Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

01x02 - Episode 2

Episode transcripts for the TV show, "Back on the Record with Bob Costas". Aired: July 30, 2021.*
Watch/Buy Amazon


Interviews with the biggest names in sports, entertainment and popular culture, and discussions led by Bob Costas that will address today's most topical sports issues.

01x02 - Episode 2

Post by bunniefuu »

And so here we go

with our second installment

of "Back on the Record".

A bit later, fresh off the fitting

for his Hall of Fame jacket in Canton,

our conversation

with Peyton Manning.

We'll also convene our panel

to talk about the issues

of sexual as*ault in sports,

the proliferation of gambling,

and league COVID policies.

And we'll start with a duo

who made their legends

on the tennis court.

One smashed the glass ceiling

in her sport.

The other smashed

pretty much everything else.

On the eve of the US Open,

a tournament they each won

four times,

we welcome John McEnroe

and Billy Jean King.

Well, hello, you two!

We're back on the record. I love it.

I love HBO too.

We're back on the record, and we're

on the cusp of the US Open.

So the first question, does Djokovic

get the Grand Slam?

I believe he's gonna win it.

And we certainly could use

a little boost

after what's been going on

the last year and a half

in the world,

but particularly tennis.

Last year, Bob

And nice to be back.

I feel like this is the Bill Maher

segment over here.

- Well, we're following Bill Maher.

- Beautiful.

Last year,

I called without any fans,

and not even in the same room

as my brother,

so the fact that we're being told

that there's gonna be full capacity

is not only outstanding

for me personally

and for the sport,

for most importantly the players

and hopefully some of these

young upstarts,

'cause Nadal and Federer

aren't playing,

on the men's side will step up

and challenge Djokovic.

But let's remember Billie Jean King

knows all too well

- Great to see you, Billie Jean King.

- Great to see you, John.

- I see your book there too.

- Let's take care of this right away.

There's much too much in "All In",

Billie Jean King's memoir,

to get to even a fraction of it.

Just go out and buy it.

'69 was the last time

a guy's done it, Rod Laver.

- Rod Laver did it, yeah.

- His second Slam.

His second Slam.

This is gonna be quite historic

if he pulls it.

I think he's gonna do it.

No Federer, no Nadal.

Now no Serena.

That's true. We're having

a change of the guard.

And I've been through this a few

generations now because of my age.

And it's so sad when they start

dropping out,

but then you look towards

the young people.

'Cause I remember when Sampras

and Agassi quit, and I was like

And Martina and Chris quit.

I hate it,

but I really look forward to the young

ones that I've been watching,

the Tsitsipases, the Medvedevs,

Rublev.

All these guys are really good.

And with the women,

anything can happen,

because Serena is not here.

But Serena has not played

her best since 2017,

the last time she won.

Is it even possible

to compare Serena, let's say,

or Federer, Nadal, Djokovic

with players of earlier generations,

or has the sport changed

so much that these comparisons

are like comparing Walter

Johnson to Randy Johnson?

It's the same.

That's exactly what it is.

It's, like, you know,

Rod Laver was my idol,

but can you compare him

to Roger Federer?

I suppose in a way you could

or Babe Ruth.

They always talk about this guy

Ohtani is the new Babe Ruth.

Can you really compare

what was happening

with the equipment,

et cetera to go into that?

But I happen to believe

that Serena Williams is the greatest,

with all due respect

to Billie Jean

Every generation is the best

as far as I'm concerned.

Every generation gets better.

I think so,

and the racquets, the strings,

the information,

the training is so superior.

I would have given anything

to have this information.

They're so much better.

In your mind's eye, though,

do you ever say,

"here's how I would go about

competing with Serena,"

or, "here is how I,

24-year-old John McEnroe,"

"would do against Djokovic"?

- Totally.

- I would absolutely do that.

I hate to admit on television,

I do that on a fairly regular basis.

I think:

"How would I do against them?"

And I have a feeling that it

wouldn't be that great

for most of the time.

Would I beat him two out

of three out of ten times?

You know, I always thought Federer

was the best on grass.

Nadal's the best on clay.

- I know I wouldn't be the same

- You'd be better.

With these racquets

and your touch, are you kidding?

So that's how come I'd win

two out of three out of ten.

These guys are the three greatest

players that ever lived.

We're looking at the three greatest.

And in ten years from now

I don't think you're gonna see

Stefanos Tsitsipas,

who's gonna be a great player

They're not gonna be as good

as these three.

If they get better than this,

I'd like to see it.

Okay, in your imagination,

is it possible,

can you create a scenario

where you or Chris Evert

or Martina could beat Serena,

on even terms?

No, she should win every time.

Now, mentally, mental toughness

and emotional toughness,

I think you can take each generation

and analyze it pretty well, actually.

- It's very different.

- Well, that brings us to this.

Mental health in sports

is much in the news.

Osaka, Simone Biles.

Michael Phelps.

We've been talking about him

for a number of years.

Each of those situations

are different.

I bring this up because both

of you have been very open about it,

about being in therapy,

in your case anxiety

and eating disorders.

Therapy has really helped me a lot.

But my therapy was court-ordered.

It was?

- Like the tennis court?

- By a magistrate?

Or by a line judge

on the tennis court?

- No, it was more my divorce stuff.

- That's different.

The linesmen deep down liked me,

I think, believe it or not.

And there's not gonna be any linesmen

in a couple years,

so it's all like a distant memory.

Now they're like, "God, isn't it great

when there were linesmen?"

We didn't have microphones.

Nobody heard it when we went crazy.

First generation microphones

right here,

and man of all the people

to have this microphone

near the umpire's chair and all that,

I go, "this is gonna be amazing".

We used to be as horrible,

but we heard him.

We could hear you, John.

We didn't hear us.

We could say

What you want from

a tennis player or any athlete

is to be able to go out

and give 100%.

You know, that's all you can

really ask for.

I always believe it's better to try

and fail than not try at all.

Osaka went to the French Open.

She decided she didn't want

to talk to the press

for a variety of reasons.

I don't know if there was

some new team involved.

Supposedly she had

a new publicist.

Obviously with social media

you don't need to do that

to the same level.

She didn't want to be annoyed

about saying

she's not as good on clay

or on grass

than she is on hard courts.

Then she says:

"I'll accept 15 000 a match,"

"a fine, donate it to charity,

good idea."

These bozos, in my opinion,

the people "in charge"

decided that they're gonna

threaten to default her.

So what ends up happening?

