Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

Escape from Extinction: Rewilding (2024)

Curious minds want to know... Documentary Movie collection.

Moderators: Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters, Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters

Watch Docus Amazon   Docus Merchandise

Documentary movie collection.

Escape from Extinction: Rewilding (2024)

Post by bunniefuu »

- We must act now. The

Earth is in crisis.

- We're facing a

sixth mass extinction event,

with up to a quarter of

all species on the planet

threatened with extinction.

- What is the

cost of indifference?

- We've identified

around 40,000

threatened species.

- Where is

our point of no return?

- Thirst for consumption-

- Deforestation and overfishing.

- Fossil fuel addiction.

- The growing

threat to our natural world.

- When are

self-inflicted wounds

too deep to heal?

- We cut down

old growth forests.

We pollute our water.

- Numerous

vulnerable species

targeted by poachers.

- We have done so

much harm to nature.

If nature is not healthy,

we won't be surviving this.

- If Earth is our home,

how many windows can we smash?

How many bricks can we remove?

- Populations are dwindling-

- How much can

we crack the foundation

before it all comes

crumbling down?

- The house is on fire.

- We really only have about

a decade to turn things around.

- It's time to take action.

- Rising global temperatures-

- Drought, storms, and floods.

- It's the life

support system of people

and the whole planet.

- Ocean dead zone.

- Things are bad and

it's getting worse.

- Habitats vanished.

- We waited until

it was too late.

- To eventual human extinction.

- Extinction.

- Extinction.

- 1 million species.

- 1 million species.

- And we are losing 1 million

species within the next year.

- And the

biggest question of all,

can we still win this w*r

when so much has

already been lost?

An international army of

wildlife protectors says yes.

- Chief Veterinary Officer

and animal ethicist.

- I'm the animal

and plant director-

- Director of science-

- Global director

of Humane Conservation.

- President

and chief executive officer.

- Honorary Professor

of the university.

- PhD.

- PhD.

- Neuro-

- Physiology.

- The world's

leading animal experts,

veterinarians and

scientists are fighting

to save our planet,

standing up to misinformation.

- Our fossil fuel

use has protected us.

It's taken an unsafe

climate and made it safe.

- And

choosing facts...

- The world's hottest

day on record...

- Over fear.

Solutions over slogans.

Science over special interests.

- We're in a w*r and

most people don't even know

this w*r even exists.

- This is a lifetime battle,

a multi-generational battle.

No mistake, we're fighting a w*r

to keep these animals alive.

- When you think

of animals in the wild,

it's a term we all use

all the time, right?

But there's very

little wild left.

- What

does wild truly mean?

When every corner of the

globe is connected and mapped

and touched by human hands?

Is wild a pure state of nature,

self-generating and

beyond human control?

Every acre of wild

lands requires expertise

and stewardship, from

a mix of government,

indigenous and

private management.

- There's no place

on Earth which is not

under human control.

We control the whole globe,

so there's nothing

that is not artificial

all over the world.

- Farms, fishing, mining

and logging

penetrate ever deeper

into tropical rainforests

and national parks

from Southeast Asia to

South America and Africa.

- One of my worst experiences

was a visit on Madagascar

and then I was almost crying

when I saw what is gone.

Now we're standing in

a forest without trees

and no chance for

animals to survive.

- Not even

Antarctica can escape our grasp.

Considered the last true

wilderness on Earth,

over two thirds of

the South Pole's

land mass is now affected

by human activity.

- And that's the reality.

There is no nature or wild left.

- We have 8 billion people

living here on the planet.

We take so much space

and there's only

a little bit space left.

- The human being

is the only organism

on the Earth today that

can make a difference.

They either can screw

it up or fix it.

The animals can't do that.

- A bold new

approach to conservation science

asks us to dream

bigger, and wilder.

Instead of just

preventing the extinctions

of our favorite animals,

what if we could rebuild

the patterns and connections

that support entire ecosystems?

- Rewilding is about bringing

back a natural habitat

to its original form.

- I think rewilding in

a more general sense

is about leaving things messier,

leaving nature to regenerate.

- Like shifting

pieces of a living puzzle,

the addition or subtraction

of one new piece can impact

the fates of so many others.

- Rewilding is a relatively

new concept where we try

to restore nature

and reintroduce the

natural processes

that got lost many years ago,

giving space for the

biodiversity that

we need to get back.

- Rewilding

projects have taken root

on every continent,

in every biome.

Restoring of the

lush kelp forests

of the California coast,

rebuilding the intricate webs

of life in the rainforests

of Bolivia, renewing the

human-wildlife connection

across the vast and

varied climates of Africa.

In this quest for successful

biodiversity models,

no nation has engineered a

more remarkable turnaround

than Rwanda, a country

that rebuilt its ecosystems

and its economy from

the ashes of tragedy.

For most of the 20th century,

Rwanda was a

biodiversity hotspot,

but in 1994, Rwanda

erupted in violence.

- In 100 days, 800,000

people were k*lled.

- With basic survival at stake,

it's easy to understand

why wildlife conservation

was a low priority.

The Rwandan government

was in dire need of land

to shelter hundreds of

thousands of displaced people.

Their only option

was to open the doors

of the country's largest

wildlife preserve,

Akagera National Park, shrinking

the park's protected area

to one third of

its original size.

New conflicts exploded,

this time between

humans and animals.

Desperate Rwandans

poached bush meat to feed

their starving families.

Rhino horns were an easy

source of ill*gal revenue,

one that caused the extinction

of the region's entire

rhino population.

Lions died off, poisoned

by angry cattle herders

in retaliation for k*lling

the livestock so crucial

to their survival.

The conflict was clear.

The locals needed land

and food security,

while the nation needed to

revive its ecotourism economy.

But Rwanda was quickly losing

its most precious resource,

the animals themselves.

- Rwanda has moved forward

since those dark days,

both politically

and economically.

- The new government

recognized the importance

of restoring wildlife to

rebuilding the Rwandan economy.

Akagera had the potential

to be the economic engine

of the entire Rwandan nation,

a global attraction on par

with the iconic parks like

Kruger in South Africa.

But the benefits had

to outweigh the costs

for the people most

directly affected.

