It does not appear that there's any kind of an effort up there yet.
Now remember.
Oh my God.
That looks like a second plane.
That's just yet.
Today, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack.
In a series of deliberate and deadly t*rror1st acts.
I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you.
And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon!
What you're watching here is a video I made back in 2011 after bin Laden was k*lled by SEAL Team 6.
It was a tribute to G.W. Bush and the w*r on Terror.
I once believed, as many others, the official narrative of the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
And here are the things that have forever changed my mind.
May 28th, 2001.
The World Trade Center, encapsulated here in a rare glimpse into one of its final days.
For in just three and a half months, this site will be renamed Ground Zero and the world will forever be changed.
But in just a few days, NORAD will run a full-on t*rror1st simulation.
This simulation will be conducted with naval ships, members of the Air Force, and will feature a fictitious attack orchestrated by none other than Osama bin Laden.
Using drone plane technology and cruise missiles.
A haunting near run-through of the attacks that would occur just three months later.
Which begs the question, how many people do you think know that just three months prior to 9/11, they w*r-gamed an Osama bin Laden terror attack with planes?
I would imagine, not many.
But to properly tell this story of unbelievable coincidences known as 9/11, we need to go back even further.
USA Today reports that in the two years before the attacks on September 11, NORAD conducted exercises using hijacked airliners as weapons.
And one target was the World Trade Center.
Here's ABC's Brian Ross.
President Bush has said again and again that no one could have imagined what Osama bin Laden ordered for September 11th.
We knew he hated us.
But there was nobody in our government, at least.
And I don't think the prior government could envision flying airplanes in the buildings on such a massive scale.
But that turns out not to be true.
U.S. military planners did envision and practice those very scenarios.
As reported by USA Today, the North American Aerospace Defense Command, NORAD, conducted exercises with fighter jets,
simulating hijacked planes flown into the World Trade Center in the two years before the attacks.
Pentagon planners also envisioned the attack on the Pentagon five months before it happened.
According to this April 2001 Pentagon email, Air Force officials wanted a w*r game, having a t*rror1st group hijack a commercial airline and fly it into the Pentagon.
The email was obtained by the non-profit group Project for Government Oversights.
But according to the Pentagon email, the plan was ultimately rejected by senior Pentagon officials as too unrealistic.
Still to come are questions, big questions, about NORAD's response on the day of the attack.
Why, despite all the exercises and the planning, Peter, jet fighters were not in place anywhere near New York or Washington.
It's quite an amazing story. Many thanks, Brian.
Well, that is quite amazing. It's also quite amazing that it took until 2004 for this little piece of information to poke its head out.
Because as Peter Jennings himself reported on the day of 9/11, our government were quite clear that, "none of them could have foreseen this coming."
The question is, go to w*r with whom?
Because from the FBI, from the CIA, from the Pentagon today, no warning of this whatsoever,
no knowledge of who's involved, no clues yet as to who's involved that we have heard about in any respect today.
Now, a proven lie, which again poses the question, how many people do you think know that in the 24 months leading up to September 11th,
NORAD conducted simulations, including jets being flown into the World Trade Center and wanted to hold one with a commercial airliner being flown into the Pentagon.
My guess would be next to zero.
And while their request to run said simulation of a hijacked plane into the Pentagon just five months before September 11th was denied,
it's of note that this request was for a second run through of such an event.
Not a first.
The Pentagon already hosted one.
That October.
October 24th, 2000.
A mass casualty event is held at the Pentagon featuring a plane smashing through to its courtyard.
With full-scale models and everything.
Which is interesting to me because I feel like this should be the number one story every single September 11th.
At the very least, it should have been the first thing reported on in the immediate aftermath.
It wasn't.
Why would you want to hide these simulations from public knowledge?
Now, going back to this initial description of Amalgam Virgo,
it states that this was a, quote,
Planning exercise involving the hypothetical scenario of a cruise m*ssile or UAV launched by a t*rror1st group.
UAV stands for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, otherwise known as a drone plane.
These aircraft are remotely piloted with various degrees of autonomy.
The most infamous of these is being introduced just six years prior to September 11th in 1995.
The MQ-1 Predator.
When you come down and look at its command and sensor systems capabilities,
you'll find that by the year 2000,
improvements in communication systems made it possible, at least in theory,
to fly the drone remotely from great distances.
It was no longer necessary to use close-up radio signals during the Predator's takeoff and ascent.
Now, to many of us, it is believed that the U.S. went into Afghanistan in October of 2001.
If you Google, when did the U.S. go to Afghanistan,
it states that the U.S. went there in 2001.
Even the Wikipedia page, Manhunt for Osama Bin Laden,
starts its timeline in November of 2001.
But what if I told you it started before that?
What if I told you that it started at least a year before that?
What if I told you that the CIA was already in Afghanistan,
hunting Bin Laden in the summer of 2000?
What if I told you that their team name was the Bin Laden unit
and that they were using full-size Predator drone planes to do it?
That's right.
The Afghanistan hunt for Osama Bin Laden started before the September 11th attacks.
The only thing that changed following them was that now it no longer required secrecy.
Now the hunt for Bin Laden had the full consent of the public,
along with new permission to launch a full-scale military invasion.
Here is Tom Brokaw.
Good afternoon, everyone.
It does now appear that United States military action against targets in Afghanistan,
that that action is underway.
Let's go to NBC's Jim Miklaszewski at the Pentagon for the latest.
Jim?
Tom, U.S. military officials tell NBC News that the airstrikes have begun.
According to these...
Former managing editor of the Washington Post, Steve Coll,
gives some insight into the real manhunt for Osama Bin Laden
and the emergence of the Predator drone as a tool of the Air Force/CIA.
Chapter 29 of 2005's Ghost Wars.
We take you back now to a year and a half before the attack on the Twin Towers.
By the late spring of 2000, Richard Clarke and his White House counterterrorism group
had grown frustrated by the quality of intelligence reporting on Osama Bin Laden's whereabouts.
The CIA's unilateral human sources and its liaisons with Pakistan,
Uzbekistan, and Masoud had generated volumes of fragmented hearsay,
but nothing solid enough to warrant m*ssile strikes or a snatch operation.
Clarke asked his longtime acquaintance in the national security bureaucracy, Charles Allen,
who ran all of the CIA's intelligence collections efforts,
to work with Admiral Scott Fry, head of operations at the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
on fresh approaches to the Bin Laden problem.
Clarke and his aides continued to hope the Pentagon would come up with a plan
to use American commandos in Afghanistan.
This is spring 2000.
So where the public was led to believe the invasion of Afghanistan was a knee-jerk reaction,
it was not.
They were vying for a way to go to Afghanistan, at very least a year earlier.
The book continues,
Despite the confusion of competing recollections,
it seems clear, in the general sense,
that Clarke, Fry, Berger, Allen, Black, and officers in the CIA's Bin Laden unit
jointly conspired, amid persistent squabbling among themselves,
to launch the Predator experiment.
It was these efforts that finally got them the approval to send Predator drones to Afghanistan.
In the summer of 2000,
the CIA begins engaging in secret talks with Uzbekistan
for permission to use it as a jump-off point to fly the reconnaissance drones over Afghanistan.
The reason for involving Uzbekistan is because in the early days of drones,
they could only be remotely piloted from a distance while already in the air.
Takeoff and landing were trickier and required a nearby control station.
The drones were first tested in Bosnia in 1995,
then Kosovo in 1999.
What the CIA found was that they were too light and too slow.
Also, there was the problem of the nearby control station.
The pilot had to sit in a sealed, unmarked van
near the runway of the drone's operating base.
For the two aforementioned operations in Bosnia and Kosovo,
these bases were in Hungary and Albania.
The van was surrounded by generators and satellite dishes
with a pilot inside using a joystick in front of a screen.
The drone was controlled by radio signal and then satellites.
But next would be Afghanistan.
And securing relations in Uzbekistan for the operation in Afghanistan
was proving a no-go.
If this was going to be pulled off,
they were going to have to try a new way.
So the CIA gets approval to test a new technology,
full remote drone flights.
Takeoff, landing, and all.
Piloted straight from the inside of a CIA operations center in Virginia.
September of 2000, they run their first flight and pull it off.
The CIA has their new toy.
100% remote-controlled, full-size drone planes.
Just one year before September 11th.
Oh my God!
Oh my God!
What's going on?
Oh my God!
Oh my God!
Being able to run drone flights straight from home
proves to be a game-changer.
And with their new technology in hand,
Air Force drone pilots and CIA officers
go on to run 15 Predator drone flights over Afghanistan,
manned 100% from the United States.
This would, however, only last one month.
When the program is abruptly ended by Washington,
the CIA's operations in Afghanistan
put once again in serious jeopardy.
It would be just one week later,
October 11th, 2000,
that the CIA would present a classified bulletin on Afghanistan
highlighting the,
"growing threat of the Taliban."
The very next day,
the USS Cole is bombed.
What perfect timing.
The CIA immediately insists it's Bin Laden
they had been searching for
right up until a week earlier.
Now think about that for a second.
Right as their mission is shut down,
a new need for it suddenly pops up.
That doesn't seem like interesting timing to anyone?
Now to the public,
this attack had one name attached to almost every headline:
Osama bin Laden.
But what went unreported
is that internal documents on the Cole
reveal that Bin Laden
had not been tied personally to the attacks
and that despite the headlines,
the FBI and the CIA
had not provided a definitive conclusion
about responsibility.
Yemeni Prime Minister,
Iryani,
echoed this to the press
when he stated
that while investigators suspected
he was indirectly involved,
they had yet to find hard evidence.
In fact,
if you go to Bin Laden's
FBI Most Wanted poster,
nowhere does it mention the USS Cole or 9/11.
When contacted about this in 2006,
FBI Chief of Investigative Publicity,
Rex Tomb,
stated that the reason for this was because the FBI
had no hard evidence
connecting Bin Laden to 9/11
and that bin Laden,
as such,
has never formally been charged
by a grand jury.
which is interesting
because the main name
attached to 9/11
and the USS Cole
is Osama bin Laden.
It would be just two weeks
after the bombing
of the USS Cole
when the curiously similar simulation drills would begin.
October 24, 2000.
The Pentagon
holds their aforementioned
mock-mass casualty exercise
in which a plane crashes into its courtyard.
Okay?
The Pentagon paid someone to make scale model mock-ups of itself with a plane
crashed into it just 10 months before September 11th.
Seven months after that,
NORAD would wargame out the, "hypothetical", yet also suspiciously on-the-nose scenario
of Osama bin Laden using drone planes to launch a terror attack.
And three and a half months after that, both of these things would actually happen.
Oh my goodness.
Oh God.
There's another one.
Oh.
Oh my goodness.
There's another one.
This seems to be on purpose.
Oh my goodness.
Another plane?
Now it's obvious, I think.
So what came first?
Chicken or the egg?
How is it possible
that the exact thing happened
that they had been running
training simulations on
since the previous year?
Involving the exact vehicle
they had just developed
unique, high-end,
one-of-a-kind technology
to full remote control
the previous year.
With the aftermath
being the public
begging them to do the exact thing
they were seeking permission for the previous year.
Invade Afghanistan.
Good afternoon.
On my orders, the United States military
has begun strikes
against Al-Qaeda t*rror1st training camps
and military installations
of the Taliban regime
in Afghanistan.
These carefully targeted actions are designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan
as a t*rror1st base of operations
and to attack the military capability
of the Taliban regime.
I'm speaking to you today from the treaty room of the White House,
a place where American presidents
have worked for peace.
We're a peaceful nation.
In the months ahead, our patience will be one of our strengths.
Patience with the long waits that will result from tighter security.
Patience in understanding that it will take time to achieve our goals.
Patience in all the sacrifices
that may come.
Today, those sacrifices
are being made by members of our armed forces.
To outright dismiss the idea that September 11th
may have been planned by individuals in our own government is crazy.
But that's just the start of it.
Here's where
the long list
of, "incredible coincidences" that are 9/11 begin to pile up.
For instance, what if I told you that former Secretary of State James Baker and former Deputy Director
of the CIA Frank Carlucci spent the morning of September 11th at a conference
with none other
than Osama Bin Laden's brother, Shafiq Bin Laden,
with George Bush Sr. also being there among all three
just the day before. The event?
An investors conference
for the Carlyle Group,
an investment firm
that just so happened
to be at the time
one of the U.S. military's
largest vendors.
Carlyle Group achieved this status by owning
Lear Siegler Services,
a leading contractor
in aircraft logistics support, maintenance, pilot training, and ground support.
They also owned
United Defense, Inc.,
which manufactured combat vehicles, a*tillery, naval g*ns, m*ssile launchers, and precision munitions.
Both of these companies went on to receive billions in Pentagon contracts in the aftermath of 9/11.
Carlyle Group
was, more specifically,
a private equity firm,
which in layman's terms means that they
buy fledgling companies, restore them over the course of five to ten years,
and then sell them for a profit,
basically like flipping houses but with million-dollar corporations.
Carlyle were essentially
put on the map
when they brokered a deal for Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal
to buy a $590 million of Citicorp in 1991.
But what made things
really take off for them
was in 1993
when none other
than George Soros
invested $100 million in their
Carlyle Partners II Fund.
