could,

and then they realized that,

really, the only way

to move it further forward

was to leave government

and do it outside of that.

NARRATOR:

Some believe that this new

roll-out of information

was a cleverly crafted

set of events

being orchestrated

by hidden hands.

An evasive faction

who has controlled

this information for years.

I'm not a believer

in the conspiracy theory

that this is some plot to leak

it to The New York Times

and all that.

I mean, too many elements

came together

completely serendipitously.

And, you know,

looking back,

you can, you know,

try to make a case

that this was all orchestrated

and not at all true.

I think that this

was definitely something

that was organized,

thought out long-term.

Again, I think some...

I think they know,

and they're trying to

get ahead of something.

I think... I use the analogy

of a snowball at the top

of a hill,

and it starts out really small.

And as it rolls down,

it's going to get bigger

and bigger,

and I think they're trying

to get ahead of that.

You can't talk about

this subject with

a government background

without being the bad guy,

in some people's minds eye.

It just comes

with the territory.

I refuse to discuss

anything classified.

I've took an oath,

which is, by the way,

a lifelong oath.

As I've told people before,

don't ask me because

I'm not going to tell you.

Lue is in a tough spot,

because he knows

a lot of things that...

I mean, he still...

He was...

He came out of

the Intelligence community

and he probably still,

undoubtedly still has

connections to the

Intelligence community.

Well, you know, so he can't

say everything he knows

and has been privy to.

These people promoting this...

agenda of UFO openness,

not disclosure, but openness,

they have enemies

within that establishment.

So we're not talking

about a unified message.

It's very uncomfortable.

Especially if you've

lived a life

where anonymity

has been your friend.

We have every right

to know the truth.

And it's... It's not okay

that they're holding that back.

It is not

a fun place to be.

In fact,

if I had any opportunity

for anybody else to stand up

and take my place...

I would do it.

There are a lot of people

that want this information out

and there are a lot of people

who don't want

this information out.

The level of pushback that

Harry Reid shared

with me on camera.

When he tried to launch

this investigatory arm

into creating AATIP,

he said he got so much pushback

from the intelligence agencies,

that they, like,

tried to destroy people.

They really did not

want this to happen.

NARRATOR:

After the initial media flurry,

the Pentagon promised a report

that might shed some light

on the subject.

JAKE TAPPER:

Do you expect to see

real answers in this report?

What do you think?

Look. Honestly,

I don't think so, Jake.

NARRATOR:

The public only received

a few pages of

inconclusive information.

A more elaborate report

was delivered to Congress

behind closed doors.

Freedom of

Information Act requests,

known as FOIA requests,

were submitted.

The responses received

were heavily redacted.

Three years later,

three and a half years later,

no new evidence has come out.

We've got no new videos.

Nothing like that happened.

NARRATOR:

Congressman Tim Burchett

has become

an outspoken crusader

against the secrecy.

The American public

deserves to know.

We need transparency.

That's why nobody

trusts government.

Nobody trusts either party

when it comes down to it.

NARRATOR:

Instead of new answers,

we've been given

a whitewashing of the past

and further reinforcement

of a "New Narrative"

created to fit the day.

NARRATOR:

The New Narrative states that

the UAP's not ours

or any foreign government's.

They display characteristics

that defy explanation.

"We are committed

to determining their nature,

"and assessing

any potential threat."

There was no official

government study of the topic

after Project Blue Book

ended in 1969,

until the AAWSAP program

started in 2004.

By sort of extracting

a lot of the history out,

they're able

to make it seem like,

wow, this is

a real mystery here.

So, I don't agree with that.

I think their New Narrative,

I think they have this fear,

you know, that it's a threat.

And the word "threat"

kind of bothers me a little bit.

But I understand that in order

to get government attention,

they need to call it,

perhaps, a threat.

So we have an

ongoing situation here.

This is a defense issue.

It's an air safety issue.

It's a national security issue.

It's a valid issue.

There is something

flying around in our airspace

and we don't know what it is

or we're not telling what it is.

Eighteen months ago,

if you had asked anyone

in government the official line

on UFOs,

you would have received

a standard response

rather like this.

"There is no current interest

or involvement in the subject.

"Since the termination

of Blue Book in 1969,

"nobody in government

"is researching

or investigating this."

You know,

the department writ large

is clearly not interested

in UFOs whatsoever.

NARRATOR: This story leaves

a gap of over 35 years

that the government

was supposedly

not engaged in the study

of the phenomenon.

The media was quick

to participate

in the new story.

Were they complicit

in delivering this

new version of the facts?

There is a risk of believing

the official narrative

too quickly

and just reporting it.

There's many steps to go

and it's going to take a while.

And, you know, they still have

a totally compliant media,

for the most part.

I can tell you from my knowledge

of The New York Times.

The New York Times

is not afraid to

confront the government.

Having been legal counsel

for The New York Times

and for NBC News,

the people on the board

of editors of those things,

you know, feel themselves to

have a certain patriotic duty,

as they perceive them,

to not reveal anything

to the American public

that the National Security State

people don't want revealed.

So I don't want to be bound

[CHUCKLES] by what

Danny Sheehan said about his,

you know, concepts of what

The Times prints and doesn't.

NARRATOR: This New Narrative

has become the official story.

It was even stated as fact

by Andre Carson

at the beginning of the first

congressional UFO hearings,

in over 40 years.

More than 50 years ago,

the U.S. Government

ended Project Blue Book.

An effort to catalog

and understand

sightings of objects in the air

that could not otherwise

be explained.

For more than 20 years,

that project

had treated unidentified

anomalies in our airspace

as a national security threat

to be monitored

and investigated.

In 2017, we learned

for the first time that

the Department of Defense

had quietly restarted

a similar organization,

tracking what we now call

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

NARRATOR:

We've heard all of this before.

The New Narrative

is really an eerie echo

of 70-year-old events.

We can say that

the recent sightings

are in no way connected

with any secret development

by any agency

of the United States.

Aircraft, we call them aircraft,

are displaying characteristics

that are not currently

within the U.S. inventory,

nor in any foreign inventory

that we are aware of.

Air Force interest

in this problem

has been due to our

feeling of an obligation

to identify and analyze,

to the best of our ability,

anything in the air

that may have the possibility

of threat or menace

to the United States.

We know that our service members

have encountered

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

And because UAPs pose

potential flight safety

and general security risk,

we are committed

to a focused effort

to determine their origins.

However, there have been

a certain percentage

of this volume of reports

that have been made

by credible observers

of relatively incredible things.

It is this group of observations

that we now

are attempting to resolve.

There will be a recognized

concerted effort

to figure this out.

NARRATOR: The old story

was repeated almost verbatim

by the current players.

We're still far

from the goal line,

and there is a lot of positions

that they could

take along the way

that still will allow them

to maintain credibility

and avoid culpability.

The media and

the public want more.

They want answers.

I'm not sure that

there are going to be

easy answers to this.

They're trying to sweep anything

prior to 2004 under the carpet,

but we won't let them

because we've got

all the historical cases

and those can't go away.

They're not only

whitewashing history,

they're denying it.

They're only acknowledging

the phenomenon back to 2004.

The government has

a lot to answer for.

Absolutely right.

The history of the subject

has been replete

with misinformation

and disinformation.

It's just a complete cover up.

NARRATOR: What was going on

in the time between the closing

of Project Blue Book

and the beginning of

the officially announced

UFO programs

that we know about today?

Why is it important?

Because in those years,

is where the truth lies.

A truth that many have gone

to great lengths to conceal,

deny, and debunk.

We start by taking

a closer look

at the period between

1947 and 2005.

The existence

of official UFO research

and programs by

the U.S. Government

in this time frame

has been staunchly denied.

The facts challenge

that position.

