Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

01x02 - A m*rder in D.C.

Episode transcripts for the TV show, "Web of Make Believe: Death, Lies and the Internet". Aired: 15 June 2022.*
Watch/Buy Amazon


The series explores instances of digital misinformation and its consequences.

01x02 - A m*rder in D.C.

Post by bunniefuu »

The night of July 10th, 2016,

Seth Rich is at Lou's City Bar,

a place in the Columbia Heights

neighborhood of Washington, D.C.

It's a sports bar. He's a frequent there.

They know him by name.

They know how he likes his buffalo wings.

The whole deal.

He leaves in the early morning hours.

And then takes a

somewhat circuitous walk back home.

He tries to reach his father.

Doesn't.

He speaks to his girlfriend. Twice.

Once for almost exactly

an hour and a half.

Another time for about

three-quarters of an hour.

At the end of the second call,

she hears some sound that concerns her.

And he says, "Don't worry. I'll be fine."

And gets off the phone.

Then about 4:20 in the morning,

Seth Rich is shot in the back twice.

There appears to have been

some kind of significant scuffle.

He has bruising

on his face and his wrists.

Security cameras nearby

don't capture who did this to him,

but they show you legs

essentially scuttling away.

That was the beginning of this story,

which has since

spiraled way out of control.

The m*rder of Seth Rich

- Seth Rich

- Shot in the back. Left for dead.

Mary and I had gone out to breakfast.

We came back,

and there was a note on the front door,

"Call D.C. Police."

He didn't want to give us

any real information.

And then I asked him,

"Is this really bad?"

And he said, "Yes."

And I said, "How bad?"

And he says,

"Your son was m*rder*d last night."

I believe I probably ran

Dropped to the floor.

Because

it made no sense.

It made no sense.

Why would anybody sh**t my son?

Excuse me.

I think my life ended right there.

A sense emerges

from the Metropolitan Police Department

that it was a robbery gone wrong.

We are aware of the robberies

from that particular area.

And we are looking to commonalities

uh, with the robberies and our case.

This neighborhood had

a fair degree of crime over the years

and it actually had homicides there

within the previous year or so.

There had been shootings there.

He's from Nebraska.

He came to Washington

to get involved in politics.

He wanted to make the world

a a better place.

He was m*rder*d about

a block and a half from his home.

This was a pretty big local story.

You have a young man who is working

for the Democratic National Committee

during a presidential election year.

In July 2016,

the presidential election

was getting really heated and nasty.

It's not hard to imagine Donald Trump

leading us into a w*r

just because somebody

got under his very thin skin.

Hillary Clinton is a weak person.

Hillary Clinton is totally scripted.

Hillary Clinton is a thief.

We have received

more votes from people under 30

than Hillary Clinton

and Donald Trump combined.

Due to Seth's links to the DNC,

people almost immediately

started speculating

that he was k*lled for political reasons.

Our little guy

with the haircut that never quit.

And the Goofy slippers.

And the Goofy slippers.

He walked out with those.

Tell me about Seth.

Where did he grow up and what was he like?

Well, he grew up in Omaha, Nebraska.

He loved to joke.

He loved to make people laugh.

He felt that was an excellent way

to start communication.

In, like, eighth grade,

he was taking some speech classes

and maybe some starting debate.

That continued strongly in high school,

where he would watch

C-SPAN for fun, which is

- In high school?

- In high school.

At a very, very young age,

he could tell me every congressperson,

every senator, every governor,

what they stood for,

what the policies were.

His whole heart and soul

was into voter registration

and getting the registration right.

How do we get better access to data

that tells us why ballots are rejected,

why ballots are cast as provisional,

so that we can

For him, every person should vote.

That was part of his heart.

If you could name an all-American kid,

it would be him.

I was covering politics and crime

for a local alt-weekly

and so initially we saw

the Seth Rich story

as a straight-up m*rder

that was mysterious, that was unsolved.

And then as I was also consuming

sort of as my side job

writing about right-wing media,

I was going on forums

like thedonald

and stuff like that and I was seeing

all these mentions of Seth Rich.

And I thought, you know, "Oh, the guy

from the the botched robbery?"

Conspiracy theories

tend to pick up in traumatic moments.

When there's something

that is difficult to explain

or difficult to come

to emotional terms with.

People are susceptible

to conspiracy theories

because we naturally,

as primates, look for patterns.

We look for recurring signs

that help us explain things

that are happening in the world.

The Democrats

have all these emails released

and it shows that the DNC

had not played exactly neutral

between Bernie Sanders'

more insurgent campaign

and Hillary Clinton's

more establishment campaign.

As the Democrats

get ready to start their convention,

leaked emails from

the Democratic National Committee

now show that Sanders

may have been right all along

when he claimed the party

had its thumb on the scale for Clinton.

WikiLeaks, the Internet watchdog group,

leaked 20,000 emails from seven

top DNC officials during primary season.

There were also a lot

of other emails that got out there.

Emails about trading recipes.

Just personal jokes and things.

In the days after Seth Rich's death,

there is an SVR bulletin.

The SVR is essentially

a Russian intelligence outfit.