With Soros' endorsement, the floodgates opened,
and by September of 1996,
Carlisle Partners II fund
had shot past their initial goal of $500 million to $1.3 billion.
They immediately sunk this cash
into defense, aerospace, and security companies.
This investment would pay off massively
in the wake of the September 11th attacks
and become their most successful venture ever.
This could not have been more of a conflict of interest.
For starters, Carlyle Chairman Frank Carlucci
was Donald Rumsfeld's college roommate.
Secretary of State Colin Powell was a Carlyle advisor
who considered Carlucci to be a mentor,
and even President Bush was a former Carlyle employee.
With his father, Bush Sr.,
and the Bin Laden family
both being actively
involved with Carlyle
at the time of September 11th.
Bush, Baker, and Carlucci
had even flown overseas
to visit the Bin Laden's family headquarters
in the years leading up to 9/11.
How is this not talked about?
How is Bush Sr. and Bin Laden's
brother being together
on the eve of September 11th
at a conference for an investment company
that made a man's fortune
because of September 11th
not a main talking point
of September 11th?
Or the other interesting coincidence
that President Bush his brother, Marvin Bush,
was the head of the digital security
company for the Twin Towers,
Securacom.
Or this doozy
from the 9/11 commission transcript
where Condoleezza Rice admits that a strategy
to eliminate Al-Qaeda was formed before 9/11
in that spring and summer.
Yeah, we noticed.
She states
that early in 2001,
President Bush had told her that he didn't want
to respond to Al-Qaeda one attack at a time
because he was, "tired of swatting flies."
But instead, he was developing
a new comprehensive strategy
to eliminate Al-Qaeda once and for all.
In fact, it was the very first
national security presidential directive
of the Bush administration.
After being developed through spring and summer, this, "new strategy"
was finally approved,
giving it the go on September 4th, 2001.
Just one week to the day of 9/11,
a new strategy to take out Al-Qaeda is launched.
Just one week later, all the permission in the world
to launch said plans is handed to them on a silver platter.
It is called No Better Time, The Brief Remarkable Life of Danny Lewin,
the genius who transformed the internet. As Don Daler reports, he is believed to be the first
casualty of the September 11th attacks. American Airlines Flight 11 left Boston on a clear Tuesday
morning 12 years ago.
What unfolded shortly after takeoff is haunting. The c*ck's not answering.
Somebody's stabbed in business class, and I think there's Mace that we can't breathe. I don't know.
I think we're getting hijacked. The passenger stabbed in business class was 31-year-old Danny Lewin.
He was seated between three of the suspected hijackers. They knifed him, investigators believe,
on the way to the c*ck. Born in Denver, Lewin moved to Israel, where he joined the Army,
becoming captain of an elite special forces unit. From there, Lewin entered a master's program at
MIT, where he met mathematics professor Tom Lake. It was pretty quickly apparent he was special.
They started designing computer codes to speed up the sluggish pace of the old dial-up internet.
Eventually, those codes turned into a company called Akamai, and turned them into overnight
billionaires. I hope you guys get a sense there that this is pretty huge. The goal there really is
to dominate the world. Now, while a touching piece on the familiar and heartbreaking story of 9/11's
first victim, Danny Lewin, CBS curiously falls short of certain details. For starters, Danny wasn't a
captain in just any elite special forces unit. He was a captain in the most elite special forces unit
in the entire IDF, the Sayeret Matkal, the premier Israeli black ops group that, amongst other things,
dealt in irregular warfare and counter-terrorism. And while this graphic is correct in showing Danny's seat,
they failed to mention that despite looking like row 4 or 5, this is in fact row 9. Row 9 of flight 11.
And this picture, shown at about 40 seconds into this piece, is from a photo sh**t that Danny took
just a year earlier, in front of what are framed to look like two gray towers, wearing a watch
named the Hijacker. That's right, the well-publicized first victim of 9/11 was an Israeli black ops
specialist seated in row 9 of flight 11, who just so happens to have pictures of himself in front of
gray towers, wearing a watch named the Hijacker. What are the odds of that? I mean, that's almost
too on the nose to be ignored. Now, remarkably enough, Danny Lewin isn't the only captain from
the Sayeret Matkal with an interesting connection to 9/11. Let's hear from another.
Well, I was getting this question in the 1990s, and I said that the West really doesn't understand
militant Islam. So I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that if the West doesn't wake up to the
suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you'll see is that the militant Islam is bringing down
the World Trade Center.
Mark, were you close enough to be able to see any markings on the airplane?
Hi, gentlemen. How are you doing? Yeah, there was definitely a blue logo. It was like a circular logo
on the front of the plane towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane.
I didn't see any windows on the sides. And as far as I knew, when I saw it coming down, I was like,
well, LaGuardia is pretty far away, and that plane is really slow.
Mark, if what you say is true, those could be cargo planes or something like that. You said you didn't see
any windows on the side? I didn't see any windows on the sides. I saw the plane flying low. I was
probably like a block away from the subway into Brooklyn, and that plane came down very low.
And again, it was not a normal flight that I've ever seen at an airport. It was a plane that had a
blue logo on the front, and it just did not look like it belonged in this area.
Winter 2000. An Austrian art group named Gelatin begins an ongoing project on the upper levels of the
World Trade Center to allegedly add a balcony to the outside. It's called the B-Thing. And on the
morning of March 12, 2000, this helicopter is commissioned to capture the event. And standing on a makeshift
balcony extending out of Tower 1 are the members of Gelatin. This video appears to be a recon mission
to get pictures of the towers with the balcony serving as a reference point. The event is immortalized
in a rare piece of press appearing in the August 18, 2001 edition of the New York Times, and features
what at the time may have seemed like a throwaway line, that while occupying the towers, Gelatin confiscated
all film and video of the project. Why confiscate every piece of media if you're just really there
doing a balcony? Why not simply tell them just not to release it till you're done? They certainly
didn't intend to hide it forever. There's an article about it in the New York Times less than one year
later. And they also published their own 62-page book about it. The book is absolutely damning.
The main middle fold-out, for starters, is of Tower 1. The only other thing on the page is a plane.
The book also clarifies the exact location of this stunt. The 91st floor of Tower 1.
But that's not even the half of it. This picture, seen featured in the New York Times write-up,
appears in the book as a two-page layout, in high def, and completely uncropped. With the full version
revealing that the entire wall of boxes are labeled BB-18. BB-18 is a popular fuse housing for when you
have a million wires that you need to organize. What would an art team be doing surrounded by empty fuse
housing boxes? Gelatin, coincidentally, is also the name of a high-powered blasting gel
that cannot explode without a detonator. That paints quite a picture. The back sketch in their
own book even refers to this cardboard enclosure as the, "Trojan box." But it also shows another
thing. This sketch reveals that Gelatin had after-hour night access to the towers, where they
note that the Trojan box, "opens at 11.45 p.m. and shuts down at 6.39 a.m.", meaning that they were
working in the towers through the night. And their notes earlier in the book shows that they also had
access on the weekends. Which brings us to what I consider to be the three most damning sketches of
the B-thing. Now, keep in mind, these are supposed art students, okay? Now, I know art doesn't always
mean drawing. It can mean many things. But nevertheless, these look like the scribbled out blueprints of a
heist. Here's one with the tower that says, very depressing building inside, very amazing building outside.
Odd. We want to break through to the amazement from the inside, okay? Like a b*mb breaking out. And then,
if you follow the arrow from the first World Trade Center drawing, it brings you to a second World Trade
Center drawing that literally looks like it's collapsing. And on this one, instead of saying
depressing inside, it says deeppression inside. Pression means pressure. Deep pressure inside. Next to a sketch
of the World Trade Center starting to crumble. Definitely not shady. Here's a sketch of someone
jumping out of the Twin Towers, an unfortunately all too familiar sight on that dreadful morning.
And finally, this sketch that has God crossed out in the clouds, but rewritten under a picture of an
airplane. And right next to that, a line just before the towers that reads, last chance to open a
parachute. The only reason you would need a parachute would be if your plane was about to crash into that
tower. All right? So this is a sketchbook that shows a crumbling tower, another sketch of the
towers with the hole right where the plane hits and the same size, unless that's the biggest balcony in
the history of mankind, right under a picture of a plane with the word God written under it and last
chance to open a parachute. They had weekend and night access. The only pictures of them are standing
next to a hundred fuse boxes. Their name is gelatin, which is a high powered expl*sive. And it's called
the B-thing working on the same area of the building where the first expl*si*n hits.
But according to gelatin, this was just a fun project to build a balcony. Well, if they have nothing to
hide, then why in 2005 did they change their name from gelatin spelt like the expl*sive to gelitin
spelt with an i? And again, why did they confiscate all video and film of the project?
And why is the website on their book, the B-thing that featured these three most damning drawings
now removed? Even on their website, these drawings are nowhere to be found. The closest you can get is
this link right here, and it only shows you a couple. If you have nothing to hide, why would
you hide these? Are all official ties between gelatin and these pictures deleted forever? The answer?
No. In fact, gelitin still stores these pictures on this very website. And while there is no menu,
submenu, or link anywhere on the page to access them, if you come up to the URL box and manually
replace projects with WTC, it takes you to a hidden gallery. That includes, you guessed it,
these very sketches. Image three, man jumping out of the towers.
Image six, last chance for a parachute.
And image 10, the building collapsing. All three erased everywhere else, but kept hidden here like
trophies. Which brings us back to this footage. Because not one, but two art teams curiously took
aerial helicopter footage of the 91st floor of Tower One in the year and a half leading up to the attack.
Both eerily similar, with people standing in the windows of the 91st floor. First gelatins in March
2000 was taken on the east facade, and then the E-teams a year later taken on the north facade,
directly in line with the first hit. Even eerier, just weeks before that, E-team would light up five
floors with their name. Look familiar? They lit up floors 90 to 94, and the first plane expl*si*n hits
floors 93 to 99. What are the odds? The middle of their footage even contains an animation of the
near-exact flight path of Flight 11. The B-thing and the E-team. A chilling memorial of the World Trade Center's final days.
Gelatin's work on the B-thing would be presented at Leo Koenig's gallery. Opening day? You guessed it.
September 11th, 2001.
Now, many of you might wonder why the topic of 9/11 is one that's so near and dear to me.
I think in many ways, on the surface, my story parallels a lot of others. It was traumatizing.
It felt like my backyard. The vision of watching the towers across the water engulfed in smoke will
forever be etched in my brain. But my real connection came later. Because five months following 9/11,
February of 2002, I began my journey as a surveyor/skyscraper layout engineer in New York City
on Trump Building F. I did this and also detailing later on for 17 years. And basically, what that
entails is this. When a company sets out to start a building, I'm the guy who's given the architectural
set of blueprints and the structural set of blueprints, along with any other details, insert
plans, mechanical drawings, and so on. I'm the guy who gets the information. It's my job to then calculate
and really convert the numbers in each set into the localized grid coordinate system I've created for
the job. Then I essentially have to translate them into English for the rest of the job via field
working plans, establish a new line and grade on every floor, and finally use my field drawings and
the new line and grade to physically lay out every single aspect of every single floor. So it's safe to
say if there was ever one topic I was qualified to give an opinion on, it would be the collapse of a
building. Now, of course, this is just my personal assessment based on the things I know about
skyscrapers, coupled with years and years of studying these videos over and over again.
But first things first, those buildings were tanks. I mean, those might have been the two
sturdiest buildings on the entire planet. Majority of buildings get most of the strength from the core
around the elevator shaft. It's where the heaviest steel will be. It'll come up the middle of the
building creates essentially a spine. So this is where most of the strength in the buildings come
from. However, if you look at the twin towers, they were built like that, like every other building,
but they were also built with an exoskeleton of some of the heaviest steel in any building citywide.
To make a hole that size in those buildings, you'd have to drive an aircraft carrier into them. A plane
like that would just shred itself like paper. Half of it wouldn't even enter the building,
would just crumble and fall to the ground. I don't care how much jet fuel is on board.
Take a look at this video of this plane being scrapped here. The demo claws are going through
it like paper. They're nothing. They're lightweight aluminum cylinders. There is no way on planet earth
that that thing could blow a hole that big into one of the most solid buildings ever created.
This 25 foot high aluminum can that can't even withstand hitting a seagull,
blows an 80 foot crater in this building. I don't think so. There almost had to be expl*sives,
either on board or pre-planted at the impact zone.
Which brings us to the collapse itself. You have the top 10 plus floors about to fall onto the bottom 90,
leading us to everyone's favorite theory. They say it pancaked. Oh, the building just pancaked.
Well, first of all, it's not even what pancaking looks like. When floors pancake,
the horrible occurrence that that is, they stop in between each drop. It goes floor, floor, floor,
floor. Now look at this video right here. You can see briefly, there's a lot of smoke. It drops the
floor and then stops for a second. Then it drops again. Well, look at this one collapsing. It collapses
the floor and then falls over. These are the two most common occurrences with a pancake. It either goes floor,
stop floor, stop floor, stop floor, stop. Or what most likely would have happened is it would have
come down those first couple floors and then the whole top would have fell off onto the streets.
Furthermore, buildings hit with projectile and in the case of this example, missiles almost always tip
over. These buildings neither pancaked or tipped over. They free fell perfectly into their own footprint.