- The public opinion

is critically important

for wildlife conservation.

- You cannot protect and

save species against people.

You have to do it together

with the people living there.

- We have to show them

that Akagera National Park

is their assets.

- And valuable

assets need protection.

The eastern edge of the park

had an effective natural

boundary, the Kagera River,

but the western side needed

additional safeguarding.

- Rewilded areas are

fenced because most

of these areas

we're talking about,

they're surrounded by

farmland and we don't want

the animals we reintroduce

to go out on the field

because then they'll

destroy the crops,

thereby the income

of the farmer.

- The idea of

fencing the animals

was to keep them

away from people.

- The fence really,

really help us to manage

a human-wild conflict.

- The next

step, share the benefits

of a healthy Akagera directly

with the locals

living alongside.

- It's all about survival.

We cannot achieve conservation

when the communities are hungry.

- There is no way that

we can save wildlife

if we do not also

have happy communities

and healthy communities

in these ecosystems.

- As long as the

communities don't feel

the economic incentive derived

from wildlife areas,

protected areas,

they'll not value them.

- All the Rwanda

parks contribute 10%

of the tourist income.

They put that in a fund

and with that money

we just ask the community

or the local authority

what they need for the

community around the park.

- The park revenues

also support local jobs,

everything from

construction to beekeeping.

- Rwanda is a grand

success and it's a success

because they brought together

multiple different groups

to create an ecosystem,

an ecosystem that

addresses food security,

an ecosystem that addresses

the local economic needs.

- Those successes paved

the way for the reintroduction

of iconic megafauna,

the so-called big

five African mammals,

attracting legions of

international visitors

and crucial tourism revenues.

Lions were brought back first.

Since genetic diversity

in a small population

is so important, the

translocated lions were drawn

from several different regions.

Each individual

lion in South Africa

was carefully

studied and selected

by population biologists

based on genetics

and their potential to

breed and thrive in Rwanda.

- We can't have

inbreeding of animals.

- The more genetic

diversity a population has,

the more adaptable

it is to any kind

of potential changes

which may come along.

- The communities

that once poisoned the lions

now celebrated their return.

- If there's a benefit

from wildlife, sustainable

benefit, there'll be a future.

- These misfit

lions bonded together

and formed a pride.

The initial group of 12

lions bred and thrived.

The electric fencing kept lions

from hunting

domesticated cattle,

while keeping the lions'

natural prey within reach.

- Well, the carnivore

is a very important part

of the ecosystem.

They take care of a lot

of the surplus of animals

that we would otherwise

have to take out

of the population

in order to keep

the population size adapted

to the available habitat,

so in order not to

graze everything down.

- Most recently,

Akagera reintroduced

the iconic black rhino.

Akagera's wildlife experts

teamed up with an alliance

of European zoos.

- That breeding

population that we've got

within European zoos can now

act as founders to go back

to helping in some

of those countries.

- Jasiri is one

of several black rhinos

now living in Rwanda.

Her long journey home

started in a small zoo

in the Czech Republic.

Sickly and underweight

baby rhinos are not

the typical candidates to

restore native populations.

Her birth weight was only half

that of a normal

black rhino calf.

Even worse, she was too

small and weak to latch

onto her mother for the milk

that would keep her alive.

Zoo veterinarians

fed the baby rhino

from a bottle around the clock.

After 10 days, Jasiri

was finally able to nurse

on her own, without any

need for human assistance.

She grew into a strong

and healthy calf

and was soon chosen to

help restore her species

in its native land.

- A group of five black rhinos

were all pulled together

from different European zoos.

And now Jasiri is one

of those five rhinos

that's actually gone

to Rwanda to help save

the black rhino in

Akagera National Park.

- The achievements

at Akagera created a blueprint

for successful conservation

work throughout Rwanda.

Volcanoes National Park

is Africa's first

national protected area,

best known as the research site

of the well-known American

primatologist, Dian Fossey.

It's also the home of Rwanda's

iconic mountain gorillas,

who share 98.2% of human DNA.

These gentle giants were

decimated by poachers

throughout the 1970s.

By the early 1980s,

scientists estimated only

220 remaining in the wild.

Park rangers rarely

enforced anti-poaching laws.

Corruption and

bribery were rampant.

Baby gorillas were cruelly

stolen from their mothers

and sold to the highest bidder,

devastating gorilla families

like this one, the Agashyas.

The Agashya family

counts 36 gorillas spanning

multiple generations.

Like human families, the

Agashyas show a wide range

of personalities and emotions.

Gorilla mothers experience

pregnancy and parenthood

much like humans.

Gestation takes nine

months and mothers dote

on their newborns with

close care and affection

for the first several

years of life.

The children laugh and play

under the parents'

watchful eyes.

Gorillas even mourn their dead,

crying at the loss

of a loved one.

The decades following

the civil w*r

have seen remarkable recovery

for gorilla families

like the Agashya,

as a new of African

conservationists fights to save

the mountain gorilla

from extinction,

a profound shift for a

culture where poaching

was deeply entrenched.

- The previous generations

was k*lling and harmed

the animals, but now

we are protecting

and conserving these gorillas.

- If they don't poach,

but protect as a ranger,

it's so good to have them

on board because they

are the experts.

They know the places

the best, you know.

They know where the animals

are, how they behave,

where to find them.

- Compared to

poaching or ill*gal herding

on parkland, ecotourism jobs

could offer a better payday

and a better life.

- Better to become

a conservationist rather

than being a poacher,

because if you take care

of natural resources,

everybody gets benefits.

- The gorilla

numbers increased

in just a few short years.

By 1989, tourism

had quickly become

Rwanda's largest single source

of badly needed foreign dollars.

The Rwandan economy was

now permanently linked

to the gorilla's survival.

In 2015, the national

governments of Rwanda,

Uganda and the Democratic

Republic of Congo signed

a treaty to formally collaborate

on conservation, tourism,

land management,

law enforcement,

and community conservation.

- We are having

1060 mountain gorillas.

- It's a

point of national pride

that the gorillas have

been reclassified out

of the critically endangered

level on the IUCN Red List.

- The IUCN Red List is like

the currency of conservation.