It has put out a bulletin,

essentially fraudulently,

as though it believes

that Seth Rich was going to meet

in those very early morning hours

of July 10th, 2016,

with FBI agents.

But it turned out

that the FBI agents were paid K*llers.

And it looked like those K*llers

might in some way

be associated with Hillary Clinton.

That's the claim.

And then it appears almost simultaneously

on WhatDoesItMean.com.

This website,

WhatDoesItMean.com, posted this bulletin

that was put out by

Russian foreign intelligence.

The guy who founded

the WhatDoesItMean.com website

was sort of semi-infamous

for having tried to hijack a plane

when he was like 14 years old.

And then gained some notoriety

for having a dream about another plane

crashing in very specific terms.

Everybody talks about a dream but

And, everybody has dreams

I didn't have a dream, I had a vision.

A few days later,

there was a plane crash that very closely

resembled what he had dreamt about.

So he was, like, all over TV

as, like, the psychic

who could predict these terrible events.

And he sort of laundered that then

into this website

very much focused on

elevating different conspiracies

and a long history of seeming ties

to Russian intelligence sources.

He posted a reference

to the trove of emails that Russia had

before this was broadly public knowledge.

His site served as a

clearing house for Russian disinformation

as they were flooding him

with things to put out.

These claims start to metastasize

and they particularly grow wild

at 4chan and subreddits.

In the aftermath of Seth Rich's death,

this idea that he was m*rder*d by

the Clintons or some sort of cabal

is really still sort of bubbling

on the fringes of the right wing.

It hasn't been embraced in a major way.

And then Julian Assange of WikiLeaks

goes on a Dutch TV show.

Whistleblowers go to significant efforts

to get us material

and often very significant risks.

There's a 27-year-old

that works for the DNC

who was shot in the back,

m*rder*d, just two weeks ago,

uh, for unknown reasons,

as he was walking

down the street in Washington. So

That was just a robbery,

I believe, wasn't it?

No. There's no finding.

So, that's the sort of

What are you suggesting?

I am suggesting

that our sources, uh, take risks,

and they are

they become concerned,

to see things occurring like that.

But was he one of

your sources then? I mean

We don't comment on

who our sources are but

Then why make the suggestion?

About a young guy being shot

in the streets of Washington?

Because we have to understand,

how high the stakes are

in the United States.

Julian Assange is very cagey about it,

but the implication is that Seth Rich

was a source for WikiLeaks.

At 10:15 in the morning,

I get a call from

a Washington Post reporter,

saying WikiLeaks

has just offered a $20,000 reward

for information about Seth's death.

"What are your comments?"

And it's like, "No comment."

There are rumors swirling

all over the place as to why WikiLeaks

would have an interest

in this m*rder case.

Our sources face serious risks,

that's why they come to us,

so we can protect their anonymity.

But it's quite something

to suggest a m*rder.

That's basically what you're doing.

This is laying the groundwork

for people to say that Seth Rich

was involved in the leak of these emails.

We know now that that's completely untrue,

and yet in the final months

of the presidential campaign,

that narrative spread very fast.

As one example,

there's a Tennessee GOP Twitter account

that purports to represent Republicans

in the Volunteer State.

It's actually run by folks

on behalf of the Russians.

And it is sowing

as much discord towards Democrats,

towards Hillary Clinton in particular,

as possible,

and it seizes on these allegations

that somehow Seth knew,

that he had a meeting with the FBI,

'cause he was a tortured conscience

and wanted to reveal dark truths

about the Democrats and Hillary Clinton.

The Clintons

were blaming all that on Russia,

and it was somehow some Russia conspiracy,

they were trying to get Trump in,

these kinds of things.

Julian Assange on with Danish television,

perhaps saying, "Not so quick."

It breaks

before the start of the convention.

- Think it's gonna have impact?

- I think it's already had.

We haven't even started this convention

and we're already

enmeshed in conflict and chaos.

Party Chairwoman,

Debbie Wasserman Schultz,

resigning after WikiLeaks

released thousands

of internal

Democratic National Committee emails.

This is the kind of tension

that the party was hoping to avoid here.

Feel the Bern! Feel the Bern!

It's useful to those

who would disrupt Clinton's campaign

for it to happen at this time.

But in fact, Assange receives

these huge tranche of emails

four days after Seth Rich's death.

The timing doesn't align.

The man's dead.

Some of the leaked emails at one point

were modified to have their dates changed

in a way that was more consistent

with Seth Rich's death,

implying that they were leaked

about five days before he was k*lled.

I promised my son

I would find his murderers.

And the best time to do that is immediate.

We need more help.

Somebody knows something,

and hopefully with the $125,000 reward,

it will allow, you know,

someone to come forward to give us some

to give some information to the police.

And that reward

does not include this WikiLeaks

- It includes a reward we can validate.

- No.

This includes the police 25,000

and the graciousness of Jack, 100,000.

Jack. Sorry.

I can tell you this will never go

into the cold-case file,

at least as not as long as I'm alive.

When I saw the story about Seth,

the heartbreaking story,

all I could think of was my mother

getting the call that Mary Rich got.

Jack Burkman is

a truly bizarre character in Washington.