She pulls out, lose-lose for everyone.

The problem I have

I respect

and in some ways admire

what she's trying to do.

Obviously with this pandemic

this has been insane

for God knows how many people,

but now the attention

is gonna be even,

the scrutiny, in my opinion,

is gonna even more on her,

and she's an introverted,

shy person to begin with.

I think that she's gonna have

a tougher time the next couple years.

She does a lot of stuff, though.

Do you notice?

Yeah, she does a lot

of social cause stuff.

Yeah, her heart is in

the right place.

But is it even

possible in this atmosphere

to have a nuanced conversation

about something like this?

You want to be as empathetic

as possible.

On the other hand, that doesn't

mean that every assertion

has to be met with a nod of ascent.

Paul Daugherty

of the "Cincinnati Enquirer"

asked what was actually in my view

a fairly sensitively framed question.

And it triggered her in some way.

She walked off, and then she

was trying to hold back tears.

And her representative says

that this is a bullying question.

If a question like that

is a bullying question

Look, if something's a trigger,

we can empathize,

but if every time someone sees

a redhead it triggers something,

are we gonna get rid

of all the redheads?

- We need to do a better job

- I have a daughter who is a redhead.

Yeah, be careful.

My relatives are too, so careful.

No. We need to do a better job

of what I call rookie school.

Because for instance, the WTA,

which no one knows,

has been giving help

to all kinds of players

with abuse, getting them a therapist,

whatever they need.

But of course they're gonna

do it confidentially.

You're never going to hear

from the WTA.

We've been doing that forever,

okay?

But if the player doesn't take them up

on it, I don't know what to do.

It is all black or white in society.

It's not even just tennis.

Social media is bullying.

It's this. It's good. It's bad.

There's a lot of people.

It's tough to make

60 million a year.

Why do you think

you make that money?

Can you imagine if

she was making 20 grand?

How about this? Let's turn

the clock back 20 years,

you and me on the record,

and here's what you had to say

about this subject.

To answer that question,

assuming that you're right,

why didn't someone have the ba*ls

to go out there and say,

"okay, toss me"?

A good question.

There were times when I was begging

to be tossed.

I mean,

I wanted out of there so bad,

I was so fried from playing.

You think you had an emotional

problem at some point?

Beyond really caring about the game

and caring about the competition,

did you have some kind

of emotional problem?

You probably should have

a psychologist,

psychiatrist to talk about that.

But to me there were certainly

times when I lost it.

What do you think seeing that?

My hair's gotten whiter,

but I still have some.

Part of the way I acted

on the court

was for some of these reasons

that we are talking about.

As a guy, you were

supposed to be tough

and not let your guard down

and cry, for example.

Is that a fair assessment

of the way you were brought up?

I would get angry instead of showing

that fear of failure

that all athletes have at times.

And so this mental health thing

has been going on

since the beginning of sports

at a certain level.

No, but now it's out, which is good.

Let's talk about it.

We were talking

about it 20 years ago.

But part of our job is talking

to the media.

That's why we make

the big bucks.

You are the person who said

pressure is a privilege.

You can either

make it a friend or a foe.

You decide,

but it's not easy.

Just go get some help.

Don't play if you're really,

really in a tough place.

However imperfectly,

the world has changed for the better.

And so there's much

more acceptance.

You write about this episode

in your life

when a relationship

with a woman became public,

you lost all your endorsements.

Now people would actually

be embracing that.

And I would make more money.

We see same-sex couples

in commercials.

You lost all your endorsements.

Of course, being who you are,

you bounced back from it,

and you triumphed over it.

So in the one sense,

society is more accepting.

But now along comes social media,

which is a hellhole or can be.

It can be good or bad.

It's one extreme to the other.

Thankfully, I don't know.

I have managed

to stay out of it this far.

- I like it.

- So it's not a hellhole for you.

I like it,

because I like communication.

Any time you can talk,

you can argue,

it's fine as long as you don't hit

A couple of things we have to

get to before we leave here.

You were in the forefront

of a generation of activist athletes,

yourself, Arthur Ashe,

Muhammad Ali, Jim Brown,

and others, Smith and Carlos.

- Bill Russell.

- Bill Russell. It's a long list.

What do you think

of the current generation

that is stepping

forward in that respect?

I think it's good they are.

I think the one challenge they have

The one thing we did is

we knew about our history.

And the more you know

about history

the more you know

about yourself, number one.

But more importantly,

you are able to shape the future.

Why was the original line in

1971 able to shape the future?

Because we knew about the past.

Do you know, by the way,

the younger viewers

who are gonna watch this show,

that Billie Jean King has done more,

you know this, Bob,

for young girls,

female athletes growing up

than anyone in the history

of the world?

Yeah, just think about that.

You're on the Mount Rushmore

of that. Very quickly.

Just because we're pressed for time,

you once refused a million bucks

back when that was real money

to play in South Africa,

because it was still

an apartheid regime.

That was one of my most

if not my proudest moment

in terms of making a good decision

you know, for the right reason.

I knew something was wrong

with that.

I've gotten a lot of positive

feedback over the years,

and I got to meet

Nelson Mandela

when I finally did go down

there when he was president.

And he said to me at the time,

he said,

"I listened to your final

on the radio".

And I realized he was

at Robben Island

listening to the final

between me and Bjorn Borg,

my old buddy,

and I'm sitting there

complaining about line calls.

And he spent 27 years

of his life

Did you ever see

Robben Island yet?

Did I ever go to Robben?

No.

I've been twice.

It's an unbelievable experience.

You really should go. And Ilana

and I got to meet Mandela as well.

- Your partner, Ilana.

- We couldn't even breathe.

She said, "I can't breathe"

when we walked into the room.

It was such an amazing experience.

Last thing,

the Battle of the Sexes, 1973.

They made a movie about it.

Steve Carell was Bobby Riggs.

Emma Stone played you.

Okay, 90 million people watched

this match from the Astrodome.

It was a different landscape.

Not only was tennis in America

more front and center,

but the whole media landscape

was different.

- You didn't have that many choices.

- We were very young as a pro sport.

Everybody is watching, okay?

You're 27 or 29.

- 29. He's 55.

- You're 29, he's 55.

- Same age as my dad at that time.

- He had won Wimbledon in 1939.

He won the Triple Crown.

And the US Open a couple

times in the early '40s.

- No, he was a great player.

- He's 55 years old.

He had beaten Margaret Court

in a Mother's Day match,

and Margaret Court was at that time

ranked number one in the world.