It tells us how good

or how bad it's going

for different species.

- Now that

locals have a stake

in the gorilla's protection,

they take a more active

role in reporting

poaching and other ill*gal

activity in the park.

As the gorilla numbers have

thrived, so too has ecotourism.

Curious nature lovers from

all over the world travel

to Rwanda for the

mountain gorilla trek.

Tourists are allowed to come

close to the mountain gorillas.

Not close enough to spread

disease or interfere

with the animals'

natural behaviors,

but enough to experience

how gorillas live.

The biggest challenge

is a familiar one,

too many animals and

humans in need of land.

- The gorilla population grow,

but the gorilla habitat

remain the same.

That's why we need to

work on park expansion.

- The park expansion

will give the gorillas

the space they need

to grow and thrive,

while improving the lives

of local communities

by sharing material

benefits from ecotourism,

paid for entirely by

families like the Agashya.

The park will become larger

by approximately 23%.

A new buffer zone separating

the expanded parkland

from human areas aims to

reduce human-wildlife conflict

and restore more of the

ecosystem's natural processes.

The Rwandan government estimates

the park expansion will

result in a 20% increase

in mountain gorilla

ecotourism revenues.

Those revenues will be shared

with the local communities

in concrete, tangible ways.

Several thousand homes will

be moved and resettled,

so the land can be rewilded

into a self-sustaining

gorilla habitat.

These households, often

lacking electricity

and running water, will be

compensated with new homes

in a modern housing development,

plus a land grant for

income-generating activities

like agriculture,

a nursery school, a health

clinic, markets, roads,

community banks, expanded

internet services,

modern electrical and water

supply infrastructure,

all paid for by mountain

gorilla ecotourism revenues.

The park expansion will

put $70 million back

into local communities.

The incredible resilience

of the Rwandan people

and their forward-

thinking protection

of precious ecological

treasures is an inspiring lesson

for the rest of the world.

The health and fortune

of human communities

and their surrounding wildlife

are deeply connected now

and into the future.

- Rewilding is the ability

to bring our species back

into their native ranges,

and that's happening

all around the world.

- The bottom line is

that habitat is the key

to preventing species from

going extinct, pristine habitat.

- Often what we leave

behind is not the best part

of the habitat.

We leave behind

swamps and mountains.

We take all the fertile

ground and then we wonder

where the animals that used

to live in that area are gone.

And so it is really important

that we protect as much

of the planet that

we can that's left,

and we actively

start moving some

of the agricultural land,

some of the park land,

all the land that we live

on, how do we make it wilder?

How do we introduce more species

and more diversity

back into these areas?

- When we do rewilding, we

need to find the balance

between losing control

and taking a little bit

of control that is needed

in order to make

sure that the animals

have a proper welfare.

- And so it's a continuum.

You have what is wild over here,

which is shrinking daily, up

to completely managed care.

- As true

wilderness disappears,

semi-managed habitats

play a crucial role

in the modern spectrum

of wildlife conservation.

- The semi-managed

habitat is one

where we reintroduce

animals into the wild,

but we still have some

kind of ongoing management

of that population

to help protect them.

- One

rewilding method involves

transforming non-productive

farmland into natural reserves,

like this 600 hectare

farm in Bolivia purchased

by Loro Parque.

- We bought a farm and we

turned it into a habitat

which is a protected area.

- We maintain inside

puma, jaguar, capybaras.

It's amazing how many

monkeys are inside.

- We have the anteaters.

We have caiman.

We have lots of other birds

and fishes because there

are no humans predating them.

We don't allow people

to step in or to walk

through and it's

just for animals.

- And by moving away

from this species-

level conservation

towards ecosystem-

level conservation,

we can have cascading

conservation effects,

which ultimately impact hundreds

if not thousands of species.

- The new reserve

has thrived as a fortress

for a wide range of animals,

including one of the world's

rarest and most beloved birds.

- Blue-throated macaw

in Bolivia is very rare.

less than 400 individuals

are counted in nature.

- Bolivia has

experienced a rapid loss of

forest over the past decades,

primarily due to

industrial agriculture.

The tropical savannas of Bolivia

are the only natural habitat

for the blue-throated macaw.

The population of

the blue-throated

macaw has plummeted

in the 1970s and '80s

when they were captured

by the thousands and

sold as exotic pets.

Live exports were

banned in 1984,

but a thriving ill*gal

trade decimated the birds

to the point of

extinction in the wild.

Or so we thought.

In 1992, 50 individuals

were found in one pocket

of Bolivian forest.

But decades of rampant logging,

burning and grazing

had severely reduced

the birds' ideal habitat and

their primary food source.

The nuts and fruits of

the motacu palm nourish

a wide range of animals.

It's also the only tree

where the blue-throated

macaw will nest,

in particular old or dead trees

with hollowed-out cavities

high in the trunks

to protect them from predators.

- One of the problem of

the blue-throated macaw

is that they can't find

opportunities to breed.

- A crisis emerged,

suitable nesting trees

were in short supply.

The scientists

overseeing the habitat

had planted new motacu palms

to replace the trees

lost to deforestation.

But the trunks of these

new trees didn't yet

have the hollow cavities

favored by the macaws

as nesting sites.

Manmade problems required

manmade solutions.

- To help the species to

establish in the reserve

we put up nest boxes,

so we offer them possibilities

for nesting and sleeping

in a protective area.

- The boxes

allowed biologists to observe

the macaws' nesting behavior

up close and improve

the design to maximize

breeding success.

One feature of a

semi-managed habitat

is greater accessibility

for human caretakers.

That proximity

allowed scientists

to quickly address problems

that might otherwise

go unnoticed.

The entrances were made smaller,

to keep out potential predators.

The interiors were expanded

to offer more space

for the fledgling chicks.

Over 100 chicks

have been born from nest boxes

since their introduction.

With fewer than 500

individuals in the wild,

blue-throated macaw is

still critically endangered.

- When we restore

nature and habitat,

we often expect that the

species will rebound by itself.

That's not always true.

Some species are such

big trouble that we need

to give them intensive care.

- Thanks to the

imagination and dedication

of local wildlife experts,

the region is now a thriving

habitat in the fight

to restore the

blue-throated macaw.