He's a very publicity-hungry lobbyist,

who is ostensibly conservative,

but seems to be willing

to sort of attach himself

to any cause that will get him publicity.

Before this, he'd jumped on a cause.

He had attempted to get g*y players

banned from the NFL

because that was in the news.

And then he sees in

the Seth Rich case, I believe,

a chance for more publicity for himself.

Conspiracy entrepreneurs

are people who take a tragedy

and use it for their own gain.

These are people who will promote

a false narrative, often knowingly,

because they know that

they can get money and attention from it.

Jack Burkman probably does fit

into this schema of people

who rush to the scene of a disaster

and promote themselves as the authority

and work to subvert the truth

around that event.

No, I actually have one here.

Uh-oh. Rickety old chair.

So why did you decide to get

involved in the Seth Rich case at all?

Like I said,

I really took a liking to Seth.

I felt he was a great and noble guy.

Everybody said wonderful things

as we checked in,

everybody said on both sides of the aisle

many great things about him.

That's one of the reasons I got involved.

This is a strange crime in that there

exists currently no theory of the case.

I'd been a lawyer

for two and a half decades

What about "robbery"?

Well, I don't know that

I don't think I frankly

I don't believe

there's much evidence of a robbery.

Thank you, everyone. Thank you.

No, it definitely wasn't a robbery.

The D.C. police seemed to suggest that,

but that's just plain wrong.

My friend. Do you have a second?

Sorry to bother you.

We're just trying to find out who did it.

He worked for

the Democratic National Committee.

It became very, very clear

that what Jack was actually interested in

was to be a central figure

in the narrative around the m*rder.

He wanted the spotlight.

A group of

George Washington University grad students

they have spent the past

few months probing into Rich's death.

GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman,

who put up $105,000 of his own money

as a reward to help solve the m*rder,

is also funding The Profiling Project.

These folks are gonna become profilers.

They're gonna become

lead investigative agents.

We're trying to figure out

persons of interest

and any areas

that the police may have overlooked.

We were approached by a number of people.

I had a guy who claimed

to be former CIA and I think he was.

He claimed that he had been approached

by someone who claimed

that the Russians k*lled Seth.

In early '17,

we reported that to the news.

- Break down

- Sounds like a spy novel.

Yes, exactly.

It does. I wish I had

It's kind of a morbid subject,

but it's a hopeful subject

because finally some progress,

and it's my job

to bring closure to the family.

That's what I'm trying to do.

You get a lot

of crank calls in this type of role.

I've done this sort of stuff before.

It's just part of the job.

But I think I have

something credible here.

Was approached by a guy who styles himself

as a former US intel officer.

Uh, I quizzed him. I think he's credible.

You never know motive of people,

but what he said is basically this,

that Seth discovered that

the Russians had been hacking,

and therefore the Russian government

did away with Seth.

At every turn,

he would take over

the media narrative from the parents

in ways that were very unhelpful.

And it became very, very clear that

he was doing much more harm

to both the parents,

as well as Seth's legacy.

We are a simple family in Omaha, Nebraska.

What the hell

is all this crap coming at us?

We had agreed that

everything he was going to say or do

would come through us,

because we are only going to be honest.

We're not gonna play a game.

This is my son's life.

I don't think

the Rich family liked I did that,

but that was my commitment to put out

each and everything that came to us.

That was just a tidbit that came to us,

so we put it out there.

Whether that's true or not, I don't know.

Well, it was true enough

for you to put it out there.

What evidence did you have?

Was there any evidence

to support that statement?

The only evidence

was I found the guy credible.

Why would the Russians

want to k*ll Seth Rich?

I don't know. I really don't know.

You could probably find

a hundred different theories about that.

I'll be very honest.

I don't want to jump ahead,

but we investigated this.

As you know,

we put out an 80-page document

from The Profiling Project.

The guy who authored it,

he did a good job.

Turned out he was a little nuts.

That's another story.

Kevin Doherty, he actually shot me.

You may know this.

Two years after that, he shot me.

He turned out to be a little nuts

You got shot in the butt

and, like, it didn't

I currently have

three and a half b*ll*ts in me.

One in each butt cheek, one in the leg,

and another fragment of a b*llet.

Doherty uncovered a report

that there had been an FBI truck

robbed of ammunition and certain weapons

about 60 minutes before Seth was shot.

And it was in the same vicinity,

within a half mile radius of that.

I felt that this was something

that should be put out there.

For some strange reason,

Doherty didn't want that out there.

I said,

"Well, Kevin, look, I respect you."

"You're a great professional,

but I have to make the final

decision here."

That changed the relationship

between me and Kevin Doherty.

This guy, who'd once been our star,

all of a sudden had deteriorated mentally.

We had words one day, nothing too serious.

But then he went away.

So I started getting emails

on Proton email,

I should've been suspicious.

Turned out to be Kevin Doherty,

but he was masquerading

as some guy in the FBI, um

A fake name. Brian Brian actually!

Some fake name. Just a fake name.

He then started giving me documents.

He always left the documents under a cone.

You'd go up a parking garage.

Go through the restaurant area, go up

the garage, go in, get the cone, leave.

And I bent over to pick the documents up.