At first, you had turned down

a match with him.

He followed me around

for two years. I said, "no, no, no".

But after Margaret Court lost, you felt

you had to take the baton, right?

I did. I told my former husband Larry,

I said,

"If she should lose,

I don't think she will,"

"then if she does,

then I have to play."

And it was a statement,

even though a cynic could say:

"What does this prove?

55-year-old guy,"

"one of the best

women's players in the world"

"in the prime of her career,

what does this prove?"

But in the context of that time

it was meaningful.

It was.

Title IX had just been passed

the year before, which means

the first time ever

that schools, private,

public, high schools,

colleges had to spend the money

equally to men and women.

And you'll see a lot of schools

became co-ed around there.

And this is the first time

we had athletic scholarships.

But what happened with that match,

it was about social change.

Women could not get a credit card

in 1973 by ourselves, by the way.

I know, it's hard to believe.

But the point is that every tennis court

was full the next week.

You could not get on a tennis court,

and it was so in

that everyone was wearing

And because of that match,

I've been asked

the last 20 years how I would

do against Serena Williams.

You've been trying

to play her?

No, I haven't been trying

to play her.

Yeah, you have. You know

you love the attention. Come on.

Can we come back to the next

"Back on the Record"?

Why would anyone want this to end?

But they're rushing me

in the control room.

But I am not leaving

without getting to this.

Let's end on a smile.

It was important,

as we just laid out,

in 1973, but it was a garish spectacle.

And you had to either buy

into it or at least accept it.

They bring you in practically

on Cleopatra's barge.

Yeah, but I said okay to it.

Jerry Perenchio, the promoter, said:

"Billie, I have an idea".

And then he goes:

"Would you get on this?"

And I go: "Absolutely".

I said: "Feminists love entertainment.

Let's go."

All right, but Howard Cosell,

who was a progressive

on many social issues

- Especially with Ali.

- Especially on race.

He wasn't exactly up to speed

with the feminist movement.

As you will now see and hear.

A very attractive young lady,

and sometimes you get

the feeling

that if she ever let her hair

grow down to her shoulders,

took her glasses off,

you would have somebody vying

for a Hollywood screen test.

There she is.

And there you have it.

Howard Cosell always at the forefront

of social enlightenment.

There, right there.

I didn't see that tape for 25

or 30 years after that match.

And when I saw it,

I could not believe it.

It's so interesting,

because in 1971

when nine of us signed a 1 dollar

contract with Gladys Heldman,

one of the reasons

that we were able to do this

and we were willing to give up

our careers

is that, the number two reason was,

that we'd be appreciated

for our accomplishments,

not only our looks.

And little did I know

that Howard said that until,

like, 1000 years later,

and I went,

"Oh, my God, it's scary how people"

40% of professional athletes

are women.

We get 4% of the media. Okay?

How are people ever

gonna know who we are?

- You've got 50% here.

- I know.

- You've got 63%.

- And we've got to go.

Billie Jean, John, great to see

you as always.

Good to see you, Bob.

All-American at Tennessee,

number one draft choice,

two-time Super Bowl champion,

five-time league MVP,

14-time Pro Bowler,

Walter Payton

NFL Man of the Year,

unanimous first-ballot

Hall of Famer,

and so the natural question is,

what it's like being

Eli Manning's brother?

Especially here in New York,

Bob.

I was playing golf yesterday,

I had two kids come up to me,

they just called me, they said,

"Hi, Eli's brother".

"Nice to meet you."

I was, like, perfect.

Just cut right to the chase, right?

Okay, Eli's brother still to come.

But right now, we cede

the floor to Bomani Jones,

who has some thoughts

on the NFL's priorities

in a controversial situation.

Thank you, Bob.

So why should we trust

the NFL's investigation

into Deshaun Watson?

22 female massage therapists

have sued Watson

for inappropriate conduct

during massages.

Two of them, Ashley Solis

and Lauren Baxley,

have waived their right to anonymity

and publicly accused

the Texans quarterback.

In an interview with

"Sports Illustrated's" Jenny Vrentas,

both describe how they were treated

by NFL investigators

feeling more like they were accused.

Solis said league investigators

asked what she was wearing.

Baxley called the tone of her

interview "victim-blaming".

The NFL did not make Lisa Friel

and Jennifer Gaffney,

their lead investigators,

available for comment.

Now, none of this is surprising.

I mean, sure,

in 2006 Roger Goodell

took over the NFL and made himself

the law and order commissioner,

making his reputation by cracking down

on off-the-field misbehavior

and landing on the cover

of "TIME" magazine

with the headline

"The Enforcer".

That's not his job.

He's the moneymaker.

It's like rock, paper,

scissors for the NFL,

and profits always beat justice.

An NFL investigation

of a budding star like Watson

is operating less from innocent

until proven guilty

to innocent until proven

more innocent.

Without another bombshell

report or criminal charges

from the current police investigation,

how does exposing Watson

do anything good for the NFL?

Watson's jersey

makes a lot more money

than a prison jumpsuit would.

He is the face of the Texans.

And if he gets his wish

and is traded,

he'll be the face of that team too.

So why would a league built on

marketing quarterbacks

tear one down, one whose image

was pristine before March,

if it did not have to?

It has felt like the NFL's

investigations are decided

before they've begun,

serving whatever

the league wants at the time.

The league wanted to send a message

to the Patriots in 2016,

and the Deflategate report

read like a math student

who got the answer

from the back of the book

and needed to show work, any work,

that looked like it made sense.

The only investigator to interview

Ezekiel Elliott's accuser

in 2017 produced an internal memo

saying Elliott

should not have been suspended

and that his accuser

was not credible.

But it was time to look tough,

so the NFL suspended him

six games.

It all feels agenda-driven.

But that's what people asked for.

They wanted the NFL,

which only demonstrates accountability

when it's been sued,

to hold players to a standard

higher than the law,

a standard to which it

barely adheres itself.

The NFL isn't trying to create

a better world.

They just want a richer league.

It's more about accounting

than accountability.

And any quest for the truth,

no matter the process,

will arrive at that conclusion.

Bob?

Okay, much to think about there.

And now joining Bomani

for our panel, noted journalist,

the director of the center for sports

communication at Marist College,

Jane McManus.

And an investigative reporter

who's written extensively

on the intersection of sports

and off-field violence, Jessica Luther.

Jessica, let's start with you.

It's obviously a topic that requires,

if we are gonna discuss it fully,

much more time

than we have here.