- And I'm quite

proud about this,

but it has to be much more.

- Loro Parque's success

in rewilding farmland

has established a valuable

model for other zoos

to emulate an ecosystem-

based approach

to saving vulnerable animals

on the brink of extinction,

from the Dublin Zoo's work

rewilding Irish peatlands,

and restoring red panda

habitat in the forests of Nepal

to Seattle's Woodland

Park Zoo funding

a marine reserve sheltering half

of Peru's Humboldt

Penguins whose populations

are on the brink.

- I don't think that the

decision is to intervene all

over the world, at least not

actively managing ecosystems.

But certainly our

intervention has to be lower

the pressure in many parts,

so for these

ecosystems to recover.

- If forests

are the planet's lungs,

oceans are its lifeblood.

No other biome

has such an impact

on Earth's weather,

temperature, or food supply.

Our planet supports

a broad spectrum

of oceanic environments:

deep ocean,

coral reefs, mangrove swamps.

One of the planet's

most biodiverse

and productive marine

ecosystems is the kelp forest

of the Pacific coast

of North America.

Like Earth's

terrestrial forests,

kelp anchors a vast and

intricate web of life.

Kelp grows in shallow water,

where it can drink in the

sunlight, forming thick beds,

providing food and shelter for

over 1,000 different species.

- Everything from the sea

otters that we know and adore,

all the way down to the

sea urchins and the abalone

that they depend on to eat.

There are salmon, rock

fishes, sea stars,

sponges, bryozoans.

So many different species

depend on kelp forests

to provide them the habitat

they need to survive.

- So it's a cascading effect,

and all of them are important.

- Kelp forests help mediate

against ocean acidification

because it helps regulate

the balance of CO2 in the ocean.

So they're taking

carbon dioxide in

and they're putting

oxygen back out.

- The CO2 that is coming

from the atmosphere

that we are releasing, this

CO2 is passing to the ocean,

and when it passes to the

ocean, it becomes acid.

- Like human

bones made weak and fragile

by osteoporosis, the

calcium-based shells

of crucial species are

dissolving before our very eyes.

The loss of filter

feeders like oysters harms

the entire ecosystems.

Their ability to

filter excess nitrogen,

bacteria and sediment is

crucial to healthy oceans.

Reduction efforts haven't

kept pace with the rapid rate

of ocean acidification.

- Are we gonna wait until

the ocean is so acidic

there's gonna be

no life left in it?

- The health of

the kelp forest is shaped

by this ecosystem engineer.

- Sea otters are what

keep the other species

in that ecosystem in check,

so that the kelp

forests themselves can

survive and thrive.

- Sea otters feed

on sea urchins and the

sea urchins feed on kelp.

So once the sea

otters are removed,

the urchins explode

in abundance,

they eat the kelp and

prevent it regeneration,

so the whole forest collapses.

And with the loss of the forest,

all the species associated

to it go as well.

- Kelp forests,

they can't survive and thrive

without healthy sea

otter populations.

- These cascades of

extinction, once a species

that is keystone in the

ecosystem, disappears,

make others go away without

us even knowing about.

- Thousands

of otters now swim

along the Pacific coast,

but hardly a full recovery

from their peak population.

Before the dawn of

commercial hunting,

an estimated 300,000

otters ranged the coasts

from Baja California

to the northern islands

of Alaska, Russia and Japan.

Fur traders exploring

the Pacific coast

soon discovered what

was already known

to the local indigenous tribes

like the Tongva and Chumash.

The fur of the sea otter

is thick, plush and warm,

perfect for a

luxurious winter coat.

Insatiable demand for otter

pelts led to a century

and a half of

ruthless over hunting,

until those 300,000

otters were nearly gone.

Trade in otter fur was

banned worldwide in 1911,

but by then the damage was done.

The once abundant otter

populations of the west coast

had now vanished from Baja

California to Washington state.

until 1938, when several

dozen otters were found

in the waters off Big Sur

in central California.

This tiny remnant population

of southern otters

had somehow survived.

All sea otters now swimming

off the coast of California

are descendants of this one

hardy group of survivors.

- One rewilding success for

us in the state of Washington

is the reintroduction

of sea otters

to the Washington coastline.

- In 1969, state

wildlife agencies moved a group

of otters from Alaska

to the Washington coast.

Their goal, repopulate

native otter ranges

in the Pacific Northwest.

- They've come back.

We have almost 3,000 animals

in the State of Washington,

and as a result,

we have thriving kelp forest

ecosystems on our coast.

- And bringing

sea otters back,

they start feeding on the

urchins, kelp regenerate,

and then other species

that live around

the whole ecosystem

recover as well.

- On North

America's other coastline,

a different marine ecosystem

faces parallel challenges.

Similar to kelp's role

on the Pacific coast,

sea grass is a

crucial building block

for its marine ecosystem.

It absorbs twice as

much carbon per acre

as the tropical rainforest.

It cycles nutrients from

the soil to the water,

while filtering out pollutants

and sediment to help keep

the water quality clean,

clear and healthy.

Seagrasses also form the basis

of an intricate food web,

nourishing everything from

microalgae and crustaceans

to fish and birds, to

sea turtles and manatees.

- Seagrasses all around the

world, as we're learning,

are also providing

this ecosystem service

of mediating against

ocean acidification.

But climate change

is wreaking havoc

on these ecosystems

'cause they're really

sensitive to temperature.

And so as the sea

water is warming up,

we're losing our seagrass beds.

- The cascading effects

of global warming are like

a Jenga game where all

the pieces fit just

perfectly together

and you remove one and the

whole thing falls apart.

That's impacting our manatees.

- Weighing

in at 2000 pounds,

manatees have a gentle

disposition and playful nature

that has delighted

humans for generations.

At the same time,

humans are the manatees'

only real predator.

Coastal habitat loss,

industrial agriculture

and boat collisions form

the most immediate threats

to the manatees' future.

As recently as the 1960s,

manatee populations in

Florida dipped below 1000.

Decades of habitat restoration,

new boating regulations

and awareness campaigns

have pushed their numbers

to an unstable 7,500.