Now, little did I know,

Kevin Doherty's sitting over there

with some kind of M1 r*fle,

ready to blow my head off.

The only reason I'm here alive today

is because of my little dog,

Jackie the dachshund.

He didn't think it was me,

because I wasn't in a suit.

I was all messed up,

and I had the dog pressed to my face.

He pulled the r*fle back.

That's the only thing that saved me.

Because what happened next

is he then realized it was me.

I grabbed the documents, hurried out.

By the time he boom-boom-boom,

he hit me in each butt cheek

and twice in the leg.

And then, the dog,

the b*llet bounced

and hit the dog in the paw.

And so I'm running down with

the baby. The baby's bleeding.

I'm bleeding.

He then tries to run me over.

I threw the dog as I was running

because I wanted to save the baby.

I thought I was dead.

I thought 'cause the thing's coming at me.

But lo and behold, at the last minute,

he hits a speed bump. Boom.

Pops him up

and slows him down with just enough force

that the only thing he did was just about

destroy the bottom part of my left arm,

which almost fell off.

I'm on the ground, half dead,

run over, shot.

He turned away and ran. Drove away.

But I think he did, nonetheless

I think he did a fine job

on putting out the report.

A report just issued by

The Profiling Project

says the m*rder was more likely

committed by a hired k*ller.

It's a possibility.

A proficient k*ller is what we think.

As the case falls out of the news,

he starts getting

more and more outrageous.

And so Jack Burkman says,

"We're gonna have

a re-creation of the m*rder."

Whoa. What do you guys want?

D-d-did you want something?

You want my wallet? Here, have it.

My phone?

You want my phone too? Have both.

He films this really

Have my watch.

sort of half-c*ck, amateur fake m*rder,

which is not something the family wanted.

Damn amateur. You exposed us.

No. I took all the necessary precautions.

They can't trace you to anything.

That was his own and

I have nothing positive to say about that.

What can I do for you, Mr. Rich?

I have access to something you might want.

I want to get into

the reenactment of this event,

in which you suggested

that very theory that you just said

you don't have any evidence for.

It's a work of literature

designed to call attention to the issue

with the hope of getting people

out of the woodwork.

Mr. Assange, thank you for taking my call.

They'll show that the DNC

is doing everything it can

to guarantee a Hillary nomination.

That they're basically

rigging the primary.

If you never found evidence

that Seth was connected to Assange,

why is there

a whole scene in the reenactment

in which Seth literally talks to Assange?

Reenactments all come

from a certain point of view.

If you didn't do that,

you'd put in something else.

No different than when FX

does The People v. O.J. Simpson.

You gotta pick a point of view.

You could do the O.J. trial

from any one of

18 different points of view, right?

I think the assumption is,

from the audience point of view,

that they're at least

basing it on what happened.

Here there's no evidence at all.

There are lies, damned lies,

and then there are statistics.

You're starting to lose traction and time.

What else could I do?

Ed Butowsky

is an investment manager

based outside Dallas.

Someone who

enjoys, uh, shall we say,

edging close to the spotlight.

Butowsky had been sort of

a spokesman for the Republican team

for six or seven years.

They say we've had a lot of jobs growth.

A reliable figure you could turn to

to articulate and identify

Republican talking points on economics.

to offset our deficit.

He worked with

an associate named Ellen Ratner,

who had a small,

sort of talk radio enterprise,

so that he could qualify for

a radio-TV correspondents

press pass for Capitol Hill,

which would allow him

to go around the Capitol.

He reaches out on Facebook and says,

"Hey, does anybody know

Joel and Mary Rich in Omaha, Nebraska?"

And he connects with them.

Then I said to them this.

I said,

"Why don't you hire a private detective?"

And they said,

"We would love to. We can't afford one."

And you know what, Chris?

You don't know me,

but a lot of people out there do.

You know what I said?

I said, "I'll pay for it."

Most people would say, "No, thank you,

that's We don't know you."

They said, "Yes."

And I said, "Oh."

I had no idea how much

a private detective cost.

I started asking people,

"Who knows anybody

who's a private detective?"

I got recommended Rod Wheeler by somebody.

Fox is a repository

of all kinds of characters

that it keeps on the payroll

to be able to talk at a moment's notice

about all kinds of things,

including one of them is a former D.C.

homicide cop named Rod Wheeler.

Butowsky gets in touch with him

and Wheeler says, "Sure. Happy to do it."

Unbeknownst to the Rich family,

Ed Butowsky is talking

to reporters at Fox News,

specifically Malia Zimmerman.

He's saying, "Wow,

we really got this hot story going."

He's saying to Rod Wheeler stuff like,

"Don't make clear to the Riches

you're talking to Malia."

He's working in a way

that I personally have never seen

how closely the reporter

is working with someone

who's effectively the source, Ed Butowsky.

I mean, he's almost

like the press agent for this story.

He's really closely involved

with Malia Zimmerman.

Butowsky wants to prove

that Seth Rich was the person behind

the leaks of the Democratic emails,

and that Seth Rich was m*rder*d,

and that there is a link.

But the, you know, the point of all

He is trying to

backwards-engineer an investigation

that will arrive at

the result he wants.