In the late 1940s,

the world was recovering

from World w*r II.

The military was reorganizing.

In 1947, the Air Force

was being created

as a standalone branch

of service.

The Cold w*r

and its strategic questions

were looming.

But in the midst

of all of this,

the United States Army

created what they called

the Interplanetary

Phenomenon Unit

of the Scientific

and Technical branch.

Why did they need that?

Numerous FOIA request

verified the existence

of this Army program.

They state that

the unit disbanded

and was folded into

Project Blue Book in the 50s.

But the files of this group

are not part of the official

Project Blue Book Collection.

So where did they go?

During that time,

there was advanced technology

in the possession of Germany.

Scientists were brought over

after the w*r to continue

the work.

Stories of UFOs and

crashes were abundant,

including the famous

Roswell incident of 1947.

The late astronaut

Dr. Edgar Mitchell

was given secret information

about events of the time.

In this

never before seen video,

he shares what he was told.

Individuals at the Pentagon,

had been attempting

to get into the system

and find out about it,

thus confirming

and had confirmed.

that the Roswell incident

was real.

They saw some of the material

from the crashed spacecraft.

Some saw bodies from the beings

that were k*lled in that crash.

There were some

that saw a live being.

A live being had been

taken away and was

in the system somewhere.

So those were

real life incidents that

were reported to me.

NARRATOR: Many believe

in the formation of a group

called Majestic 12

assembled by President Truman,

to strategize about how

to handle the information

about these encounters

and more.

Documents purport

to detail the creation

and deployment of this group,

but their authenticity

is still a hotly debated topic.

It makes sense, however,

that under such circumstances,

just such a group

would have been formed.

They would have had

control of the subject

and accountability

to a select few.

If a decision was made

to enact secrecy,

this group would have

made it happen.

After years of UFO hysteria

and speculation between

1947 and 1952,

the government finally said

that they were taking

the subject seriously.

Enter Project Blue Book,

a public program

that was supposed to

shed light on the UFO subject.

Paul Hynek,

son of the late J. Allen Hynek,

shared this.

My father was the

chief scientific consultant

working alongside

Air Force counterparts.

And it became clear that

the role of Project Blue Book

wasn't to look for the truth,

but was to manufacture answers

and to tamp down hysteria.

Somebody called it the

Society for the Explanation

of the Uninvestigated.

My father had to question

whether he should

stay involved.

James McDonald,

one of his colleagues, said,

look, you're being played

a fool by the Air Force,

and my father

thought a lot about it.

He finally decided that

having that

front row center seat

to all these goings on

and being able to

influence things, not control,

was worth the trouble.

But it became increasingly

frustrating for him over time,

as he saw that the Air Force

was not changing their colors.

NARRATOR: J. Allen Hynek

was openly frustrated

by the fact he was

never given access

to what he knew were compelling

events shrouded in secrecy.

It haunted him

until his passing in 1986.

Official Air Force statements

regarding the conclusion

of Blue Book say,

"Since the termination

of Project Blue Book,

"nothing has occurred

that would support

"a resumption of

UFO investigations

by the Air Force."

But another four-year request

revealed a different story.

A 1969 memo from

General Carroll Bolender,

a senior director at Air Force

Research and Development,

stated, "After Blue Book

was dissolved,

"that reports of 'UFOs'

"would still continue

to be handled

"through a standard

Air Force procedure

"designed for this purpose.

"Furthermore, reports of

unidentified flying objects

"which could affect

national security were, are,

"not part of the

Blue Book system."

There was the creation

of the Air Intelligence

Service squadrons,

which were tasked

with going to any spot

in the continental

United States,

within six hours

and picking up debris,

fallen pilots, and also

containing information leak.

And so many people think

that that would have been

the entity or the agency

that gave birth to

the Men in Black.

What seems to be clear

is that there was a bifurcation.

That Project Blue Book

may have started off

as a serious

scientific endeavor,

but as of 1953,

it no longer was,

and there was most likely

the Air Intelligence

Service squadrons

that picked up the banner

of going out and

trying to find saucers

and then hand them off to people

who would try

to reverse-engineer

the propulsion systems,

et cetera.

DON SCHMITT:

General Arthur Exon

described to us

when he was base commander

at Wright-Patterson

Air Force Base in 1964,

that there would be

an ongoing joke

that the Blue Book, you know,

a two-man team would fly off

in a little single engine plane

in one direction,

and then the actual project

would arrive from Washington

on a commercial flight,

they would change back

into their uniforms,

and a team of 12-15 officers

would fly off in a jet

to actually conduct

full-scale investigations.

NARRATOR:

Project Blue Book

was headquartered

at Wright-Patterson

Air Force Base,

but some of the other,

more secret UFO programs

seem to have been

located there, too.

One of these is

the mysterious Blue Room,

an underground repository

of recovered technology

and debris.

MICHAEL: This is the location,

allegedly, where they

brought the bodies

and the craft from

the Roswell crash

and where all of the other

crash retrievals and bodies,

kind of like they have

a consortium of where

they keep all this.

So you've got the bodies,

you've got the craft,

you've got the debris,

autopsy reports,

the eight-by-ten glossy

black and white photographs,

and the g*n camera footage

is all supposed to be kept

at the Blue Room,

some type of

an underground vault

or Building 18 at

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

NARRATOR:

Senator Barry Goldwater

sought confirmation of this.

At Wright-Patterson field,

if you could get

into certain places,

you find out what the Air Force

and the government knows

about UFOs.

Reportedly, a spaceship landed

and it was all hushed up,

quiet, and nobody ever...

I've never heard

about much of it.

I called Curtis LeMay,

and I said, "General,

"I know we have a room

at Wright-Patterson,

"where you put

all the secret stuff.

"Could I go in there?"

I've never heard him get mad,

but he got madder

than hell at me.

Cussed me out,

said, "Don't ever

ask me that question."

NARRATOR: Supposedly,

the contents of the

Blue Room were filmed.

Exhaustive FOIA requests

finally revealed that this film

did indeed exist,

but was destroyed.

Nick Pope, a longtime

ex-British government pundit

on the topic,

denied official investigation

of the subject for years.

Until he didn't.

The more interesting

UFO sightings are

being looked at,

but not under the auspices

of a formally constituted

UFO research program.

We now know about

a government UFO program,

but we might not know about

the government UFO program.

[DRAMATIC MUSIC PLAYING]

NARRATOR: Pope has

told a story about

a picture that hung

on the wall of his office

for years

until being removed.

The Calvine incident

from the United Kingdom,

is one of the

most intriguing sightings

in the British government's

UFO files.

And for some years,

when I was working in

Ministry of Defense

main building on this issue,

we had a blown-up,

poster-sized enlargement

of one of the photos

that was taken.

The story is that two hikers

were out and they saw

a large diamond-shaped UFO.

At one point,

there was a military jet

in the background.

And then the UFO

accelerated away.

We had looked at them

at the Ministry of Defense.

They'd been analyzed by

various intelligence

community imagery analysts.

It was literally a UFO.

The Ministry of Defense

embarked on a campaign

to declassify

and release its UFO files.

Documents about the

Calvine incident emerged,

but the full-size color photos,

the negatives,

the enlarged image

that was on my wall,

gone. Disappeared.

There was an effort to see

if the original photos

might be in the hard copy file

held at the National Archives.

And, apparently,

the hard copy file

will be released in

about the year 2072.

NARRATOR: In an interesting

turn of events,

just as we were

finishing this project,

the picture appeared.

This is the mysterious

Calvine UFO photograph.

The facts around

this photograph

strongly suggest

an unknown group

that was able to intercept

the release of this image

and attempt to stop it.

But who are they?

Information in government,

in particularly

intelligence information,

it's highly classified,

deeply compartmentalized,

everyone works in silos.