It is nearly impossible to get a clean straight down collapse without a building being meticulously
pre-wired for demo. The odds of it happening three out of three times to three buildings all with
significantly different damage done to them is a statistical impossibility. There's only one thing
on earth that can make three buildings with three different damage locations free fall perfectly into their
own footprint and that is controlled demolition period. It's not even up for debate.
Now let's take a look at the Nodia twin tower demolition video from august of 2022.
Demolished to dust in just seven and nine seconds. Look familiar?
In this they use the implosion technique.
An advanced technique used most commonly for demolishing high rise buildings.
This method is adopted when there are many surrounding buildings.
In this way, the demolition of the building is done right onto its footprint.
Its advantages are listed as being, quote,
more suitable for tall buildings and being fairly fast.
Exactly how the towers came down.
Free fall speed.
And what type of expl*sive is commonly used in the implosion method?
You guessed it, gelatin.
We heard a loud expl*si*n and at that point, the building was collapsing.
They heard a loud expl*si*n immediately preceding the building's collapse.
And this wasn't the only report of major explosions preceding the building's collapses.
In fact, if you go back to the in real-time coverage, it was a near certainty.
And you can see the two towers, a huge expl*si*n now, raining debris on all of us.
We better get out of the way!
And then when we came outside, it just blew, the tower blew.
All of a sudden you hear expl*si*n and you can see the building starting to collapse.
There was another major expl*si*n.
The building itself, literally at the top of it, came down.
We understand now there has been a secondary expl*si*n on Tower 2.
Again, there was a third expl*si*n.
It's unclear what caused it, whether it was a b*mb or whether the first plane that crashed
into the tower had somehow been booby-trapped with a b*mb that was timed to explode later
after the crash had occurred.
It was an expl*si*n.
It was way up where the fire was.
And the whole building, at that point, bellied out in flames, and everybody ran.
The tower, rather than it, has collapsed, though, we are told collapsed because of a third expl*si*n.
Both have been hit by planes.
We understand it was a third expl*si*n, however, that brought the tower to collapse.
As we were moving towards the building, we saw the top begin to blow out in a plume of smoke,
and we heard the noise associated with an implosion.
When the first tower collapsed, it was a massive expl*si*n.
I looked up.
That's when I heard the expl*si*n.
That's when the second tower came down.
The offices are located.
Wow.
And some people were.
Jamie, Jamie, I need you to stop for a second.
There has just been a huge expl*si*n.
We can see a billowing smoke rising.
And I can't, I'll tell you that I can't see that second tower, but there was a cascade of sparks and fire,
and now this, it looks almost like a mushroom cloud expl*si*n.
You can just hear this huge kaboom.
At that point, we heard a large boom.
You know, I looked up and just saw the building coming at us.
Hello?
Yeah, David Lee, what can you tell us?
John, the scene is horrific.
One of the two towers literally collapsed.
I was making my way to the foot of the World Trade Center suddenly while talking to an officer
who was questioning me about my press credentials.
We heard a very loud blast, an expl*si*n.
We looked up, and the building literally began to collapse before us.
Just seconds ago, there was a huge expl*si*n, and it appears right now the second World Trade Tower has just collapsed.
Are you able to talk?
Can we just talk to you about what happened?
You were right there at the building?
Yes, a lot of people tried.
When I tried to save people in the moment, we heard a big expl*si*n coming down.
Everything just went black.
Everything came down, glass started popping.
People got hurt.
Stuff went on top of them.
And it was a big expl*si*n. Everything got dark.
Pandemonium here a short time ago, when the building did collapse or whatever it was that happened,
it was a huge expl*si*n, a huge rumbling cloud of smoke and fire came across Church Street.
We could hear a rumble, which was about five seconds long, preceding the actual collapse,
and then a boom when each of those towers collapsed.
I was about five blocks away when I heard explosions.
Three thuds and turned around to see the building we just got out of antenna tip over and fall in on itself.
We're not sure exactly what happened, but it was another expl*si*n on the far side of one of the buildings
from where we're standing, the reverberation, and another expl*si*n on the right-hand side.
According to the Associated Press, another building that has either been attacked or exploded.
It sounded like the 4th of July.
You heard a big expl*si*n before the building fell?
I saw it as it was happening, and it sounded as if you had a hundred of those black cat firecrackers
and you lit them all off at once.
That's what it sounded like.
10-13, 10-13, 10-12, I had a major expl*si*n and what appears to be a complete collapse.
It surrounded the entire area.
Do you know if it was an expl*si*n or if it was a building collapse?
To me, it sounded like an expl*si*n, then the building, the rolling sound sounded like the building collapsed.
And in addition to all these, there were also reports of many preliminary explosions
going off from while the buildings were still standing.
Then somebody said that they saw an airliner going to one of those towers.
Then, I don't know, an hour later than that, we had that big expl*si*n from much, much lower.
I don't know what on earth caused that.
There was an internal expl*si*n in the building maybe like 10, 15 minutes later.
The first expl*si*n, then there was a second expl*si*n in the same building.
There were two explosions.
There were two explosions.
There were a plane in there.
There were two explosions.
Two separate ones.
I heard two explosions, however.
There was a first expl*si*n that was louder and then a second expl*si*n.
Firefighters brought a lady to us.
I was covered in smut and we heard an expl*si*n, turned around, commandeered an ambulance,
and we left the scene very quickly.
Then we saw secondary explosions.
Just about ready to go outside when we heard a secondary expl*si*n.
Doctors treating the injured here say most of the 100 patients treated so far are suffering
not just smoke inhalation and eye damage, but fractures.
Many of them have told the doctors that they were responding to the attack on the south tower
when they were suddenly trapped by the second expl*si*n in the north tower.
And many of the fractures they're suffering come not from fallen debris,
but from the concussive force of the expl*si*n, which slammed them against walls, knocked them
to the ground, or slammed them up against their own ambulances.
I was actually on the 78th floor of the second tower and was evacuating the tower
and experienced all these explosions.
But then when we got down to about three, we heard like another expl*si*n.
I don't know what that was.
It just went boom, it was like a b*mb went off.
And it was like, it was like holy hell coming down them stairs.
And then when we go, we finally got to the bottom.
They were coming out on a mezzanine level there.
And then another expl*si*n came right from me.
Just everyone flying.
And about an hour later after that, there was a huge expl*si*n at the base of the south tower.
That's the One World Trade Center and part of the building collapsed.
This was a secondary expl*si*n right behind the floor.
We've heard reports of secondary explosions after the aircraft impacted,
whether in fact there wasn't something else at the base of the towers
that in fact were the coup de grace to bring them to the ground.
We stuck on the stairs for a while.
We finally got down to the lobby.
Then when we got to the lobby, it was this big expl*si*n.
There were numerous secondary explosions taking place in that building.
There were continuous explosions.
We made it all the way downstairs.
And then when we were just about to come out of the building,
there was another blast.
And all the lights went out.
And this is what happened then.
The glass came down?
We didn't see we were still inside the building.
All we heard was a big blast and the whole volume of air moved.
And we went, we came out through the subway.
But then there were other doors that were locked.
So we were brought into another floor when there was another expl*si*n.
And they finally let us continue to go down.
People were experiencing secondary blasts in the stairwells the entire way down.
And this is, of course, exactly where these blasts would be occurring in a controlled demolition.
In the core of the building.
And as you can see here, the stairwells were also in the core.
On top of all that, there was also further evidence from that day of an expl*si*n on the B-1 basement and lobby of Tower 1.
That occurred, according to workers inside the building, simultaneously with the first plane.
With some saying that the basement actually detonated first.
I went straight to the North Tower, to the basement number one of the North Tower.
The building has six sub-levels of basement.
B-1, B-2, all the way down to B-6.
And at 846, while we are in the basement, all of a sudden we hear, boom, an expl*si*n, very loud, very powerful.
That lift us up, the walls cracked, the full ceiling fell on top of us, the sprinkler system got activated, water started spewing everywhere.
And the fax machine fell on the floor, screaming, everybody's screaming.
I thought one of the generators blew out from the mechanical room because it lifted us up.
And when I went to verbalize it six to seven seconds after, we hear, bah, all the way on the top of the building.
Two different events.
The expl*si*n came from, I believe, at first we believed that it came from the mechanical room.
But then we heard a series of other explosions that sounded up on the above levels of the building to where we then realized that there was something wrong.
The amount of explosions I've heard from 08:46, the time we get out, was so many, at least ten.
And it was just like multiple explosions to where I felt like there was different grenades.
That's what it sounded like, it was just different grenades being set off, like, in the building.
It was like, you know, there was one major expl*si*n, and then there was different explosions throughout that period of time until we got out.
I was down in the basement, came down, all of a sudden the elevator blew up, smoke, I dragged the guy out, his skin was hanging off, and I dragged him out, and I helped him out to the ambulance.
I took the train, got out from underneath, the smoke was in the train station.
I worked down on B1 in the World Trade Center.
What happened?
And the whole place just filled up with smoke.
I popped our ears, couldn't hear anything down there.
The ladies that are with me were in the World Trade Center, in the first building, and escaped through the lobby, where they report they believe there was a b*mb in the lobby.
As we were coming out, we passed the lobby, there was no lobby.
So I believe the b*mb hit the lobby first. And in a couple of seconds, the first plane hit.
Pfeifer was the first chief into the building.
Right away, a guy from the Port Authority told him the damage was somewhere above the 78th floor.
But all you had to do was look around.
It was obvious.
Something had happened right there in the lobby.
You just saw that all the windows were blown out.
The lobby looked like the plane hit the lobby.
I think a b*mb went off in the lobby first, then a plane hit the building.
Then another plane hit the other building.
But when I was coming through the doors on the other side of the Trade Center,
something, either they blew the lobby up or something, because it blew the glass out of the doors and knocked us all down.
And I got smoke and everything on me.
I just felt a little shook up because I got blasted.
That's several accounts that the lobby blew up before the first plane and that the subway was filled with smoke.
How is this never mentioned?
And what about the FDNY?
According to the firefighters who were in the towers, there were bombs going off all over these buildings.
I demand to know, as should everyone, especially the media, why important testimony made that day from over 150 police, firefighters and first responders
regarding explosions wasn't included in the commission report, nor investigated further.
What happened?
We was in an expl*si*n.
We was in the lobby and the third expl*si*n, the whole lobby collapsed on us.
What was it like?
Horrible.
It's like hell.
You don't want to know.
The whole building just collapsed on us, inside the lobby.
Was that a secondary expl*si*n?
Yes, it was.
That was good.
Yeah, definitely a secondary expl*si*n.
But we was inside waiting to go upstairs.
And on the way upstairs, the whole f*cking plane blew.
And we just collapsed on everybody inside the lobby.
Similar to the first tower coming down, secondary?
I don't know about the first one, but I know the second one, it was terrible.
Then there was a third one, too, after that one.
There was explosions.
I mean, there was a couple of explosions.
Yeah, while we were in the building.
We were running for stairwells.
A couple of times, we dove into the stairwell.
We thought another plane was coming.
We made it outside.
We made it about a block.
We made it at least two blocks.
And we started running.
Floor by floor, it started popping out.
It was as if they had detonated.
Yeah, detonated.
As if they were planning to take down a building.
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
And you heard the boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
New York's Bravest never had a chance.
We really never even got that close to the building.
The expl*si*n blew and it knocked everybody over.
Five minutes and the elevators exploded on us.
Yeah.
We said something's wrong, yeah.
I mean, the plane hit up on the 80th floor.
I mean, in five minutes, all of a sudden, now the elevators are exploding on the first level.
There was a secondary expl*si*n, probably a device either planted before or on the aircraft that did not explode until an hour later.
It's undeniable.
expl*sives were planted in these buildings.
Even the FBI was initially admitting this.
Federal agencies that were down there do believe that there was some sort of expl*sive device somewhere else besides the planes hitting.
I spoke with some police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me that they have reason to believe that one of the explosions at the World Trade Center,
aside from the ones that may have been caused by the impact of the plane with the building,
may have been caused by a van that was parked in the building that may have had some type of expl*sive device in it.
So their fear is that there may have been expl*sive device planted either in the building or in the adjacent area.
Apparently, what appears to happen was that at the same time two planes hit the building,
that the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with expl*sives underneath the buildings,
which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down.
Now, that's the first time we're hearing that.
So two planes and expl*sives that were in the building, is that correct?
That is the working theory at this point.
That is still unconfirmed, but that is what the FBI is going on.
Of course it was their working theory.
Literally every person in the building said there were detonations going off.
It sounded like g*nf*re.
You know, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang.
And then all of a sudden, three big explosions.
About 50 consecutive bangs and it went and fell down like a waterfall.
Tower number one, the second tower collapsed.
It was the exact, exact same series of detonations.
All of a sudden, I looked up and about 20 stories below, at least that's what it looked like to me,
about 75 flights up, below the fire, I saw from the corner, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
And he goes, how fast?
I go like firecrackers.
You can observe detonations going off before the collapses, like this window blowing out,
or this pre-expl*si*n below the impact zone.
You can observe them leading the collapse by about 10 floors or so,
making the zero resistance of their freefall make sense.
The notion of controlled demolition only became a taboo after the fact,
as you can see, a sort of revisionist history in regards to 9/11.
But on the day of, everybody knew it.