Rod Wheeler, he started wanting

direct access to the computer.

- Seth's laptop

- Yes.

that everybody's talked about?

The police

had already checked his computer.

The computer had nothing.

Nothing to do with any investigation.

Had nothing to do with DNC,

WikiLeaks, any of that.

We kept saying that.

But Mr. Wheeler

wouldn't take no for an answer.

Butowsky is casting about,

trying to find people to talk to,

to find evidence.

In December of 2016,

Ed approached my company

about working on a financial investigation

unrelated to Seth Rich.

Ed learned that I was

old friends with Seymour Hersh.

All I did was introduce him

to Ed Butowsky.

I was not part of the phone call.

I wasn't aware of what

the substance of the conversation was.

Sy Hersh is a giant in journalism.

He is a legend and with every reason.

You know, he broke the news

of the My Lai m*ssacre.

Just a terrible atrocity

brought to light by Sy Hersh.

Sy Hersh's reporting on bioweapons:

legendary, and incredibly important.

A skeptical voice of authorities

and with good reason.

I'll tell you what I know.

What I know comes off an FBI report.

Don't ask me how.

You can figure out,

I've been around long enough.

The kid gets

I don't think he was m*rder*d.

I don't think he was m*rder*d

because of what he knew.

The kid's a nice boy, 27.

He was not an IT expert,

but he learned stuff.

He was a data programmer,

but he learned stuff.

When you have a death

like that with D.C. cops,

if you're dead

you generally don't just go

You have to,

"What's the motive? What's going on?"

Get to the kid's apartment

and see what you can find.

They go in the house

and can't do much with his computer.

His password

The cops don't know much about it.

They call the FBI cyber unit.

The Feds get through

and here's what they find.

This is according to the FBI report.

Sometime in late spring, early summer,

he makes contact with WikiLeaks.

That's in his computer.

He offered a sample, an extensive sample,

you know, I'm sure

dozens of emails and said, "I want money."

Okay.

Then later,

WikiLeaks did get the password.

He had a Dropbox, a protected Dropbox.

And they got access to the Dropbox.

He also,

and this is also in the FBI report,

he'd also shared this box

with a couple of friends.

"So if anything happens to me,

it's not going to solve your problem."

Okay?

Butowsky thinks

that this is the holy grail.

Sy Hersh then says, "Please be clear,

all of this may not be true."

You saw a report. You saw the FBI report?

No.

I've been around a long time

and read a lot of stuff.

I have somebody inside

who will go and read a file for me.

And is there any way

we can get our hands on the report?

- That changes everything.

- I know. You know

- This particular

- I can't get the report.

But I'm just trying

to get something in my hand

that I can get public about this

No. Hey, man, listen,

that's not what I'm

No, no. That's not what, you know

I'm not trying to give you something

to go to the White House with,

that's not what it's about.

Right. And that's okay.

That's okay. I appreciate you

I just need to know what you know

All right.

because I want

I'm writing something, that's all.

All right.

Maybe that doesn't work.

If it doesn't work, we shouldn't talk.

It's all wrong.

They're talking about

having Seth's computer, the FBI having it,

who had looked at it,

Dropbox accounts,

uh, deposits would have been made, um

And we just know it's all false.

There's-there's not a bit of truth

in anything that he said.

Hersh says to me later,

"Have you ever told a source

something that wasn't quite true

in order to get

information from the source?"

Hersh thought that Butowsky was going

to be a source of information for him,

and was dangling things

or supposed knowledge

in front of him to try to elicit.

He was a fisherman using bait.

Uh

I don't think it was wise,

but Hersh always said to me as well

in our conversations,

"Always judge me by what I publish.

Not what I do before I publish."

Seymour Hersh

did not publish anything about this.

But his involvement in this recording

then becomes cited by blogs

like The Gateway Pundit,

and you can sort of see

the Seth Rich story, conspiracy theory,

it kind of goes from there

and it adds this credibility

that really starts, you know,

gathering momentum.

On April 20th, Sean Spicer,

the White House press secretary,

takes a meeting

with Ed Butowsky and Rod Wheeler.

He meets with Sean Spicer

and he's saying like,

"Y'all gotta get in on this."

"Trump's being

investigated for his Russia ties

and I have the thing that's going to

totally undo that whole investigation."

My conversation with Sean

about this recording

lasted about one minute.

He said, "Ed,

I don't know anything about it."

"I don't want to know anything.

I can't do anything."

And we ended up

talking about other things

Spicer says, "That's crazy."

Spicer tells me, "No."

"They came here, briefed me about

this thing involving this investigation

that they were doing of Seth Rich

and wanted to tell me

where they were at with it."

He's like, "A m*rder in metropolitan D.C.,

while tragic, has nothing to do with me."

"That's not my problem.

It's not a White House problem."

And that's possibly true.

Sean Spicer, prior to joining Trump,

was a pretty establishment, mainstream,

straight ahead, Republican party partisan.

And not used

to this kind of manufactured crisis.

Ed Butowsky was depicted

in his messages to Rod Wheeler

to be increasing the pressure on him

as the weeks tick by

in the spring of 2017, to say,

"We need to publish this.

The White House needs this."

"We need to show that

the Russia-collusion theories are BS."

"We need this. It's time to go.

We need to get this."

The pressure is relentless.

Wheeler used to be at

the Metropolitan Police Department,

and his former colleagues there

are not having a ton of luck,

and neither is he.

He talks to an officer

named Joseph Della Camera.

Well, I met face to face

with Della Camera.

He met with me over

at my office down in D.C.

And, nice guy, we talked a long time,

but he kept telling me

the entire conversation,

"Rod, I can't.

I can't tell you anything. I can't."

I said, "Why?"

He said, "Well, they want us to not say

anything about this case

and kinda like stand down."

Really? I said, "Who?"

He said, "Come on, man,

I can't tell you any more, you know that."

Wheeler walks away with raw

material for Butowsky to put out later on

that there's some sort

of political heat behind this.

But no evidence to show

of something truly sinister occurring.

He goes back to the neighborhood.

He knocks on doors.

He tries to figure out

what could have happened and gone awry

and there's just not a lot there

for him to work with.

There is an incredible push

from Butowsky and from Zimmerman

to get this thing

ready to publish and do it.

We are two months shy

of the one-year anniversary

of Rich's m*rder.

Conspiracy theories online

have taken a life of their own,

but today Fox 5

has learned there is new information

that could prove these theorists

are, in fact, right.

New information from

the family's PI suggests

there is tangible evidence

on Seth Rich's laptop

that confirms he was communicating

with WikiLeaks prior to his death.

The family hired Rod Wheeler,

a former MPD homicide detective,

to run a parallel investigation

into their son's death.

Wheeler says

he believes there is a cover-up

and the police department has been told

to back down from the investigation.

Rod Wheeler has contacted

Marina Marraco at Fox 5,

the local Fox affiliate, owned by Fox,

and so the same parent company,

but two different entities.

And so as Malia Zimmerman

is sort of laying the final groundwork

to have this claim that

the FBI had Seth Rich's laptop

and that there's all this

shadowy stuff going on,

Rod Wheeler is telling this

to Marina Marraco.

You have sources at the FBI

saying that there is information

For sure.

that could link

Seth Rich to WikiLeaks?

Absolutely. Yeah, and that's confirmed.

I actually have a source inside

the police department that said,

"Rod, we were told

to stand down in this case,

and I can't share

any information with you."

Now, that's highly unusual

for a m*rder investigation,

especially from a police department.

Again

Rod Wheeler, the investigator,

assures us at Fox 5

and assures Fox News

that there's a full report

that contains information that will show

how many times Seth Rich

made contact with WikiLeaks

and will show exactly

when this communication took place. Shawn.

We will be watching.

We will be waiting. Thank you.

She goes on the air with this.

Well, this sends Fox Digital overnight

into hyperdrive to get this thing out.

Zimmerman just has

to get it out there in public.

And I remember my stomach fell

because I understood at that moment

exactly what had just happened.

Fox News had just reignited

conspiracy theories

around Seth Rich's m*rder

with a larger megaphone

and with bigger stakes

than anybody had at that point.

Here's Zimmerman and Fox's bombshell.

What she posts in early-morning hours

of May 16, 2017,

is that multiple law enforcement sources

are telling Fox News

that Seth Rich clearly had leaked

thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks.

If true, proving

the first half of the equation.

That he was the source of these leaks

and raising the specter of the second half

of the fever-swamp equation being true,

that his death was related to that.

That Rich had made contact with WikiLeaks

through Gavin MacFadyen,

a dead investigator and documentary maker

who was involved with WikiLeaks himself

and was living in London.

So these are very specific connections.

And very specific assertions

being made in this story.

They don't allow for a ton of ambiguity.

Then it's part of the bloodstream.

It's being watched

by the White House under Trump.

And it's part

of the national conversation,

given credence and amplification,

and away they go.

Back with a Fox News alert.

A brand-new bombshell in the m*rder

of that guy right there. A DNC staffer

There's evidence

that Rich had contact with WikiLeaks.

That evidence on a laptop

belonging to Seth Rich,

showing he was talking with WikiLeaks.

Wheeler says,

"This smells like a cover-up."

The news side of Fox was more

careful about it in their programs on air.

But the opinion sides ran with it.

None of this explains

why the FBI's involved.

- And why, uh

- Right.

There are claims that the D.C. detectives

were told to stand down.

Right. And that's a claim

that I actually heard myself.

I was just sitting there

in sheer shock of,

"What the hell are you talking about?"

"And where the hell did this come from?"

You are nobody.

You have a life around your kids.

You work every day.

You pay bills. That's it.

And suddenly,

we are the lead story everywhere.

Now, if true, this could become one of

the biggest scandals in American history.

And could mean that Rich

could have been m*rder*d

under very suspicious circumstances.

And then you see

the "private investigator" of yours,

who's under contract not to talk

talking away about a bunch of lies.

I can't describe that moment

any more than the shock of

missing the couch,

landing on the floor, going

"Am I? I can't be hearing right."

You know, the fellow,

Bauman, who is speaking for the family?

He is a He is connected

to the Democratic party.

I was called a Democratic party hit man.

Accused of taking money from the DNC

in order to explicitly

try to cover up a m*rder.