The left hand often doesn't know

what the right hand's doing.

NARRATOR: We saw an example

of compartmentalization

and the evasion of scrutiny

and straight answers

during the recent

Senate hearings on UFOs.

So you're not aware

of anything in between

Project Blue Book and AATIP?

Hasn't been brought

to my attention.

That data is not within

the holdings of

the UAP task force.

There are many things

that are out there in the ether

that aren't officially

brought to our attention.

GALLAGHER:

How would it have to be

officially brought?

[CHUCKLES] I'm bringing it

to your attention.

Probably a lot of leads

that we would have

to follow up on.

I don't think we have resource

to do that right now.

All I can speak to is, you know,

what's within my cognizance,

the UAP task force,

and we have not looked

at that incident.

And then, finally,

are you aware of a document

that appeared around 2019,

sometimes called the

Admiral Wilson Memo

or E.W. Notes Memo?

-I am... I am not...

-I'm not personally

aware of that.

NARRATOR:

These answers are made possible

by compartmentalization

that A*DS in deniability.

You can ask the questions,

but who are you going

to ask them of?

And you've got to

make sure you're asking

the right people the questions,

because that's

another problem.

You can ask questions

all day long.

NARRATOR: While we're at it,

what is the Wilson-Davis Memo

that Senator Gallagher

asked about?

It's the leak of 15 pages

of notes by Dr. Eric Davis,

of a meeting he had in 2002

with a retired member

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,

Admiral Thomas R. Wilson.

And the contents of these notes

are absolutely expl*sive.

NARRATOR: The Wilson-Davis Memo

was found in the files

of the late Dr. Edgar Mitchell.

It was the existence of

a reverse-engineering program

to reverse-engineer

extraterrestrial technology.

After he learned

about the existence

of a deep classified program

to study ET technology.

And the fact that he had

genuine legal regulatory

oversight over this,

how he was denied

access to this program.

We'd retrieved

a functioning craft

that was ET in nature.

I mean,

this is all stated in there.

And that there

had been this long

reverse-engineering program.

But it had gone

into a corporate company,

and the heads of

the Joint Chiefs of Staff

have no business

looking into it.

The memorable quote

on that note is,

"Technology not of this Earth,

"not made by man,

not by human hands."

They said, "No,

you're not read in."

NARRATOR: Admiral Wilson denies

the authenticity of the story.

Dr. Eric Davis plays

a significant role

in the programs

we are describing here,

the history and the research.

He said this,

"I am not at liberty

to confirm or verify

any aspect of those notes."

These notes, in my view,

there's no question

about their authenticity.

NARRATOR: In a recent

presentation to Congress,

MUFON, the Mutual UFO Network,

presented a slide pointing out

nearly 20 government agencies

that have some program

or study of UAP.

There were many.

In 1991,

New York Times writer

Howard Blum

released the book Out There.

In it,

he detailed an actual group

formed by the Pentagon

to investigate new evidence

related to an

extraterrestrial presence.

This group,

referred to in the book

as the UFO Working Group,

was led by

a shadowy army colonel

referred to

as Colonel Phillips.

It is believed that the

mysterious Colonel Phillips

represents a real colonel

who is even more of a mystery.

Colonel John Alexander

is a central figure

in much of this history.

In 1985, he became the director

of advanced concepts

at the U.S. Army Lab.

In 2009,

John Alexander spoke

at the UFOX Conference

and was interviewed

behind the scenes.

What I think needs

to happen at this time

is not disclosure per se,

because I don't think

there is much to disclose.

What I think needs to happen

is we need to make it okay,

permissible

for serious scientists

who want to explore

these fields to do this.

NARRATOR: Unknown at the time

of this original interview,

he had been running a program

exactly like the kind

described in Blum's book.

KEAN:

A bunch of military, aerospace

and government insiders

started with the

Advanced Theoretical Physics

Working Group.

Now, there's even some

evidence that it existed

prior to that.

I ran a program

inside the government,

I had all of the

services involved,

I had many aspects of

the Intelligence community,

I had aerospace engineers.

It was at the

top secret SCI level,

so everybody had

the high clearances.

They had this meeting

at BDM Corporation

in a secure vault room and said,

"We're forming up this group."

And that was in 1985.

NARRATOR:

The real name of the group

was the Advanced Theoretical

Physics Working Group.

The study topics included

Advanced Detector Deployment,

Established Communication,

New Materials,

Develop a

"Gravity Interaction System",

"Biological Controls

of Processes".

We start by saying it's real.

So let's be clear.

UFOs are real,

sensor systems picked them up.

UFOs have been around, you know,

since, again,

the beginning of time,

or recorded history

as we know it.

It is a global phenomenon.

One of the things that will

come up in this, undoubtedly,

is the BAASS study

or the one that

Lue Elizondo said

came out in The New York Times.

We spent a lot of time

in the analysis piece of this,

getting experts

within the community,

both the Department of Defense

and the Intelligence community.

It basically followed

the same thing

that I had done

30 years earlier

and found, I think,

basically the same thing.

What we're talking about

is something

that is probably not ours

or adversarial.

Something that we really just

don't know where it's from.

And may have been frankly here

for quite a while.

The things that they knew about

the capabilities of UFOs

were being observed

felt the same.

Really fast,

high speed turns, anti-gravity.

You know, things that

just can't happen.

And first of all,

every sensorial system we have

does pick up UFOs

from time to time.

We have hard craft

more than a mile across,

multi sensor.

I mean, absolutely real.

And thousands and thousands

of variations in between.

UAP observed

and interacting with

and flying over

sensitive military facilities,

and not just ranges,

but some facilities housing

our strategic nuclear forces.

One such incident

allegedly occurred

at Malmstrom Air Force Base,

in which ten of

our nuclear ICBMs

were rendered inoperable.

People do look at

some of these things.

Particularly, the incidents

with F aded Giant

that Bob Salas talks about

where you had missiles go down.

Absolutely real.

I have heard stories,

I have not seen

the official data.

No official assessment

that you've done or exist within

DOD that you're aware of

regarding the

Malmstrom incident?

We have not looked

at that incident.

You're the guys

investigating it.

I mean, who else is doing it?

Studied the hell out of it

and end up with,

"Have no idea."

NARRATOR: This stunning

set of revelations

places John Alexander

in the thick of the subject

during the elusive

missing years

in question.

A request for information

on the military background

of Colonel John Alexander

returned an absolute refusal

by the Department

of Army personnel,

to even acknowledge

Colonel Alexander's

military record.

After retiring from the Army,

John Alexander worked

at Los Alamos National Labs.

In 1995,

Alexander took a position

at a new research group

called NIDS.

The National Institute

for Discovery Sciences.

NIDS was founded by a Nevada

billionaire, Robert Bigelow.

These individuals became friends

with Robert Bigelow,

and they became

involved with him.

Shortly after that,

another organization

was formed called NIDS,

National Institute

of Discovery Science.

And Bigelow funded that,

and it involved all these

same people and others.

NARRATOR:

Shortly after forming NIDS,

Robert Bigelow bought the

famous paranormal site known

as Skinwalker Ranch.

John Alexander was there.

I was with Bob,

Robert Bigelow who owned it.

I was with Bob the day

he bought the ranch.

Was the first one to,

you know, spend the night.

We spent years looking at that.

NARRATOR: He would go on

to personally witness events

that led him to

startling conclusions

about the complexity

of unexplained phenomenon.

There was no single phenomenon

that was happening at the ranch.

The stories are so bizarre,

what you end up, though,

with is something that

is terribly complex,

maybe more complex

than we can imagine.

NARRATOR: It wasn't long

before strange reports

of unusual activity

at the ranch

attracted the attention of the

Defense Intelligence Agency.

You look at the guys involved,

and some of them were,

I mean, we're talking

PhD-level scientists.