But on the subject of how

leagues and sports entities

deal with this as opposed

to the criminal justice system,

what's your reaction

to what Bomani just said?

I think Bomani and I are on

the same page here.

I mean, I think of the NFL

as a business,

and I think starting there

is a good place to start.

I also think it is important

to note that the legal system

which they built a lot of their

investigative systems on

is not itself very good

at handling this issue.

So it is a really big ask

of a business to take this on.

I think they need to figure out

how to deal with it.

The NFL has taken a different approach

to various situations.

In this situation

with Deshaun Watson

facing both civil suits

and criminal investigations,

they're saying hands off

for the time being

till we see how this comes out.

Same thing

with Major League Baseball

in the Trevor Bauer situation.

He is on administrative leave.

He's being paid,

and baseball is waiting to see

where the criminal

investigation goes.

Right, which is always

a precarious position to be in,

because we never know

how those are gonna turn out.

And the Deshaun Watson case

is really complicated.

But there are a lot of people

who came forward about him,

and it is really interesting

that the NFL has chosen

to leave him on the field

at this point in time as,

you know, a flash point

in all of this.

I don't know. We should be

questioning that choice by the league.

And for those who don't know,

if I can summarize this quickly,

in Trevor Bauer's case,

he's been accused

of sexual as*ault.

He says it was all

consensual sex,

kinky and off-putting

to most of us as it may be,

and that's what the case

hinges upon, correct?

Right, the idea of rough sex,

right?

He hasn't denied

that the violence happened.

He's just saying it was in

the context of consensual sex.

Jane?

Let's keep in mind

why leagues decided

they had to discipline

in these types of cases

or to put players

off the field.

And it's because

when you're a team,

you are asking your fans

to cheer for somebody

when they take the field and they do

something that's impressive.

And they didn't want somebody

who has a history

or pending charges,

a really messy case

that's in the public sphere

to then be on the field

and cheered for on a Sunday

or during a baseball game.

And so to me that is actually

something where the leagues have

recognized their responsibility

and their unique place in our culture.

It is not like a regular business.

When you are working

at Wendy's,

nobody's cheering for you

when you take an order.

There are lots of places where

you don't experience that.

But sports is different.

And the NFL could be deciding

this week

whether or not they want

to take Deshaun Watson

and put him on the

commissioner's nonexempt list,

which means that he wouldn't be

on the field for this season.

I do think it's important

to note that these teams

often position themselves

within the community, right?

Like, they say that they

are part of this community,

and so they're willing to take

all those resources

from the community, when they want

a stadium or something like that,

so I do think they have

a responsibility

to that community

when they have a player who

Especially when you talk

about college teams.

It may be a quaint notion,

but the idea is that

the college administration

is acting in loco parentis.

These are young adults

or adolescents,

and you've reported extensively

on the situation at Baylor,

where, I don't mean

to overstate it,

but sexual as*ault

became epidemic there.

Right, yes. And we saw just

two weeks ago, I believe,

the NCAA finally,

it was six years after

the initial reporting that my friend

Dan Solomon and I did,

the NCAA finally had their ruling.

And they came down

saying there were no sanctions

around the sexual as*ault part of it.

Because they have no rules.

They have never taken it on themselves

to make a rule around this.

The NCAA is more apt

to sanction a university

for some sort of ill*gal inducement

to get a recruit to come to campus

than for allowing

sexual as*ault on their campus.

Yes. That's what we learned.

But that's the business

that they're in.

Like, they are good

at throwing tournaments

and keeping kids broke, right?

Like, that is what they do.

And I'm curious what you think

about this,

because when the NCAA

They did something similar

with North Carolina

in the academic scandal

where they looked up,

and they were like, we don't

really work in that department.

And I actually was okay

with that in both cases,

because why in the world

would I trust

this particular institution

to do something credible

on these matters, right?

I feel like what we have

in a lot of these cases

is people are looking to an institution

to do something about this problem,

and the institution that's charged

with doing something

has been woeful in that regard.

And that is

the criminal justice system.

And so we want anybody,

anything to do something,

and so we look for the ruling

institution over all of us,

which is capitalism,

but the problem is,

it's capitalism,

and so the NFL is like:

"So you're asking us to take

a story that is not a story"

"and throw it on the front page

so that it becomes a story?"

So we have no institution

that we could trust.

And I'm wondering if anybody

has any thoughts.

Is there a solution

to that fundamental dilemma?

I don't think they're

interested in one, really.

I mean, the NCAA

is a revenue-generating business.

It's not in the interest

of that organization to do anything.

Look at the gender inequity

report, I'm calling it,

because of the way it treats

NCAA basketball,

men's versus women.

It's terrible.

I mean, they're just

not interested in it.

I think too often in society

and in sports

we see women being collateral damage

in whatever the enterprise is.

I mean, Deshaun Watson,

let's take him for example.

Imagine that instead

of massage therapists

being asked to do things

that they shouldn't be asked to do,

instead it was TVs

being stolen out of a house.

You wouldn't have his attorney,

Rusty Hardin, coming out and saying,

"Well, why were the TVs

so close to the door?"

You just wouldn't have that.

People would probably react differently.

But because this is about

harassment and women,

we treat it as though it's not really

the same thing when it is.

Next topic.

Today, Friday,

for our first airing,

we find out that nine

Tennessee Titans,

including the quarterback,

Ryan Tannehill,

have tested positive

for COVID.

The NFL has said that there

may be forfeits this year.

If a team can't field its full roster

or something that's competitive,

you forfeit the game.

It goes down as a loss.

What's your response,

any of you,

to the situation regarding vaccinations

in sports and COVID in sports?

I think what the NFL did,

which was really smart,

was they said,

"Okay, you guys want a choice"

"on whether or not you

want to get vaccinated?"

"Great, but we're not

gonna pay for it."

You want to take that choice,

you then incur the risk.

People made the decision whether

or not they want to get vaccinated.

There's nothing new coming.

FDA has approved it.

It's no longer EUA.

You can get the vaccine

and be pretty sure

that you're getting something

that's fairly stable.

And if you choose not to do it,

that's fine. But you will pay, then,

if you end up costing us a game.

And if you break protocols,

you're gonna be fined 15 grand.

Yeah, exactly right.

What happens here

that's a little bit different

is that you have players who,

if they are anti-vaccine,

and they decide to make a stink

about something that the NFL does,

everybody's gonna know about it,

and you're gonna have a lot

of people that follow them.