That was a b*mb that did that.
Oh, God, look at that.
That was a f*cking b*mb that did that.
There's no g*dd*mn way that could have happened.
Okay, the second tower has gone down.
The tower would not have collapsed absent some tremendous trauma.
It could have been something that was planted.
Or a b*mb planted in the building, yeah.
This defies belief.
We have a World Trade Center engineer who has a comment.
It's a very strong building, as you remember from the blast the last time, so.
But what does it take, as an engineer, to do the damage?
Oh, no.
Let's get ready, though.
As this man is standing here saying they're very strong buildings
and that he expected them to continue to stand,
we in the background see the buildings collapse,
which, again, feeds that feeling that there was something else,
that there may have been something else that brought those buildings down.
There was a lot of talk there in New York of another expl*si*n
prior to the collapse of the first building.
I said, there's no way.
That's a steel structure.
You know, that's just draperies and carpets and so on.
And I didn't really finish that sentence.
And right up at the top, like we were invited to watch,
boom, boom, boom, down it started to come.
I am reasonably sure that it was not the impact of the plane that did this.
It didn't fall over.
It looked as if somebody put TNT all throughout that building.
As if a demolition team set off when you see the old demolitions of these old buildings.
The way the towers collapsed seems similar to pictures we've become accustomed to watching,
as old buildings like the Kingdome in Seattle are taken down with expl*sives.
This was clearly, the way the structure is collapsing,
this was the result of something that was planned.
This is not, it's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse
and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way.
I think it's safe to say there were bombs in these buildings.
And this doesn't just go for towers one and two.
It also goes for the often forgotten World Trade Center 7.
Well, me and Mr. Hesch, the corporation council, were on the 23rd floor.
I told them we got to get out of here.
We started walking down the stairs.
We made it to the 8th floor.
Big expl*si*n.
Blew us back into the 8th floor.
And I turned to Hesch.
I said, this is it.
We're dead.
We're not going to make it out of here.
The Red Cross rep was like, he goes over and he says,
well, you got to stay behind this line because they're thinking about bringing the building down.
They didn't say what building.
They just said bringing a building down.
He came back over with his hand over the radio and it sounded like a countdown.
And at the last few seconds, he took his hand off.
And you heard three, two, one.
And he was just saying, just run for your life.
Just run for your life.
And then it was like another two, three seconds, you heard explosions.
Like, ba-boom.
It's like a distinct sound.
It's not like when the compression, like boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
Like floors that were dropping and collapsing.
This was ba-boom.
Like you felt a rumble in the ground.
Like almost like you wanted to grab onto something.
You want to call your mother or something?
Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running.
And the sh*t's hitting the ground behind me.
And the whole time you hear them, thum, thum, thum, thum, thum.
So, I think I know an expl*si*n when I hear it.
But, you know, so, yeah, I want to know what took that building down.
I don't think it was a fire and it certainly wasn't a plane.
Which brings us to World Trade Center 7.
For you see, as I've alluded to throughout this video,
there weren't two skyscrapers that came down to New York City on September 11th.
There were three.
Tower 1, Tower 2, and 370 feet to the north,
World Trade Center 7, or as it was locally known,
the Salomon Brothers Building.
Standing 47 stories high,
World Trade Center 7 would be the tallest building
in more than 30 states still to this day.
Yet, it is rarely even mentioned.
World Trade Center 7 wasn't hit by a plane.
It didn't have a huge hole blown into it.
So, how could it fall?
In general speaking,
The official explanation given in the government NIST report
for the collapse of World Trade Center 7
is fire.
That's right.
Simply fire.
Triggered a New York City skyscraper
less than 15 years old
built with some of the highest building regulations
in the world
to go into full failure collapse mode.
Definitely not suspicious.
But if you want to go into a little more detail,
the NIST report goes like this.
A fire on the 12th floor
heated up beams G3005, A3004, B3004, C3004, and K3004, causing them to thermal expand to the west,
pushing girder A2001
6 14 inches west,
knocking it off its column seat at column 79,
initiating an internal failure of nine floors,
which in turn
caused the entire building to collapse.
That is the official report
of the collapse of World Trade Center 7.
Leroy Hulsey, Zhili Quan, and Feng Xiao's
structural re-evaluation of the collapse
detail the many inaccuracies
in the official NIST breakdown.
For starters, NIST only shows thermal expansion
in one direction,
allowing for zero give
on the outside of the building.
This is not the case, as, of course,
both sides of said beams
would incur their thermal expansion.
Furthermore,
even when assuming the false notion
of beams shifting in only one direction,
they found that they still
would have needed to increase
the coefficient of thermal expansion
of the steel by approximately 40%
in order just to get them
to move A2001, the 6 14 inches required
for it to fall off its seat
in the first place.
Speaking of its seat,
NIST also removed
column 79's side plates,
pictured here in the structurals,
and confirmed to have been
indeed added here in this 1986 footage
of World Trade Center 7's construction.
Meaning that even if gerder A2001 could be pushed with such a force,
it couldn't move
more than 3 58 inches anyway,
or it would get wedged up
against column 79's
western side plate,
making it impossible for it to slide off
the way NIST claims.
To add to even that,
NIST simulations conveniently leave off
gerder A2001's web stiffeners,
significantly decreasing the bending resistance of the flange.
During their investigation,
Hulsey, Quan, and Xiao found that even if
they removed the western column plate,
set the beam to move solely west
with zero give to the east,
and added the 40% increase
that the web stiffeners alone
were still enough
to prevent the girders
from walking off its seat.
On top of all that,
when calculating the thermal expansion of G3005,
NIST conveniently leaves
off connector beams S3007, G3007, and K3007,
despite showing them in other areas
of the report, which prevents the movement they are claiming to have happened
as part of gerder A2001's displacement.
So in layman's terms, the driving force behind NIST's theory is an impossibility.
Architects and engineers then reconstructed World Trade Center 7 piece by piece digitally,
using the structural blueprints,
and then ran through simulation after simulation
until they found one that resembled the actual collapse
that we were able to observe
of World Trade Center 7.
They also inputted and simulated
the alleged official NIST report theory
in which the simulation tipped the building.
This makes sense as Column 79 and gerder A2001
were way over in the northeast corner of the building.
If their failure had truly been the linchpin
to Building 7's collapse,
then it would make logical sense that at some point the building
would tip east rather than flow straight down.
Architects and engineers ran simulation after simulation until they finally got the one
which resembled the actual collapse.
And the only way they were able to get the simulation to accurately recreate
what happened on that day was with the simultaneous failure
of all core columns over eight stories
followed 1.3 seconds later
by the simultaneous failure
of all exterior columns over eight stories.
Very much like a controlled demolition.
It's amazing.
Amazing, incredible pick your word
for the third time today it's reminiscent
of those pictures we've all seen too much
on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed
by well-placed dynamite to knock it down.
Also, you have owner Larry Silverstein in this interview
actually saying that they gave the order to pull it.
I said, you know we've had such a terrible loss of life
maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it
and they made that decision to pull
and then we watched the building collapse.
Then, you have the British Broadcasting World News Update
reporting it as having collapsed already when in fact
it is right behind her.
That's the Salomon Brothers building right there
better known as World Trade Center 7.
You might have heard a few moments ago I was talking about the
Salomon Brothers building collapsing and indeed it has.
Apparently that's only a few hundred yards away from where the World Trade Center
towers were and it seems that this was not a result
of a new attack it was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks.
We'll probably find out more now about that from our correspondent Jane Stanley.
Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse?
Well, only really what you already know.
Details are very, very sketchy.
Yeah, they're sketchy all right, especially considering that
it's still standing in the live shot behind you.
Jane's feed would stay on the air with the Salomon Brothers building
in the background for another six minutes until this happened.
Jane, I think many of us when we heard the news perhaps on
the radio earlier today were completely flabbergasted
by it and just couldn't comprehend it.
I mean, it almost sounded too far-fetched.
I was wondering what it felt like for you being in Manhattan.
Well, unfortunately, I think we've lost the line
with Jane Stanley in Manhattan.
Perhaps we can rejoin her and follow that up later.
Clearly, someone had advanced knowledge that this
building was about to be brought down and jumped the g*n.
But going back to the structural
re-evaluation of World Trade Center 7, you'll find
that when calculating the impact force
of this alleged falling girder A2001, even
though as we just went over couldn't have happened anyway,
the impact force it would crash into the 12th
floor with works out to be 61,950 pounds, less than a tenth of the 632,000 pounds
of force that would be required to shear the girder bearing seat below it.
Meaning that even if the
impossible occurred and there were no connector beams, thermal
expansion only happened in one direction, there were no web stiffeners, and
the column 79 side plates magically disappeared allowing girder
A2001 to collapse onto the floor below that
still wouldn't even generate 10% of the
force required to further collapse the floor below it and it
would have been contained right there on the 12th floor anyway.
Yet, with all that in mind, on this day, despite
not being hit by a plane, despite having no gaping hole, despite its beams being fireproof, and the
whole slew of other flaws in the NIST report, World Trade Center 7 also
fell at free fall speed perfectly into its footprint, making
it only the third steel building to ever collapse from
fire alongside World Trade Center 1 and 2.
The only three times in history, all in one day, all falling the exact same way, despite
all three of them being damaged in three different ways.
It's also of note that since only one other steel building has ever collapsed from fire, and that
was in Iran.
which, if you observe, falls much more realistically asymmetrically.
Here's a side-by-side comparison. Which one does World Trade Center 7 resemble?
I mean, how are we even still discussing this two decades later?
You also have this interesting response from John Kerry when
asked about Silverstein's statement that he gave
the order to "Pull Building 7."
I do know that wall, I remember, was in danger, and I
think that they made a decision based on the danger that it
had of destroying other things, that they did it in a controlled fashion.
Wow.
It takes weeks to months to prepare such a demolition.
The only way someone could make a decision to pull it and bring it down in a
controlled fashion would be if they had already been pre-rigged for demo.
People realize that, you know, this is probably something that was orchestrated.
And of course, everyone knew right away that it was t*rrorists.
No need to do an investigation of more than, say, I don't know, half a day.
They found Satam al-Suqami's passport on the street.
So everything on the plane just exploded into a fireball the size of a giant stadium.
But his passport somehow survived.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
He himself was a incinerated to dust.
But his passport remained fully intact and was found immediately.
Another development on Saturday, New York
officials revealed at a news conference here in the city that a hijacker's passport was
found blocks from the World Trade Center crash site if you believe that.
I actually can't believe that.
Also, this is New York City.
There are random papers and trinkets floating around the street at all times,
it's normal place.
Something like that wouldn't even stick out to someone, especially
not in the ensuing chaos when everyone's eyes were focused a
thousand feet in the air on the hole in Tower One.
Now, a wheel? Sure.
An engine? Like the one seen flying off the plane here?
Absolutely.
But a random passport? Absolutely not.
And again, the idea that one of the hijackers' passports survived this in the
first place is laughably made up.
They also claim to have found two passports in Shanksville.
The plane and passengers, again, were completely obliterated, but two
passports survived.
No one thinks that's a little strange?
Here's footage from the Nepal crash site of 2023.
Luggage everywhere, debris everywhere, big sections of the plane, bodies,
everything you'd expect from a crash site.
Here's footage from the recent Cuban plane crash.
Same thing.
The India plane crash.
Same thing.
And here's Shanksville.
A couple small fires and tiny metal scraps.
No luggage.
As this first responder remembers, no bodies.
And I just looked around and no people.
You know, and I'm thinking, where are the people?
And not a single section of the plane.
But of course, these passports were touted as prime proof that
this was indeed Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.
A narrative they had been setting up all summer.
The intelligence community for some time has been warning
in a steady drumbeat, Brian, that Osama bin Laden has not been
heard from now, frankly, since the
beginning of the year, the USS Cole incident
rather, and they've been wondering when and if he will strike again, and they only believed it was a matter of time.
And I believe that today that is going to be their first suspicion.
But we have no confirmation of that.
I must underline there's no confirmation that this is a t*rror1st attack,
number one, or number two, that it's Osama bin Laden involvement.
But I can tell you right now, that is what they are
thinking, that is the working premise, and we'll just have to see as the day unfolds what they discover.
Among the key targets, key people that they're looking at is Osama bin Laden.
It was just last Friday that the U.S. State Department put
out a worldwide caution to American citizens traveling abroad and also to U.S.
government facilities, and they said that terrorism knows no limits, whether it's on U.S. soil or outside.
The initial assumption this official said was that this had
something to do, or at least they were looking into any possible connections with Osama bin Laden.
The administration recently released a warning that they
thought Osama bin Laden might strike out against U.S. targets.
Just like they had rehearsed three months earlier.
Also, just like government whistleblower William Cooper had
warned what would happen only two months earlier.
They're doing the same thing today with Osama bin Laden, and
that's where I've been getting at.
Can you believe what
you have been seeing on CNN today, ladies and gentlemen?
Can you believe it?
Supposedly, a CNN
reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television
camera crew with him,
went into Osama bin Laden's hideout, interviewed him
and his top leadership, his top lieutenants and colonels and generals in their hideout.
This is a CNN reporter with a camera crew.
And he came out and told everybody, within three weeks, Osama bin Laden is going to attack
the United States and Israel.