But global air and sea

temperatures are soaring,

with heat records

broken each year.

- It's been a week of record

breaking heat around the world.

- Excess

heat in the atmosphere

is absorbed by the ocean.

Marine ecosystems are

already suffering.

- Snow crabbing

season in Alaska's Bering Sea

is canceled for the

second year in a row

after billions of

crabs disappeared

over the last couple of years.

- All signs point to

warming ocean waters.

- It was evidently

a population collapse

and that 10 billion snow

crabs had disappeared.

- The

warmer sea temperatures

that k*lled 10 billion

snow crabs also feeds

a growing menace that

threatens marine life around

the world, algae blooms.

Fed by warm water and

nutrient pollution

from agricultural

runoff, algae blooms

are slowly k*lling

the seagrass beds

of Florida's Atlantic coast.

Phosphorus is a common

ingredient in fertilizers

and an essential element

for plant growth.

But the demands of industrial

agriculture have resulted

in higher levels of

phosphates in the soil,

which then washes into the sea.

Combined with warming

ocean temperatures,

the higher phosphorus level

fuels expl*sive red tides.

As the algae grows

out of control,

it starves underwater

plants of precious sunlight,

choking them off until

they wither and die.

- So manatees right now are

having a really hard time.

They're actually starving

to death on the east

coast of Florida.

You think of these

animals as big and round,

then you can see their

ribs, you can count them.

- Those

big round bodies come

at a high caloric cost.

Adult manatees need up to 100

pounds of sea grass per day.

- There's

no more sea grass left.

They have nothing to eat.

It's pollution, it's plastics,

it's fertilizers you

use on your grasses

and your plants that

run into the sewers

and all combining and running

off into the waterways.

- In desperate

need of a long-term solution

to restore the health of

Florida's coastal waterways,

the conversation has

turned to rewilding.

- We need to restore the

habitats of the animals in order

to make sure that they can

live in these areas again.

- In recent years,

local residents and

environmental groups

have manually vacuumed more

than 300 million pounds

of algae and debris

from the Crystal River

on Florida's Gulf Coast.

That debris is then composted

to help other plants grow.

They've also planted over

350,000 eelgrass pods

to replace the functions

of the lost seagrass.

Other coastal communities

have turned to dredging

the sea floor to remove trapped

nitrogen and phosphorus.

And so far it's working.

Without the algae

smothering nutrients,

the newly-planted eelgrass

has helped the waters

of the Crystal

River become clear

and clean once again,

attracting record high

numbers of grazing manatees.

- The state will spend

about $30 million

to support Florida's

manatees and their habitats.

- The state's

powerful agricultural lobby

has signaled their

support as well,

by adopting voluntary reductions

in harmful fertilizers

like phosphorus

that contribute directly

to algae blooms.

The modern focus on restoring

and healing entire habitats

represents a profound shift

in our thinking.

Conservation works when

humans from all walks

of life, farmers, fishermen,

nature lovers alike,

see themselves as integral

parts of a living ecosystem.

- Rewilding is really important

because we are looking

at how to restore ecological

species and functions

that have disappeared.

Well, we have to be careful

because we also

don't wanna play God.

- You need to know what

you're doing or you're putting

the animals at risk.

- We have to be so,

so careful about

unintended consequences.

If we don't take those

things into consideration,

we're doing more harm than good.

- Rewilding

isn't only about addition,

it's also about subtraction.

- Rewilding is really exciting,

but also there's lots

of things to consider.

If we look at Australia

with its amazing wildlife,

those animals are really

under threat right now

because of invasive species.

- But the species are

introduced into an area

where they have no

natural predators

and therefore go ballistic.

Then the risk is those

invasive species will drive

the native species

to extinction.

- The cane toad in Australia

was brought in to eat

the cane beetle, which was

destroying sugar cane crops.

Turns out, in Australia, cane

toads don't eat cane beetles.

Instead, they're poisonous

to things like quolls

and lizards and snakes

and other frogs.

Australia's frogs are being

decimated by cane toads.

So people thought they

were making a decision

that would help, but

instead have really,

really impacted negatively

on Australia's animals.

- So you either

have to find a way

of protecting those

native species

from the invasive species,

or you have to remove

the invasive species.

- The general public

may not really accept

the eradication of

invasive species,

but we really need to

move the invasive species

for the likelihood for survival

of those endemic species.

- So when humans move

one place or the other,

they usually bring the animals

and the plants with them.

And that happened in Australia

with European

colonization, rabbits,

cats and dogs and other

creatures travel with humans

and establish themselves.

Rabbits were very successful.

They grew and

spread very quickly.

- They don't have a natural

predator in Australia

because they didn't

evolve in Australia.

- And then the idea of

the European colonizers

was to bring in foxes

to control the rabbits.

- I think when we make

decisions that we think are

the right decisions at the time,

sometimes they have

unintended consequences.

- But the foxes found

it a lot easier to feed

on Australian mammals,

the marsupial mammals,

which were slower and

didn't have the kind

of predator response.

The consequence of that was

that the foxes started wiping

out the Australian mammals.

- The bandicoot is a

little tiny marsupial.

They're not very big.

They would sit in your

hand quite comfortably.

The problem for the

eastern barred bandicoot

is they evolved in a time

where their only predation

was aerial predation.

And so raptors, big

birds would hunt them

and their entire defense

mechanism is to sit in a bush

and not move at all.

And so that was a great defense

against aerial predation.

It's a disaster when cats

and foxes are introduced

into the habitat.

And so a strategy that had

worked well for millions

of years didn't work anymore.

- The bandicoot

population eventually dropped

so low that the only ones left

were those living in zoos.

- Like for everything

valuable in life,

it's good to have

insurance for it.

So for some of these

endangered species,

we've built populations

in zoos, aquaria,

botanic gardens,

and we manage them really well.

And that way we can use those

individuals and their genes

to reestablish wild populations.

- Insurance

populations have been used

around the world

to revive numbers of

near extinct species like

the Iberian lynx,

golden lion tamarin

and the Arabian oryx,

and now the bandicoot.

- And so we were able

to find fox-free habitats

to reintroduce them.

Fox-free habitats

are challenging.