And so I think the union,

the NFL Players Association,

then is in this position where

they don't necessarily want

to challenge their players to talk out

against the NFL and its rules,

because ultimately, that kind of policy

is better for the entirety

of the union's players.

We have turned it over

to Capitalism again

and asked it to solve

our vaccine problem.

Well, Jerry Jones

this week says,

"Hey, look, you can do whatever

you want"

"until it starts to affect

somebody else."

"And in sports,

we talk about we."

"So stop talking about I

and talk about we."

Sean McDermott,

the coach of the Bills,

says, "Look, we're at

a competitive disadvantage."

"We have 80% vaccinations,"

"which is higher than

the national average,"

"but lower than

the NFL's average of 93%."

"The Falcons, by the way,

are at 100%."

"What if guys can't practice?

What if we lose them for games?"

"You're putting us at

a competitive disadvantage."

Which is obviously

an indisputable fact.

However, one of his players,

Cole Beasley,

says, among other things,

the following:

"Everybody is all-in on science.

What about God's will?"

"I'll get vaccinated

and be an advocate for it"

"if Pfizer puts a percentage

of its earnings in my wife's name."

I think Albert Einstein

said it best:

"The difference between genius

and stupidity"

"is that genius has limits."

The fun thing about Cole Beasley

is he says all this stuff on Twitter.

He does not do any of it

in front of a camera.

Every time that we need to

say stuff about Cole Beasely,

we gotta put his stuff on

the inset on the screen.

He's been very wise about not putting

his face and voice on this.

But I think all the people in

power in the country thought,

"Once the vaccine is available,"

"people are gonna

line up to take it."

And people did line up to take it,

and then all of a sudden,

there weren't

people in line anymore.

And that never dawned on anyone

that we would have

this solution to come around

and people wouldn't take it.

And so now the money is trying

to get the money back going.

And so how are we

going to do this?

The institution that runs this is like,

"Okay, we are going to create

negative incentives,"

"or disincentives, that will make you

then want to get this vaccine."

And there's still people looking up.

In the NFL, where your job is tenuous,

and where your money

isn't necessarily that long,

people who are still willing to say,

"Nah, I'll roll the dice on this."

"So yeah, it might mess up

my body forever."

"Yeah, that's fine.

I'll go ahead and do this."

And the people in charge can't

have that for much longer.

And I think that's what

we're seeing.

But that's the calculation

that a lot of players make anyway.

Whether it's concussions,

going out there,

knowing that your knee could

get blown out on a tackle.

I mean, they've already

made that decision.

"I'm in for short term."

That's your career,

not other people's health.

All right, last issue here.

And we have to be brief

even though it's a juicy issue.

Cover story in the most recent

"Sports Illustrated"

all about gambling and

its proliferation in sports.

Jane, you've reported

fairly extensively about this,

including outside the borders

of the United States.

Obviously,

the profit motive is there.

It's a windfall for the leagues.

It's a tax windfall for various

municipalities and states.

What's the downside?

Well, in 2018,

I made a bunch of calls

to some people who work

in the EU as regulators

when it comes to gambling there.

In many countries there,

you can bet on sports, no problem.

And one of the regulators said to me

as this was beginning,

"You in the United States,"

"you know, you have

a really good thing going."

"And when there's a play,

you know, in the fourth quarter"

"or if there's a pop fly and somebody

drops it in the 9th inning,"

"you never really have to worry"

"about whether or not

that effort was genuine."

You know, maybe they were

boneheaded play, whatever,

but you don't necessarily think

that someone's thrown that.

And that could change.

That could change in this

country as a result of this.

And I think we're all

looking at the money.

You know, Bomani's made this

point now a couple of times,

we're run by Capitalism.

Everybody's looking at the money.

But we have a large class of athletes

in this country who are amateurs,

who do not have a financial

stake in the game.

And if someone came to them

and said,

"Hey, you know, I'm gonna

give you ten grand if you do that",

that's ten grand more than

they're making off that game.

Here's what many don't realize.

There's a line on Division 3 volleyball.

You can bet on this cornhole thing

that's on ESPN 27.

- You know, what is that?

- Well, that's exactly right.

We don't think about it,

but in other countries,

they know firsthand

that a lot of times, you know,

these games can be corrupted.

And that's something

we haven't had to worry about,

and I think we possibly could.

We also have to look at, like, reporting

and different rules.

What if you know something

if you cover the Cowboys

and you happen to know

something about an injury?

Rather than reporting it,

what if you sold it to this

group of sharks over here

who are all about to,

you know, place a bet.

You could make

a lot of money like that.

And we're not looking

at any of that.

Where's the accountability

on sports betting?

It's a state-by-state thing.

That makes it ripe for anyone

who wants to take advantage.

I'm not playing moralist here,

for the record.

My dad was an inveterate gambler.

He collected from and paid to

guys named "Blinky"

and "Three Finger".

I'm not kidding.

When I was 12 years old,

if you asked me on a Monday

after Sunday's football games,

"What's the line

on Giants/Eagles?"

I'd give it to you within a point.

I do think that there was

kind of a dark romance

or Runyonesque kind of thing

about what my dad did

as opposed to someone

sitting with their smartphone

in a dorm room.

But if everything

becomes transactional,

if everything is monetized,

maybe we're too far gone

on this anyway,

but isn't some of the charm of sports

gone if that becomes the case?

At this point, we're talking about

billions of dollars, right?

I mean, I see what you're saying.

At the same time,

it's so interesting to me

that Manfred and Goodell

have both talked about

how this is good

for "fan engagement".

Like, that's the language

they're using.

A decade ago, every commissioner

testified before congress,

"It's the end of the world

if we have legalized betting."

I think it's out of the barn,

you already have reporters who

are specializing in betting

even though years ago, when

we started off in the business,

if you placed a bet,

you could be fired.

By the way, in fairness,

that's still the rule.

If you work for one of these

leagues, if you're a player,

or, for example, I do some stuff

for the Major League Baseball Network,

which is owned by the league,

if you share proprietary

information,

or if you're found to be

gambling yourself on baseball,

you can be terminated.

Who are we now, once again, trusting

to enforce the standards

and keep this right?

The same Capitalist structure.

'Cause the person,

or the entity, I think,

that we trust the most to try

to keep all this level

is the house, the casino.

They're the ones most invested

in keeping this level.

Like, once again, we are just hoping

that the market will save us.

Which is crazy.

And I am hoping

that we can move on.

Otherwise, there's gonna be

an insurrection in the control room.

So thanks to you all,

Bomani, Jane, and Jessica.

And now, on to Peyton Manning.

We spoke with him last week

in the aftermath of his

Hall of Fame induction.

He's clearly one of the greatest

quarterbacks of all time.

He's also, of course, part of one

of the great football families.

On top of which,

he's pretty damn funny.

All of that made Peyton's

Hall of Fame enshrinement

and his acceptance speech

a memorable occasion.

In his remarks, he made it clear

he's not done with football yet.

Peyton, obviously

you love the game,

you know its history,

you're concerned about its future.

What role do you see

for yourself?

Well, I don't have a specific role.

I know a couple people

have said they thought

I was campaigning for

the commissioner's position.

That was never on my radar when

I put that speech together.

I think if the NFL was lucky,

Roger Goodell would do it another

20 years, to tell you the truth.

But I've taken very seriously

my role to be an ambassador

for the game

since I've stopped playing.

The game's been under attack,

there's no doubt about it.

And keeping the game safe

I think is priority number one.

Getting the high schools

and the junior programs

to limit the tackling and to limit

the on-the-field contact

to keep players healthy

and keep it safe,

those are all initiatives that

I'd like to continue to be a part of.

Commissionership

is out though, right?

I don't know where that came from,

and it never crossed my mind

in anything that I was saying.

But no, that was not

on my radar by any means.

Players being part of ownership

is a continuing trend.

Jordan with the Hornets,

Jeter with the Marlins.

A-Rod made a run at the Mets,

and now he's part

of the ownership group

with the Timberwolves.

And there are other examples.

Now, I figure you don't

have 3 billion, 4 billion,

even though you've done

pretty well.

- If it is, I can't find it.

- It's not on you.

But being part of a group,

would that interest you?

I haven't said no to anything.

I've kind of said no

to this for this year.

Sure, to be a part of a team

on the competitive side

would be exciting, would be fun.

Like, people ask me all the time,

"Hey, are you gonna buy a team?"

I'm like, "I keep looking for

the 3 billion in my pocket."

"I just don't know where it is."

But, you know, I haven't had

any serious conversations

with anyone that's been close

to buying a team.

But if the situation arose,

and to be a part of it,

yeah, that would certainly

be interesting.

Being an athlete is unique

in that you peak,

and then you're done

while still a young man or woman.

A 30-year-old ball player

is a veteran.

A 30-year-old in almost any other walk

of life is a youngster.

Is a newcomer.

And so you have more

than half of your life,

generally speaking, remaining

after you've played your last down

or thrown your last pitch,

whatever it might be.

And a lot of guys

have difficulty adjusting to that.

"Who am I?

What am I gonna do?"

- Have you thought about that?

- Sure.

There's no doubt about it,

and I've seen it firsthand.

I think the first thing that I admitted

and I came to the realization

that nothing is going

to give you a rush

like running out through

a tunnel in an NFL stadium.

I don't think it exists.

Skydiving, flying a plane,

hang gliding, you name it,

I just don't think it's there.

And so because I've admitted

that it's not there,

I'm not chasing that same rush

and adrenaline.

And I got to do it for a long time.

I loved everything about it.

And so you just sort of find,

I don't know, use a cheesy

football analogy,

completions to kind of matriculate

down the field.

As Hank Stram would say.

And I've kind of taken it

one year at a time like I said.

Priority number one for me

is being there for my family,

our children's flag football

games that I'm coaching,

my daughter's softball games.

My dad said no to a lot of things

that would have taken him away

from our Little League

baseball games

and high school football games.

My dad was there every

Friday night in the stands.

He never coached me,

but he was there.

I always knew he was there,

and that was important to me.

And so I've tried to follow

that model.

At the same time, staying busy,

staying stimulated.

I like my kids seeing me

going to work,

whatever it is that I'm doing.

I don't really have

a one-word job description.

But that's important

to create some free time

to still do some of those

things I never had a chance to do

in 25 years.

People may not realize

just how serious your neck injury was

and all the nerve damage

and what it took

A, surgically to put you

back together,

and then B, all the rehab.

Was it more serious

than people realize?

Yeah. It's one of those things that

you don't wanna give live updates

as to

"this is how weak my arm is",

"these are the weights

that I'm lifting now".

I was very sensitive

to kind of who could see me.

I really only threw the football

during that time, Bob,

with about three people.

With my wife,

I let her see me throw,

Eli, and my dad.

And that was it, 'cause I didn't want

anybody else to kind of see me

and to see the reaction

on their faces.

It was definitely the greatest

professional challenge

that I ever had to go through.

I had great support

during that time,

but it's something about

being flexible, being adaptive.

Still maybe not make these

65 yard throws,

but be really accurate

on these mid-level throws.

In a weird way, I'm almost

kind of glad I went through it.

I had pretty good health

prior to that.

I didn't have a lot

of challenges that way,

and I feel like I kind of persevered

and sort of passed that test.

When you first came back

with the Broncos,

you're throwing 50 touchdown

passes in a season.

You're putting up huge numbers.

At the end, you were like a guy

who had a 100 mile-an-hour fastball,

and now he's throwing

junk ba*ls.

- But you still won the Super Bowl.

- There's different ways to win it.

And every time I see Von Miller

and DeMarcus Ware,

I thank them

and I jump on their backs

because they carried me

that season.

I said, "I want you

to keep carrying me."

That's football, right?

A golfer couldn't do that, right?

Because it's an individual sport.

I had to have teammates

help me.

That's pretty much why

I knew it was time.

I just couldn't do the things

that I used to do

and felt like it was

the right time to step away,

especially coming off

a championship season

with the Broncos.

When you got that closure,

even though had you not had

a very serious injury,

you could have continued

to play longer,

was it out of your system

because you got that closure?

Yeah. I just felt like

I did everything that I wanted to do.

I got to experience all of it.

You know, Super Bowl wins,

Super Bowl losses,

rookie year with 28 interceptions,

to be a part of

two world championships

on two different organizations.

And then I felt like there's

something about getting out

when you do have your health,

as opposed to waiting till the health

is the reason that you gotta go.

And I didn't want to be

carried off the field.

I wanted to walk off the field.

And it just felt like the right time.

I always thought I had

pretty good timing, right?

Working on those timing routes.

And it just felt like the right time.

And zero regrets.

I had people say, "Hey, you're

not gonna want to go to games"

"right away,

you're gonna get antsy."

None of that.

I love going to games.

Love, you know,

cheering on players

and being a part of the game.