Now, don't you think that's kind of strange, folks?
You see, because the largest intelligence apparatus in the world,
with the biggest budget in the history of the world, has been looking
for Osama bin Laden for years and years and years, and can't find him.
Some doofus, jerk-off reporter with a camera
crew, marches right into his hideout and interviews him.
Now, that tells us two things.
Either everyone in the intelligence community and all of the intelligence
agencies of the United States government are blithering idiots and
incompetent fools, including the entire apparatus of the FBI and all of their personnel.
Are they lying to us? They're not looking for him at all.
And the second is the truth.
You see, the CIA created Osama bin Laden.
They recruited him.
They trained him.
They found his leadership.
They brought them all together.
They showed them how to fight the Soviet Union in
Afghanistan, and when that was over, they still
continued to fund him and train him, and they're now
using him to help bring about world government by making him the big
boogeyman because they can't use S*ddam Hussein anymore.
Do you ever hear of Osama bin Laden before you heard of S*ddam Hussein?
When did you start hearing of Osama bin Laden?
It was after S*ddam Hussein and Iraq were
supposedly neutralized in the Gulf w*r because they
needed a new boogeyman.
But they're not looking for Osama bin Laden because I'm
telling you right now, if I were the head of the Central Intelligence Agency
within two weeks, I would have him dead or in custody without fail, a
reporter from CNN and his little camera crew got in to Osama bin Laden's
secret hideout and conducted an interview.
If you don't believe me, tune in to CNN.
They're probably running it right now as I'm speaking.
And if you believe it, you
are one of the stupidest jerks that ever lived on the face of this earth.
And whatever is going to happen that they're going to
blame on Osama bin Laden, don't you even believe it.
Wow.
That was two months before
September 11th.
And wouldn't you know it, Bill Cooper was k*lled in his
own driveway just two months after that.
Interesting that the most famous government whistleblower of all
time, author of the book, Behold the Pale Horse, warns
people, remarkably, about 9/11, just two months before 9/11 and
winds up being k*lled by law enforcement immediately after 9/11.
Now was Cooper a prophet?
No.
It was simply someone with
former Q clearance who knew how
covert government operations were.
So when he saw CNN talking about
Bin Laden playing Bakr Atyani's interview where they were allowed
to just waltz right in to Al-Qaeda's
secret hideout, followed by a
warning of an imminent attack, he knew exactly what he was watching.
He was watching one of the most
integral parts of any of these
operations, making sure the public
knows who the bad guy is.
It's false flag 101.
They were re-seeding Bin Laden's name into the mind's eye of society.
In order to sell Bin Laden as the perpetrator, the public first needs
to know that he is already an enemy.
Cooper knew this concept well.
It's something that has preceded
almost every w*r of the 20th century.
It's an archetype.
First you build them, then you let
them loose, then you expose them,
followed typically by a well-timed
traumatic event, and then you wage w*r on them.
He knew the next round was coming.
We had just went through this same
cycle with S*ddam Hussein.
First we built him and Iraq during
the Iran-Iraq w*r, funding them,
giving them technology, and overall
aiding him as he waged open chemical
warfare on Iran.
Then, once we were done with him, we
exposed him to the public as a monster,
and then we waged w*r on him.
Once you know how these people
operate, it becomes easier to read their moves.
And like William Cooper stated during
his now famous June 2001 broadcast, we
also built up Bin Laden.
Because from 1979 to 1992, in a campaign
called Operation Cyclone, the CIA funded the Mujahideen.
The CIA's prized asset during this time
was Mujahideen Commander Jalaluddin
Haqqani, close friend and mentor of Osama Bin Laden.
He is the Mujahideen Commander who
personally helped and protected Osama bin Laden during his rise.
Haqqani received his assets like the
rest through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Agency.
As this was the office used by the CIA to
get their funding to the Mujahideen.
But due to his, "prized asset status",
he also received additional payments direct
from the CIA's operatives themselves.
This is the man who took Osama bin Laden
under his wing and mentored him, funded
directly by the CIA.
British Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001,
Robin Cook, further clarifies that
specifically throughout the 80s, Bin Laden
was armed by the CIA and that,
"Al-Qaeda, literally 'the database', was
originally the computer file of the thousands
of mujahideen who were recruited and trained
with help from the CIA"
Al-Qaeda was the CIA's Mujahideen recruitment database.
Incredible.
Bin Laden himself even admits this
in a 1995 interview where he states, quote,
I created my first military camps
where these volunteers underwent training
by Pakistani and American officers
and that the arms were supplied by the Americans
and the money by the Saudis.
This group was Bin Laden's Maktab al-Khidamat
and they were nurtured by Pakistan's
Internal Services Intelligence Agency,
the CIA's primary conduit to the Mujahideen
during Operation Cyclone.
The Mujahideen is what split into Al-Qaeda,
as we just went over, and the Taliban.
We helped build them.
And Bin Laden, S*ddam Hussein, and the Taliban
were bad guys, one, two, and three,
and kicking off the new never-ending w*r
in the Middle East.
All at one time funded by the United States government
through the CIA.
They say the casualties from this one
are going to be so much worse.
They are ready to go to w*r.
There is a sense of w*r here at the Pentagon.
And thank you very much, John McQuethy, at the Pentagon.
We'll be coming back to you many times in the course of the evening.
The question is, go to w*r with whom?
Because from the FBI, from the CIA, from the Pentagon today,
no warning of this whatsoever, no knowledge of who's involved.
No warning of this whatsoever,
no knowledge of who's involved.
The intelligence community for some time has been warning.
The U.S. State Department put out a worldwide caution.
The administration recently released a warning
that they thought Osama Bin Laden might strike out against U.S. targets.
If you think the idea of our own government
lying to us to generate support for a w*r
is impossible,
they've literally done it so many times.
President Wilson commissioned an entire council
in World w*r I
dedicated to propaganda,
which circulated monstrous imagery
and invented horrible stories
of the German people,
all with the sole intention
to make American citizens
beg him to enter the w*r.
It worked, and they did.
This propaganda they told us about
k*lling women and children and one thing or another,
they had a lot of propaganda
about that there.
the Hun, you know, they called him.
And how he'd go through these villages
when he'd capture them
and k*ll all the people off and that there.
That's the stuff that they told us.
To feed you up to get you mad, I guess.
Atrocities alleged to have been committed by the Germans in Belgium
were presented in melodramatic form.
The evil Germans threw the babies on the floor
and left them to die.
We'll flash back to this in a moment.
The Woodrow Wilson administration's
Committee on Public Information
brought advertisers, graphic artists, newspaper editors, novelists, and more
together for a two-year media campaign.
George Creel headed the operation, Edward Bernays,
the future father of public relations,
chaired the CPI Export Service,
and Hollywood itself
got right to work making propaganda films.
All to sell the Great w*r.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident.
August 4, 1964.
The U.S. military vessels openly attacked by the North Vietnamese.
President Johnson gave a public address
explaining it to the nation.
And on the heels of the public's outrage,
the Gulf of Tonkin resolution signed by Congress
allowing President Johnson to deploy U.S. forces to Vietnam
for open warfare.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident was made up.
It never even happened.
The National Security Agency had deliberately skewed intelligence
at President Johnson's request
to create the impression
that an attack had been carried out,
leading to literal Vietnam.
Still think it's impossible?
In the lead-up to the first Gulf w*r,
a young girl named Nayirah, last name redacted for safety,
of course, came forward with a harrowing tale of Iraqi soldiers
coming into Kuwaiti hospitals, taking the babies out of their incubators,
and putting them on the ground to die.
Look familiar?
Nayirah presented this as an official testimony to Congress.
The second week after invasion, I volunteered
at the Al-Adan Hospital with 12 other women
who wanted to help as well.
I was the youngest volunteer.
The other women were from 20 to 30 years old.
While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers
coming to the hospital with g*ns.
They took the babies out of the incubators,
took the incubators, and left the children to die on the cold floor.
That was horrifying.
Public reaction naturally
was one of pure anger.
The incubator babies,
President Bush, came on TV
and repeated it to the nation like a rallying call.
And three months later, with the public now fully on board,
Bush initiated open warfare in Operation Desert Storm.
Off to fight literal monsters once again.
Nayirah's testimony was made up.
It never even happened.
Nayirah's name, as it turns out,
wasn't redacted for safety, but because she was
the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador
to the United States,
who also testified
at this same hearing.
Nayirah's testimony was fabricated and coached
by the American public relations firm Hill & Nalton.
So, the idea of a distressingly
emotional incident being orchestrated
by the powers that be in order to initiate a w*r
is actually more common than not.
And in one such case, even in writing.
Preserved forever in the Operation Northwoods document,
a plan to remove Fidel Castro
and overthrow the Cuban government.
Born out of the failure of the Bay of Pigs,
the main operation was dubbed Mongoose and it included
the CIA, the Department of Defense, the State Department,
the FBI, and more.
Within four months of its inception,
early March 1962,
a memorandum titled Northwoods
is drawn up
detailing a list of false flags
to, "justify U.S. military intervention in Cuba."
So, it is documented fact
that our intel communities
plan false flag attacks.
It's in writing.
Northwoods proposed
using actors to fake attacks,
stage riots,
and in one scenario,
stage a new Remember the Maine incident
by blowing up a U.S. ship
in Guantanamo Bay
and blaming Cuba.
Sound familiar?
Aggression by terror against the peaceful
villagers of South Vietnam has now been joined
by open aggression on the high seas
against the United States of America.
I have been given
encouraging assurance
by these leaders of both parties
that such a resolution
will be promptly introduced,
freely and expeditiously debated,
and passed
with overwhelming support.
Hey, seems that one was a keeper.
But it's page 10
that is too familiar to ignore.
It's here the Northwoods
first suggests hijacking attempts
against civil air and the painting of a drone plane
as an exact duplicate of a civil airliner to be used in a false flag attack.
Documented fact.
In this exercise, the actual civil airliner
would be loaded up with selected passengers with carefully prepared aliases.
It would then launch both the civil airliner and the painted drone at the perfect time
for both of their flight paths to rendezvous south of Florida
where the civil airliner would then descend to a minimum altitude
as the drone would take over its flight path.
So on radar, the drone would appear to still be the civil airline.
It's right after this where they would then put out a mayday to grab everyone's attention.
It's 08:52 here in New York.
I'm Brian Gumbel.
We understand that there has been a plane crash
on the southern tip of Manhattan.
and you're looking at the World Trade Center.
We understand that a plane has crashed into the World Trade Center.
The plan was to destroy it on call
for all the airwaves to hear and many to see.
A public act of w*r.
It further states that doing it this way
would allow the radio stations to tell the U.S.
what happened rather than the U.S. trying to, "sell it themselves."
They wanted the people who witnessed it
to sell the public, not the government.
I mean, it was a t*rror1st attack. It had to be.
So,
it's gone.
It's only struck one of the buildings.
The other building appears to not
have been...
Holy f*ck!
Holy f*ck!
That's a f*cking t*rror1st,
you...
Holy sh*t!
International tourist place.
Lots of people.
There's another plane coming down. Holy sh*t!
Look at the building down.
Boom!
Oh, man!
What the f*ck's going on?
Wow!
Oh, sh*t!
Wow!
Do you see this this aircraft?
I've got it all.
Yo, what the f*ck?
Yo, that's t*rror1st sh*t, man.
That is it.
This is t*rror1st.
That's...
Obviously.
Oh, my God!
Oh, my God!
Oh, my God!
Oh, my God!
What?
Oh, my God!
It's t*rror1st!
That is...
What do I do?
Oh, my God!
Mom, another plane just crashed into the Otherworld Trade Center.
Another plane hit it.
A jet.
A jumbo jet.
I'm so scared. I'm leaving.
No, no, don't make it.
Holy sh*t, man.
That's the other building. That's t*rror1st.
Other building? That's t*rror1st, bro.
That's f*cking t*rror1st.
Holy sh*t.
Oh, my God.
That's t*rror1st, bro.
Did you get that?
I zoomed out on it.
President Kennedy rejected Northwoods, and that is the only reason it did not happen.
So, to suggest that our own government wouldn't stage a public tragedy with alleged hijacked
plans in order to justify, "U.S. military intervention" in a country the CIA was already
running missions in is an indefensible position.
They quite literally were one signature away from doing exactly that in 1962, in writing,
a hauntingly similar to 9/11 incident born out of a program that had nearly the entire government
on board, essentially mimicking the very event that, as predicted, made us beg for w*r in
the Middle East.
That gave the CIA the full military intervention they were lobbying for before the September
11th attacks.
Mimicking it, in my opinion, right down to the painted drone planes.
Because I noticed something going through the immediate coverage and home videos of September 11th.
Nearly every single early eyewitness refers to those planes as 737s or smaller.
Not 767s, as stated in the official narrative.
I just witnessed a plane that appeared to be cruising slightly lower than normal altitude
over New York City.
And it appears to have crashed into, I don't know which tower it is, but it hit directly
in the middle of one of the World Trade Center towers.
Sean, what kind of plane?
Was it a small plane, a jet?
It was a jet, looked like a two-engine jet, maybe a 737.
Can you tell us what kind of an airplane is it?
It had to be a 737 and had to hit the World Trade Center.
And a 737 hit the World Trade Center.