The Internet

just went crazy.

Seth Rich was a "good" Democrat

that read all this evil about,

- "- Let's keep people poor, in the dark.

- Let's have race w*r."

"Let's steal more Haitian money.

We got kids ready for you in the hot tub."

Why would a man,

a leftist, betray his own?

I know there are rumors,

and they're rumors,

there's information in there

about child pedogate, if you will,

pedophile rings, that sort of thing.

We know that it is not past

Podesta or Clinton to do either.

I watched as hundreds

of thousands of messages on Twitter

came through a bot army.

I had my personal information

spread all over 4chan, Reddit, Twitter.

I had people outside of my apartment

who would randomly

take photos of me and run away.

I was receiving calls to my cellphone,

making threats against me.

The bar that Seth visited,

they hounded and made their lives hell.

Uh, his girlfriend,

they threatened and made her life hell.

All of his friends have been threatened.

They went to his house,

threatened to kick down

his roommate's door

because his roommate wouldn't talk to 'em.

They threatened they were coming

with all the people with the g*ns,

and they were gonna

make people talk and

I take it for real. I was scared to death.

It was like

watching reality gaslight you,

to the point where you actually

had to turn to these two people

that you trust implicitly

and actually beg the question, like,

"We're sure, right?"

You can never fathom

that something like Fox News

would have put out something

that was so poorly sourced,

so counterfactual,

something that was so false

and filled with such lies,

you have to question

your own sense of reality.

Because your son died,

m*rder*d, shot in the back,

that's hard enough to go through.

But then to have

assholes

do that sh*t to you,

it compounds it, ungodly.

And there's no way to stop sh*t like that.

I can't take you

through the pain, the t*rture

the t*rture that we have gone through.

Today, Rich's parents

wrote in The Washington Post,

"The amount of pain and anguish

this has caused us is unbearable."

"With every conspiratorial flare-up,

we are forced to relive Seth's m*rder

and a small piece of us dies

as more of Seth's memory

is torn away from us."

A detective who worked on researching

an expl*sive Fox News story

is today taking the channel to court.

Alleging they defamed him

in a deliberate effort

to help Donald Trump

deny Russia was behind the election hack.

Well, I was asked to get involved

in conducting an investigation,

a m*rder investigation, of Seth Rich,

and that's why I got involved,

so I could try

to find out who k*lled this guy.

But halfway through the investigation

and then up until the point

at which this article was released by Fox,

there were these quotes in there from me,

supposedly saying that I knew for a fact

that Seth Rich, the decedent,

had been in contact with WikiLeaks,

emailing them emails.

- That was not true

- Let's pause.

- Fox News, reporting you as the source

- Right.

linking the DNC staffer to this hacking.

- Right. The reporter.

- That was false?

Right. The reporter from Fox News,

Malia Zimmerman, she wrote that story.

I immediately challenged her,

and I said, "Malia, that's just not true."

"You and I both know this isn't true."

And she said her bosses

told her to leave those quotes in there.

I said, "Why would you leave something

in an article you know is not true?"

And that's why we're here today.

Wheeler's backtracking on what he said.

We're telling him,

"You're in violation

of your contract as our investigator,

so we're trying to get attorneys

to get a cease and desist order in place."

We were able

to start clawing the story back.

This is a complicated story and

We were able to start getting

folks to start asking the right questions.

You know Hersh says

you got his reporting wrong, right?

That he says you took

two and two and made 45 out of it.

Yeah, well, you know what?

Sy Hersh, maybe that's his math,

but the reality is

I'm not saying anything.

Go listen to it, listen to his words.

I'm not concluding anything.

And then ultimately,

we were able to get it retracted.

Yesterday,

the Fox News website retracted a story

it had published on Rich's death,

saying it "was not initially subjected

to the high degree of editorial scrutiny

we require, and has since been removed."

The cracks in the Fox News narrative

started to come apart,

and what you were left with was,

"How did this happen?"

"And who put Fox News up to this?"

Then you have

the other part of your complaint,

which is this documentary

evidence and text

that the President of the United States

was personally involved

in reviewing this story before

it was published and pushing it out.

When did you learn about that and

why do you believe that to be the case?

Right.

I learned about that from Ed Butowsky.

He's the one that sent me an email,

which I've shown,

I'll show the emails

and I have shown them,

and voicemails,

where he said the president has

reviewed the story and wants it out there.

Wow. So, hold on,

what did you think when you got that text?

First of all, I'm thinking,

"Why would the president have to review

a story pertaining to a death

to the m*rder of a guy in D.C.?"

"Why would the president

even be involved in this?"

The suggestion that

the president was aware of this story,

he may have seen it in advance,

that he had a profound interest

in its advancement,

what is your response?

Not true. I never talked

to anybody at the White House.

I've never talked to President Trump.

President Trump, nor the White House,

has anything to do with any of this.

This was tongue-in-cheek talking.

Just texting. Wasn't serious.

Can I get a White House reaction

or the president's reaction to the report

that Seth Rich was emailing

WikiLeaks before his m*rder?

I I don't I'm not aware of

I generally, um, I don't get updates

on former DNC staffers.

I'm not aware of that.

The newly released Mueller Report

says WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange,

falsely implied that Rich

was the source of stolen DNC emails.

The Mueller Report indicates WikiLeaks

used Rich's m*rder to cover up the fact

that they got the emails from Russia.

WikiLeaks contacted

the Russians privately on Twitter, saying,

"If you have anything Hillary related,

we want it

in the next two days preferable."

Uh, okay, you're on.

Audio speeds.

Okay, so let's just start real broadly.

We flew down to Plano

to interview Mr. Butowsky.

- Right.

- So why are we talking to you?

He's really not supposed

to discuss Seth Rich

or any of those subjects publicly.

So, that's, uh

You know, when his lawyers

talked with him about it,

we obviously had to advise him,

"Nope, don't do that."

Robert Mueller,

in his special counsel report,

said there was no evidence

connecting Seth to the leaks.

But we now know that the FBI

never looked at the DNC's servers.

They relied on CrowdStrike,

a private company, to do the analysis.

So, CrowdStrike

was hired to investigate the email hack

and, at the time, you were actually

one of the few to see the evidence.

So, what are the facts?

What do we actually know

about who hacked the DNC?

Russian SVR is also known as APT29.

There was a very specific technique,

like a fingerprint,

being used by APT29.

The fingerprint was a way of establishing

persistence on a computer system.

So, when you break into a computer system,

if someone shuts it off,

reboots the computer,

turns it off for the night to go to sleep,

you're gonna lose access

to that computer system

if you don't find a way

to restart your malware in the morning

when they wake up

and turn their computer back on.

So it was a very specific way

of maintaining

what in the industry

is called "persistence."

And it was a fingerprint

that if you knew to look for it

and you knew where to look for it,

it was a very easy indicator

to say, "Yup, this is APT29."

And that fingerprint became very key

in uncovering the rest

of the breach at the DNC.

I have no doubt

that they tried to put money

and influence any way they could,

just as we tried to influence

foreign elections in other countries.

CrowdStrike allegedly discovered

that there was Russian intrusion,

but they don't do anything.

I mean, they literally do not

shut down the computers.

Because we know the messages

that were taken and given to WikiLeaks,

the last date of that message is,

I believe, Sunday the 25th of May.

According to CrowdStrike,

they shut down the system

at the DNC on the 10th of June.

What in the hell are these people?

They're incompetent.

Who allows 16 days to go by

when you're quote "being hacked"

by a foreign government, the Russians?

There was a lag

from when they are first notified

to when the bad guys were

effectively kicked out of the network.

I'm not sure exactly why that was.

They maybe didn't think

it was as serious as it was,

you know, in their defense.

The Chinese broke into

the Obama campaign in 2008 and in 2012,

and they didn't leak anything.

The McCain campaign

came under considerable attack as well.

And so nation-states

breaking into political campaigns

wasn't a new thing in 2016.

The only thing novel about what occurred

was how the information was used.

How sure are you that this was APT29?

Uh, because of that fingerprint,

at the time I was 100% sure.

I mean, there was no doubt in my mind.

No one else was doing this at the time.

Now, the reality is,

to convince the public,

you need a lot more.

The guy got f*cking m*rder*d

after he leaked information to WikiLeaks.

If you don't think that's a little weird,

what are you looking at?

What delusional rose-colored glasses

are you looking at your party from?

I usually don't even like

adding a little breath of fire

into that conspiracy theory.

I think it's been incredibly damaging.

I can't imagine what

life is like for the family.

Uh, you know,

it's got no technical foundations.

And that's all I really

have to say about that matter.

Everyone in this country's gonna hear

Butowsky sued me

and NPR for my reporting.

And he felt that

I had made his life very difficult,

and that there were

economic harm as a result.

Even with the Mueller Report

and other things,

contradicting claims he was making,

even with Senate Committee,

led by a Republican,

contradicting claims he was making,

he was still arguing

in favor of his interpretation

or his claims of what had happened.

Therefore,

it took exception to what I reported.

It was a surreal lawsuit.

At no time did we hear anybody say,

"Gosh, this is really

gonna hurt the Riches."

"But because of this

incontrovertible truth we have,

we have to find a way

to present this to the public,

the government's

trying to cover it up."

You don't hear it that way.

It's just like,

"The president really wants this."

"We've gotta k*ll this Russia narrative.

We gotta help him out."

"We gotta make him credible.

Let's get this out there."

And Seth Rich and his parents,

his family are never

treated as human beings.

The Rich family is now suing Fox News,

one of their reporters,

and a well-connected Republican donor,

who they say

coordinated on a fake news story

and put it on the network.

I made one promise to my son.

And that was the day of his funeral

I put my hand

on his coffin and I made one promise.

That I would find his murderers.

That I would bring justice

somehow before I die.

All this bullshit

has distracted

It's totally taken away

probably ever finding his murderers.

How far will these people go,

supposedly working

for the truth or something,

but it's their truth?

We have always said from day one,

we will follow the truth.

And whoever provides the truth,

we will follow that path.

So far there's been nothing to follow.

To give those ideas merit,

that's monstrous thinking.

Was I the victim, or was I also a villain?