And so it was a fun journey.

Talk about a football family.

Your dad was a terrific player,

but not so terrific NFL team.

He presents you.

That was an emotional moment.

You talk about your mom

in the speech,

how she could read a Cover-2 defense

as well as most NFL quarterbacks.

Your brother is there, he might

be a Hall-of-Famer someday.

And your nephew, Arch,

Cooper's son,

might very well play in

the NFL someday himself, yes?

Yeah, I'm really proud

of my nephew.

I'm proud of Cooper

for how he's handled it.

He's really made it

an enjoyable experience.

I feel for these young

high school players now.

The recruiting starts so much earlier

than when I was getting recruited.

Since he was a freshmen,

they've been asking him,

"Hey, where are you going?"

Plus, he's at the same school.

He's at Isidore Newman

in New Orleans.

I go back to those games. My parents

are sitting in the same stands

they sat in when they watched

me and Eli play.

And I want him to have

a fun high school experience.

I worry about these kids

that don't enjoy the process

because, I mean, heck, we got kids

leaving high school early now

to go to college.

But I'm proud of him.

Eli and I get a little mad at my dad,

'cause I feel like my dad skipped

a generation with his speed.

He gave it all to his grandson.

He skipped me and Eli.

Like, "Dad, I'd like to have

a little speed."

Yeah, your Dad was a scrambler.

Of course, he had to be,

'cause the offensive line

was so bad.

So I have to admit, you know,

for Cooper,

who, as you know, Bob,

was gonna have a really

good career at Ole Miss

as a SEC wide receiver.

Had a neck injury,

never got to play.

Handled it with incredible grace,

a positive attitude,

never complained,

was Eli and I's biggest supporters.

Never said, "This isn't fair."

For him to have this full circle,

to have his son being recruited,

and it's really a cool thing to see.

Let's talk about Tom Brady.

People are fascinated by this.

They see him come to Canton,

they see you playing

in the match, golf situation.

They find out later,

Wilt and Russell actually

were good friends,

dined at each other's homes,

stayed at each other's homes

while they were active players.

Magic and Larry Bird, the same.

On the other hand, Ali and Frazier

were trying

to beat each other's brains out.

So how did that relationship go?

How is it different now

than ten years ago?

I think there was always

just great respect

on the perception of things.

I could tell Tom Brady was a guy that

I said, "He's got to watch

a lot of film."

"I can tell he spends time

with his receivers"

"working on timing

after practice."

I didn't really know that,

I just assumed that.

And then you play in a Pro Bowl

together, right?

And you spend time

in Hawaii together.

You play in a charity

golf tournament together.

You spend time with him.

You have dinner together,

and you realize

that he is doing those things.

And next thing you know,

we're kind of talking about ideas

and how we watch film.

Not giving away all the secrets,

but, trying to improve

each other's craft.

And so it's been a special friendship.

And I think it's important to

have respect for the opponent.

You want to beat him,

you want to do the best

you can for your team,

but, you know, respect the guys

you're playing against.

That's an important part of it.

Bill Belichick recently said

no doubt in his mind,

not even close,

the best quarterback he

ever had to compete against,

and the hardest guy

to prepare for was you.

That's a tremendous compliment.

And I'm very honored

and humbled by that comment.

And Coach Belichick

came to Canton

to see Jimmy Johnson,

Bill Cowher,

and he said to say hello to me.

He was there at

the Saturday night ceremony.

Harry Carson came

and grabbed me and said,

"Bill Belichick wants

to say hello to you."

I walked back, had a great

conversation with him.

He shared that with me.

I was with Marvin Harrison.

He said, "Thank God

both of you guys are retired."

"I got tired of playing

against you guys."

So look, he's the greatest coach

of all time in my opinion.

And for him to say something

like that really means a lot.

Here's something from your

Hall of Fame speech

that completely captures

your love of the game.

And everybody, including all the former

Hall of Fame players loved it.

Let's take a look at this.

The other night I had a dream

that I was in one of those scrimmages.

We were on the 50 yard line

with only three seconds

left in the game.

Coach Cowher

called a running play.

I said, "Coach,

I'm gonna have to audible."

I called a pass play.

my bust faked a handoff

to Barry Sanders.

I threw a 20-yard break-in

route to Michael Irvin

right as Deacon Jones and Ray

Nitschke hit me at the same time.

Irving, as he was getting

tackled by Ronnie Lott,

then lateraled to Steve Largent,

who was in a footrace

down the sideline

with Darrell Green

and Lem Barney.

The savvy Largent,

knowing he couldn't win

a footrace with Darrell Green,

then lateraled back

to Lance Alworth,

who dove into the end zone

for the game-winning score.

- Sums it up.

- Yeah, I know. That was

I kind of get emotional

thinking about it.

Just the history of it

A lot of those guys

aren't with us anymore.

They've moved on.

You know, Deacon Jones,

I think the Hall of Fame

is where he really held court.

There's a Ray Nitschke

luncheon now,

where Ray used to kind of

tell these young guys,

to, "Hey, be good ambassadors

for the game."

"Come back, right?

Be a good servant."

So yeah, kind of capturing all that in.

Lance Alworth called your dad, right?

Lance Alworth was watching.

He and my dad are somewhat

of the same vintage,

and told my dad he appreciated

the shout-out.

I don't think Lance Alworth's

been called out

at a Hall of Fame ceremony

in years past.

And so, you know, I mean, look,

I love the players

that have just retired,

I love Jerry Rice, Chris Carter,

but a little bit of a throwback

to the players of yesteryear,

because they were important, Bob.

They didn't make nearly as much money

as the players make today,

but they were integral in the

success of the NFL today,

so it was a little shout-out to them.

When you look back

over an epic career,

if you had one or two moments

to put in a time capsule

that just kind of embodied

everything that you care about,

what would they be?

I gotta tell you, I really think one

of them was last Sunday night

after the Hall of Fame

ceremony.

The Colts hosted kind

of an open party for me

where I could invite Colts,

Broncos, you name it.

But at one point,

I was looking around the room,

I was looking at

my high school teammates,

college teammates,

Colts teammates,

Broncos teammates,

35 years of football

kind of captured in one room.

I said, "Well, if I could just

capture this moment"

Because we don't get to see each other

very much anymore.

Everybody's got different

things going on, families.

And so I think that was just

kind of a reminder

of the greatest takeaway for me

in my football experience

were the relationships.

Were the people, teammates,

the equipment manager,

as you know, is behind the scenes

the heart and soul

of a baseball team,

a football team.