And I was just curious at the same time, that was the aircraft.
It just seemed like a smaller plane. I don't think it was anything commercial.
Possible 737 jet may have crashed into World Trade Center tower number one.
This just happened, folks. You're looking live.
A plane, possibly a 737 jet, hit tower one of the World Trade Center in the Financial District.
I just heard somebody say that they thought it was a 737 that went through the building.
It's speculated that the plane is as big as a 737.
Not a big plane like an airliner, but not a tiny propeller plane either.
A small jet plane.
Now I was told the 737 jet hit the building all the way up.
The planes are still coming out of the Trade Center on the top.
Yeah, it was a jet.
A small jet, like a private jet or something.
Also more eyewitnesses saying they saw a small commuter plane crash into the building.
Right now we're getting information, Al, that it was a small commuter plane.
The plane looked either like a 737 or an Airbus.
737 or an Airbus.
Okay, you know, you, I understand you're an airplane aficionado?
Yeah.
Some reports are that it was a small commuter plane.
It was a plane?
It was definitely a plane?
They said a 737 plane.
They have some guy on the phone who said it was either a 737 or an Airbus. He witnessed the whole thing.
In your estimation, what type of plane did..
Either an Airbus, A320 style, or a Boeing 737.
There were many people in the building.
Oh, another one just hit. Something else just hit.
As I was walking down Fifth Avenue, which is close to our studios,
and I heard a jet, perhaps a 737 or a small Airbus.
Did you see a 747?
It was a 737.
Some guy standing next to me said, oh, my God, that was like a Learjet that just hit it.
Did you just see that? I mean, it was a 737.
The guy just took a 737 and he flew it right into the building.
It was a small commercial aircraft, like a small Airbus or a 737 Boeing.
One was hit by an aircraft.
Some witnesses saying it was a 727 or 737.
That's obviously designed to do considerable damage to those buildings on this day
when we're holding a primary election in New York City.
Now, I would imagine...
Jim, what you're saying could be a drone aircraft.
That's an aircraft that's guided electronically to its target without having a pilot.
Now, that is a possibility as well.
It's a 737, we're now being told.
That is clearly, from the indications I'm looking at, is a small jet, small airliner-sized jet.
Looks to me either an A320 or a 737-sized airplane.
Looked like a Boeing 737.
The reports have suggested it was perhaps a 737.
It looked to me a small, you know, commercial plane, the first plane that I saw.
A commercial airliner-sized, you know, not a jumbo jet.
I'm just getting messaged from one of our employees here at MSNBC, whose husband, and we hope to get him on the phone, saw this.
He said it looked to him like it was a 737.
My guess is what we saw there was an A320.
That's just my guess.
Didn't seem like a big passenger jet. It was a smaller-type plane.
It definitely did not look like a commercial plane, didn't see any windows on the side.
Those could be cargo planes.
We were en route to the scene, and an airplane passed over our head from south to north.
And this was a Boeing 737 aircraft.
I saw it for a fraction of a second, but it appeared to me to be a 737 would be the most likely candidate.
Yeah, yeah, that certainly is what it looked like.
The first plane appeared to be a 737.
The plane we saw, absent any perspective, seemed to be a smaller plane.
Let us go to Richard Thompson on the telephone.
He is a licensed pilot, and he witnessed this.
It was a small business jet of some type.
The engine configuration looked like it was a 737.
What's reported, at least, is a 737-type size airplane.
The second plane hit the Tower 2.
Looked like a 737.
Some witnesses saying that they saw one of the planes, I believe the DC-3, or maybe it was a smaller plane.
I think it was a smaller plane.
They compared it to the size of a shuttle, you know, like the Boston or Washington shuttle.
Was it a large aircraft?
It looked fairly large.
I didn't think it looked as large as I'm hearing it probably was.
I thought it was a small jet.
It sounds like maybe it was larger than I thought.
Well, but you are the eyewitness.
I mean, that's not just a few people.
That's damn near everybody.
Even going so far as to argue people down who so much as even suggest a 747.
Furthermore, we even have some channels who are trying to hide these statements.
Such as the official CBS YouTube editing out yet another eyewitness account here.
That, yes, that was definitely looked like it was on purpose.
You saw a plane?
Yes, I just saw a plane go into the building.
Why do you say that was definitely on purpose?
Because it just, it just flew straight into it.
It looks like it's about, uh, I would say 15 floors lower than the first building.
Now is the cut
Of course you didn't.
That's the point.
Now let's listen to the full broadcast.
You saw a plane?
Yes, I just saw a plane go into the building.
Why do you say that was definitely on purpose?
Because it just, it just flew straight into it.
There's not, it didn't look like it was, uh, and it didn't look like a commercial jet.
It was a smaller plane.
It was definitely a smaller plane.
Um, can you characterize the, the scene down there right now for us?
Now on the.
Yeah, as you can look down at the street.
Yes.
From your vantage point.
On the second building, I think that we, the further one, the east side, um, there,
it is, looks like it's about, uh, I would say 15 floors lower than the first building.
The entire statement left in full, except the part where she says it was a smaller plane.
Clearly someone made the decision to edit this out.
So I decided to take it a step further.
Step one, create a scale.
Using the typical floor plans of tower one.
I set the scale at 207 feet, two inches.
This line right here represents the alleged hijacked 767's overall length.
And this range right here represents the size of the plane sighted by nearly every eyewitness.
I then gathered as many clear straight on shots of flight 175 in the south tower as I can find.
Stopping each one as close as possible to the tower for maximum accuracy.
As you can see here, this set of shots covers the full spectrum from slightly south to slightly north.
Due to the angle that flight 175 hits tower two, the shots taken from the southeast perspective
will scale the plane as slightly larger than it actually is due to two variables.
The plane being closer than the building and due to the angle lining up more straight with the plane,
but not with the tower from which we're setting the scale off of.
As you'll observe, even with these variables in its favor,
flight 175 still scales short of the proposed 767.
Conversely, the shots from the northeast perspective will show it slightly shorter.
There's one.
And there's two.
Both scaling to a 737.
And finally, an angle with as close on of a shot as there is.
Also, scaling to a large 737.
Running the gamut and showing that every last one scales shorter than the 767 they claim it is.
The planes that hit the Twin Towers were not the ones that were hijacked.
We know they look like the ones that were hijacked.
An American Airlines jet hit the tower.
I know about planes.
Is that where it's in the airplane?
No, United.
Is that the United?
It was the United.
It was the United airplane that just crashed right into it.
An aircraft at Eglin Air Force Base would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft.
Straight from our own government's writings.
And of course they were drones.
They hit their target dead on.
You're telling me that alleged hijackers with minimal flight training who supposedly could barely fly Cessnas
were able to perfectly navigate full-size passenger jets 100 miles off course without help from a tower
and hit their targets dead on three times.
There is no way.
Which brings us back to Amalgam Virgo.
Because if you were going to orchestrate a false flag, the level of Operation Northwoods or 9/11,
you would need drive runs.
We're said he was formulating a plan to take out Al-Qaeda once and for all that they,
"developed over the spring and summer."
Coincidentally, the same time this simulation is set up, a much-needed dry run.
Even if the majority of people involved have no idea it's for a real event,
you still need to be able to conduct a high-end run-through.
And that's what NORAD seems to have done just three months before it happened.
Here is the PDF of the earlier mentioned Amalgam Virgo.
Again, with a picture of Osama bin Laden preparing to use drone planes to commit a t*rror1st act.
This fictional drone plane attack is also taking place not on an overseas embassy,
not on a ship, not on a military base, but on a U.S. city.
And as you scroll down, you will observe the chilling similarities
as nearly every mock-up shows a drone plane flying over a body of water towards the city.
When you get to page 22 in the corner,
you have a drone next to a city with what looks like exploding skyscrapers.
Page 23, the same thing.
And atop even that off, you finally have the track synopsis on page 31.
If you come to the bottom corner, it states that the UAVs, or drones, are color-coded red.
And what are the two UAVs on this map?
9 and 11, with 9 circled with dots.
And what's the highlighted UAV-9's time frame?
8.30 to 9.30 local.
The exact time both planes hit the towers.
8.46 and 9.03.
I'm sure that's just a coincidence, though,
that NORAD conducted a simulation of Osama bin Laden flying drone planes into buildings
with the first two drone designations being 9 and 11,
with the attached exact time designation window only three months before.
Definitely just a coincidence.
And again, these are their own documents.
The events of 9/11 have been covered by 10,000 journalists since it's happened.
And surely, some of them must have read the Amalgam Virgo PDF.
Or what about the, "official investigation"?
Speaking of such, it might also surprise you to find out that the FBI director at the time of 9/11
was none other than Robert Mueller, who was appointed just one week before the attacks,
who then conducted an investigation that went on for years and led nowhere.
Sound familiar?
That investigation, by the way, or should I say THE FBI investigation into the September 11th attacks,
is codenamed PENTTBOM, short for Pentagon Twin Towers Bombing Investigation.
Not Twin Towers Hijacking Investigation.
Not Twin Towers Jet Fuel Investigation.
Twin Towers Bombing Investigation.
b*mb, b*mb, b*mb, b*mb, b*mb.
Robert Mueller was also one of the main voices behind the, now proven false, Declaration of
Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
I am concerned always about the threat of WMD, the attack on the United States.
Our particular concern is that S*ddam Hussein may supply t*rrorists with biological,
chemical, or radiological material.
Even worse than Mueller was another familiar name, one James Clapper, who, as the director
of NIMA, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, was the main person tasked with analysis of Iraqi
satellite imagery to determine whether or not WMD sites existed.
NIMA claimed to have located more than 950 WMD sites, which went on to serve as key evidence
behind the WMD lie.
Colin Powell then used NIMA's generated graphics of the alleged mobile biological production facilities
to give an impassioned briefing to the United Nations.
And immediately following that, as we just watched, George Tenet and Robert Mueller confidently
amplified the WMD hysteria to Congress for the final stamp of approval.
One month later, we invaded Iraq.
And two years after that, and Iraq's complete dismantling, it was concluded that there actually
weren't weapons of mass destruction.
As it turns out, the satellite images Clapper's NIMA used to validate the claims of the alleged
mobile biological production facilities were, in fact, milk pasteurization trucks.
Starting to see a pattern yet?
Terror against the peaceful villagers of South Vietnam.
Took the incubators and left the children to die on the cold floor.
That's the stuff what they told us. To feed you up to get your mad, I guess.
And where did the FBI's top anti-terrorism task force just happen to be on 9/11?
About as far away from New York as they could be.
But this very interesting information, Katie, Matt, and Tom from the FBI, they had been
operating a massive exercise from their hostage rescue unit.
All of their top teams, about 50 personnel, helicopters, equipment, were in Monterey, California
for the last two days, scheduled to fly back today commercially.
So all of those people are out of place.
It's fair to say, according to sources that we've talked to here at NBC, that the FBI rescue
operations and other FBI operations are really in chaos right now because they can't reach
their officials in New York.
All of their phone lines are down.
And now you've got all of their special experts on this stuck in Monterey, California,
trying to get a military flight back because there are no longer commercial flights.
So they are seriously out of pocket.
And there is a real breakdown of the FBI anti-terror coordination team, which is, of course, the
principal team that would lead any effort and was so effective under Jim Costner.
Our intelligence stunk this time.
Put it this way.
It was so bad that the FBI's anti-t*rror1st task force responsible for investigating situations
like this was on a training exercise in Monterey, California at the time of the bombing
and still can't get back to investigate it.
That's okay, though.
Fortunately for the FBI, their anti-terrorism task force didn't need to be there right
away to solve the case because the case solved itself.
In an act of miraculous fortune, one passenger's luggage somehow was never transferred to its
respective doomed flight, which, when searched, just so happened to contain written out breakdowns
of all 19 hijackers, their backgrounds, their motives, each of their assignments, their ties
to Al-Qaeda, a video cassette of a Boeing flight simulator, a knife and pepper spray.
The entire plot of 9/11 is neatly packaged and dropped in their lap.
Of all the passengers and all the planes, the one suitcase that just so happened to not make
the plane has a written out breakdown of the attacks.
Give me a break.
I call this one the magic suitcase, which, when coupled with the magic passports, you get
the FBI's official reasoning when asked how on earth they were instantly able to discern
all of the hijackers and how they were attached to Al-Qaeda.
That is some stroke of luck.
And what about the alleged hijackers?
The majority of them, 11 to be precise, obtained their visas through the U.S. consulate in Jeddah,
Saudi Arabia.
This is notable because according to J. Michael Springman, former head of the Visa Bureau in
Jeddah, this was the very consulate the CIA used throughout the 80s and 90s to obtain visas
for their newly recruited Arab assets.
Springman states that while head of the Visa Bureau from '87 to '89, he was consistently ordered
by CIA higher-ups to push through visas.
Springman also stated that while your typical Foreign Service post would be comprised of roughly
a third of intel officers, that the consulate in Jeddah was at least 50%, if not more.
One notable CIA agent stationed in this very consulate in Jeddah from 1982 to 1984, the heart
of Operation Cyclone was none other than John Brennan.
John Brennan would later go on to become the chief of station responsible for overseeing and managing
all CIA intelligence operations in all of Saudi Arabia from 1996 to 1999, right as the 9/11 hijacker
visa operation was getting underway.