NARRATOR: Robert Bigelow

went on to form Bigelow

Advanced Aerospace Studies,

BAASS, as the

evolved version of NIDs.

He was quickly rewarded

with a Defense Intelligence

Agency contract

to study subjects closely tied

to the UAP phenomenon.

According to

the original contract,

some of these topics included,

Lift, Propulsion, Control,

Power Generation,

Spatial/Temporal Translation,

Materials,

Structural Configuration,

Signature Reduction,

Human Interface,

Human Effects, and Armament.

At one point,

BAASS brought on MUFON,

the Mutual UFO Network,

to help in the study

of UFO events around the world.

Richard Lang ran

the program inside MUFON.

When we put this

program together,

basically what they were doing

is they were paying MUFON

for data every month.

At the time

that we put this all together,

we didn't know that the DIA

was funding this.

I knew based on some

of the conversations I had

that there was

somebody funding that,

that wasn't Bigelow,

but I didn't know who it was.

I assumed it was

some government agency.

NARRATOR: The BAASS program

was called AAWSAP.

It was the precursor program

to what we now know as AATIP.

Lue Elizondo says

he took over the remains

of the program in 2009.

So the initial focus of AATIP,

which was really AAWSAP,

was very broad.

So imagine trying to sh**t a fly

with a shotgun, right?

Chances are

you probably hit the fly,

but chances are

you're going to hit a lot more.

So we quickly realized

that we were getting

a lot of information

as a result of this

broad focus very quickly,

and we frankly, just didn't have

the staff to deal with it all.

So a decision was made early on

to focus a program,

the program was

renamed to AATIP,

and really use, let's say,

instead of a shotgun,

maybe we're going to use

a sn*per r*fle this time, right?

So much more focused

on what it is we were

trying to collect,

and try to digest this elephant,

one bite at a time.

And so the focus

of AATIP was indeed...

Was indeed the phenomenon.

Again, the challenge is,

where do you start?

We have got,

and we may well get,

interesting information,

but we may never get all of it.

What I'm afraid happens,

too, is that somebody

that has this knowledge,

passes away or goes on,

and then the new person

coming in doesn't quite

grasp what's going on.

One difficulty with

getting information

from the military is,

those who say don't know.

Those who know don't say.

In other words,

when someone says

that they know everything

about what's happening

with the military,

then don't believe it.

Because maybe there are things

that they don't know.

So I think the mantra here

is "Beware".

That is, be cautious.

Don't believe everything

you hear from the military.

These private corporations

that are running

the special access programs,

they are the Mafia.

They don't want anything

examining what they do.

They've got the future

in their possession.

They've got the most

exotic technology and

science imaginable,

and they have it.

Why would they possibly

want to share it?

Anybody that

does know the truth,

I don't know their name.

You don't know their name.

They are not in

the public right now.

They are not speaking

to anybody.

They're not on camera.

You don't know them.

And that's where

the dark programs,

I think, come in.

The Skunk Works

and things like that.

It's where the government

and big business somehow

are interlocked,

that we don't know

and there's somebody knows.

Somebody is getting that money

and it's going somewhere.

When it came to

investigating UFO mystery,

a lot of people used to say

that all roads lead to

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

But in the last few years,

and especially some of

the more controversial subjects,

a lot of the roads

lead right here.

NARRATOR:

Recently declassified documents

now shed light on

the other aspects of BAASS

and information that

may have originated

from some of

these older programs.

Since the early 1900s,

there have been reports

of crashed UFOs.

For over a century,

hundreds of witnesses

have shared their accounts.

There were 119 alleged

crash retrieval cases.

All we need is one to be true,

and it's disclosure right there.

All we need is one.

So, some of the cases

that come to mind

are certainly 1941,

Cape Girardeau, Missouri,

where there were

three bodies recovered.

The craft was

recovered as well.

It's alleged that the bodies

in the craft were stored,

not at the Pentagon,

because the Pentagon

didn't exist in '41,

but in the basement

of the Capitol Building

in Washington, D.C.

So that's 1941, Cape Girardeau.

Now, move fast forward

six years,

you've got July 2nd, 1947.

You've got the

Roswell Crash retrieval.

There was a small

egg-shaped craft

the size of a Volkswagen

with a dome on top.

There were

five bodies recovered,

one was still alive,

so that's Roswell.

Move forward in 1953,

you've got the Kingman.

This is not the crash retrieval,

but it is a forced landing.

There were

four beings associated

with that particular

retrieval operation.

They were all live,

they did establish contact.

That craft was

allegedly brought to the

remote test site in Nevada.

Now, prior to that,

we've got the

'48 Aztec crash retrieval.

This was a 99.9 foot diameter,

disk-shaped craft,

that had kind of a silver

outer exterior color.

There were two bodies recovered

on the upper dome of the craft

in the central part

of the rim of the craft.

On the interior,

there were another 14 bodies

for a grand total of 16 bodies.

That craft was allegedly

brought back to Los Alamos,

reassembled,

and then the retrieval

operation or the reverse

engineering operation

began at that point.

These are some

of the retrieval operations

in cases that come to mind

that, if we could get

one of these,

the evidence for one of these,

it would push this field

of ufology forward.

There's a red line

in this whole process that

you're not allowed to cross.

And the red line is, well,

the conspiracy line.

The red line is basically

crash retrievals,

because if you acknowledge

that there had been retrievals

of this technology,

and bodies,

there is no way to avoid

the obvious conclusion

that this is a conspiracy.

Areas of materials recovery

to the extent that

they have been

recovered in crashes,

are heavily classified,

so we don't have access

to that material.

NARRATOR: We know

about programs

that have existed to study

and attempt to

reverse engineer

this technology.

The evidence has been

circumstantial at best.

Until now.

Included in

the 2017 media flurry,

was an additional story

by The New York Times.

And they took the conversation

right to the edge,

of crash retrievals.

Right to the precipice.

If they took one more step,

they're going off that cliff

and we're talking about

genuine UFO cash retrievals.

What we do know, and what we put

in The New York Times,

and I'm pretty proud of this

because it was as far as

we could go,

that was fully documented,

was that a congressional

committee's staff

were briefed on with slides

referring to material recovery.

Apparent material recovery

from crashed UFOs...

off-Earth, off-planet vehicles.

DOLAN: They quoted

Eric Davis, they quoted

Harry Reid,

both very positively

about UFO crash...

Can you imagine what that's like

for The New York Times

to talk about

UFO crash retrievals?

NARRATOR: Senator Harry Reid

was quoted as saying

that materials recovered

from off-world craft

were studied as part

of the AAWSAP Program.

After the story broke,

Senator Reid

strongly objected

to some of the wording

of the story

and demanded a retraction.

The verbiage was

changed slightly,

but The Times still sticks by

its original reporting.

Stories in The New York Times

were fully documented,

with named sources.

We didn't put in information

that hid the origin.

It was very transparent.

We said where

we got the information,

we had briefing slides.

One was put into a story

that we wrote in The Times.

We actually had

the slide, you know,

copied and and pictured

in The New York Times.

NARRATOR: Dr Eric Davis

again made an appearance.

This time, it was reported

that he delivered

a presentation

behind the closed doors

of Congress,

acknowledging that some

materials were recovered

from off-world craft.

Dr. Davis is quoted

elsewhere as saying,

"We have crash retrievals

and they've been analyzed.

"The program was terminated

for lack of progress

in reverse engineering."

Because there is no way

at that point

that you can pretend

there's something out there,

but we don't know what they are.

Which has been a little

pretend game that everyone's

been playing all this time.

Elizondo plays that game

'cause he has to.

'Cause he knows how far

he's allowed to go.