There's a number of

ways you can do that.

One is with big fences,

but in Australia we have

animals like wombats

that go straight

underneath a fence

and create enough space for

anyone else to join them.

- And so we look to

islands as places

where we could feasibly

eradicate these invasive

or introduced predators.

- Historically,

island ecosystems

like Australia,

Madagascar, and Hawaii have

been the most vulnerable

to invasive species.

But in the age of rewilding,

islands could now be

the most practical refuge

against the invaders.

- The goal is to create

biodiversity hotspots on a range

of these islands where we

can get invasive species off

the island and restore

the wild and what it used

to look like pre the

impact of these species.

- Foxes were removed

from three local islands

that were suitable for

the tiny marsupial.

- And that's where we

really focused the release

of the bandicoots.

- The important

thing about rewilding

is that we make sure we

have the right species

in the right place at the

right time with the right kind

of management to make sure

that it really is gonna thrive.

- Remote

cameras monitored

any new fox incursions,

and dogs, which never

threatened the bandicoots,

were brought in as

their protectors.

The dogs, drawn from hunting

and herding breeds

like Great Pyrenees,

black labs and springer

spaniels can detect predators

and chase them off before

any damage is done.

- Dogs and their incredible

sensory perception

are a really critical tool

to help us in this fight

against extinction.

- Another

rewilding challenge,

the same species may be

invasive in one environment,

but endangered in another.

- In Colombia, there

has been an introduction

of hippos, associated

with Pablo Escobar.

- Cocaine kingpin

Pablo Escobar built himself

a private zoo in the heart

of the Colombian jungle.

Escobar smuggled four hippos

from an American wildlife

park into his menagerie

in Colombia, one male

and three females.

After Escobar's death in 1993,

his animals were sent

to reserves and zoos,

but the hippos escaped into

the nearby Magdalena River.

Their numbers exploded,

putting a massive strain

on the local ecosystem.

- The hippos,

they became wild,

so they escaped the

private zoo and became

a serious invader in Colombia.

- They pose a

danger to humans as well.

Hippos are the world's

deadliest land mammal,

responsible for over

500 deaths each year.

The current population

of hippos in the river

is growing exponentially.

Scientists estimate their

numbers will soon be over 1000.

Their unchecked growth

could re-engineer

the entire landscape at the

expense of native species.

- And it's the same scope

and the same organisms

that in one part of the

world are being driven

to extinction, in other part

of the world are driving

the other species to extinction.

And we have to deal with both

extremes, controlling them

in one place and saving

them in the other.

- The rewilding model

doesn't seek to define the value

of one animal over another.

It asks how a species functions

within its specific ecosystem.

- The African elephant

is losing more and more

of his habitat in Africa,

but where he is

safe and cared for,

he's just breeding too well.

You know, there are too many

elephants in too small places.

- They have an

overpopulation of elephants.

Several thousands. I was there.

I saw. They destroy

their own habitat.

And this habitat is

also lost for all

the other species living there.

The solution would be,

they can go all over

Africa as they did hundreds

of years ago, but that

is not possible anymore.

- The reality is there

are fences there to keep

the animals in and

threats like poachers out.

- So the big animals are not

really free-ranging animals,

so they cannot go out.

Then you have to manage them.

So it's a big,

big issue and a big problem

and a big discussion.

Do we have to cull

these animals?

- Sustainable hunting

presents numerous ecological

challenges and

ethical complexities.

- Sustainable hunting

is absolutely something

which works, for example,

in Europe very well.

Especially if you

think about the wolf.

The wolf is coming

back to Germany.

He's making problems already.

He's taking sheep, even horses.

And we had the discussion,

will we hunt the wolf?

And if you see where

in Europe the wolves

have a good population, it's

exactly in the countries

where they hunt wolves.

So hunting can be a

tool, a proper hunting,

a controlled hunting, a

legal hunting can be a tool

in our completely

changed environment.

- It's easy

to imagine a scenario

in which hunting can

be useful to control

an overly aggressive predator.

But what about hunting

for sport or profit?

- Trophy hunting?

It's complicated.

- Trophy hunting

means different things

to different people.

Hunting ethics are

fiercely debated,

even among hunters themselves.

- Trophy hunting is

hunting of senile

and old wild animals with the

purpose of generating money

to support conservation.

- If you sh**t an old animal,

which is not any

more putting genetics

into the population,

you can say it's okay.

It's not okay probably for

the animal which got shot,

but he will die in a

year or so by himself.

And if the meat goes

to the communities,

if the money the people

pay for that goes

to conservation, the

species can thrive

through this kind of hunting.

- That is crucial that

we only can save species

and we cannot save each

individual specimen.

- We lose one animal to

save the rest of the family.

- The trick is in doing it well.

'Cause if we don't do it well,

we can have the opposite

effect and do damage.

- Because it can

be prone to abuse.

- The lions bred for

slaughter by rich tourists,

what's known as canned hunting.

- The problem is that

there are trophy huntings

which are ill*gal, where

they breed animals somewhere

in the backyards and

then just open a cage

and let them out and some

crazy people k*ll this animal.

That is something I

absolutely can't see.

I really hate that.

- So it is a bit

of a risky venture.

- Anger is growing tonight

over the American dentist

who hunted and k*lled a lion

in Africa that turned out

to be well known and

beloved by tourists.

- I think about Cecil the lion.

I think about that

dentist who paid

to k*ll these

incredible animals.

That is morally wrong, ethically

wrong, and it should stop.

- Trophy

hunting can also violate

religious practices

or cultural beliefs.

- In India, any sort of

k*lling of animal is a sort

of taboo in our religion.

Like all the animals

have got the same right

to live like human being.

- From an intellectual

standpoint,

I certainly can understand

that it's a very complex issue,

but I still think it's wrong.

Quite frankly we can

move that animal.

We can fundraise by

bringing that animal

into an environment

where someone can meet it

for the first time.

Meeting an elephant

for the first time,

that's an opportunity

to raise funds to ensure

that not only that one

elephant has a great life,

but an entire herd in

a natural environment.

- Is it

as simple as that?

Can humans just

move animals around?

- Well, we did it with

the beavers in Denmark.

Beavers had disappeared

from Danish nature

many years ago,

and they are really

good landscape engineers

because they cut down the

trees, they make dams,

and so they actually

raise water levels,

so they're really good

for shaping new habitats.

Since they wouldn't be

able to come by themselves

from Germany, we took some

animals from a wild population

in Germany, moved them

to a place in Denmark,

released them and

it works very well.

- Other countries

are now restoring beavers

to rewild habitats and

seeing profound improvements

to ecosystem health.

- There has been

translocation of key species,

in particular, giraffes.

Giraffes have been

translocated from one park

to another and they're

doing very, very well.

- Species translocation

has proven effective,

but also brings steep financial

and logistical hurdles,

with risks to both

humans and animals,

such as the spread of diseases.

And just because a

translocated animal

is the same species

doesn't guarantee

a healthy, long-term

population rebound,

the ultimate objective.

Self-sustaining population

growth is the goal of this

daring and unconventional

new rewilding project,

one that aims to return

an iconic species.

India has a long

and storied history

with the Asiatic cheetah.

The maharajas prized

cheetahs for their speed,

and even domesticated them

as hunting companions.

But the British colonialists

hunted the cheetah

to be stuffed for trophies.

Modern India's

population boom consumed

the cheetah's

traditional habitat.

- The last cheetah

was shot in 1948.

- That

deep-rooted connection

to the Asiatic cheetah

has made the cats'

reintroduction

a matter of national pride.

- There are a lot

of discussionS going

on a government level.

We should bring back

cheetahs to India.

- By reintroducing them in

this grassland ecosystem,

we are going to rectify

that wrong which was done.

- But reintroducing

the Asiatic cheetah

was no simple matter as

their numbers had dipped

to near zero.

- When we talk of locally

extinct means it became extinct

in India. They are

still there in Iran.

- For decades,

India negotiated with Iran,

home to the last extent

Asiatic cheetahs on Earth,

but none were available

to relocate to India.

- Actually the population in

Iran is not itself very good.

- There are just few tens

of individuals there.

- So this was the only option.

We had to get the

animals from Africa.

- Scientists

turned to sub-Saharan Africa.

- But it's technically

not a reintroduction.

It's what we call an

ecological replacement.

And that's a replacement

because we're not putting

the exact same population,

same subspecies into here,

but bringing one from Africa.

- These two

subspecies diverged

from each other around

70,000 years ago.

- It might have adaptations

to the local ecosystem

that are not adequate

for the new ecosystem.

So although they're

the same species,

they might be

different ecologically.

- If you put an animal

into an environment

where it's not supposed to be,

it's not likely that that

animal itself will survive.

It doesn't know how to eat,

it doesn't know how

to avoid predators.

And in a lot of places it's

just about saving the species.

But then we also have to

think about subspecies.

- So although a species

might not go extinct

as a species, as

populations disappear

and the range shrinks, we

start losing local adaptations

to different ecosystem

types, different climates.

- The African

cheetah is clearly

a non-native exotic

species to India.

But what's not clear is

whether its introduction will

have a positive or negative

effect on the local ecosystem.

- I like to see nature

as close as possible

to its original state.

And in that sense,

I feel that there

are more benefits

than disadvantages because

you're bringing us something

that is pretty close, I agree

that we could be even closer,

but it's hard to be able to

make that happen in reality.

- I personally believe

that if we can get those

animals back out functioning

in the ecosystem and not

having big, unintended

consequences, then great.

- Out of the 20 cheetahs

that were bought to India

from Namibia and South

Africa, only 14 are left.

- Yes, it sounds alarming,

but this is the norm for

wild cheetah reintroduction.

- So it's an experiment,

the process is on-going,

it has happened and it'll be

a great opportunity to see

if they succeed, and if

they don't, learn from it

and try to do it

better the next time.

- So one of the things

that really worries us

is this invisible

extinction that's going

on where populations

are just disappearing

and it's not noticed,

especially in species

that are more numerous

and more widespread.

If you look at giraffes,

the species itself overall

is probably around 125,000

to 150,000 giraffes in Africa,

which is quite a large number.

They're declining and sort

of potentially at risk

of extinction, but

not imminently.

But if you start to look at some

of those different types,

then you get to things

like Rothschild's giraffe

where there's less than 2000.

So we now have a population

of Rothschild's giraffes

that we breed.

So we're preserving

the genetic stock

of that particular population,

that particular type of giraffe.

- Is a giraffe a

giraffe a giraffe?

Or are there different

genetics that we need

to make sure we're

protecting as well?

And those are hard

decisions to make.

Some people think as long

as we don't lose

giraffes entirely,

then we can just

move giraffes around.

Whereas others are really

fiercely protective

of subspecies and

wanna make sure

we're conserving the genetics.

And I think it really

comes down to making sure

we use all of the

tools in our toolbox,

making sure that the genetic

scientists are protecting

the genetic

diversity of giraffes,

and working with the field

practitioners and the rangers

to understand the

implications on the ground.

- Rewilding is

incredibly hard to do.

- It is incredibly

difficult to do

that with mammals, especially

with large mammals.

We all wish we could have

more elephants and tigers

and rhinos in our forests, but

it is really hard to achieve.

What is quite possible to do

is rewilding smaller species

such as birds or reptiles,

turtles in particular.

- We can potentially, with

the expertise of good zoos,

step in and do some

c*ptive breeding or some

wild introductions

into certain areas

to help repopulate species.

- Restoring

the Lear's macaw

to the Brazilian desert involved

a different challenge,

retraining human-bred animals

in the skills and instincts

necessary to thrive in the wild.

Lear's macaw evolved

to the harsh conditions

of a specific landscape,

the dry shrublands

and sandstone canyons

of northeastern Brazil.

Habitat loss, poaching and

the ill*gal pet trade led them

to near extinction in the '80s.

Two pairs of Lear's

macaws were recovered

from the black market

pet trade and brought

to Loro Parque in

Tenerife, Spain.

- So we got two couples,

four individuals to Loro

Parque and within six months

we had the first fledge,

that means the first chick

raised from these Lear macaws.

Since then, we

reproduced 41 chicks.