The video director who I made

him spend countless hours

breaking down video

to get me to watch.

And so I think about

all those people,

and luckily, even though

I don't play anymore,

I still get to have

those friendships.

And so that was better

than a throw or a game for me,

was the friendships that I made

in this long football journey.

Last thing. A lot of athletes have

hosted "Saturday Night Live".

Many of them have been good.

You, in my humble opinion,

far and away the best.

What was the best thing

about that experience?

The cast members,

the rehearsals,

how much of it did you

ad lib or suggest?

Going behind the ropes in another field

is fascinating to me,

because you don't get

to do that in football, Bob.

You don't get to bring

a 12th guy in the huddle.

You can't get in there, right?

But to go behind the ropes

of "Saturday Night Live"

and to see how Amy Poehler,

Bill Hader, Jason Sudeikis,

all big stars now, were kind of

working on their craft.

They're writing all these ideas,

trying to make them real popular,

and go on to the next deal.

So to witness that

was pretty special.

The one people talk to me about

the most, Bob,

was this little skit we did

for the United Way

where I was pegging these kids

in the head.

Okay, I'm sorry.

Do you want to lose?

I throw, you catch.

It's not that hard, okay?

All right, get the f*ck

out of here.

You know, that was in 2007, right?

A friend of mine sent me an email,

said, "Hey, this guy Jack was

the guy you pegged in the head"

"on the way to the portalet,

he's getting married now,"

"and would you do

a shout-out video to him?"

And so I said,

"Absolutely I will."

I said, "Jack,

Peyton Manning here."

"Best wishes to you and your bride.

I hope for eternal happiness."

"You know, I threw a few

touchdowns, I had a few wins,"

"but for the most part, when people

come up to me on the street,"

"they recognize me

for one reason,"

"for pegging you

in the back of the head."

"Thank you for blessing me

with that opportunity"

"to hit you in the face.

Best of luck. Best wishes."

So, that was an all-timer.

And that's the one people still

talk to me about the most.

And what's not to like

about Peyton Manning?

In addition to everything else,

Peyton and brother Eli

will provide an alternative Monday

night broadcast on ESPN 2.

Just a pair of brothers,

each with a pair

of Super Bowl titles,

talking about the game as

they watch it along with you.

And finally, consider this,

the week after next

in Cooperstown,

baseball's COVID-delayed

Hall of Fame induction ceremony

will take place for Derek Jeter,

Ted Simmons, and Larry Walker.

Also to be honored,

posthumously, Marvin Miller,

the long-time head

of the Players Association.

Under Miller's intelligent

and principled direction

in the '60s and '70s,

the players, until then powerless

over the direction of their own

careers, gained free agency,

one of the most

significant developments

in baseball history,

which also had a ripple effect

as other leagues eventually

followed suit.

Some in baseball

never forgave Miller

for how he beat the owners at

every turn in negotiations,

not that he was ever

especially charitable

in his own assessments

of the Lords of the Game either.

And while Miller could, at times,

be too unyielding and doctrinaire,

in the big picture, and in his time,

he was right.

And his influence was monumental.

There's no denying he's one

of the most significant figures

in the history of the game.

Despite that, Miller always

believed he'd never join

the various executives

enshrined in the Hall

as long as he was alive,

and as long as baseball officials

would have to listen

to his acceptance speech.

In fact, Miller's prediction came true.

He died in 2012 at the age of 95,

and only now, nine years later,

will his place in baseball history

finally be recognized.

But not properly,

since he won't be there

both to accept his honor

and speak his piece.

And that brings us to the player

most closely associated with Miller,

the late Curt Flood.

The All-Star Cardinal

outfielder of the '60s

who hit .293 lifetime,

won seven Gold Gloves

and was an important part

of three Cardinal pennant winners.

Flood was a distinctive player

and an even more distinctive

individual,

well-read and with a variety

of interests which included

his active participation in

the '60s civil rights movement.

And when, after the 1969 season,

the Cardinals traded him

to the Phillies,

Flood decided he wouldn't go.

He had his reasons.

It's been a master and sl*ve

relationship.

"As long as you do what I say do,

you're fine."

Flood's cause was taken up

by Marvin Miller

and the Players Association,

and eventually, went all

the way to the Supreme Court,

where it lost on a narrow vote.

Still, a statement had been made,

an important one on the long

path to players' rights,

even if Flood himself would never reap

the tangible benefits.

He'd play only 13 more games

in the Majors.

By that point, a broken man,

both emotionally and financially.

Baseball and the museum

where its history resides,

can do better by Curt Flood.

This is not an argument for

his enshrinement as a player.

He was an excellent player,

though not quite

Hall of Fame great.

But there exists a perfect answer.

Years ago,

a special committee enshrined

17 previously overlooked

players and contributors

from the n*gro Leagues.

And somehow,

they bypassed Buck O'Neil.

Their focus was too narrow.

They looked at statistics alone.

Buck O'Neil's significance

and contribution to the game

was so much greater

than mere numbers.

Storyteller supreme,

contemporary of Satchell Paige

and Josh Gibson,

treasure trove of baseball

and n*gro League history,

a national treasure who was

the most memorable presence

in Ken Burns'

baseball documentary.

How could they not see all that?

Well, Buck was too gracious

to say so,

but the snub hurt him

and embarrassed the Hall,

which quickly found a way

to remedy the injustice,

a statue in Cooperstown

and a lifetime achievement

award named for O'Neil

to be given only occasionally

and only to those

whose overall contributions

to the game merit it.

Buck himself

was the first recipient.

Rachel Robinson is among

the select few

who have received it since.

Curt Flood absolutely fits the profile

of a baseball figure

worthy of the O'Neil award.

And now is the time.

No need for the Hall to be

constrained by technicalities

or myopic devotion to process.

There are 12 days between now

and induction day.

Just do it by acclimation.

When baseball gets it right,

it can be both moving

and meaningful.

The All-Century Team,

baseball's role

in the aftermath of 9/11,

the Field of Dreams game.

But sometimes,

baseball gets it wrong.

They got it wrong for

a long time with Marvin Miller.

Here's a chance to at least,

in part, make it right.

Miller and Flood are gone.

But on September 8th

in Cooperstown,

they can be symbolically reunited,

honored together for their enduring

place in baseball history.

It would be a perfectly

fitting gesture

and the kind of grace note

Buck O'Neil himself

would approve and applaud.

We're back on the record

next month. See you then.