I'm not a whistleblower,

and as far as a leaker,

I'll be damned if someone's

going to call me a leaker,

because a leaker's

somebody who takes

classified information

and provides it

in an unauthorized manner

for the purpose of disclosure.

I've never done that,

and I never will do that.

Do you think

the U.S. Government has

debris from a UFO

in its possession?

Unfortunately, Tucker,

I really have to be careful

of my NDA.

I really can't go into

a lot more detail than that.

-Okay.

-But simply put, yes.

NARRATOR: Chris Melon,

former undersecretary

of Defense for Intelligence,

said in a Washington Post

Op Ed,

that the government

had not been studying

the UFO topic,

and because of his position,

he would know if it was.

But when we pressed him on it,

he made a stunning statement.

There's a bona fide

issue there, and I

understand that...

I was part of a process

that was supposedly reviewing

all of the Defense Department

special access programs,

and I'd also...

People don't generally

understand this taxonomy,

but there is

a world of programs within

the Defense Department

that is entirely separate

and distinct from

the Intelligence community,

and is not shared with

the Intelligence community.

And to some extent, vice versa.

In addition,

there's a group of programs at

the Department of Energy,

and again,

those are not generally shared.

So, there's sort of

three galaxies which intersect

to some degree

of very tightly held programs.

I was very deep on

two of the tree,

had some access to the third.

But as I've often said

to people, "You don't know,

what you don't know."

And you know, there is

a possibility that there is

some very small...

tightly held close hold group,

for example, that has

some crash debris or something,

and was working that...

The rest of the department,

and even we didn't know about

at the Special Access

Program Oversight Committee.

So now there are reports

of perhaps debris.

Debris left over from UFOs.

NARRATOR: Even with

thinly veiled admissions

from those in the know,

and evidence pointing

to corporations having

received materials to study,

details about any of these

physical materials

have been unverifiable.

Recently, that changed.

UFO investigator Anthony Regalia

finally received a reply

to a Freedom of Information Act

request that he filed

back in 2017,

pertaining to "Physical debris

recovered by personnel

of the Department of Defense

"as residue, flotsam,

shot-off material

"or crashed UAP,

or unidentified flying objects."

NARRATOR: After two years

of going back and forth,

and Ragalia's threat

of lawsuits,

the DIA admitted that

it had documents

responsive to the request

on recovered debris,

and its analysis and a program

under which

it was administered.

Included in the FOIA release,

are reports about a

variety of advanced materials.

The reports speculated

about how they may be created,

and what they may be

capable of.

One is a well-known alloy,

called Nitinol.

It's a shapeable,

memory retaining

titanium alloy.

Nitinol enjoys wide use today

in a variety of applications.

But its capabilities bare

similarity to the many accounts

about the so called

Roswell memory metal.

Hey, is it from a crash?

How do you know about that?

We heard about it on the radio.

Everybody's talking about it.

Abracadabra.

How'd it do that?

NARRATOR: The origins

of Nitinol help make a case

for stories

of extraterrestrial technology

being recovered and delivered

to science and industry.

It was supposedly invented

in a naval weapons research lab

in 1959.

But its origins have been

traced back even further,

to a corporation

called

Battelle Memorial Institute.

Since the late 1940s,

Battelle maintained a contract

to analyze metal samples

provided by Wright Patterson

Air Force Base.

Another is a class of materials

called metallic glass.

[COMPUTER BEEPING]

Transparent aluminum?

That's the ticket, laddie.

NARRATOR: The material

described in the Star Trek

film Voyage Home

in 1986 actually exists.

We find upon further research,

that the original patents

for this type of metallic glass

was initially applied for

in 1981

by the Raytheon Corporation.

These guys in the Lockheed

and TRW,

and McDonnell Douglas

or Boeing,

General Electric, Raytheon...

Look, there's no way

they're going to voluntarily

let this happen.

NARRATOR: There's more.

We now enter the stunning world

of meta materials.

In this recording,

from an interview Lue Elizondo

gave to the MUFON journal.

He discusses the finer points

of the materials claims.

ELIZONDO: So,

it was never about

unidentified metal alloys.

Any second year

metal artist will tell you

elements are elements,

and we can figure it out.

What was actually discussed

was certain meta materials

in which they're isotopic

ratios at the molecular level

are so unique,

and so precise,

based on the complexity

that the origins of those

materials remain unknown.

If we do encounter

extraterrestrial materials,

they would have isotopic ratios

that are not found on the earth

because of their exposure

to cosmic rays,

different kinds of manufacturer

they would differ from us.

And so that's one way to analyze

the fact that these are,

in fact extraterrestrial,

because they have different

isotopic ratios.

NARRATOR: There are more

space age materials

described in the reports

that the Defense Intelligence

Agency acknowledges.

One type may be

used to slow down light.

And even bring light

to a complete standstill.

Another may induce invisibility

by manipulating refraction,

reflectivity,

and increasing

light absorption.

Meta materials allow you to,

in principle,

make objects invisible.

In principle,

allow you to stop light.

In principle, allow you

to magnify things

beyond what we can do

with present day technology.

We can do that

in the microwave range.

We have not yet done it

in the optical frequencies.

NARRATOR: Another has

the interesting ability

to compress

electromagnetic energy.

Things that we would

consider impossible

would become child's play

if you have a technology

that is centuries

more advanced than us.

NARRATOR: Still another

exhibits a particular

tunable resonance,

which was likely determined

during fabrication.

You see, if these objects

come from a civilization

more advanced than ours,

they have mastered the art

of manipulating

individual atoms.

NARRATOR: The reports

on these materials

have something in common.

They all talk about

what the materials might do,

and their possible uses.

This seems to be

an indirect confirmation

that we didn't create them,

and we're not sure

what they do.

And they have to be analyzed

on several levels.

First, they have to be analyzed

spectroscopically.

So we know what they're made of.

So let's say that there is...

There are materials

that some other civilization

has created

and that they have

atomic grade printing

that we don't have today,

the only way to understand it

is to de-assemble it

atom by atom.

NARRATOR: Dr. Gary Nolan

is a scientist

at Stanford University.

He publicly stated that

a new technique

for mass spectrometry,

that he developed

attracted the attention

of those in possession

of UFO materials.

GARY NOLAN: Well, there is

one technology

that's in my lab called

Secondary Ion Mass Spec,

and we developed

a company around it

and the technology for using it

to read biopsy material

from patients, right?

And we had a way of

labeling the biopsies

with metal tags delivered via

antibodies, and that would

light up the tissue

in a way that would tell you

something about the distribution

of those proteins

in cancer cells

and immune system cells.

That's a very

successful technology

that's worked very well.

It turns out that it was

tuned to look at metals...

right, because we were

using the metal tags

and so when in discussions

with Jacques and others,

that they said they had

these pieces of metal.

Well, I have an instrument

that's perfectly tuned

to look at metals,

so let's do it.

But what that stuff consisted of

and why they think

it's off-planet,

and, you know,

what the testing showed about

the possibility

that nothing like that

could appear on Earth.

That's all stuff we were not

able to get access to.

We don't know.

NARRATOR: Upon release

of the FOIA request,

there was evidence of

internal commotion inside

the DIA and the Pentagon.

You know, the powers that be...

I mean, there are such people.

I think they realized

"All right. You just went,

you went actually,

as far as you can go,

"and in fact,

you went a little too far.

"We're going to dial it back."

NARRATOR: Susan Gough,

a Pentagon spokesperson,

said that although

she was aware

of the social media chatter,

the information provided

by the DIA

actually relates in some way

to an advanced weapons program

and not UFO items.

But if you start with

different assumptions

about how something

might operate,

you can come up with

things that another

equally advanced civilization,

America, let's say,

or Western civilization,

doesn't understand how it works.

But that doesn't mean

it came from E.T.

But I suspect that

Freedom of Information Act

is talking about something

a little different.