- Zoos and aquariums have

become the emergency room

or the intensive care unit

for many, many species,

breeding endangered species

for reintroduction of the wild.

- But breeding

macaws was only the first step.

Their goal was to return the

birds to their natural habitat.

These birds had spent their

entire lives in human care.

They had no idea how

to survive in the wild.

So it was up to the

biologists at Loro Parque

to teach the birds

how to be wild again.

- When you have a bird

that's born in managed care,

we need to teach them fear.

- Once we

introduce them into the aviary

for the release, but we use

tape recording to train them

to be aware of the danger.

It's very different

what they eat and drink

in nature because in

human care we offer them,

for example, water,

which we will withdraw

throughout the training.

The difficulty of

hydration in the Caatinga

where it never rains

is that these birds,

they actually have to find

the liquid palm tree to eat

their coconuts, which are

very small, very hard,

and there's just one

drop of water in.

So they have to find lots

of these little coconuts

to get their hydration.

- 19 birds were

reintroduced from Loro Parque

back to their homeland.

- And now they're successfully

flying in the Caatinga again

and most importantly

they've already reproduced.

- The threat of

ecosystem collapse is global,

but the future of

conservation is local.

- I've done community

conservation in Borneo,

and what I've seen is if a

community's happy and healthy,

if they can feed themselves

and if they can send

their children to school,

they will be there to

fight for the forest.

And here's what's so important.

If there isn't somebody

there watching over habitat,

it could easily be gone.

- Rewilding

emphasizes the connections

between natural ecosystems

and human communities,

especially indigenous

groups whose contributions

and knowledge have

long been overlooked.

But in recent years,

an encouraging

statistic has emerged.

Environmental degradation

has been less severe

or even avoided entirely

in areas inhabited

by native peoples.

Surprisingly, one quarter of

the Earth's land is managed

by indigenous and

local communities.

Their deep-rooted connections

to ancestral lands

have protected wildlife

for future generations.

Designating land

as a national park

or nature reserve means nothing

without proper oversight.

ill*gal logging and

mining operations

have annihilated protected

areas from Brazil

to Borneo, stripping

forests bare

and destroying

entire ecosystems.

- What was shocking my first

time to Borneo is the number

of logs that were coming

out of the national park

on a daily basis.

They're going out

on small barges

literally 24 hours a day,

week upon week upon week.

- The

uneven success rate

of wildlife reserves suggests

that government-protected

land still needs more local

and tribal involvement.

But historically,

conservation work

has excluded native communities.

Many of the world's iconic

protected areas like Yosemite

in the US were created

by the cruel displacement

of native people.

But as indigenous groups

assert a more active role

in managing the

resources and wildlife

of their traditional lands,

they face increasing

resistance and danger.

- ill*gal

gold miners exploiting

and destroying the

rivers and land,

intimidating and

firing at Yanomami.

- Unfortunately, the

work in conservation

has become dangerous.

- The desperate search for

an indigenous rights advocate

and renowned journalist in

a remote area of the Amazon

in Brazil has apparently

come to a grim conclusion.

- Brazilian authorities

have recovered the bodies

of British journalists,

Dom Phillips

and his expert

guide, Bruno Pereira.

- Recent figures of the number

of environmental defenders

k*lled is especially serious

in Latin America, and Brazil,

Colombia, and Mexico are

well known for being

at the top of the list.

It is mainly people

who are challenging large

interests like mining

and logging typically

are the ones

that have the biggest problems.

It's a very serious issue.

We have to make sure

that citizens around

the world become aware and

start doing something about it.

- Rewilding

is a path to peace,

for a fragile planet

at w*r with itself,

a peace that protects the future

of Earth's most

misunderstood pollinators.

- There are 1,400

species of bats,

and most of them are

insect-feeding bats.

They are pollinators for

hundreds of species of plants.

They are doing amazing

services for us humans.

But what people know,

it's vampire bats,

which is only three species.

People only can think

about Dracula, blood,

even Batman, you know?

Wanted people to

be afraid of him.

- I'm Batman.

- Despite the

crucial role bats play

in their ecosystem, these

furry flying mammals

are often treated as if

they were invasive pests.

- In caves where

there are big groups

of bats living there,

people will go and

put fire on the cave.

That's why education

is so important,

because if you tell people

that that bat is feeding

on mosquitoes that

you don't like,

on mosquitoes that can

transmit diseases,

if people knew that,

I'm pretty sure they

wouldn't attack them.

- It's the whole picture.

It's the environment,

it's the habitat

and how they all

interplay with one another

that we're looking at.

And it's gonna take all of

us to figure out what to do

to continue to live

together in harmony.

- There is hope. I

always have hope.

- What gives me hope

is partnerships.

- We also collaborate

with each other,

so that giving us a

hope not just right now,

but also for the future.

- And that is exactly

what we need to tell.

We need to tell stories of hope.

- There is hope,

and I think that's

something we forget

or we don't see often because

there are so many stories

of doom and gloom.

But there is a lot

of hope and a lot

of success stories out there.

- We're sharing

scientists' stories.

We're sharing their story

of animals on the brink

of extinction and how

we're bringing them back,

how we're rewilding,

how we're seeing natural

habitats come back to life.

That's exciting. We have

more stories to tell.

- The work isn't done. We

are just getting started.

- In Victoria, we have

1,995 endangered species.

And it sounds like

an enormous number,

until you remember just how

many of us there are as humans.

What if we each picked

one species to conserve?

Suddenly that number's

not daunting at all.

Suddenly we'll have teams of

people working to save each

and every species.

And all we have to

do is care about one.

We don't all have to

care about all of them.

- We have to live in

a sustainable way.

That means our living

can't harm other species.

- We have to take care

of them like we take care

of our children.

- So let's get our force

together, get our momentum,

and make a change,

a valid change in our community

to make sure that there is

a future for wildlife

in wild places.

- And rewilding is possible.

There are so many examples

where we are bringing

species back from the brink

of extinction and they're

starting to thrive again

in their wild environments.

As long as we ask

the right questions

with the right people in the

room, we can save species,

we can save ecosystems.

We just need to be working

together and doing more of it.

- Everything

can be recuperated.