Is it all starting to come together now?
Furthermore, in even another all-too-on-the-nose coincidence. On the morning of September 11th,
officials at the National Reconnaissance Office, the agency charged with operating our nation's
spy satellites, had an exercise scheduled in which a small corporate jet would crash into their building.
The National Reconnaissance Office draws its personnel straight from the military and CIA.
I believe these drills, along with the FBI being scheduled on the other end of the country
and NORAD being scheduled for drills up in Alaska and Canada,
were designed to handicap response time and hinder the initial investigation.
I believe that's also why World Trade Center 7 was taken out, to cr*pple the on-site operating center.
Because World Trade Center 7 wasn't just any office building.
It housed, among other things, the SEC, the IRS, Secret Service, the Office of Emergency Management,
the Department of Defense, and the CIA.
Taking out Building 7 was crucial to muddying up the investigation process.
Because as we've gone over consistently in this video,
many things from the in-real-time coverage do not line up with the official narrative.
Like, for instance, FDNY Battalion Chief Olio Palmer,
who was able to take an elevator to the 41st floor and then used the south stairwell
to make it up to the 78th floor, the site of impact.
We've got two isolated pockets of fire,
we should be able to knock it down with two lines.
Radio that. 78th floor, numerous 10-45 1's (civilian fatalities)
What's the area, William?
South stairwell and Adam, South tower.
I'm gonna need two of your firefighters, Adam stairway to knock down two fires.
We got a house line stretched, we can get some water on it. Knock it down, OK?
All right, South stairwell, we're coming up a chair.
Go on 77 now in the B-Stair.
I'll be right to you.
Just two isolated pockets of fire that they can knock down with two lines.
Boy, that sure paints a different picture than what we've been led to believe.
Just minutes after this narrative damning communication,
the south tower would explode into a near freefall collapse.
How's that for timing?
I think there were plans to take down a building.
But this defies belief.
Quick, say that again.
Speaking of defying belief, you have the most remarkable piece regarding Silverstein.
Yes, even more remarkable than him admitting to giving the order to pull it
and then watching Building 7 fall.
For you see, Larry Silverstein had a meeting every single morning
in the World Trade Center at Windows on the World.
Right here, right on the floors that were completely cut off from escape.
He had a morning meeting there every single weekday.
Except for 9/11.
Where were you on September 11th?
Um, you know, I was home.
Um, and I, the only reason I wasn't where I was every morning,
subsequent to the 26th day of July, um, I was, my, my mornings were spent,
um, usually at a breakfast meeting at Windows,
an 8 o'clock breakfast meeting, Windows at the top of it.
And then going down to visit with my tenants, my new tenants, um, at the Trade Center,
getting to know them, understanding their problems and so forth,
ascertaining how I could, how we could service their needs better.
Um, and, uh, which is the first, first, one of the first things you do
when you acquire a property.
Begin to meet your, meet your tenants and start talking with them.
Um, and so my mornings were spent at the Trade Center.
And then, by noon, I was back uptown.
And, uh, um, and so that particular morning,
uh, because I have light-colored hair and fair skin,
and an annuity to the dermatologist.
My wife, God bless her, had made an appointment for me at the doctor.
And I remember dressing to go to the doctor.
I'm finally saying to my wife, I said,
Sweetheart, I've got so much to do downtown
I've got to cancel this. I've got to go downtown.
And she said, "You're not going to cancel this appointment.
You're going to the dermatologist."
You know, having been married now to the same woman for 46 years,
you, you get this sense of determination on occasion in their voice.
And I said, "Okay, okay, yes, dear. I'll go.
I'll go."
And then, just minutes later, uh, received a telephone call
to turn on a television set
and witnessed this horrendous circumstance.
The first plane hitting, and then the second plane hitting,
of course, with the second hit,
uh, it became obvious that this was terrorism.
Uh, but, uh, thereafter was, uh, absolute hell.
Well, what are the odds of that?
It's also of note that in May of 2001,
the Port Authority lost their lawsuit against former insurers
to have them foot the bill for the hundreds of millions of dollars
it was going to cost to remove asbestos
from the World Trade Center complex.
Nevertheless, Larry, who already owned World Trade Center 7,
still worked to beat out Vernado for it,
knowing that this asbestos price tag would lie on him.
Fortunately for Larry and Silverstein Properties,
and thanks to the attacks,
it would be the insurance companies
who would have to pay after all.
And since there were two attacks instead of one,
they were able to argue above the insurance payout cap
of $3.55 billion to $4.6 billion.
Over $1.3 billion more than they had just acquired the complex for
from the Port Authority in July.
Instead of having to pay hundreds of millions,
they made $1.3 billion.
That was a very fortunate trip to the doctors.
Next up, you have FEMA worker Tom Kenney being interviewed about the horrors he had seen during the cleanup,
where he states, curiously enough, that he arrived the night before 9/11.
Looking at it, based on your experience, is this likely to take a month, two months, longer?
What's your own personal estimate?
To be honest with you, we arrived on late Monday night and went into action on Tuesday morning.
And not until today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site
other than the spot of church and day to which we were deployed.
So let's just think about this for a second.
FEMA arrived in New York Monday night.
And we know he's definitely talking about Monday the 10th and not Monday the 17th,
because if you go to the source broadcast of this interview and rewind,
you'll see that it was on the 13th.
And he wasn't just a day off and misspoke thinking it was Wednesday
because he would have said yesterday morning.
But instead, he specifically says Tuesday morning.
Somebody knew this was going to happen.
Another curious slip-up came just two months following the attacks.
During the town hall when President Bush had this to say
about Flight 11.
I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in.
And I saw an airplane hit the tower of a TV.
The TV was obviously on.
And I used to fly myself.
And I said, well, there's one terrible pilot.
This one's a particularly interesting statement,
being that no footage of the first plane existed until the day after 9/11,
when the FDNY revealed that they had just happened to be out filming that morning
and caught it on tape.
The fire department was sitting here all morning.
They were sitting right there.
And I was wondering what they doing.
And I said, where's the fire department just sitting here?
That's what I'm thinking.
Is it a conspiracy?
Boom!
Boom!
This footage would remain the only known video of the first plane
until later on when this video caught the sound.
What the hell was that?
It sounded like a plane crash.
There was a reaction on the part of, uh...
Yeah, I'm close to you!
Come to us!
Come to us!
And this one caught the impact.
To this day, these three videos along with these three pictures
are the only recorded footage of the alleged Flight 11.
So, it would have been impossible for Bush to,
"have seen the first plane on TV before entering the classroom."
And what happened right after September 11th?
They signed the Patriot Act, taking away everyone's privacy.
The Patriot Act is often presented as a bill created urgently
in the response to 9/11,
much like the hunt for bin Laden or the U.S. in Afghanistan.
But this is also not the case.
The Patriot Act was actually mostly drafted already by Joe Biden in 1994.
Right after 1994, and you can ask the Attorney General this,
because I got a call when he introduced the Patriot Act.
He said, Joe, I'm introducing the Act basically as you wrote it in 1994.
It was defeated then, not by any liberals.
It was defeated then by the folks who worried
that we'd have the Minutemen would get in trouble,
by the Mr. Bars of the world,
who were worried about the right wing, not anything else.
So, that has nothing to do with you all,
but just to set the record straight.
Almost the same thing that got passed, the Patriot Act,
was introduced by me in 1994.
It wasn't able to pass.
This time, however, it went through with not even a second thought.
It's interesting, because all these things were sold
as knee-jerk by-factors of the attacks on September 11th.
But in reality, they were all already in the works.
So, quick recap,
Joe Biden is the one who drafted the Patriot Act,
James Clapper was behind the WMDs,
and Robert Mueller is the FBI director
who conducted the 9/11 "investigation" that led nowhere.
It's funny, because all I ever hear about are the Bush connections.
It's almost as if they're controlled by the same people.
And speaking of the vast array of coincidences concerning 9/11
and political figures on the other side of the typical 9/11 aisle,
September 11th included a silver lining for the Clintons,
as their most public enemy,
political researcher Barbara Olson
had been booked that morning aboard Flight 77.
She was on a promotion tour for the upcoming sequel
to her scathing Hillary Clinton hit piece,
Hell to Pay in which she was set to present her deep dive
on the Clinton White House.
On September 11th,
Barbara was scheduled to appear on Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher.
And the rest is history.
Barbara's upcoming book, titled Final Days,
was released posthumously.
Barbara was also married to Theodore Olson,
the Bush administration's lead counsel in Bush v. Gore.
According to Theodore and his secretary,
Barbara called him two times during the flight at the DOJ.
He claims she called around 9:15
and then shortly thereafter to inform him
that the plane had been hijacked.
Barbara was,
had changed her flight
because September 11th, unfortunately, was my birthday.
And so she changed her flight to be there the night before.
So she got on this flight from Dulles Airport to Los Angeles.
She was going to be on the Bill Maher show that night.
And when the news came in,
I was in the Justice Department,
the Solicitor General's office.
My secretary rushed in
and we turned on the television set
and we saw the film that was coming in
over the networks of the first plane
that crashed into the World Trade Center
and then the second,
and I can't remember the exact sequence,
but somewhere around 9:15 or something like that,
my secretary rushed in and said,
Barbara's on the phone.
I don't know how Barbara managed to make her cell phone work
or make the cell phones.
In those days, you could make phone calls,
but they were up in the air.
And she,
I had worried,
as soon as I saw this tragedy unfolding,
that maybe Barbara's flight
was one of the ones
that had been flown into the World Trade Center.
And so when my secretary said
she was on the phone,
I thought, oh my God, you know,
Barbara's okay.
That isn't what's happening.
And then she got on the phone
and she told me that
their plane had been hijacked
and that all the passengers
had been moved to the back of the airplane.
It seems Theodore makes a good point.
How did Barbara get her cell phone to work?
At the time of the calls,
American Airlines Flight 77
was at an altitude of 25,000 feet.
Tests to this day
show cell phone reception
capping out at around 10,000 feet.
There's no way her cell phone worked at that altitude, especially in 2001
when there were so few cell towers,
they literally had ad campaigns
where people would walk around normal cities
saying, can you hear me now?
So the answer to this, I think,
absolutely relevant question
of the magic cell phones
has become air phones.
When you ask a question
about one of the many phone calls
made from the hijacked planes,
you will typically receive
a snarky,
condescending retort
of air phones.
Yes,
many airplanes
did in fact have air phones
at this time.
But to act like mentioning
cell phones is absurd
is in fact absurd in itself.
The theory of air phones
was added after 9/11.
A revisionist history.
The original reporting
is what called them cell phones, not us.
Passengers on two different flights were now learning.
The United flight
that went into the World Trade Tower as well as the flight
that went into the Pentagon.
Cell phone calls from passengers
on both those flights.
From a cell phone call
aboard the plane
that crashed in Pennsylvania.
The passenger on the plane
told an emergency dispatcher
in a cell phone call.
She did get off
a phone call
to her husband
on the cell phone.
Tonight we're getting reports
of cell phone calls
from at least three
of those four flights.
There's a flight attendant who apparently
got a cell phone call off.
It was a businessman who got off
two cell phone calls.
Everywhere you looked
they were talking
about cell phones.
Not just calls.
Cell phone calls.
It was even in print.
Cell phone calls
carried message of terror.
Several people
used cell phones Tuesday
to describe the hijackings.
A few people on the hijacked planes
managed to make
cell phone calls.
The harrowing
cell phone calls
from hijacked victims.
She made two cell phone calls
to him before the jet crashed.
She was able to call
her husband from the plane
on a cell phone
and tell him
that she loved him.
One man aboard
United Airlines Flight 93
called 911
from a bathroom
using a cell phone.
It was one of at least
four cell phone calls
made from the doomed aircraft.
Cell phone calls
made by passengers to relatives
shortly before the crash
suggested they plan to wrest control
of the jet
from hijackers.
Barbara Olsen
called twice on her
cell phone
to describe the hijacking
to her husband.
Cell phones.
Allowed hijacked victims
to say final goodbyes.
So at the very least
it's not ridiculous
to think that
these calls
may have actually
been made
from cell phones.
And if so
that means
they could not
have been made
from the air
which again
is yet another arrow
pointing directly
to Operation Northwoods.
The passenger carrying aircraft
will descend to a minimum altitude
and go directly
into an auxiliary field
at Eglin Air Force Base
where arrangements
will have been made
to evacuate
the passengers.
Which brings us
to Flight Attendant
CeeCee Lyles'
call to her husband.
Tuesday 9:47 AM
Hi baby
I'm
Baby you have to listen to me carefully
I'm on a plane
that's been hijacked I'm on the plane
I'm calling from the plane I want to tell you
I love you
please tell my children that I love them
very much
and I'm so sorry
babe
I don't know
what to say
there's three guys they've hijacked the plane
I'm trying to be calm
we're turned around
and I've heard that there's planes
that's been thrown into the World Trade Center
I hope to be able to see your face again, baby
I love you
bye
It's a frame
End of message
It's a frame after telling him to listen carefully
It's a frame
and also if you'll notice
there's no background noise
here's unamplified video taken from the back
of a commuter jet now here's CeeCee's call
Tuesday 9:47 AM
Hi baby I'm Baby
you have to listen to me carefully
Nothing. The tape hits from her husband's
answering machine that's louder than her background. This call was also
from CeeCee's cell phone
It was about like 9:30
I guess that's when the call started
then I guess about I didn't answer the phone
until the last time
she called which was I think it was like 9:51
or something to that
it was towards the almost close to 10 o'clock by that time
and then that's when I get the phone call from her
and I actually had a chance
to speak with her. Once the phone got disconnected
then I sat up in the bed because I did all this laying down
I sat up in the bed
like it was like I just woke up
I'm like was that a real call so I looked at the caller ID
and noticed that it was a call and it was from her cell phone
and I'm like okay wait a minute how can she call me from on the plane
from a cell phone because cell phones don't work on the plane
CeeCee's call
took place
at 9:47 which means she would have been at 20,000 feet.