NARRATOR: Some of

the main players

in the material story

were making new statements

that changed

previously reported facts.

Right. This is a counter...

This is

The Empire Strikes Back.

This is what we're seeing.

You're seeing

the major establishment,

which was on the back foot

for over three years

because of the offensive of

the UFO faction.

They were on retreat.

They've gathered

their resources.

They're like, you know,

"We don't really want...

"We can't go any farther

than we've gone."

Harry Reid walked it back

as far as with

The New York Times

about Lockheed

having artifacts and so,

they get these phone calls.

I mean, why else...

You know, catch yourself

after the fact and go,

"I should have never said that."

And there's a pattern here.

It always pertains to

physical evidence.

And in our

New York Times story,

we said that a hangar was built

to contain materials, okay.

We didn't say that materials

were obtained

and put in the hangar.

You did an interview with

Jesse Michaels.

-In that interview, you laid out

some of the materials.

-Mmm-hmm.

Very excitingly,

we have parts...

Okay, the parts were

a little anti-climactic

and small,

but he claims to have

much bigger parts

that we can't see

due to national security

sensitivities.

But then when you did

the interview with Lex,

you said that she had materials

just from, like, Jacques Vilet

which obviously

wouldn't be classified,

and from TTSA,

which wouldn't be classified.

There's two classes of materials

that I've been given by people,

and they're not given by, like,

the government or anything.

So have you studied

classified materials,

but you just don't have them?

I just shouldn't

say anything more.

You shouldn't say

anything about that.

Okay, all right.

You can put that on there.

I just can't say anything more.

Right. No, that's fine.

It might have been

an accidental truth moment.

NARRATOR: FOIA responses

are based on reacting

to very specific wording.

The FOIA response from the DIA

specifically refers

to recovered materials from

UFOs being studied

at Bigelow Aerospace.

This is official confirmation

that these studies

indeed occurred.

Bigelow Aerospace is massive.

It's surrounded on most sides

by these gigantic vacant lots.

It's surrounded by

multiple layers of fencing,

including barbed wire,

video surveillance,

24-hour security guards

everywhere.

This place is a fortress.

NARRATOR: Multiple reports also

seemed to confirm the presence

of materials at the facility.

But after the release

of the documents,

the story changed.

REPORTER: For years,

one of the secret studies

was carried out by BAASS,

a Las Vegas operation

hidden within

Bigelow Aerospace.

Documents first reported

by the I-Team show that BAASS

landed a contract with the DIA,

and one of the objectives

was to study

so called meta materials.

Multiple sources

have confirmed to us

there was a weird piece

of something at

the Bigelow plant.

New York Times reported

that you modified

your facility here

in order to house some material

from somewhere else.

Did you ever have it?

-Never had any.

-Did you ever see it?

Um...

But... I... you know,

do you see...

Do you see...

It's the old Raiders of

the Lost Ark warehouse scene.

"We've got our top people

working on it."

"Who are your top people?"

"Oh, they're top."

NARRATOR: In March 2022,

the Defense Intelligence Agency

responded to

another FOIA request

that demanded information

about the work of AATIP

and its previous versions.

The result was 1500 pages

that included

38 independent papers

about potential

advanced technology.

The authors of

some of these reports,

are many of the same people

that have been involved

in secret UFO programs

all the way back

to the late 1960s.

These reports came in the form

of defense intelligence

reference documents.

Some of the technologies

that were explored

include advanced

nuclear propulsion,

for manned deep space missions.

Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion,

Pulsed High-Power

Microwave Technology,

Antigravity for

Aerospace Applications.

I think when talking about

extraterrestrial civilizations,

we have to be open

to the fact that

their technology

is thousands of years

more advanced

than our technology.

But then the question is,

is it possible that we,

that we humans can also partake

of some of these

advanced technologies?

NARRATOR: Space-Communication

Implications of

Quantum Entanglement

and Nonlocality,

High-Frequency Gravitational

Wave Communications.

I take two objects,

two particles that are

quantumly entangled,

and if I do something

to this one, this one responds.

And if you separate those two

by a foot...

when I do something here,

something happens here.

But something

even more magical happens

that when I take these objects,

and I put them one here

and one at the farthest end

of the visible universe,

that direction,

13.5 billion light years,

and I take the other particle,

I put it in that direction,

13.5 billion light years away,

when I do this,

this one responds

instantaneously.

NARRATOR:

Traversable Wormholes,

Stargates and Negative Energy.

Special relativity says

you cannot break

the light barrier.

But special relativity

has a loophole.

The loophole is

general relativity,

the theory of gravity,

whereby you can bend time

and space into a pretzel

if you have enough matter

and energy.

An energy which we won't have,

perhaps for another 100,000

to one million years.

So it's not for us.

Perhaps for an

extraterrestrial civilization,

but it's not for us.

NARRATOR: Warp Drive,

Dark Energy

and the manipulation

of extra dimensions.

We have to be open

to the possibility that there

are other dimensions,

and shortcuts.

Perhaps shortcuts between

different universes.

Now, of course, moving through

these higher dimensions,

would require a technology

much more advanced

than anything we have.

NARRATOR: Concepts for

extracting energy from

the quantum vacuum.

You would have to be

a very advanced civilization

to get net usable energy

from nothing.

In other words, it's not for us.

That doesn't mean

an advanced civilization

can't do it.

NARRATOR: Quantum computing,

and utilizing

organic molecules

in automation technology.

Technological approaches

to controlling

external devices,

in the absence of limb

operated interfaces.

Our most advanced understanding

of the brain comes from BCI,

Brain Computer Interface.

We can take a chip, put it on

the surface of the brain,

have that chip connected

to a laptop computer

that then analyzes the impulses

of the brain and deciphers it,

and then uses it

to control something.

And so you can imagine

what we can do today

and then extrapolate

to the future.

NARRATOR: Aerospace

applications of

programmable matter.

If you could design something,

atom by atom,

and position things

atom by atom,

then there's a lot more

we could do with

material science

than we can do today.

NARRATOR: Ultra capacitors

as energy and power

storage devices.

Role of superconductors

in gravity research.

Most of what we create today,

in even the superconductor areas

is basically recipes.

They are not designs.

NARRATOR: Many of these

technologies are beyond

the realm of current science.

These technologies

are discussed

as if someone knows that

they are entirely possible,

even in some stage

of successful development.

I will tell you unequivocally

if a man like Robert Bigelow

were to ask you,

to come on board

and to do something,

man, I would do it

in the blink of an eye.

It would be almost reflexive.

When do we start? Let's go.

He's a good man,

and he's also a patriot.

Machinery really does exist.

Does exist.

That the problem has been

the inability to back engineer

and I kind of think

that some...

Some things require

a weightless environment.

NARRATOR: It is

generally accepted

that the New Narrative

broke in late 2017.

It was actually

Robert Bigelow, who made

spellbinding revelations

before anybody knew

that he was involved

in government contracts

to study UFOs.

Do you believe in aliens?

I am absolutely convinced.

That's all there is to it.

Do you also believe

that UFOs have come to Earth?

There has been,

and is an existing presence

an E.T. presence.

You have the interview

that Robert Bigelow did

on 60 Minutes.

Really, an amazing interview.

This is one of the most

knowledgeable people

on this planet,

in my view,

on the subject of UFOs,

He's also a billionaire,

and he's also got a lot of

influence in this world.

And here he is saying,

aliens are real

and indeed they are actually

walking among us.

NARRATOR:

His unshakable statement

regarding the reality

of an extraterrestrial

presence,

drew some media reaction.

Its significance did not

become clear

until the story of

Bigelow Aerospace

and its role in AATIP

began to unfold.

The New York Times came out

with a couple of articles

essentially downplaying any E.T.

component of these sightings,

but also playing down the fact

that they may be

Russian or Chinese

and also playing down the fact

that these are advanced

U.S. classified prototypes.

If they're going to play

all of those things down,

then I would ask,

what gets played up?

Because there is nothing left.

NARRATOR: Confronted with

the challenge of weaving

Robert Bigelow's

informed beliefs

into the story Chris Mellon

had revealed,

-Mellon said this,

-There aren't many people

associated with

the establishment

who are so bold

and willing to make

statements like that.

Many of the Navy pilots

themselves who've engaged

these crafts

go there because they can't

conceive of any

other explanation, frankly.

NARRATOR: When Lue Elizondo

was asked about

Bigelow statements,

his response corroborated

Bigelow's position.

He has his own space stations

in space.

People say

"What do you mean?"

Yeah, he has his own,

right now, in space.

I mean, I don't know who else

has done that, and by the way,

he's done it for a long time,

so give the guy some credit.

He knows

what he's talking about.

They have stated flatly

"They're not one of ours."

Then the question is,

whose are they?

NARRATOR: All of

the people involved in

the current narrative

are deliberately

stopping short

of identifying the phenomenon

as originating

from extraterrestrials.

We have all these tales

going back centuries, millennia,

about visitations

and strange beings.

Maybe it's a record of visits

from alien civilizations.

You can't rule out the fact

that, yeah, maybe we have

been visited in the past.

You can't rule it out.

So you say one by one,

they're not natural phenomena.

They're not weather balloons.

They're not U.S. technology.

They're not Russian.

They're not Chinese.

They're not optical illusions.

They're not mental illness

on the part of the people

who report them.

Because these are our most

highly trained experts

who are reporting these things,

and they've been caught on,

as I said, Navy instrumentation.

So what are you left with?

Well, no one is going there.

Our view is, let's follow

the trail wherever it leads.

Let's get the data,

the best evidence possible.

There's probably more

than one phenomenon

at work here.

NARRATOR: They refused

to say the "A" word.

Alien. Why?

You know, assuming that

these things are

all of alien origin...

for a variety reasons,

in part because

people shut down

and it impedes our progress

and some of the allies

and people that we need

to bring to bear,

who are sort of

now getting on board,

wouldn't do so if we started

with the premise that

these are aliens.

I think the word alien

is a little...

People are afraid of

the word alien.

You know, E.T,

extraterrestrial, non-humans.

I've always concerned about

getting ahead of

our headlights, frankly,

and leaping to conclusions.

For me, it's more of

the thrill of the hunt.

It's trying to figure out

the unknowns

because once they are known,

they are no longer a mystery.

What it is,

no one's admitted yet.

And you've got

plenty of video evidence

of Lue and Chris

not admitting it

because they can't say it.

But they've said it

in as many ways

as you can.

Just anybody bright enough

to listen,

will, as you say,

understand the accidental truth.

NARRATOR: During the interview

in 2018, Lue Elizondo

gave us an accidental truth.

JAMES: So,

you've spoken about

some of the technologies

that are being studied

as a spin off the research

you did at AATIP.

Things like bending space-time,

and Einstein type possibilities

that may unfold.

Is there an interdimensional

element to any of this

that you guys maybe explored?

Other dimensions

may absolutely exist.

You look at String Theory,

look at M Theory,

dimensions are all around us.

So I think you have to

cast a wide net

when you're looking at this.

And that's why I've said before,

whether they're

from outer space,

inner space

or the space in between,

we just don't know,

and we need to collect

more data.

Is it possible?

Absolutely, it's possible.

Is it possible that

they're from the Pleiades? Sure.

Is it possible that

they're from...

They've been here all along

and they're from here,

they're just resonating

at a different vibration?

Sure.

JAMES: It seems like

the only question

that is answered

in the ones you just posed,

is that whether or not,

there is an actual "They."

That's a great question.

I don't know

if I can answer that.

NARRATOR: A few seem willing

to officially pronounce

the phenomenon

as originating

from extraterrestrials.

There is a willingness

to concede

that there might be

extraterrestrial involvement.

You know, what's here

is probably just an A.I.

I mean, why spend all your time

on one little planet

out in a dust speck

at the edge of the galaxy?

You send your robots.

The question is,

what's our definition of life?

I think life may exist,

may exist,

and I'll caveat that,

in all sorts of forms.

I don't think it's necessarily

going to be

something that we might

recognize or even initially

even classify as life.

Because we don't have

a full understanding of it.

NARRATOR: There is

a growing consensus

that the

extraterrestrial hypothesis

doesn't answer all

of the questions.

There are multiple phenomena

at work, that cannot be

explained completely

without looking at

other possibilities.

Maybe there's a whole range

of different phenomena

at play here.

In fact, I think, given

the differences in what's been

reported by people,

that's quite likely that

there are many different

parallel strands to this.

But whatever is involved,

and as I say, I don't know,

I think it does raise important

defense, national security

and air safety issues.

The E.T. hypothesis,

for instance,

is a logical starting point.

If not from here, from where?

Until you start

talking about, well,

what do you mean, where?

We think that an object

is solid and can only be

one place at the same time.

But in quantum mechanics,

electrons can be two places

at the same time.

In fact, they can be

many places,

and this is called

the multiverse idea.

The idea that we exist

with other universes

simultaneously.

Well, wait a minute.

We're talking about

multi-dimensional realities.

But doesn't really matter

how far you go

in a three-dimensional space

and distance,

that there are shortcuts,

and those shortcuts exist

as part of the natural universe.

So that is a real world example

where we know

other dimensions

may absolutely exist.

Whether it's extraterrestrial

or interdimensional,

to me, is irrelevant

because whatever it is,

clearly has

the ability to manipulate

dimensionality.

These things can

jump in and out,

appear, disappear.

And so, for all intents

and purposes, it's both.

NARRATOR: In August of 2022,

Dr. Hal Puthoff released

a paper in which he explored

other options

for what may be at work.

He presented

concepts such as

ultra-terrestrial beings.

The concept that

there could be another

intelligent race living with us

inside the Earth

or under water.

A civilization

with advanced technology,

that has been here,

long before us.

Time travelers.

While mainstream science

debates the feasibility

of time travel,

it still remains a possibility.

Some people say that the aliens

don't come from Mars,

they don't come

from a distant star.

They come from a different time.

Well, I'm open

to all sorts of ideas,

as long as they are testable.

Our notion of time and space

is flawed, seriously.

And you're entering

issues where

there is no time

and there is no space.

You've got man-made craft.

You've got possible

extraterrestrial.

You've got interdimensional.

You've got...

Hmm. A pre-existing

high tech civilization

that could have been

on this planet

for thousands of years.

And when you wrap

this all together,

you can see how confusing it is

because a lot of

these things merge.

NARRATOR: Some of the

phenomena seemed to point

to a direct interaction,

with consciousness.

Well, the consciousness

is interacting in

all aspects of it.

And to take it a step farther,

going to Max Planck,

suggests that maybe

the physical evolved

from consciousness,

as opposed to

the other way around.

NARRATOR: As part of developing

new understandings,

it's hard to ignore

the so-called experience

or phenomenon.

A significant percentage

of the population

report having encounters

with non-human beings.

These encounters range

from enlightening

to terrifying,

Many, many, many people

have had some very

strange experiences.

Either seeing UFOs,

and not just at night

while they were dreaming.

These are not nightmares.

These are often described

as more real

than everyday reality.

The people who describe it,

these people are solid.

They come from

all walks of life.

NARRATOR: Ralph Blumenthal

wrote a book about the late

Harvard psychologist John Mack,

called The Believer.

Mack was one of the first

members of academia

to acknowledge the validity of

the experience or phenomenon.

John Mack investigated

these stories of people

who said that this and this

happened to them,

and at least Mack,

as a psychiatrist,

was able to evaluate

their stories to the...

Couldn't prove that this

happened or didn't happen,

but at least could say that

these people were solid people

and were not mentally ill.

We interface with

whatever this is.

Contactees, abductees.

I think we can create

some of the phenomenon itself.

So I do believe that there are

certain individuals

on this planet

who are more in tune,

are more intuitive,

are more in touch

with the unseen world

than the seen world.

Some of us are able

to pierce the veil

and connect with whatever

is going on out there.

NARRATOR: Stunning new research

by Dr Gary Nolan,

has revealed a trait in

the human brain

that may make some people

more prone to abilities,

such as heightened intuition,

psychic abilities,

and possibly an ability

to communicate

in undeveloped manners,

such as telepathy.

We had MRIs of claimed

remote viewers,

high-end remote viewers,

and this area of their brain

lit up like a Christmas tree.

NARRATOR: The condition has

been observed in so-called

"Experiencers."

Nolan has detected

increased activity

and development

in a region of the brain

called the basal ganglia.

NOLAN: The thing that

got me really intrigued

was that we did have MRIs

from experiencers,

but these were

high functioning individuals

that we happened to notice

that an area of their brain,

had a density in it

that we first thought was

damaged because we were studying

damage at the moment.

But then we realized,

this is not damaged.

This is living tissue.

And that became sort of

a side discovery.

You're left then

with, frankly,

what was

an even less uniform

group of individuals

with such varied interactions.

Things that

we're talking to them,

things that they had

gotten close to and had

been damaged and harmed.

And there were a couple

of people in that group

who were harmed.

But of the remaining

individuals,

I would say that the majority

of them were not harmed.

This area of the brain,

that we came to the conclusion

at the time

was probably involved

in intuition,

when we actually

looked into it,

and then looked into

the literature,

believe it or not,

people were finding that

it had something to do

with intuition.

And that's the basal ganglia.

This area, the caudate putamen,

which is, you know,

by many neurophysiologist

called the brain

within the brain.

NARRATOR: What Dr. Nolan

has discovered

may represent a leap

in human evolution

or even a new variation

of h*m* sapien.

You have to ask the question

"What kind of information

"is being perceived

and how is it

being translated into,

"let's say, traditional

neuro-physiologic pathways?"

We don't understand...

space time the way

we'd like to pretend we do.

And so, who is to say

that there is not some kind

of information transfer

that we just don't

necessarily yet appreciate,

but evolution has found

a way to latch onto.

NARRATOR: The people that

we've met since 2017

seemed to have

some genuine interest

in helping to make humanity

more aware of these realities.

Chris Mellon continues to work

quietly behind the scenes

to bring about an effective

means of disclosure.

Very much changing

within the government,

on the Hill

and the executive branch,

as well as you can see

with the media lately.

It's becoming respectable

and legitimate,

and that's so crucial

to engaging more minds

and more energy,

and more resources

to getting to

the bottom of this.

NARRATOR: Lue Elizondo

seems to have put

everything on the line

since going public.

So if there's an issue where

the government is doing

something we don't want to

then it's up to us

as a people to change that.

But it doesn't have to be

an adversarial relationship.

I think where we go wrong is

that people often times look

at the government, they say,

"Oh, the government's bad,

the government's bad."

NARRATOR: His role in AATIP

has been challenged by the

Defense Intelligence Agency.

Lue fought back by hiring

one of the most effective

and well known

civil rights attorneys

in the field, Danny Sheehan.

I was contacted by Lue Elizondo

and asked to represent him

because he was upset

about the fact that the Pentagon

even after

the publication of this

on December 16th and 17th

of 2017,

there were officials inside

the Pentagon issuing

completely false statements,

still, saying,

"Yeah, there's no such thing

"as the Advanced Aerospace

Identification Program."

NARRATOR: Together,

they approached the

Inspector General

of the Defense

Intelligence Agency

to reverse the Pentagon's

failure to acknowledge

Elizondo's position.

When Elizondo started,

talking about this

phenomenon publicly,

you can see the Pentagon had

tremendous pushback against him.

They lied.

They said "No,

he didn't run such a program."

That was a lie.

They said AATIP

had nothing to do with UFOs.

-That was a lie.

-We were trying

at the same time,

trying to determine

what Lue can say

in light of his

security clearances,

you know, publicly.

Not long ago,

Elizondo supposedly

said to his attorney

that he had seen

a flying saucer in a hanger.

That gets out and

the stuff hits the fan.

And, you know,

Lue had to walk

that back too.

What did he do?

He said,

"Well, you know,

"I went to a hangar

that was designed

"to accommodate

exotic materials,

but I didn't see anything there.

"I never saw any intact craft."

He was like, very lawyerly

in how he said what he did

because he had to.

I guess I'm just

genetically pre-disposed

to not trusting government

and seeing it now, too,

it's just a joke.

It really is.

NARRATOR: MUFON,

The Mutual UFO Network

is the largest and oldest

UFO organization in the world.

After over 50 years,

MUFON is stronger than ever.

I'm Ron James.

It's March 11th 2022.

I'm here in front of

the White House.

It's been a historic week

for the UFO community

and for MUFON,

the Mutual UFO Network.

We have actually been taking

meetings all week long

with key members and staff

of the House and Senate

intelligence committees

regarding the UAP phenomenon.

We've been here

for three days now, four days,

and have met with about

10 different officials,

congressmen, representatives

staff and senators,

and we've really had

a tremendous welcome.

NARRATOR: Thousands of people

over 100 years or more,

have challenged

the official deception

around the UFO topic.

They have been ridiculed

and debunked.

Today, they are beginning

to be vindicated,

but still have not

accomplished their goal.

A total end to

the UFO cover-up.

There is no way to inform

the American people

writ large,

all 500 million of us,

and ensure that information

is not going to get into

the hands of

a foreign adversary.

Maybe it's that

there are some elements

of the technology

that has to be kept under wraps

or kept to a limited number

of people because

if you cross the wires,

bad things happen.

This is a version of disclosure.

But is it going to be

the real truth?

And, I mean, I don't care

about anything except

what the actual truth is.

So, we'll see

if they can get there.

They could say, for example,

down the road,

"Well, actually, yeah.

We have had a few reports

down the road,

"over the years,

but we kept it quiet because,

"honestly, we needed

to avoid public panic."

They'll say that.

At a societal level,

I believe that we are

completely ready

to incorporate this new reality,

and if the President

were to go on

the evening news today

and say, "My fellow Americans,

"people of the world,

we're not alone,"

I think the reaction

would be sorta two-fold.

Obviously, there would be

a huge interest in it,

but actually there wouldn't

be panic in the streets.

So to be part of that journey,

to uncover and to show links

to this advanced civilization,

that would be a great honor,

because as a scientist,

you go where the data takes you.

And sometimes the data

takes you to places that

are uncomfortable.

But, hey, that's the way

the cookie crumbles.

Yeah, I just... You know,

I'm going to get hit on it.

They told me. They said,

"Man, Burchett you need to

cool this stuff out

"because it's gonna

hurt us at the polls."

But we'll see.

NARRATOR: We've shown

that even today

there is a narrative at work

that has been created to

manipulate public perception

about the UFO topic.

We are not alone

in the universe.

There are those

who have struggled

to keep this truth a secret.

But the proof of the deception

serves its own purpose

and tells us much more

than ever before.

I have good news

and I have bad news.

And the good news

is the government's

been telling you the truth.

The bad news is

the government's been

telling you the truth.

I mean, just look at Roswell.

There are no 509th

b*mb group members left.

They're all dead.

So according to the government,

it's cover up complete.

All right, then what did I see

out there in that field?

Oh, that...

Why, that was a weather balloon.