How could she make that call unless on the ground?
Thomas Burnett's wife, Dina, said she also knew he was using a cell phone
because of caller ID
Jeremy Glick's wife wrote in her deposition that she also couldn't hear
any unusual sounds and that the connection was very clear
"as if he was calling from the next room."
and as for Theodore Olsen changing his tune from cell phones to air phones
it's noteworthy that in 2002 as Solicitor General in the Supreme Court case of Christopher v. Harbury
Olsen maintained that the government had an inherent right to lie
"there are lots of different situations when the government has legitimate reasons to give out false information."
coincidentally enough Barbara was not the only person aboard American Airlines Flight 77
with connections
to Washington.
For the pilot, Charles Burlingame
just so happened to work at the Pentagon for 10 years
assisting the Defense Department
on wait for it
anti-terrorism strategies.
So now that's multiple anti-terrorism intel agents on these flights
and what else happened in regards to Flight 77?
Well Monday September 10th,
Donald Rumsfeld had announced this:
According to some estimates we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions.
2.3 trillion with a T. That's $8,000 for every man woman and child in America
Well it should come at this point as no surprise to anyone watching this
that it was the budgets analysts office where they were
"looking" for this 2.3 trillion dollars and unaccounted for transactions
that just so happened to get hit and explode.
Furthermore, the Pentagon which is the security center for our entire country
for some reason has no security camera footage
of the plane save for 3 frames of it from across the street.
what happened to all these cameras? Did they mysteriously black out
right at the second the plane came as if they were guarding Jeffrey Epstein?
And they're there quite visible in many pictures from the Pentagon
that day. 1, 2, and 3,
but alas all we've gotten is this
there's something about what hit that day they do not want people to see.
There's zero chance the Pentagon doesn't have real footage of this
incident. They've had over 20 years in the lead up to AI to release it.
Now it's too late.
If it was flight 77 it went down exactly as they have told us
they would have released that video the following week instead
they waited 4 years and released 3 blurry frames.
Nothing about the attack on the Pentagon makes sense.
In the hours following the event,
aviation sources describe flight 77 as having been flown with extraordinary skill
even marveling at the presence of mind of the hijacker to shut off the transponder
but this however also makes no sense.
According to hijacker Hani Hanjour's flight instructors,
his piloting skills were so shoddy earlier that year
that they questioned if his 1999 pilot's license was even genuine.
They described him as a very bad pilot who shouldn't even be in the air
with one employee expressing his amazement "he could not fly at all."
Yet on September 11th Hani Hanjour allegedly
performed an extraordinarily skilled 330
degree descending corkscrew to perfectly smash
his plane into the middle of the Pentagon.
Very believable,
but now going back to the second part of this statement
the alleged hijacker's presence of mind to turn
off the transponder codes.
They didn't just change on flight 77
the transponder codes changed on all four flights that day
with three of them disappearing altogether.
According to the secondary surveillance radar data,
at 8:47 the flight being tracked as United 175 would suddenly start showing two different transponder codes.
this would go unnoticed for four minutes
while air traffic control frantically looked for flight 11.
By the time they would check back,
they could only speculate that the aircraft on radar was still United 175.
The reason for this is that the only way to identify a plane is via their transponder code.
Once that's shut off all radar can do is tell you that something is flying at that place
not what is flying at that place,
hence for the final 10 minutes of its journey it is referred to as,
"the unidentified aircraft (believed to be United 175)".
Air traffic controllers lost flight 11's transponder code altogether at 8:21
immediately degrading the information about the aircraft.
17 minutes later American Airlines SOG Halleck would report that they have no
active read on flight 11.
United 93's transponder code was lost at 9:41 and by 9:53 controllers had lost track of it on radar as well.
And as for flight 77, air traffic control lost anything on radar even resembling American Airlines 77.
For 29 minutes after its transponder code also disappeared
until an object on radar going in the complete opposite direction with no transponder code was tracked
under the assumption that it was flight 77.
Right into the Pentagon.
It was showing the same time frame of the lost flight 77
that reports started coming in from the FAA to NORAD that American Airlines flight 11
had been spotted still in the air headed towards Washington.
35 minutes after it allegedly struck Tower 1.
Leading the FAA to state that it was evidently another aircraft that hit the tower.
Takeoff times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous
where the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan.
Operation Northwoods.
Another often overlooked factor is that Hani Hanjour's two alleged counterparts
on flight 77 Nawaf Alhamzi and Khalid Al-Midhar actively rented rooms in the lead up to 9/11
from an anti-terrorism FBI informant.
Just a minor detail that also seems to be missing from the yearly fluff pieces all the major networks put out on September 11th.
And finally, the impact zone also makes no sense.
On one hand, the wings are reported to have mostly disintegrated on impact
as before the roof collapses there appears to only be a singular hole.
Yet at the same time, we're expected to believe the fuselage somehow managed to
plow through the equivalent of not one, not two, but three full rings of the pentagon
opening up a hole in corridor C.
How could a plane that, we already went over, is like paper to steel
have gone through three full buildings essentially. Thick reinforced concrete walls.
Here, footage of a plane being smashed into a concrete wall at even higher speeds.
Now the single wall is thicker and the plane is smaller
so it's not an exact one-to-one,
but the thought of a regular 757 going through three whole buildings feels hard to believe
after watching this.
at least absent some sort of expl*sive materials on board it's also hard to believe
again that this was literally simulated less than 11 months earlier.
That's some incredible foresight.
And here is some more incredible foresight
have begun a major investigation into whether someone or many people benefited financially
from the evil done to the country last Tuesday.
Not long before the attacks occurred there were some financial transactions in the stock market
that may indicate knowledge of the attack before it began.
ABC's Antonio Mora is here if they ever get to the bottom
of it will be astonishing.
No question, Peter, what many wall street analysts believe is that the t*rrorists
made bets that a number of stocks would see their prices fall
they did so by buying what are called puts.
If you bet right the rewards can be huge the risks are also huge
unless you know something bad is going to happen to the company you're betting against.
One example, United Airlines, the Thursday before the attack
more than 2,000 contracts betting that the stock would go down were purchased.
90 times more in one day than in three weeks.
When the markets reopened United stock dropped
the price of the contracts soared
and someone may have made a lot of money fast.
180 thousand dollars turns into 2.4 million dollars when that plane hits the world trade center.
It's almost the same story with American airlines
that's a five fold increase in the value of what was a $337,000 trade on Monday.
All of a sudden becomes what?
1.8 million dollars.
And there's much more including an extraordinarily high number of bets against Morgan Stanley
and Marsh & McLennan
Two of the world trade center's biggest tenants
Could this be a coincidence?
This would be one of the most extraordinary coincidences in the history of mankind
if it was a coincidence.
So major short selling went on with United and American
immediately preceding the event.
More specifically 4,744 put options to 396 calls
were put on United Airlines five days before September 11th
and 4,516 put options to 748 calls were put on American Airlines one day before September 11th.
No other airline companies had an unusual put to call ratio
in the days leading up to the attacks.
Clearly, someone knew but nope this occurrence was determined a coincidence by the SEC and FBI
because the people doing it were "U.S.-based" and had no ties to Al Qaeda.
So you're still not going to follow that lead?
We're supposed to believe that nearly 5,000 put options being purchased on each airline
involved in the attack just a few days prior
is just an innocuous coincidence?
No other airliners had massive short selling in the week prior.
just United and American
and part of the FBI's reasoning behind dismissing this is because the buyers were US based?
You know who else was US based and made a ton of money
following the attacks on September 11th?
The Carlyle Group and their many investors
like Bush's chief legal advisor and advisor on the Iraq w*r
James Baker deputy CIA director,
joined the foundation of Operation Cyclone,
Frank Carlucci and of course Bush senior.
Follow the money.
one of the most powerful questions in any investigation is memorialized in the Latin phrase
Cui bono? Who benefits?
On the 14th of December 2001 just three months after the attacks,
Halliburton KBR is awarded the US Army Logistics Civil Augmentation Program 3 contract
to provide a complete array of service 24 hours a day 7 days a week under any condition
and at any location around the globe
including but not limited to the construction and facilities, transportation
utilities, meals, housing, laundry, mail, the full spectrum.
LOGCAP 3 was one of the largest government service contracts in history.
In 2003 Halliburton was also awarded another contract on top of the ongoing LOGCAP
named RIO (Restore Iraqi Oil).
For this Halliburton put together a team to do exactly that.
Build oil infrastructure in Iraq.
Now why are these contracts a conflict of interest you might ask?
Because from 1995 up until the day he was announced as George Bush's Vice President,
Halliburton Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer was none other than d*ck Cheney.
Carlyle and Halliburton both making massive fortunes in the wake of September 11th.
What are the odds?
Coincidentally enough Carlyle Chairman Carlucci and Halliburton CEO Cheney were also part of another organization
along with 14 other future members of the Bush administration
including Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld, Bush's top two
in the DOD.
Project for the new American century,
a neoconservative think tank focused on US foreign policy
who in 1998 wrote an open letter calling for the removal of S*ddam Hussein
via full scale ground invasion as the only way to remove the threat of WMDs
and whose 2000 report on rebuilding America's defenses stated that
due to the dramatic reduction in military research and development
their envisioned transformation would be a long process absent some catastrophic
and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
This is being seen on Capitol Hill as another Pearl Harbor.
Everybody's talking about a second Pearl Harbor.
Pearl Harbor
Well looks like they got their wish,
which brings us finally to the man who ties them all together, George H.W. Bush
And the question:
Would he have been aware of the Operation Northwoods proposals?
According to the official documentation, Bush didn't enter the CIA until January of '76 when he became director
that's some 14 years after Northwoods had circulated
or at least that's what people thought until July of 1988
when a memorandum from 1963 surfaces putting Bush in the CIA a lot earlier than previously admitted.
It's an update direct from J. Edgar Hoover himself
on the situation surrounding the assassination of Kennedy
sent to one Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency
putting George H.W. the man who spent the eve of September 11th with Osama Bin Laden's
brother Bush Jr.'s future envoy and advisor to the Iraq w*r and one of the masterminds of Operation Cyclone
in the CIA at very least within one year of the infamous Operation Northwoods document.
The blueprint of 9/11.
So in summation, I reject the official narrative of September 11th.
While easy to swallow in simplicity amidst its chaotic aftermath,
when one finally stops to examine it with a sober head
it completely falls apart
that a single facet of their story is held up over time,
but why?
Why orchestrate such a catastrophic event?
The why is because I believe w*r is control
with ongoing w*r comes a general uneasiness
an uneasy public is a controllable public
in the name of safety the machine was finally able to enact their surveillance state
via the newly branded Patriot Act
which of course is always the most important goal of any operation.
Ways to get the public to willingly give up their rights,
tightening their control.
September 11th ushered in a police state
under the panic of national security.
I also believe w*r is freedom,
it's a license to run amok on the world stage.
The CIA was finally free to resume clandestine activities in Afghanistan
and this time alongside the full-scale invasion
coveted just one year prior
with all the funding their heart could desire.
Full freedom.
Since September 11th the United States has sent nearly four trillion dollars to Iraq and Afghanistan
Who audits the billions paid for w*r?
Who actually receives the money?
I believe these reasons to be the why.
Now as for the how,
I believe towers 1, 2, and 7 were absolutely rigged for demo.
I believe their free fall pulverization into dust
specifically mimics the high rise implosion technique
that typically employs the expl*sive gelatin
which just so happens to be the name of the group who worked
on the B-thing followed by the E-team
pictured standing nearly in the exact same spot the first plane hits
next to 100 fuse casing boxes.
With the Pentagon mass casualty event in Amalgam Virgo with dry runs.
With Operation Northwoods being the blueprint.
I believe the hijackings were staged
by a combination of Operation Cyclone assets
and insider passengers from our intel communities
and abroad.
Knowing full well they would never be able to be seen in public again.
I believe the planes were landed
and the passengers forced under duress to call loved ones
which is why their cell phones worked.
I believe that while that went on, 737 drone planes painted as exact replicas
of the hijacked airliners
were remote piloted into Tower 1 and Tower 2
and that after waiting a nominal period of time
both buildings were then intentionally brought down by the aforementioned pre-placed dynamite.
These are the reasons I no longer believe
the official narrative surrounding 9/11.
There were too many moving parts and too many cameras wrong
and far too many details that don't line up
Nothing has aged worse than September 11,
a false flag that will live in infamy.
Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.
Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?
Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register
Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?
Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register
Codex 9/11 (2025)
Moderators: Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters, Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters